It is odd. It may have to do with the reporting systems in place in the hospitals, care home facilities, schools, etc. . It may be coming from the "higher-ups" to keep it under tight wraps.
And if people see no-one in their locale is reporting it, then they may hesitate to report it too.
I saw a difficult to watch video showing a 13-year old die after receiving the 2nd jab. It looked like it was videoed from a phone. He collapsed and CPR was initiated. He seemed to have come back a little as his arm moved and it looked like he may have lifted his head, but then he died; becoming lifeless, limp, suddenly pale-blue and CPR was stopped after no further response. It was reported as occurring in Brazil. Another video of an occurrence like that, showed the medical staff abruptly closing the door so that the scenario could not be seen.
I have a friend who works in Gibraltar, who told me of some adverse reaction cases in Gib. A 14-year-old who has been suffering for months from swollen ganglia ever since his first vaccine; many 20-30 year-olds with Myocarditis post vax; and an elderly lady who developed Bells Palsy, facial paralysis only a few days after the vax. It is our understanding that Yellow Card forms have been filled out for all these cases. There was a lot of pressure in Gib to be jabbed.
Principle 1 - Vaccinated people may carry the virus and may not experience any symptoms. It takes two weeks following a first dose of vaccination, for immunity to be established.
Principle 2 - Vaccinated people may still pass on the virus to those that are not protected. The chances of passing it on are reduced between 50-80%, however, if someone is unvaccinated and catches the virus, they are still at risk of falling seriously ill.
Principle 3 - We do not know whether vaccination has actually protected any particular individual. Around one in twenty people will not be fully protected despite vaccination.
Principle 4 - The virus is mainly spread through aerosols, therefore masks, physical distancing and outside environments all contribute to the prevention of spread.
READ Principle 3 Again -
We do not know whether vaccination has actually protected any particular individual.
This is a PR campaign so this is the Promotional Message they want you to remember - it will help to stop you from catching and passing the virus.
Now, read Gibraltar's Principles 1 & 2 Again.
There are mixed messages, but the ones in the media are the promotional ones for high uptake.
Another site the Gibraltar Page points to is the JVCI statement:
The available data indicate that the clinical manifestations of myocarditis following vaccination are typically self-limiting and resolves within a short time. However, the clinical picture is atypical and the medium to long-term (months to years) prognosis, including the possibility of persistence of tissue damage resulting from inflammation, is currently uncertain as sufficient follow-up time has not yet occurred.
Thus, if Gibraltarians want more information they have to "dig" as public health officials and politicians, and their propaganda machine, will only hone in on "all the reasons to be shot".
What's also interesting is one of the the topics they include is "My Covid Experience – Testimonials" (Propaganda). But also interesting is there are only two video testimonials.
Too bad jabbed stories - all of them - are being supressed.
Myocarditis infarction is commonly known as a heart attack, occurs when blood flow decreases or stops to the coronary artery of the heart, causing damage to the heart muscle. The most common cause of a myocardial infarction is the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque on an artery supplying heart muscle. Plaques can become unstable, rupture, and additionally promote the formation of a blood clot that blocks the artery.
I got adverse reaction, in so far as the vaccines seem to have stopped my other medicines from working. So I'm getting more frequent R.A attacks. Was an Ambulance jobie at least twice during the first couple of months after the jab. I'm a bit better now but am scared to risk the booster. I'm not able to wear a mask for longer than five minutes, so have not been able to travel since the pandemic began, unless it's by car.
Vicky posted, the segment where her questions were addressed.
Vicky added on Vaccine Awareness Gibraltar:
IF MORE QUESTIONS ARE COMING UP?
On the 7th October 2021 I emailed viewpoint with questions to be asked to the director of public health regarding information that is not currently available in the public domain.
This would include:
Patient Information Leaflets to all vaccinations that are currently administered and available in Gibraltar.
