The deal would explain why the Government of Gibraltar, its ministers and its health officials act the way they do.
1. It would explain their actions to push the vaccines and boosters – to the point of coercion without proper informed consent.
2. It would explain reasons they deny vaccine injury and death – to the point of hiding adverse effects data from public knowledge.
3. It would explain their obstinacy – to the point they ignore and manipulate facts; ignore independent experts and new and mounting evidence that the vaccines are dangerous and deadly.
While the United Kingdom and Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) played a key role in securing doses for Gibraltar –
“I want to express the gratitude of the Government and People of Gibraltar to the United Kingdom Government for the supply of these vaccines, which are presently not otherwise commercially available. The team at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in London and in Gibraltar have been incredible in supporting us in obtaining access to the vaccine,” said Gibraltar Governor David Steel.
Consignments of vaccines from Pfizer would not have been brought to The Rock without a contract also signed by local government officials.
Gibraltar would have received a portion of the 30 million doses that the UK agreed to buy in its initial deal with Pfizer.
It has already come to light that Pfizer made SECRET DEALS with governments. The UK government’s deal has been redacted. Furthermore, it would be naïve to assume Gibraltar officials are not party to these non-disclosed contracts.
Please read this report by Public Citizen: Pfizer’s Power.
It outlines Pfizer’s secret government contracts for COVID vaccines; how Pfizer puts profits over public health; and reveals seven of its contracts are worth billions.
Before the Federal Drug Administration in the U.S. tried to block information about Pfizer’s Covid19 data from being released until 2076 – when most injured and involved would be long dead – Pfizer was busy protecting itself and wielding its power in the short-run with these secret contracts with governments. And it seems these contracts also deal with governments defending Pfizer in infringement of intellectual property suits.
Nothing is free – so what did Gibraltar government officials sign up for with Pfizer and the FCDO?
Did the Government of Gibraltar consign the Gibraltarian population to be human subjects in a massive experiment that PARALLELS what the State of Israel did?
Please read this detailed article linked below by the Alliance for Human Research Protection. Buckle up, because, unlike government hyperbole, this article explains what most likely did happen:
The “deal” helped accelerate the production and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines.
Officials failed to disclose to their constituents that the COVID-19 (mRNA) vaccines were/are experimental. The COVID-19 vaccine phase 3 clinical trials have not yet been completed and are authorized under emergency use only. The long-term risks are unknown. The short-term risk of harm from the vaccine is far greater than the risk of dying from COVID-19.
Lack of evidence that the vaccine will, in fact, prevent infection, is not Pfizer’s concern, sales and profits are – and this means a high vaccination rate – which became the designated focus of officials in Gibraltar, as they kept up their part of the bargain.
Article excerpt, of which the same can be said about Gibraltar:
“Demand for the vaccines has been generated by the continuous scaremongering propaganda which fomented a heightened degree of fear and panic. Public health officials DISCARDED the precautionary principle in medicine – “First, do no harm” – and despite serious uncertainty, officials proceeded full speed ahead, with mass vaccination. It is astonishing that the government of Israel entrusted the health of the people to Pfizer; by entering into a secret contract that enrolled the Israeli population to become research subjects, without their knowledge or consent.”
Given the commitment of Gibraltar officials to “ENSURE” the entire population is inoculated with these experimental vaccines, we can postulate that the wording of Gibraltar’s agreement with Pfizer would be similar:
“Under the contract, Real World Epidemiological Evidence Collaboration Agreement, the (Israeli) government signed a commitment to vaccinate the entire seven million adult population and to provide weekly data on its citizens during a 24-month surveillance follow-up study. The government disregarded potentially serious medical risks from the experimental vaccine and risks to privacy.”
Israel is considered an ideal place for a vast epidemiological study, encompassing 9.3 million people, because of its universal, state-sponsored healthcare system in which insurers maintain 40 years of digitized medical records, including vaccination records for each Israeli citizen. This centralized system helped Israel administer more than 2 million doses of the vaccine in under a month. In exchange, Israel received priority delivery of millions of doses of the vaccines.
“Benjamin Netanyahu stated, “Israel has committed to send Pfizer data, and details especially gathered for them, including the consequences of the inoculations, side effects, efficacy, amount of time it takes to develop antibodies according to different types of population, age, gender, pre-existing conditions etc. The agreement extensively details the various parameters that will be sent to Pfizer… This data is a treasure trove for Pfizer.”
