GSD: Unvaccinated People Have Rights

"Written by YGTV Team on 07 April 2021.

The GSD says that people who are unvaccinated have rights as citizens and should not be put in a position where they cannot see loved ones because they are unvaccinated. The party says that would be “inhumane.”

A statement continued: “The GSD is receiving reports of people who are unvaccinated who are being told they cannot see their parents or relatives at ERS or in the hospital unless they agree to be vaccinated. There are cases where persons who had been able to see a parent undergoing medical treatment in Spain are told that this is no longer possible when they are brought back to St Bernard’s Hospital. There are cases also affecting relatives of residents at ERS. In all the cases reported to the GSD the patients or residents have all been vaccinated so the risk of catching the virus is low given that the Pfizer vaccine is supposed to provide 95% protection.”

Leader of the Opposition, Keith Azopardi, said: “GSD MPs have had the vaccine, we encourage people to do so and we support the vaccine programme. But if someone cannot for medical reasons have the vaccine or chooses not to do so they cannot lose their rights. Still less should they be put in the agonising position that they are told they cannot have human interaction with a loved one because of that position. A balance must be struck so that they are able to enjoy seeing their loved ones while the vulnerable are protected. Extra precautions can be justified in these cases but they should not be banned from seeing their family.

“The Government has said that vaccines are not mandatory. To give effect to that ways need to be found to ensure that people can see their loved ones by taking necessary precautions even without being vaccinated. After all this was happening last year before the vaccination programme began. So why not now when the risks of catching COVID have been dramatically lowered because of the vaccine programme. Precautions can still be taken by mandating COVID tests before visits or the wearing of PPE or isolation of patients being visited by unvaccinated individuals. We urge the Government to reflect on this situation and review the current restrictions with the aid of public health advice.

“Members of staff are having daily interaction with unvaccinated individuals when they leave ERS or GHA. So the risks are still there. There are even unvaccinated members of staff. That brings into focus that while restrictions are understandable, they need to be proportionate and designed in a way that recognises that the vast majority of people are vaccinated. They also need to be designed against the backdrop of the current state of active cases which is being maintained at the lowest levels that COVID has been in this community since the summer.”

6 Likes

It is good to know that a few members of the political class see where this is going; and that they can apply logic - If the vaccines are supposed to be so effective, then why the Coercion?

Perhaps, they think about the Nuremberg trials - or the future where this EXPERIMENTAL vaccine harmful long-term effects will become known (and the world is seeing plenty of harmful short-term effects).

Why we need a Covid Nuremberg Trial – THE British Medical Journal (BMJ) published an editorial last year that accused politicians and governments of ‘suppressing science’ and of making bad policy based on narrow advice from people with ‘conflicting interests’. Dr Kamran Abbasi, the journal’s executive editor, suggested that since the onset of Covid-19, politicians throughout the world had wilfully neglected international and historical experience on managing pandemics, ignored established scientific advice and their own detailed plans, and followed instead a Communist strategy that has oppressed and harmed their people. All this in a vain attempt to be seen to be controlling the spread of a dangerous novel virus which turns out to be neither novel nor particularly dangerous to healthy people under 80 years old. He judges their collective actions over the past year as so egregious that they warrant an international inquiry along the lines of the Nuremberg Trials.

People in the State of Israel have already filed suit:

Israelis File Crimes Against Humanity Lawsuit Over Coerced COVID Shots, Citing Nuremberg Code – The plaintiffs say threats of job loss, banishment from public venues, and other punishments are being employed to force the injections upon people against their freely given consent.

The UK Human Rights Blog is also addressing the ethics behind compulsory vaccines:

Compulsory vaccination – the next step for Covid-19? – At the moment anyway, there is no legal basis for a mandated vaccination programme in English law. (But) Health Secretary Matt Hancock has refused to rule out mandatory inoculation. Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 permits for the detention of an individual in hospital for treatment if they do not have capacity to give informed consent under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. (UK Human Rights Blog)

So one can see where this is going... if you refuse the vaccine, you'll be classified as a nut-job, because The Establishment is trying all kinds of legal work-arounds to get everyone vaccinated. It's not about health, it's about control.

Vaccination and public/private coercion – There is no doubt that the issue of medical intervention without consent being made mandatory either through private channels has begun to exercise legal minds across the country (like with cruise ships and venues). Such private prohibitions may have almost as broad an effect as the restrictions on civil liberties passed under the Coronavirus Act. Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights may form the basis for a claim that enforced vaccinations are a breach of the right to autonomy and bodily integrity. {Pressure to conform is still on the table}. ((UK Human Rights Blog).

The political class will ensure that the Covid-19 jab will be mandatory in all but name.

Beware the tyranny of a forced vaccination– Why is the Government insisting on effectively making Covid-19 vaccines mandatory and taunting us with vaccine ‘freedom passes’, like a jailer dangling keys to a prison door? The Government has hysterically overreacted to Covid-19, destroying our economy and society while doing so. No matter how much it persists with a vaccine programme, it won’t ever escape blame for its catastrophic lockdown policies. Boris Johnson and his junta seemingly take advice only from those would see us subjected to tyranny. Not only did they say that lockdowns are compatible with human rights, but also claimed that the state has a right to arrest people who refuse the vaccine, on the basis of the Mental Health Act.