How to report adverse reactions in Gibraltar with all the relevant information that directs you to the correct process to report an adverse reaction
The Yellow Card Scheme and how this applicable to Gibraltar
Until recently (8/10/21) I have shown you that chapter 14a of the Green book has been uploaded and 12/15 year old JCVI recommendations and other useful links for this category, that were not available before...... but where are the links to the whole of the green book, consent forms, information on informed consent, patient information leaflets..... vaccine schedules, all of the information that will make us all make a better choice into this heavily pushed area that has no real clarity ....
If you look into healthy Gibraltar you will find that the information is provided to you as follows,
“The decision to offer vaccines... is exactly that, an offer.
It is important that you carefully consider the benefits and risks of taking up the offer of any vaccination as part of the informed consent process. We would encourage you to talk about this together as families and do some reading around of the topic.”
It would be extremely useful if all of the information as described above into the vaccination programs, was actually available, including vaccination schedules, brands, guidance into the reporting of any adverse reactions ...... to be easily accessed by the community ....
Everyone talks about transparency and openness, well it’s time to be transparent in this area because as with many things in Gibraltar this area lacks great transparency and has done for many years.
Does anyone else find it interesting that Carter says they have addressed vaccine adverse reactions in Gibraltar through a "frequency asked questions" section.
Here is how they address them:
What are the side effects from being vaccinated in this age group?
The most common side effect being reported is having a sore arm at the injections site that normally gets better after a few days.
In the trials that have been running, the most frequently reported wider reactions in participants were tiredness, headache, muscle aches, chills, joint pain and a raised temperature. These symptoms were usually mild to moderate and resolved within a few days after vaccination. If required, treatment with paracetamol-containing products can be used.
Is this vaccine safe for this age group?
Worldwide there have been rare cases of myocarditis or pericarditis which is an inflammation of the heart. This is more common in the younger age groups receiving the vaccine especially after the second dose. Having reviewed this very carefully we are reassured that most cases are mild, do not result in the need for hospital treatment and recovery is within a few days.
Our conclusion is that the vaccine is safe for this age group and we will be offering one dose of the vaccine. We will continue to monitor the reporting of side effects very closely, as we do for all vaccination programs.
They do not plan to release information on data from Gibraltarians – not unless a major shift occurs. But for now, all adverse reactions are keep under a tight grip – this is the opposite of transparent.
Deaths among male Children are 83% higher than the 5-year-average since they were given the Covid-19 Vaccine. The UK’s Medicine and Healthcare product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have openly admitted that they suspect myocarditis and pericarditis are potential side effects of the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines, especially among young males. A suspicion that has been strong enough for the UK Medicine Regulator to officially add warnings about myocarditis and pericarditis to the safety labels of the Covid-19 vaccines – Deaths among male Children are 83% higher than the 5-year-average since they were given the Covid-19 Vaccine – The Expose
After receiving the second does of the Pfizer vaccine, I was laid up in the ICU here in Gib, then transferred to Quiron in Marbella for 10 days, then back to the ICU here, believe me Darren, it's very real, I suffered pericarditis and myocarditis, this being a direct result of the vaccine. I also know personally two other people locally who also suffered the same after the second vaccine. I have always been fit, walking around and up the Rock, only now, many months later am I regaining my previous fitness levels.
which once again with all the promotion and push for booster vaccination this important information was once again not covered by two ‘medical professionals’, who are suppose to be there to educate the public with such a complex area of health..... educating the public of risk and safety .....
if they can push for mass booster vaccinations ..... they can also be communicating instructions and raising awareness into how to report an adverse reaction and make it known to the public ....
The Yellow Card Scheme Information is added on Healthy Gibraltar (finally) which can be viewed on the link below to be properly informed about vaccinating children....
Parents should be properly informed and educated of the risks and safety of ALL vaccination by the director or Public Health and the Medical Director so that parents can make an informed choice before committing to any vaccine program.... which throughout and past vaccine programs and this whole pandemic, has had very little coverage and awareness in the area of adverse reactions post vaccination .....
How long did it take them to take this reporting system seriously by even mentioning it?