This would explain ministers, like Samantha Sacramento, fumbling around questions about data collection of local adverse effects. If Gibraltar’s contract forbids disclosure of these details – that active surveillance is being conducted and reported directly to Pfizer – then officials like Sacramento would rather appear incompetent than risk breach of contract, which would come with some pretty hefty penalties.
Or it could simply be that if she admitted the same as Netanyahu, it would make her and other officials complicit in committing crimes against humanity, by breaching the Nuremberg and Declaration Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights Codes – BECAUSE THEY SIGNED GIBRALTAR UP making the decision that Gibraltarians participated in the experimental trials.
Sacramento admitted that there is some central person collecting data. Was this person to report directly to Pfizer?
Marlene Hasson-Nahon asked, "Has the government kept a record of side effects eminatting from the administration of the Pfizer vaccine; one, who is keeping this record; and two when will it be made public?
Sacremento said, "the side effects from the administration of any vaccines are always recorded. This includes the adminstration of the Pfizer vaccine. Minor side effects are recorded in the patient's electronic medical records. Serious side effects are similarly recorded, but are also reported through the Yellow Card Scheme to regulatory authorities. There is no intention to make this information public as it is medical in confidence information."
Marlene Hasson-Nahon asked, "... in the same way as we get information that doesn't breach protection about people and their circumstances when they acquire Covid-19, why wouldn't statistics of the effects of a vaccination in our community minor or otherwise, be made public. I can't understand what breach that is. If the minister could enlighten me.
Not reading from a script, Sacremento, fumbling with the papers, said, "um, what, there is of course someone centralizing the collection of this information; and when the time is right, uh-ah, I ...and by that... I mean, when enough time has elapsed from the administration of the vaccine to be able to make a proper analysis, then there will be a report."
Would she care to explain more? Are these patient details also given to Pfizer? And will Pfizer run the analysis, when the Phase 3 ends?
If a specific reporting protocol is in place, it would also explain why the government or Gibraltar Health Authority weren’t too concerned about ensuring that the public knew how to report adverse effects through the Yellow Card system early on – only recently adding the information when Vaccine Awareness Gibraltar raised concerns.
Isn't it possible that this protocol could give the GHA, or PHE, or NHS censorship abilities? Because that's not how reporting adverse effects, or informed consent, works. It's how CONTROL WORKS. It's how "blocking" information works.
The government’s excuse not to disclose these adverse reactions to the public is to protect privacy. Again, is the information being given to Pfizer?
Gibraltar could easily use the same protocol as Yellow Card, EudraVigilance, and VAERS to report this data, which doesn’t disclose identities.
Also interesting, it was Together Gibraltar leader Marlene Nahon Hassan who asked Sacremento these questions; and Marlene's sister Fleur Hassan-Nahoum is the Deputy Mayor of Jerusalem.
In the early negotiations of securing the vaccines, Krish Rawal said that the GHA essentially falls under the NHS. Thus, is it the NHS coordinating how reporting is handled on The Rock? The NHS may be acting as the UK liaison between Pfizer and Gibraltar, as part of the “deal” connected to that UK-Pfizer (redacted) agreement. And if so how was this coordinated? How would the NHS have gone about ensuring that all adverse effects in this experimental trial were reported directly to them for Pfizer, rather than to the Yellow Card? Conveniently the Gibraltar Official Secrets Act includes employees of the GHA, thus Gibraltar would be a prime candidate to conduct the trials and keep a lid on the details.
We know the NHS manipulated UK doctors about the vaccines as disclosed by Dr. Samuel White – Dr Sam White Wins High Court Case – NHS had suspended him for raising concerns about the safety of the Covid injection and informed consent.
Dr White, who was a partner at a practice in Hampshire, posted a seven-minute video to Instagram in June explaining why he had resigned from his job, saying he could no longer work “because of the lies” around the pandemic, which he said had been “so vast” he could no longer “stomach or tolerate” them.
Why would it be any different in Gibraltar, if the GHA falls under the NHS?