Their workaround when the private coercion doesn't work is to declare anyone not vaccinated a "danger to humanity".

Why mandatory vaccination is unethical and immoral – Ethically, various codes have been designed to protect us from unconsented medical intervention. The Nuremberg Code set out to ensure no person had medical procedures performed without explicit consent. With the formation of the United Nations came the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (There are other Acts on the Books to protect against tyranny). These all seek to protect against any "greater majority" who would trample our individual rights.

However, they are only as strong as the will of citizens to uphold them.

The question that needs addressing is whether it is for our "greater good" to have the government make our "informed consent" decisions for us, and then force those decisions upon us.

People who do not remember their history are bound to repeat it.

Hitler and the Nazi Party didn't gain their evil power overnight.

image

It was a coordinated effort, where propaganda was a means to an end, because they created an “Us vs. Them” in the minds of the people, making it easy for them to kill those categorized in the "Them" category - which included nut-jobs. Nut-jobs were considered a burden to society, but they weren't the only ones, the disabled and retarded were targeted too.

They even went after the autistic, but that's a whole other topic (but you could start here). So when will it be time for them to come after you and your family members - who later they will deem as a burden? Think Mission-Creep.

Hitler controlled the media. Who controls the media in Gibraltar? Does The Chronicle even need to exist, they just publish HMGoG press releases and other mockingbird news.

So the Covid-Control plan very much follows what Hitler did, and why the Nazification of Gibraltar is very real – and happening because no one speaks truth to power.

The Nazification of Gibraltar

An Analysis of the Techniques of Nazi Propaganda – While Mein Kampf itself was a work of propaganda, Hitler talked about the aims of a propagandist in indoctrinating a population and the importance of ensuring the continued propagation of the propaganda.

{Think of non-stop Covid news. The world has been inundated with it. Even Defending-Gibraltar is hard at work in the information warfare to combat the lies/propaganda the evil Establishment churns out.}

The Nazi party found it effective to translate their ideological notions into narrative events which always depicted an oversimplified Good vs. Evil outlook parlayed over Us vs. Them scenarios, easily accessible and understood by mass audiences.

They made Hitler out to be some sort of Savior, and look at their propaganda about the vaccines saving society. History Repeating.

The next time you want to snitch on your neighbor, ask yourself why are you really doing it? The devil inside you is quick to join the legion and conform to evil; and CONvince you that you are doing good. Open your eyes. Jesus commanded us to love others as He loved us. Love your neighbor; and mind your own business. You are only giving them more power to oppress everyone.

If you feel like picking up your phone and calling the police, like a hysterical woman with no control, instead, go sit on your hands and meditate on The Word of God. Put a Bible in your hands and read The Law.

God's Law is what everyone is really going to live and die by, despite the evil Establishment crafting their workarounds.

Look into the mirror.

4 Likes

Case in Point: The psychopath Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum and Great Reset advocate:

Tyrant Klaus Schwab Declares Unvaccinated People To Be A Threat To Humanity

WEF head Klaus Schwab, who looks an awful lot like an aged Heinrich Himmler of the Nazi SS, says humans who refuse to go along with the plan are a threat to everyone else. He, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and many of the other usual suspects all agree.

Picardo says trust only government sources, yet they trust psychopaths like Satanic-Klaus. Maybe it's time to listen to Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory:

Former Pfizer VP: Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death. – He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century... "In the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything."

2 Likes

They are crafty little devils... incrementally changing their "legislation" to fit their needs.

2 Likes

UnLawful courts do unLawful things.

Deut. 4:2 Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you , neither shall ye DIMINISH [ought] from it , that ye may keep the Commandments of the "I AM" your God which I COMMAND you .
https://jahtruth.net/nsongad.htm

4 Likes

GSD says people who are unvaccinated have rights, and cannot be treated as second class citizens

"The GSD says it is receiving reports of people who are unvaccinated who are being told they cannot see their loved ones at ERS or in the hospital unless they agree to be vaccinated.

The Party says people who are unvaccinated have rights, and cannot be treated as second class citizens.

Our reporter Kevin Ruiz spoke to Opposition Leader Keith Azopardi."

GSD: people who are unvaccinated have rights, cannot be treated as second..

3 Likes

https://www.yourgibraltartv.com/society/23213-erg-glad-to-hear-azopardi-statement-on-unvaccinated

Written by YGTV Team on 13 April 2021.

The Equality Rights Group has reacted positively to Leader of the Opposition, Keith Azopardi's recent statement on the rights of the unvaccinated.

A statement continued:

‘Without a doubt, anyone who had to manage the Covid-19 pandemic could never get it all right all of the time. It’s been a rocky but necessary journey for government which, despite sad losses, has without a doubt, also saved lives; and one in which the scenario constantly shifted and continues to do so, even on the scientific issues surrounding it. For that reason, openness at all times to science and evidence is essential.

‘On the difficult question of ‘what to do with the unvaccinated’, the legal obligations are more than clear: we cannot force people to be vaccinated, nor can we politically or socially pressure them. Their right to make their own decisions is protected. And the question has to be: in the midst of what is still medical uncertainty about whether vaccines guarantee either total non-transmission or a yet-to-be-confirmed percentage likelihood of same, the best way to handle the conflict between personal and collective rights is to find ways to protect us all. Not to close one's mind.