Thanks to Vicky for her diligence in trying to get the government to do the right thing.
Informed Consent is very important - and because the government and GHA is being very sly about telling everyone to read the fine print - it's best to read the fine print. So often what politicians and health officials are saying in the media, is not a true reflection of the fine print and reality.
Unfortunately, there is still no list provided by Public Health Gibraltar on adverse reactions similar to the Yellow Card.
And the reason this is not done is their goal is for Gibraltarians to get as many boosters and the system churns out. If it were made public that there are serious issues, how many would hold off not taking the poison?
Actually, there are serious reactions occurring. People aren't speaking out. People are in denial that the jab is related to theirs or their family member's damage. Some people don't want to put their head above the parapit – as Gibraltar is known for its bullying and intimdation to keep everyone between the lines. There are private groups, but somethign has to give. Not reporting these serious adverse reactions is really a crime because people can't make a true informed decision and the government continues to get away with its secrecy and lies.
The media also fail to be the watchdog of the governement for the people. All they seem to do is give airtime and articles to Gibraltar's Booster Boosters.
Responses to Vicky's post include -
William Mellin – Stop lying and tell people the truth of what is really happening and why you are pushing the experimental MRNA injection mantra, you are both in contravention of the Nuremberg code your hypocratic oaths and God knows how many other medical and human rights rules regulations and laws, rest assured that you and many others including the corrupt Government's around the world will be held accountable for all the crimes that are being committed against humanity.
Mark Byrne – William Mellin absolute rubbish conspiracy theory nonsense. Please go find another hobby and stop spreading your poisonous bull crap.
William Mellin – Mark Byrne do your own evidence based research and find out for yourself you brain dead muppet.
Mark Byrne – William Mellin I work in scientific research. For over 20 years I have been studying and working in it, and if you’d done the same, you probably wouldn’t have been brainwashed with all that “experimental vaccine Nuremberg” nonsense.
William Mellin – Mark Byrne well it certainly doesn't seem like you've learnt much in those 20 years, what a waste
Mark Byrne – William Mellin if nothing else, it taught me how to not be sucked into conspiracy theories and antivax lunacy. Think of it as a vaccine. A good education is the best immunisation against misinformation. Happy to show you why it is not “experimental” and why the Nuremberg code doesn’t apply here, if you’re open minded enough to change your opinion when presented with the evidence.
Are we in a pickle? Yes, I’m afraid some of us are. I recall that some time back the Gibraltar health authority was saying that if there were people with underlying health issues they would not be expected to have the Covid vaccine.
However, when it was someone's time to go for her second jab, she was attended to by a very nice young nurse who, on being asked by the patient if any of her underlying issues would be a problem, said 'no no, you’ll be alright.`
But the truth is that she was not alright.
After her second vaccine, all the pain she had been suffering from on previous years which had lain dormant of late, came back to haunt her like a vengeance; as if the vaccine had woken it up.
The comment was 'poor thing; she must be one of the unlucky ones.'
I asked GBC if they could pose a question to the CM to please explain vaccine liability, if a resident /member of the community had/has a severe adverse reaction or event to any of the vaccines offered In Gibraltar and results to being disabled or dies as a result of the vaccination, I asked what compensation scheme is the Government going to implement / make available to protect those people who suffer unexpected adverse events following vaccination as a result of vaccination.
I explained to GBC that The UK vaccine damage act does not apply to Gibraltar and it has been communicated to me by the Gibraltar authorities that there is no equivocal scheme available in Gibraltar as there is in the UK, as Gibraltar is not included in the UK legislation (Vaccine Damage Payment act / Scheme)... I asked for the CM to please make transparent the legislation that applies to these claims ?
I explained that as we follow the UK in the vaccination process and the guidance set in the MOU applies to Gibraltar, Gibraltar MUST follow all UK Government Guidance.
I asked if the CM could dive into this area and better inform the public as this area has not had any information that should already be available to the public of Gibraltar.
Included with the post was the video segment where Picardo addressed her questions.