Or perhaps the arrangement between GHA and NHS translates to Public Health England (PHE), because Sacremento thanked PHS for its “advice and support” –
"All of us that have benefited from this amazing programme need to sincerely thank everyone involved - the UK Government and the Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office for ensuring that Gibraltar had the vaccine; Public Health England for their advice and support on the vaccination programme…”
Note: The NHS is ultimately responsible for providing and commissioning public health services in England, but will follow advice given by, and be supported by, Public Health England.
Consider the wording above from the leaked Pfizer document and ask did Gibraltar officials sign up to similar?
Are Gibraltar health professionals keeping their mouths shut, as part of a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), or interim gag order involving any of these organizations (GoG, GHA, PHE, NHS, UK)? Are they afraid of losing their jobs – so much so that they would risk doing harm to others?
The NHS tried to make an “example” of Sam White by suspending him. But if you look at what’s happened to Sam White since he put his head above the parapet, he was the one who came out ahead. He became free to focus on his dream of offering functional medicine.
"Your (MHRA) failure to investigate known concerns amounts to gross negligence in office," Hyland continued, "and renders you and the executive board liable for serious misconduct in office, mal or misfeasance in public office and, or, rendering all the office holders potentially liable for corporate manslaughter in that you have been wilfully blind to the known harms of the SARS-CoV-2 injections. You have taken no action.”
White also joined the People’s Union of Britain [PUB] in their case against Matt Hancock and others.
In Gibraltar, the only way this insanity makes sense, is if public and health officials are parties in one or more SECRET DEALS.
Who are they really protecting – themselves?
We can continue the parellel between the State of Israel and Gibraltar:
Essentially, like Israelis, Gibraltarians most likely “became the unwitting human subjects of a massive, unethical, unapproved, non-consensual human experiment. The public was not informed that (a) the vaccine is experimental; (b) the population was being used as human subjects for a two-year epidemiological study; the data is meant to be shared with foreign countries and journals; the secrecy of the contract has led to strong suspicions, that (c) their personal medical record – “a data treasure-trove” – would be shared with Pfizer.”
Pfizer seeks to obtain basic safety and efficacy information that it lacks, in order for its vaccine to be eligible for an official license.
“First, the company needs to demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in preventing infection when one is exposed to the virus. Second, serious adverse effects need to be identified and their frequency and duration determined. Third, the risk for specific populations, including children, pregnant women and the elderly need to be identified and weighed against the benefits. Fourth, causes of deaths during the trial need to be documented.”
Pfizer will use, to their advantage, all data collected and reported back to them by participating governments. How is collected data channelled to Pfizer from Gibraltar?
Medicine is not like a commodity; medical decisions are personal, requiring the weighing of benefits against risks. Medicine often involves life and death decisions. Without informed consent of the individual, medicine can be, and has been, weaponized.
Chief Minister Fabian Picardo called the vaccine booster “a matter of life and death”.
His government not disclosing data on adverse reactions – to the point of covering them up with lame excuses – should be very concerning. Gibraltarians are unable to give informed consent, because they are not fully informed about efficacy and adverse effects that are glossed over by officials. The officials instead badger Gibraltarians to keep participating in Pfizer’s trial and keep up their “agreed upon high vaccination rate”.
The news articles about Gibraltar’s high vaccination rate was two-fold:
1. It was propaganda for the UK and other countries that a high rate would mean opening up and lifting restrictions (although that was short-lived).
2. It was a public announcement that Gibraltar was keeping its end of the bargain, for its own commitment to a high vaccination rate, which would also help accelerate Pfizer’s plan.
How long will the coercion persist on The Rock? Pfizer’s trials don’t end until 2023.
This may boil down to it being life or death for Picardo and other officials. What happens if they fail to keep up their parts of the bargain?
But more importantly, what happens when the TRUTH IS REVEALED and these criminals are punished for their crimes against humanity?
Unlike what Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Justin Welby, Gibraltar’s own Robin Gill, or other false prophets tell you – Christ emphatically does NOT support vaccination:
Matthew 12:30 He that is not WITH me is AGAINST me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
Everyone on this planet is currently choosing their side – Good or Evil, Life or Death.
1. Officials could guarantee it could get Gibraltarians to comply, because the Government of Gibraltar has enjoyed controlling the narrative for many years, either through its government-sponsored media, intimidation tactics, or the well-established practice of not disclosing other contracts or memorandums of understanding. GoG operates with impunity, which should be a red flag, Gibraltar isn’t really a democracy.