‘Equality Rights Group (ERG) has for some time now been openly and publicly advocating finding the institutional and political willingness to avoid polarisation on this issue. As a small community we can be more agile, and can more easily accommodate people than in large countries. We are therefore pleased to find the Leader of the primary opposition party, the GSD, speaking of the rights of the unvaccinated; a reality based on fact because Gibraltar is legally bound by the European Convention on Human Rights and the guidance of the Council of Europe (COE); guidance issued late January, and which took the form of Resolution 2361 and which, among other questions, clearly prohibits member States from forcing anyone to be vaccinated against their will, providing protections which outlaw political or social discrimination on these grounds.

‘Mr Azopardi has rightly added his voice to a call for reason and adherence to law, as well as advocating an approach to issues such as that of the unvaccinated in Gibraltar that could and should be more amenable to exploring alternative approaches which work for everyone, and which neither endanger nor discriminate anybody. It really isn’t rocket science, just good faith,’ the statement ends.

1 Like

GSLP continues with it's evil agenda.

"14th April 2021
The Gibraltar Government said the decision to prevent visits to hospital patients and ERS residents by people who are not vaccinated was based on clinical and public health guidance, adding it had “a sacred duty” to protect those in its care.

It made the comment after Keith Azopardi, the Leader of the Opposition, called for a review of the policy and said preventing access to unvaccinated relatives “would be inhumane.”

Mr Azopardi said last week that the government should find ways to ensure that people can see their loved ones by taking necessary precautions even without being vaccinated.

But the government replied that his comments were “downright irresponsible” and that Mr Azopardi should avoid positioning himself as “some kind of expert” in this context.

“This is far too serious an issue to be manipulated in this manner by someone playing to the gallery or trying to be all things to all men,” No.6 Convent Place said in a statement.

“It is absolutely true that everyone is entitled to freely choose whether they wish to be vaccinated or not.”
“That is why vaccination against Covid-19 is not mandatory in Gibraltar.”

“However, it is obvious from the global reaction to the success of our vaccination programme that other nations and individuals would be only too pleased to be where Gibraltar is today.”

“In the same way as citizens have a right to refuse vaccination, patients and residents in Government facilities have a right to be protected against the virus with the tightest measures that are available at this time.”

“This is all the more important when the persons concerned are precisely the sick or the elderly and therefore more at risk.”

“Gibraltar has sadly lost 94 lives already to this terrible disease.”

“We do not want to lose any more. It is tragic that the Opposition should again play politics with the most vulnerable.”

1 Like

Let's use logic. They plan to make life for the unvaccinated as difficult as possible.

image

It is outright despicable how the GSLP plays politics itself. No one gives up power willingly. And the ones in power are going along with the global plan; and the Nazification of Gibraltar, despite the human rights violations. They don't care about human rights, they care about being in LOCKSTEP with the Great Reset.

The goal is to Coerce as many as possible to get vaccinated so that they only have to manage about 10 percent of the population (those who remain unvaccinated) - as lower level prisoners – and eventually the Us-team will demand the Them-team to be eliminated.

This mission-creep is already happening in Ireland, which is probably a test-ground for Europe (and the world) on more draconian legislation.

Ivor Cummins connects the dots in this video (a must-watch):

Two-Tiered Prison Society In Ireland – An example for the rest of Europe and the World.

Ivor Cummins analyzes Ireland’s Statutory Instrument (SI) Number 168 of 2021, which on pages 11-12, it outlines how vaccinated persons can hold events in dwellings.

SI #168 2021 Restrictions on events in dwellings
6.
(1) A person shall not organise, or cause to be organised, an event to be held in a dwelling in a relevant geographical location for social or recreational reasons other than in accordance with paragraphs (2) or (3).
(2) An applicable person may organise, or cause to be organised, an event to be held in a dwelling in a relevant geographical location for social or recreational reasons where –
(a) the dwelling is the applicable person’s place of residence, and
(b) the person takes all reasonable steps to ensure that the persons attending, or proposed to attend the event (for whatever reason) –
(i) are part of the same household as the person organising the event, or
(ii) fulfil a legal obligation (including attending court, satisfying bail conditions, or participating in ongoing legal proceedings), attend a court office where required, initiate emergency legal roceedings or execute essential legal documents,
(3) A vaccinated person may organise, or cause to be organised, an event to be held in a dwelling in a relevant geographical location where he or she has reasonable excuse.
(4) For the purposes of paragraph (3), a vaccinated person has reasonable excuse for organising, or causing to be organised, an event to be held in a dwelling in a relevant geographical location where -
a) the dwelling is the vaccinated person’s place of residence,
(b) the event is attended only by vaccinated persons, and
(c) persons who are part of no more than 2 households, including the household of the person organising the event, attend the event.
(5) Where
(a) a child, and an event under paragraph (2) is attended by –
(b) a parent or guardian of such child, who is not part of the same household as the child, the parent or guardian, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be part of the same household as the child.
(6) Paragraph (1) is a penal provision for the purposes of section 31A of the Act of 1947.