I'm not sure how to post Vicky's video clip from FB, but one can access it on VWG FB - post link.
And while this clip below has the title that you'd expect it to be the one Vicky posted, it is not the same one. It is titled incorrectly:
The UK's liability against potential Covid vaccination damage extends to Gibraltar.
Most of this elderly people that have died with under line conditions should not be counted, they cannot live for ever our time has to come to an end at some point. My friend double japped and had a booster, now on a ventilator in the hospital for the last 8 days. People wake up, this vaccine is not helping
Those who have succumbed to the jab may go through a grieving process that was used to deal with death, but has a wider range for application. There are 5 stages to grieving: Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance. The stages are not rigid as in one at a time, nor inclusive and can help with understanding and processing the outcome of a genocide of Earth's inhabitants. What about Repentance?
Vicky Bula of Vaccine Awareness Gibraltar reminded us that a year ago, she'd contacted MHRA about Gibraltar Adverse Reactions.
Some highlights of what Bula wrote:
You will see below ZERO reports have been made to the MHRA.
My question to the Governemet of Gibraltar is: how do adverse reactions, damages or injury get recorded here in Gibraltar?
The data and the information lacks transparency...
The chief minister and the ministers responsible for the vaccination programs need to be clarifying these important issues so that we can all understand the risks and the safety procedures that need to be followed if these severe adverse reactions were to occur
The Gibraltar Governement need to be clear and need to be letting the people of Gibraltar know what the procedures are Incase any damages or injury are the result from this new vaccine .
Tie this into these government proceedings, also posted by Bula.
It was discussed in July 2021 in parliament that the GHA has been keeping a record of side effects caused by the Covid-19 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
It was reassuring to hear the minister for health say in parliament that “side effects from the administration of any vaccine are always recorded, this includes the administration of the Pfizer Vaccine administration”.
She continued with an explanation:
Minor side effects are recorded in patients electronic medical record.
Serious side effects are reported similarily as well as reported to the Yellow Card Scheme to regulatory authorities.
The minister made it abundantly clear that ....
“There is no intention to make this information public, as it is medical in confident information”, the Minister for Health, Samantha Sacramento..... told Parliament
“There is of course someone centralizing the information”...
The Minister told the house that a report would be made available on side effects once enough time has lapsed from the administration of the vaccine, to be able to run a proper analysis of the side effects...
Let's pull this statement out - There is of course someone centralizing the information. Who is this person, please? How does he/she receive the reports and what is the procedure for informing MHRA or those serious adverse reactions please? How the government has centralized reporting should be transparent, as its procedural and doesn't disclose information about individuals.
If the government ever planned to seriously and professionally keep track of adverse reactions to this experimental injection, it would have also taken as much care as it has in its constant promoting the vaccine programme to log these adverse reactions and inform the public. Was this care taken? Or was it always planned to keep those who have suffered serious adverse reactions cloaked so that government had "enough time to administer the vaccine before causing any alarm?"
And if they took "proper analysis of the side effects" seriously then all side effects would be accounted for - just like in all proper trials.
Sacramento said the government had no intention of making these reactions public. Her reason was confidentality. Seriously! The government has no problem reporting the age and sex of all the elderly who died after receiving the jab. There is a way of reporting these occurances without disclosing identity – which they proved. And a report of these types of statistics should have been on-going and disclosed, as part of the trials, and for proper informed consent.
The reporting of the adverse effects NEVER needed to be centralized. Anyone can report to Yellow Card – victims, doctors, etc.
Why has the government blocked informed consent. Why did it take the Public Health Gibraltar so long to link MHRA Yellow Card on its website?
Afterall the UK set it up prior to the start of its programme – Covid-19 campaign – The MHRA launched its public health campaign to inform those receiving Covid-19 vaccines about how to report a suspected side effect to the MHRA's Yellow Card scheme on this Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting website. The campaign aims to ensure those looking to report a Covid-19 vaccine side effect know where to go and what to do. Anyone can report to the Yellow Card scheme, whether for themselves or on someone else’s behalf.