2. Gibraltar has a large elderly population – which is the first, targeted, subject group.
3. Gibraltar’s population is small, but dense, offering a representation of larger populations – a perfect trial group of different ethnic individuals, as well as individuals with underlying issues like cancer. How would they respond in the trials?
4. Gibraltar has embraced the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)
4IR involves the creation of digital identities to link individual medical, financial, and credit data together, but no concern has been brought up that “the transfer of extensive, sensitive medical data to a multi-national foreign corporation exposes every citizen to extraordinary risks of harm. The most important commodity today is data. The transfer of its citizens’ medical data exposes Gibraltarians to security risks.”
Jonathan Klinger, a cyberlaw attorney and legal adviser for the Israeli Digital Rights Movement, a non-profit group, agrees: “We don’t really know what’s being shared. Even if aggregated or anonymous data is transferred, it could be re-identified. This is still a concern.”
In history’s largest medical experiment with “vaccines” that have not been approved for use in humans, it is the buyers’ responsibility to defend Pfizer for causing harm, leaked documents showed.
Please read this detailed article linked below pushed by Free West Media. Buckle up, because unlike government hyperbole, this article explains what most likely did happen:
Pfizer has escaped all liability and is indemnified, arguing that side effects and the long-term effects of the injections are unknown – to the company as well. Pfizer thus admits that an insufficiently tested product is being pushed in literally billions of doses on the world market.
This means that all responsibility for costs, healthcare, etc. due to vaccine damage – no matter how large and onerous – is passed on to the taxpayers in the countries that have signed the agreements. Since the agreements put each country’s own laws out of play, they have all been signed at government level.
The design of the agreements is an important explanation for why the propaganda for mass vaccination is of a totalitarian nature and does not allow for debate or questioning.
In view of the fact that the majority of those now in hospital for Covid-19 are fully vaccinated – a situation that buyers could never have anticipated – the agreements certainly appear to be criminal.
Gibraltar officials may have not known in advance that the vaccinated would be the ones getting ill or hospitalized, but they KNOW NOW. And instead of halting or investigating, they are aiding and abetting Pfizer with their continued promotion of these poisons. “Let us be clear” – as Picardo often says – the vaccines are causing harm in Gibraltar.
Gibraltarian officials continue to defend the vaccines and their uptake, being obstinate and ignoring the facts in front of them. Again, the only way to explain this insanity is that they are bound to something far more sinister than they will ever admit.
Interestingly, it was Israeli cyber security expert, Ehden Biber who is responsible for the leak regarding the agreements of Pfizer and its customers.
Consider this case, which is one of many:
A group of independent investigative journalists in South America has revealed that Pfizer in negotiations with Brazil and Argentina, among others, demanded that the country provide state assets such as embassy buildings and military bases as a guarantee for future costs for possible lawsuits.
Because the UK’s agreement with Pfizer is redacted, which translates into the deal with Gibraltar as being confidential, we have to ask if the UK also had to provide assets. Did Gibraltar provide assets as collateral against future lawsuits as well? It is a valid question, but we also know that the UK government is part of vaccine development, and would benefit from these negotiations; and thus may be part of the heavy hand placed on poorer countries.
Some samples from the confidential agreements:
The purchaser is aware that the efficacy and long-term effects of the vaccine are unknown and that side effects may occur which are not currently known.
The buyer must pay Pfizer for the ordered doses, regardless of how many you use and regardless of whether Pfizer has the preparation approved by the authorities. ” (This was written before the FDA’s emergency approval of the so-called “vaccines”).
The buyer hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Pfizer/BioNTech and their subsidiaries indemnified against all claims, documents, claims, losses, damages, debts, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses.
The buyer must pay all losses, including and without limitation costs for legal fees and other legal costs.
Buyer must indemnify Pfizer for claims and all losses and must implement this through statutory or regulatory requirements.
Pfizer has the right to make necessary adjustments to the agreed number of contracted doses and delivery schedule, based on principles decided by Pfizer. The buyer is obliged to agree to any change.
READ THESE LAST TWO WITH INTEREST -
The agreement must be kept secret for ten years.