Note there are more restriction outlined in #168; which has already been updated in SI #172.

Cummins implied this is going to be mission-creep to a two-tiered prison system, stressing that unvaccinated people are not mentioned in the SI. Unvaccinated people will have less freedom; and they might not be able to meet people in their own home. It doesn’t have teeth yet in Ireland, because most of the population hasn’t been vaccinated, but shows how it could be applied when that mission is reached.

The legislation has been pushed through too fast; and the Irish government wants to get as much of the population vaccinated voluntarily as possible, but will eventually have to strong-arm those that don’t, and reduce the number who don’t take the jab to something more containable, by making life as difficult as possible.

It's been reached in Gibraltar - as most of the population has taken the jab.

Again, use logic. The HMGoG will want to make life as difficult as possible for those who don't take the jab (and of course they are going to lie about how they are doing it for good – WAKE UP). Not being able to visit loved ones is just another step to normalize the Nazification of Gibraltar. What's to come will be more restrictions, just as Cummins pointed out in his video. Watch out for further "legislation" for the so-called protection of the population.

The Nazis didn't lose WW2, they created the EU, which is the 4th Reich.


The real plan keeps unfolding -
https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1382994758759505924

4 Likes

The people (appears to be the majority) do not see going-up against the gov't as an option. Does this mean they have already chosen their master?

The SI restriction is null and void. It is not part of The Law of God.

Deut 4:2 Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you , neither shall ye DIMINISH [ought] from it , that ye may keep the Commandments of the "I AM" your God which I COMMAND you .
https://jahtruth.net/nsong.htm

1 Like

16th April 2021

The GSD said the Gibraltar Government was failing to hear the voice of people who are unable to visit relatives in hospital or elderly care because they have not been vaccinated.

Current Covid rules mean only people who have been jabbed can visit loved ones in St Bernard’s Hospital or ERS facilities.

The Government said earlier this week that this was to safeguard the safety of all patients in those facilities.

But the GSD said it continued to hear from families concerned that they were not allowed to visit their loved ones because of this “blanket policy”.

“This is a new public health requirement,” the party said.

“It was not a requirement before.”

“It operates unfairly to exclude unvaccinated people from seeing their loved ones.”

“Those people are happy to submit to Covid tests and to wear PPE or take other precautions.”

“Surely it is the negative covid test which is the most important measure?”

The Government had raised Gibraltar’s Covid death toll as it explained its policy earlier this week but the Opposition said this was “a red herring” and a “repugnant” move to play on people’s emotions and distract from the core issue.

Many of the persons who died were residents of ERS and were infected during the outbreak in late December.

“The unfortunate fact is that we now know that members of staff were not being tested on a daily basis till 29 December 2020 when the vaccination programme had not even started,” the GSD said.

“We know 148 staff members tested positive after 1 December as did 131 residents of ERS.”

“ERS was only open for six days for visitors in mid-December.”

“If the concern was putting in place the tightest measures possible why weren’t staff members swabbed daily in November or when ERS reopened?”

“Why wait till it was too late?”

“And why does the Government not see the contradiction in the fact that there are unvaccinated members of staff?”

The GSD said that given the vaccination programme and the daily testing of staff and visitors now, the risk of contracting the virus was much lower.

It pointed to the fact there were no resident cases in Gibraltar.

Against that backdrop, it said ways could be found to allow “unvaccinated but tested” individuals to see their loved ones in hospital and ERS.

“That is the measured position of the GSD,” the party added.

“The defensive response of the Government is nothing more than a smokescreen.”

“How can the Government call the Opposition irresponsible when the Government itself were operating a looser system last year when most of us we were not vaccinated?”

“Was it irresponsible during the time they had sanctioned that system or for them not to have arranged daily swabs of staff?”

“The reality is that this is just no more than an attempt to undermine what is a measured call for people to be heard and for ways to be explored to help them.”

“The Government have closed their minds for political reasons and that is affecting people and giving families unnecessary anxiety.”

1 Like

The insanity continues - look what is happening in the UK concerning the elderly being allowed to leave their care homes.

Gibraltar usually follows the UK.

The GSD is accused today of adopting a “highly irresponsible and cavalier” stance on whether people who have not been vaccinated should be allowed to visit relatives in hospital or elderly care.

In a statement, the Gibraltar Government said the Opposition was “distorting and exaggerating” a “very sensitive” issue.

The government says its policy of restricting access to unvaccinated people is based on health advice but the GSD insists measures should be taken to allow visits even for those who have not been jabbed.

“The vast majority of the people of Gibraltar have been vaccinated with over 35,000 first vaccinations administered and over 30,000 second doses,” the government said.

“This means that this issue affects only a small part of the population who firstly have chosen not to be vaccinated, second who also happen to have relatives in elderly or medical facilities and third who want to visit them.”

“Given these facts, it is obvious that the Opposition have exaggerated this issue and blown it up out of all proportion for their own political ends.”

“That said, the Government fully sympathises with the predicament that this narrow category of persons may find themselves in.”

“However, everyone must understand that the primary concern of our health and elderly care services are the welfare of their patients and their residents.”

The Government said the Opposition had lobbied the Government last December for the admission of relatives into ERS.

This was subsequently agreed after protocols were established by the GHA and Public Health Gibraltar.