And if this centralized method of reporting was occurring in Gibraltar, the information should be a no-brainer to disclose. Was this "someone" to centralize the information really set up to be a gatekeeper on what got reported the to the MHRA? In the government inquiry, will his or her performance be evaluated or the government's use of such a person?
Why the COVER-UP? Because that's what it looks like it is. If things were properly handled, then Gibraltarians should be given these statistics as a matter of informed consent.
Still the reporting of adverse reactions following covid vaccination, as well a other important issues relating to the vaccine has also not been addressed nor communicated to the public with issues such as liability, local data collection, monitoring, pharmacovigilance regulatory, memorandums of understandings and contracts, as well as many many other issues that still need to be communciated and published to the community so that we are properly informed >
How long are we going to have to wait for this information to be transparent to the public ???
The Medical Director has now confirmed that adverse reactions are being reported, although he says that for the amount of vaccines administered these are minimal, this is clear confimation that these adverse reactions do occur and have been confirmed. At this point the MD should have been following the guidelines they are distributing at the GHA and quoted section 4 of the Patient Information Leadlet (PIL) this would have properly educated the public into the possible side effects. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet.
He confirms that the reporting of adverse reactions are being reported and recorded as well as the collection of all data to all vaccine information for all participants to the Immunisation program.
HOW ARE THESE ADVERSE / SEVERE ADVERSE REACTIONS BEING REPORTED ?
This has become very clear to me and the people of Gibraltar via myself and the yellow card communications that reporting of adverse reactions are encouraged to be reported to the yellow card scheme and that all reports from Gibraltar are all to be recorded via the MHRA - Yellow Card Mailbox. A service that is clear is eligible to the citizens of Gibraltar.
Our Medical Director has made it clear that reactions do happen however he wants to sugar coat that the vaccines have nothing to do with most adverse and severe adverse reactions, he has highlighted the very topic I have been questioning for a long time.
This was the perfect opportunity for our Medical Director to mention what the MHRA do, what their service provides to Gibraltar and what the MHRA can do to ensure medicine and vaccine safety for Gibraltar. This would include information on the method of reporting of adverse reactions. This would have been an opportunity to allow the people of Gibraltar to understand and be prepared for the possibility of any reactions but to truly educate the public so that they understand the risks and the safety information and Introduce the MHRA with their support if a person were ever to require the service .....
Although the Medical Director says they are keeping a report, are these reports in fact being sent to the Yellow Card Service to help better monitor the safety of medicine and vaccines in Gibraltar?
If not, how is this method of reporting being managed in Gibraltar ?
Most vaccine adverse events are mild so the MD says but what he doesn’t communicate is that serious injuries and deaths have and do occur from vaccines and this needs to be monitored and managed correctly, in my view clear direction and management into this area needs great clarification as far as my views are concerned.
This clip can now confirm that adverse reactions have been confirmed, reported ... now it’s time the GoG and the GHA to communicate and publish all of the correct information on the concerns into the reporting of adverse and severe adverse reactions to medicine and vaccines in Gibraltar.
Interesting that Rawal said in the video that a few have fainted post jabbed; and his reasoning being it is a reaction to pain or fear of needles, but not the vaccine.
To listen to him make light of the reactions, you'll have to click on VAG FB page at this link).
Over 100 vulnerable patients in Gibraltar have received a fourth dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, the Gibraltar Government said on Thursday.
The fourth dose is being offered to people whose immune systems may be compromised due to other medical issues, for example cancer treatments.
A total of 118 people in this category have received a fourth dose.
“A small group of immunocompromised patients who had previously received a third primary dose of the vaccine have now been given a fourth dose as a booster,” a spokesman for No.6 Convent Place said.
The data was included in the latest Covid-19 update from the Gibraltar Government, which also indicated that while there is little let-up in the daily number of new cases detected, there is no change in hospitalisation levels which remain low.