However, for the State of Israel’s agreement with Pfizer, signed by the Israeli Ministry of Health on January 6, a full 30 years of secrecy apply. The reason is unclear.
Why is the State of Israel’s agreement a further 20 years out? Would that have to do with its special arrangement with Pfizer, where it signed up the Israeli population to be guinea-pigs without their informed consent? And what about Gibraltar – how long do officials have to keep quiet, given the parallels outlined above?
Pfizer’s Power over Gibraltar – is it really any different than in other places?
Review the Public Citizen report – Pfizer’s Power:
There should be plenty of attorneys in Gibraltar to understand the LEGALESE:
- Pfizer Reserves the Right to Silence Governments
- Pfizer Controls Donations
- Pfizer Secured an “IP Waiver” for Itself; Private Arbitrators, not Public Courts, Decide Disputes in Secret
- Pfizer Can Go After State Assets
- Pfizer Calls the Shots on Key Decisions
Also see specific paragraphs of the leaked agreement: Pfizer leak: exposing the Pfizer manufacturing and supply agreement
And if they don’t challenge the government’s crimes against humanity, they are complicit in them.
The only thing from the start that has been coming out of officials’ mouths is praise for the vaccines – to the extent they are all party to marketing testimonials to ensure a “high vaccination rate”.
Fabian Picardo: I have registered for the vaccine already and I urge everyone to do so and in that way help us to turn the corner and get Gibraltar and our economy and public finances back on track!”
Samantha Sacramento: Every injection that we give from tomorrow starts to reduce the likelihood of people in Gibraltar becoming seriously ill or even dying. As soon as it is my turn I will be taking this vaccine.”
Krish Rawal: There is no doubt in my mind that having this vaccine is the right thing to do. The vaccine is now the best way to do that and I am proud to say that as a front-line doctor I will be amongst the first to be vaccinated tomorrow.
Sohail Bhatti: The Pfizer vaccine has produced a superior immune response in people of all ages more quickly than any other COVID-19 vaccine that is currently available so I am delighted that this is the vaccine that has been supplied to Gibraltar. Please take your one chance to be released from the nightmare of the last year and give yourself freedom from fear and uncertainty. When it is my turn I will be taking this vaccine.”
Consider the contrast in what they are selling Gibraltar with what is disclosed in Paragraph 5.5 from the leaked document:
And would they be responsible for the high uptake of boosters as well for the trials?
This would explain why officials have become Gibraltar Booster Boosters.
Read this March 2020 admission from Sacramento from Gibraltar Vaccine Champion Launches Operation Freedom:
By the end of March, Gibraltar is on track to have completely vaccinated all residents over 16 and its vast imported workforce, Health Minister Samantha Sacramento told The Associated Press. That's over 40,000 people. Only 3.5% have so far rejected the vaccine. But Gibraltar's struggle to regain normality is only just starting. It still faces the many challenges of reopening in a globalized world with unequal access to vaccines and new virus variants emerging. Sacramento has been working on contingency plans, including topping up vaccinations with a booster.
In Jan 2021, Olive Press ran the article – 'BRACE YOURSELVES': Gibraltar's Fabian Picardo declares COVID-19 'worst loss of life in over 100 years' and warns 'we will lose more' as 128 care home residents infected.
Picardo warned Gibraltarians to “Brace Yourselves” For the Worst.
On 31 December 2021, Fabian Picardo warned Gibraltar to "fasten seatbelts" and "brace for 2022”.
What parallels are we going to be able to follow with these warnings?
It’s about time to stop bracing and fastening seatbelts to prepare for their sinister plans, and, instead, to gird our loins with the full Armour of God and speak boldly.
Ephesians – King of kings’ Bible
6:11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].
6:13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
6:14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with Truth, and having on the Breastplate of Righteousness;
6:15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
6:16 Above all, taking the Shield of Faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
6:17 And take the Helmet of Salvation, and the Sword of the Spirit, which is The Word of God:
6:18 Praying constantly (without ceasing) with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all holy people;
6:19 And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel,
6:20 For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.
Answering any number of these posed questions could explain everything.
And one last question:
Because Christ is Mediator and Judge, how long do these perpetrators in Gibraltar have before they will be held accountable for their crimes against humanity? It’s not really a case of IF, it’s a case of WHEN.