“Moreover, the feedback that the Government has received from almost all the families of ERS residents, is that they want their elderly to be safe and protected first and foremost,” the government said.

“The two-faced attitude that the Opposition have adopted on this issue is therefore deeply regrettable.”

“If they truly support the vaccination programme, then they should urge people to get vaccinated in order to protect their elderly and sick relatives, who happen to be most at risk, when they visit them.”

1 Like

image

If they were truly concerned about the elderly, they would have at least paused, questioned, and examined what they were doing to their elderly in January - when the elderly were dropping left and right after being vaccinated.

image

image

Woe to the Politicians - King of kings' Bible

Matthew 23:1 Then spoke Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,
Matthew 23:2 Saying, The lawyers and the politicians sit in Moses' Law seat:
Matthew 23:3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe of God's Law, [that] observe and do; but do not ye after their example: for they say, and do not (and make up their own laws against God's Orders - Deut. 4:2).
Matthew 23:4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay [them] on men's shoulders; but they [themselves] will not lift one of their fingers to remove them.

Matthew 23:14 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

Matthew 23:23 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier [matters] of the Law, Judgment, Mercy, and Faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
Matthew 23:24 [Ye] blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.
Matthew 23:25 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.
Matthew 23:26 [Thou] blind politician, cleanse first that [which is] within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.
Matthew 23:27 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead [men's] bones, and of all filthiness.
Matthew 23:28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and inequity.

Matthew 23:33 [Ye] serpents, [ye] generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell-fire?

1 Like

https://www.yourgibraltartv.com/politics/23247-gsd-says-the-rights-of-unvaccinated-people-are-not-a-numbers-game

Written by YGTV Team on 19 April 2021.

The GSD has said that it is now clear that the Government are “simply playing a political numbers game” rather than considering the rights or wishes of all families or individuals. The party says the Government have apparently calculated that the issue of unvaccinated individuals visiting their family members in hospital or ERS affects a minority of individuals they are “shutting their eyes” to the problem and are “abandoning the pleas for help” by those individuals.

A statement continued: “The GSD has called for the Government to explore ways to achieve safe visiting rights. The vaccination requirement is a new one. It was not in place till a vaccination programme had been launched. By insisting on this it, in effect, creates a group of citizens that are left behind and whose rights to see their families are affected. That cannot be right as a matter of principle when the COVID situation is what it currently is. One thing is to tell unvaccinated individuals that they will need to take extra precautions because they are unvaccinated or to see family members in separate premises. But what the Government are doing is barring them completely and on an indefinite basis. This does not make sense when the risks are – so far – evidently lower than when there was no vaccination programme.

“Why else would Government be triumphantly heralding Gibraltar as a “green light” tourism destination for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals after 17 May when the UK is expected to make an announcement.”

Leader of the Opposition, Keith Azopardi said: “It stands to reason against the current COVID backdrop that ways could be found to allow families to see their loved ones. It is not right in a society where the rights of the majority have been restored to create a group of social outcasts who are prevented from seeing their loved ones. We could well understand that this would be impossible if the COVID situation was different in Gibraltar. But it is not. The truth is that residents at ERS or hospital patients are as likely to be at risk from unvaccinated members of staff entering the premises as they are with unvaccinated family members. Presumably there are unvaccinated members of the public who are also entering the hospital premises for outpatient treatment. If that is the case what is the difference? And would there not be higher methods of control of unvaccinated visitors by requiring them to take a COVID test than unvaccinated individuals entering hospital for outpatient consultations who do not receive a COVID test? As the contradictions are rife the Government should review the issue.”

2 Likes

You got to love logic:

The ruling party spun the situation from being about Gibraltarians pleading to see their family members into an opportunity to slam its opponent. Look here, not there.

While this is a human rights issue, it's so much more.

And since the ruling political class signed on with the Globalists to take individuals rights away, the Psychological-warfare on Gibraltar continues – JUST AS PLANNED.

UK Gov. document reveals disgusting tactics used to coerce Brits into having experimental COVID-19 Vaccine

We felt it was of the upmost importance to reveal to you the psychological tactics authorities are now using to coerce millions of Brits into having an experimental “vaccine” ... A disease which has been used to enforce medical fascism – COVID-19.

The document (explaining their tactics) was produced by a UK council’s ‘Behaviour Change Unit’ and was published on ‘The Behavioural Science and Public Health Network’. It is titled – ‘COVID-19 Vaccination: Reducing vaccine hesitancy – Review & Recommendations’ describes the best methods to manipulate and coerce the public into having one of the experimental Covid “vaccines” via psychological warfare.

The document describes how Brits can be easily manipulated into taking the COVID-19 vaccine if the physical and social environment around them supports them to do so, for example making sure “receiving the vaccination is seen as the right thing to do by the majority of people in their peer group” and making sure they are made aware of this.

Read the article (linked above) to learn exactly how Gibraltarians have been under Nazi-style psychological manipulation by a few traitors within their own government and health authority.

As MKUltra victim and whistleblower Cathy O'Brien said, "Knowledge is the weapon against mind-control."

Get some – knowledge – that is.