The Gibraltar Government has stated on numerous occasions that the low number of hospitalised cases indicates that the vaccines are working to stave off the worst effects of the virus, allowing people to recover at home.
On Thursday, another 151 cases of the virus were detected in Gibraltar, bringing the total number of active cases to 1291 in the community.
There were just two people on the Covid-19 ward in St Bernard’s Hospital, however, and none in the critical care unit.
To date, some 29,142 people have received a third booster shot.
O'Cadhla said, "We have seen correspondence where Pfizer has usually written to every medical practitioner in Ireland, advising them to report the adverse drug reactions, but if needs be they say, to report them directly to them. In other words (they don't need the central reporting system) they go directly to the drug company... This is a very serious development."
Video in link: 9 To 11 Vax Injuries Come Into ER At Just One Hospital In Cork, Ireland Every Day
U.S. and UK Secretly Agreed to Hide Vaccine Reactions
In the days leading up to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, U.S. and U.K. health officials entered into a “mutual confidentiality agreement” to keep vaccine adverse events under wraps.
U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID-19 shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic.
The news was revealed in 57 pages of heavily redacted U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit.
A government email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy
Regulatory filings show Pfizer knew of its shots’ waning effectiveness in April 2021 but didn’t publicly acknowledge it until late July 2021.
Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles, but the trial reported it was “completed with no safety concerns.”
In the days leading up to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 shot, an agreement was made to keep serious adverse reactions under wraps.
U.S. and U.K. health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to COVID-19 shots and emphasized their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic.
The news was revealed by Judicial Watch, which obtained 57 pages of heavily redacted HHS records via a FOIA lawsuit.
Initially, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request in August 2021 that specifically asked for:
“All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events, deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19 currently produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.”
The request was ignored, prompting the lawsuit that ultimately revealed the confidentiality agreement between U.S. and U.K. regulators.
“Why are we engaged in a secret deal to keep secret information about adverse events related to the vaccines?” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton asked. “I just think it’s troubling. The documents speak for themselves.”
U.S. and UK officials make pact to keep safety issues quiet
The pact was revealed in a series of email exchanges from December 2020. Initiated by Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and sent to FDA commissioner Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
“As background, Mogford includes information on ‘two cases of anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of allergic reactions.’
“Marks replies to Mogford: ‘It would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement.’
“Mogford later replies: ‘Attached are [redacted] hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind — information shared under our confidentiality agreement.’”
An email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering COVID-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy.
“The CDC’s [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] Dr. Amanda Cohn emailed Office of Vaccines Research and Review Director Marion Gruber and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks with the subject line ‘Coadministration of COVID-19 Vaccines with Other Vaccines During Pregnancy.’
“Gruber writes: ‘I am fine with this language.’
“Marks then responds to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi: ‘I can live with this too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know. Thanks.’
“Cohn replies: ‘We have a meeting with Rochelle [presumably CDC Director [Rochelle Walensky]
“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines that the public has every right to know,” Fitton said in a news release.
“This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.”
“It’s clear from the documents that these analyses were almost 4 months old by the time they became public,” Peter Doshi, associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, told Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia.
“It’s disappointing that neither Pfizer nor regulators, disclosed these data until it was too obvious to ignore new outbreaks in Israel and Massachusetts, which made it clear that vaccine performance was not holding up,” he said.
Even Pfizer’s six-month phase III trial data, released April 1, 2021, stayed silent on the shots’ waning efficacy.
And, at that time, health officials were still claiming that the shot would stop COVID-19 transmission. In May 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci stated “When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health … you become a dead end to the virus.”
As Doshi explained:
“Publicly disclosing that efficacy waned so soon after authorization might have undermined the credibility of authorities, who’d been projecting great confidence about the vaccines’ ability to end the pandemic.”
But instead of transparency and supporting informed consent so Americans could make their own choice about the shots with all the data, Demasi reported:
“Within weeks of Pfizer publishing its data on waning efficacy, President Biden ordered all federal workers (and employees of contractors) to get vaccinated within 75 days, otherwise they’d face punishment or have their employment terminated.”