2 Likes

20th April 2021

The Gibraltar Government’s decision to stop unvaccinated people from visiting relatives in hospital or elderly care risks creating a group of “social outcasts” at a time when the risk of infection is low, the GSD said on Monday.

The GSD has repeatedly called on the government to review its decision and find ways of providing safe access to people who have not been jabbed but wish to visit relatives in care.

The government has insisted it is protecting the most vulnerable in the community and that most people with relatives in hospital or ERS have welcomed the move.

For the GSD, this is “a political numbers game” that ignores the rights or wishes of all families or individuals.

“As they have apparently calculated that the issue of unvaccinated individuals visiting their family members in hospital or ERS affects a minority of individuals they are shutting their eyes to the problem and are abandoning the pleas for help by those individuals,” the party said in a statement.

By insisting on vaccination, a group of citizens “are left behind” and their rights are affected.

At a time when there are no resident Covid-19 infections on the Rock, that “cannot be right as a matter of principle,” the GSD said.

The GSD said people who have not been jabbed should perhaps be asked to take additional precautions or to visit family members in separate premises, but not barred completely and indefinitely.

“This does not make sense when the risks are – so far – evidently lower than when there was no vaccination programme,” the party said.

It contrasted the vaccine requirement for visitors to hospital or ERS facilities with the government “triumphantly heralding” Gibraltar as a tourism destination for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals after May 17, when the UK is expected to make an announcement on lifting travel restrictions to certain places.

The Leader of the Opposition, Keith Azopardi, said: “It stands to reason against the current Covid backdrop that ways could be found to allow families to see their loved ones.”

“It is not right in a society where the rights of the majority have been restored to create a group of social outcasts who are prevented from seeing their loved ones.”

“We could well understand that this would be impossible if the Covid situation was different in Gibraltar. But it is not.”

“The truth is that residents at ERS or hospital patients are as likely to be at risk from unvaccinated members of staff entering the premises as they are with unvaccinated family members.”

“Presumably there are unvaccinated members of the public who are also entering the hospital premises for outpatient treatment.”

“If that is the case what is the difference?”

“And would there not be higher methods of control of unvaccinated visitors by requiring them to take a Covid test than unvaccinated individuals entering hospital for outpatient consultations who do not receive a Covid test?”

“As the contradictions are rife the Government should review the issue.”

1 Like

https://www.yourgibraltartv.com/politics/23258-government-opposition-using-the-vulnerable-to-serve-their-own-political-ambition

Written by YGTV Team on 21 April 2021.

The Government says the GSD should “know better than to use the vulnerable to further their own political ambition”.

A statement from the Government follows below:

The Opposition have shown that they have no scruples in making use of any issue in order to criticise the Government, no matter how vulnerable the persons involved or how sensitive the situation in question. It is deeply regrettable that they choose to jump on each and every bandwagon without the slightest regard for the bigger picture. It is certainly a numbers game for the Opposition as they desperately seek to scrape every single vote together no matter the consequences of their actions or the distasteful quality of their methods.

This two-faced approach confirms that they are simply trying to be all things to all men. In the first place advocating vaccinations and supporting the vaccination programme and then, in the next breath, actively undermining it.

The Government have already explained that ERS residents and St Bernard’s in-patients, by their very nature, constitute the most vulnerable cohort in our community. The decision not to allow unvaccinated visitors is based on clinical and public health considerations alone.

Vaccination against COVID-19 is not compulsory in Gibraltar and this is the way it will remain. The Government therefore respects the right of individuals not to be vaccinated if they so wish. However, it is equally important to protect the rights of persons in elderly or medical care not be exposed to this deadly disease. It is important to recall that COVID-19 has already taken 94 members of our community before their time, our family and friends. The Government, the GHA and our elderly residential services have a duty to reduce any risks to their users as much as is reasonably possible.

The President of the Junta de Andalucia explained yesterday that his Government was considering making available a mobile QR code to persons who had been vaccinated with both doses, in order to enable them to cross provincial boundaries within Andalucia or to attend public events like the theatre in the future. The EU vaccine Chief announced recently that the Union expects to be ready to launch a vaccine passport in June and Israel, which already has a vaccine passport, makes it available as an app or as a paper certificate to persons who have been vaccinated or who have recovered from COVID-19. This has to be shown in order to access hotels, gyms or theatres and is the basis for travel deals which have been struck with Greece and Cyprus. It is obvious that the world we are moving forward into will sadly be very different to what we knew before the pandemic.

The Government completely sympathises with those persons who have not been vaccinated and who wish to visit relatives in ERS or in the hospital. The GHA and ERS have a duty to protect those in their care from infection. However, the question of visits by unvaccinated persons will remain

under review in this context. It is relevant to point out that special arrangements have already been made for visits by unvaccinated relatives to patients in end of life situations and by those who have had COVID-19 in the six month period before the visit takes place. It is also important to make a distinction between those who cannot be vaccinated,for medical reasons, and those who simply do not wish to. In a number of cases of the former, a different vaccine has been offered.

In the meantime, the Opposition should know better than to use the vulnerable to further their own political ambition.

1 Like

https://www.yourgibraltartv.com/politics/23262-gsd-says-families-are-being-ignored-by-government

Written by YGTV Team on 21 April 2021.

The GSD says the Government is taking a stance preventing families of unvaccinated individuals from seeing their loved ones in hospital or ERS “for political reasons” and are “refusing to listen to the anxiety they are causing many people.” The party says it is “not justifiable or reasonable” to take that stance given the state of COVID cases in Gibraltar today.

Leader of the Opposition, Keith Azopardi said: “The Government is repeatedly now noting that there are no resident COVID cases in Gibraltar. That is great news. As a society we need to act accordingly and allow freedoms to be restored carefully. What happened to Mr Picardo’s repeated statements that restrictions would not be in place a moment longer than was necessary? If visits are not allowed now for all families when there are ZERO resident cases and 90% of the population is vaccinated when will they be allowed?

“Unvaccinated family members are willing to take precautions and undergo COVID tests. How is it reasonable to impose further restrictions now given where we are with cases and the vaccination programme as a whole? Ways should be found to allow visits for all families safely.

The Guidance on Care Home Visiting published by the UK Government specifically says that vaccinations are not compulsory for visitors. Guidance on care home visiting - GOV.UK

It specifically says: “It is not a condition of visiting that the visitor or the resident should have been vaccinated. However, it is strongly recommended that all visitors and residents take up the opportunity to be vaccinated when they are invited to do so through the national programme.”

“This is the case even though there are higher numbers of cases in UK and greater risks in the UK because of the lower vaccination rate. In the UK, 50% of people have received one dose but only 16% of people have received two doses of the vaccine. We are at 90% coverage of the vaccine and therefore much lower risk. Is the UK Government being “unscrupulous” by issuing that Guidance which is what the Government wildly accused the GSD of being for suggesting something similar?

“The fact is that there are no requirements for persons to be vaccinated to enter Gibraltar by land or air. The Government will also soon seek to capture British tourism when travel restrictions are lifted. Some visitors will presumably be unvaccinated. And there are staff members at GHA and ERS who are unvaccinated. The fact that so-called vaccine “passports” may be introduced in the EU does not mean that people will be barred from travelling but rather that being vaccinated will facilitate easier travel. The difference here is that no visits are being allowed at all for unvaccinated individuals in ordinary situations. Saying that visits are organised for “end of life” situations is hardly a substitute. Are the Government saying that unvaccinated families cannot see their relatives till that terrible extreme happens?”

Mr Azopardi added: “As we have consistently said we support the vaccination programme and encourage people to be vaccinated. But if they choose not to they cannot be relegated to a situation where the State places unreasonable obstacles in front of their enjoyment of family life even when there are no cases of COVID in Gibraltar. What may have been justifiable when there was high numbers of cases or risks is not justifiable any longer. Those people and families suffering these restrictions will remember and not forgive the Government’s obstinate policy.”

1 Like

We have the evidence

Politicians, health officials and attorneys in GIBRALTAR need to pay attention to what's going on concerning legal-suits and a second Nuremberg trial. How does what Dr. Robert Fuellmich said apply to GIBRALTAR?

Reiner Fuellmich is one of the most powerful lawyers in Europe, and is currently preparing the largest class action lawsuit in history, otherwise known as “Nuremberg 2.0”.

image

Summary of Reiner Fuellmich interview:

There can not be any doubt whatsoever that, at least for me, after having interviewed so many experts from all different fields of science – doctors, virologists, epidemiologists, economists, lawyers, psychologists, psychotherapists – what’s happening here is for a year now is the worst crimes against humanity ever committed.

This has never been about the virus; this has never been about health; this has always been about taking everything away from us so that we would be dependent on THEM, plus population reduction; plus gaining complete control over those who are left. I wouldn’t have said this a year ago, but this is what all the evidence; all of the people we interviewed on the Corona committee, what this points to – this conclusion is inevitable.

The Drosten Protocol is completely unscientific – it looks like it was done is such a sloppy way on purpose for the sole purpose of producing as many false positives as possible all over the world so that their agenda which ends with the so-called vaccinations which are really genetic experiments. In the end, the cleanup will take years.

We are about to reach the tipping point

There are so many mistakes they are making. I don’t think all these adverse reactions to the vaccines are part of the plan. And that’s because they are trying to rush this thing through. We have a whistle-blower; and she told us the original plan was to roll this out in 2050; but then those who are involved in this got greedy; and pulled things forward to 2030; and then to 2020. That’s why we think so many mistakes are happening.

They didn’t expect or intend these adverse effects to happen and warn people who are still sort of inline with the government.

Fuellmich laughs at being called a conspiracy theorist and says “We have the evidence. I know there are some people out there who may not quite work with actual evidence. It’s different with us, because we have been speaking with all these scientists and other people. It may turn out we are going to have to have a special court, because maybe and there is a lot pointing in that direction, the national courts will not be really be able to deal with this, because this is so big, that it is very possible we will need to have something like NUREMBERG 2.