Shots’ effects on brain known since 2020
mRNA COVID-19 shots teach your cells to produce a protein, or piece of protein, that triggers an immune response, including the production of antibodies.
However, because natural mRNA is easily broken down, this means the experimental gene therapy needs a special delivery system to make it to the body’s cells.
The shots use lipid nanoparticles that contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) for this purpose. The mRNA is wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that carry it to your cells, and the LNPs are “PEGylated” — that is, chemically attached to PEG molecules to increase stability.
Usually, if you were to inject RNA into your body, enzymes would immediately break it apart, but the COVID-19 shots are specifically designed so that doesn’t happen. While it was originally advertised that COVID-19 shots “stay in the arm,” Pfizer knew since at least November 2020 that the shots may influence the brain.
Pfizer contracted Acuitas Therapeutics to conduct animal studies, which found LNPs from COVID-19 shots rapidly traveled to other areas, including the brain, eyes, heart, ovaries and other organs.
“Now that we have LNPs with their mRNA payload delivered past the BBB and into the brain, what do they do once they arrive to the fluid surrounding neurons? The rest is an easy journey for LNPs. Neurons take up LNPs — and they do so very efficiently, at 100 percent uptake, by means of apolipoprotein E, and usually without immune reaction at that point.
“Apolipoprotein E is abundant in the brain — it is produced by astrocytes. The mechanism of uptake is endocytosis, in which the membrane of the neuron engulfs or swallows the approaching LNP. That has been observed since at least 2013. In this way, the Trojan Horse content of the LNP is delivered, because it was contained in a benign-seeming — to the neuronal membrane — package.”
As for one mechanism of brain injury, Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, believes genetic modifications introduced by COVID-19 shots may induce immune cells to release large quantities of exosomes into circulation.
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that contain protein, DNA, RNA and other constituents, and may contain mRNA along with spike protein.
“We present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.
“We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.
“We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage.”
COVID shots melting muscles
Preclinical studies for Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots also warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles. Writing in DailyClout, Dr. Robert Chandler reported:
“The Pfizer documents contain results from a 17-day study of repeat dose injections of BNT162b2 [Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot] in Wistar Han rats. Myonecrosis and inflammation were identified histopathologically. The appearance was described as ‘Jellied’ (Table 3), which is what rhabdomyolysis might look like after 17 days.”
Despite this and other concerning findings, including fibrosis, inflammation and myofiber degeneration present at the injection site, Chandler explains:
“How was this data presented at the December 10, 2020, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting regarding the Emergency Use Authorization for BNT162b2? … Completed with no safety concerns.”
A review of data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) also revealed a dramatic increase in reports of rhabdomyolysis following the rollout of COVID-19 shots.
In fact, Chandler reveals:
“79% of all reported rhabdomyolysis cases occurred in the two complete years (2021 and 2022) after the EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] was approved in December of 2020 …
“A dramatic, 37-fold increase in the annual rate of cases of rhabdomyolysis occurred after mass inoculation with Spike Producing Genetic Therapy Products began in December 2020.
“COVID-19 (2020) did not cause an increase in rhabdomyolysis reporting in VAERS compared with years 2001-2020.”
A number of case reports have since been published of “COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-induced rhabdomyolysis,” including in a 16-year-old male two days after his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot and a 21-year-old male one day after his first COVID-19 shot.
The findings that Pfizer and government officials were aware of serious adverse events and waning effectiveness of COVID-19 shots but neglected to share this with the public will only further undermine trust in public health authorities.
As Martin Kulldorff — co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which scientifically critiqued the effects of prolonged lockdowns in response to COVID-19 — told Demasi:
“In public health, it is important to be honest with the public. Pfizer should have reported the declining vaccine efficacy in its April 1, 2021, press release, which they clearly knew about at the time.”
Likewise with the numerous reports of adverse events linked to the shots, which have now been linked to an explosion of excess deaths.