Fuellmich identifies the culprits as one-percent of the population trying to gain control over the rest of the world. This is not about money, because this group of people maybe 3,000, they are the super rich. They have in terms of financial assistance much more than they need. They don’t need to buy a 10th yacht. It’s about money in the fact that they are using money in order to bribe people at the hospitals, the doctors, politicians. They are also using all kinds of psychological techniques in order to manipulate people; or they threaten people – many politicians, some of them may be threatened, some of them may be getting bribed – but it’s not really about money. They are using money as a tool. [THINK CRONYISM or read MP’s Heavily Invested in Pharmaceutical Industry]

What they are really up to, the very same people we what we now call the Davos Clique – the self-appointed political elite and the self-appointed corporate elite – that is part of the people we are dealing with.

And those are the ones responsible for the financial crisis some 10 or 12 years ago. Had we known to look some 30 years ago, we would have known they’ve been stealing the tax-payers money all over the world. The first financial crisis would have been the perfect chance to catch on to what’s going on. They managed to tell us they have everything under control. You cannot print money to restore everything they have stolen.

This time around in late 2019, when things coming to a head and again when things were about to implode, they came up with Corona as a diversionary tactic. Even in their groups, there’s lots of in-fighting; there’s contradicting interests and that’s another one of our chances we have.

We spoke to an investment banker and she said why EUROPE IS AT THE CENTER OF ALL THIS – this is probably the most important battleground in this whole war – is because Europe is completely, definitely, totally broke. The ECB is totally broke because they bought all these bonds and papers that are totally and completely worthless. [:gibraltar: How broke is Gibraltar?]

And what’s more important is the pension funds – they are completely broke – meaning if people find out about this, that despite that they are spending so much money on their pensions, there’s nothing left. It’s all stolen. That’s one of the reason that they are trying to get Europe under control – before people find out what’s really going on. [:gibraltar: Is Gibraltar's Pension fund broke? Maybe that's why the elderly became the first target in the grand scheme of things - to save money - which newly appointed Minister with responsibility for Financial Stability Joe Bossano would know a thing or two about. Are they covering their empty coffers with Brexit and Covid woes?]

I think this is all about moral and ethics. It doesn’t have much to do with the law. Someone said once this is all over, in a better world, we want need laws anymore, because people will understand because they all have a genetic built in sensor for what is right and what is wrong. [Read The Bible - Christ will establish God's Kingdom on Earth]

These globalized laws are made by people who are so far removed from the reality of people’s lives in their different regions that these laws are practically useless. They are using them in order to keep us under control. In a better, future we probably won’t need any of this because people are educated enough and we’re talking about moral competence again. [Actually this will be for people who learn the New Song].

There will be a move toward sovereignty again. It’s globalism that got us here. What do you call them, what do you call the WHO, the WEF – these are private global organizations which has taken control over the entire world; private organizations, run by the super rich. Once people understand this it’s not going to be too hard for people to turn the tables. Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab are not to be trusted.

The most important thing is to spread the Truth. Spread the facts to as many people as possible. And don’t waste your time on those people who are aggressively on the other side; who really want to get vaccinated. It’s tragic, but we will not be able to save everyone. At lot of people will not only lose their livelihoods but also their lives. Our hand is extended to them so if they change their minds, they are always welcome to come aboard; but those 10-12 percent of the population (maybe more), we’re the ones who will turn the tables. And we focus on how can we do this best; and that’s why we have to connect with each other. If we lose, that will be the end of humanity; we lose to digitalism and to completely stark-raving mad people – that’s why we won’t lose. We cannot lose, because we must win. [We will win when we get on God's side and do and keep His Commandments, Statutes, and Judgements; and demand the Return to His Law.]

It almost seems like an impossible battle ahead, but that’s what they want us to believe, that’s why they’ve invested so much money into the mainstream media. But if I look at Germany, reality is completely different from what they are trying to make us believe. He gave an example, almost all cab drivers know this is stupid, masks aren't doing anything, many of them are actually well-informed, because they aren’t watching mainstream public television; and getting information from alternative media. [:gibraltar: Cab drivers in Gibraltar also know the score].

Just like with every flu season, people get sick, people get seriously sick and some people die, but what happened in Italy for example, it is a result of what doctors we spoke with said is probably a result of MALPRACTICE than it is a result of the flu or the corona virus, if you want to call it that. As it turns out the fatality rate is no more than the common flu. [:gibraltar: The fatality rate in Gibraltar only spiked after the vaccine euthanasia program began.]

It’s tragic, the people who line up to get vaccinated only play a role of cannon-fodder or guinea pigs.

Most of the things we become used to, our way of life, is very destructive, both on a personal level and on a global level. There’s too much injustice; and there’s too many people trying to take advantage of others – that will change – That’s the light of the end of the tunnel. The light at the end of the tunnel is what we end in order change things for the better. [Christ is the Light of the World].

It’s been working already. There has been progress. You have to look at the bright-side because more and more are beginning to wonder. We are winning some of the court battles. We will win many more.

See also – Legal team wants ‘second Nuremberg tribunal’ to try global lockdown promoters for crimes against humanity with a link to the full interview.

How long much Gibraltar suffer at the hands of SiegHeil “Dr. Death” Bhatti, Dr. Krishna Rawal, Dr. John Cortes, Samantha Sacramento, Der Fuehrer Fabian Picardo and ALL those people involved in promoting, by fear-mongering lies, and administering all these deadly vaccines, for their crimes against humanity, and genocide? Read How long must we suffer O Lord? – Until you return to keeping and enforcing The Law

5 Likes