Urgent! Stop FDA Approval of Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years

Depopulation & WW3
, , , ,
1

Pfizer wants its disastrous mRNA shot added to the official schedule for children so that the vaccine maker can have liability protection forever.

This is a plea to stop the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The clinical trial failed in this age group. We have 14 days to stop the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from committing a crime against humanity.

Pfizer wants its disastrous mRNA shot added to the official schedule for children so that the vaccine maker can have liability protection forever.

The Pfizer mRNA shot in children 2 to 4 years old failed in the clinical trial.

Feb. 1, Pfizer submitted an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application for children 6 months to 4 years old.

Pfizer and the FDA are proposing to start with two shots in this age group even though that approach has already failed and then they will add a third dose later in the spring if data comes in that supports that use.

The plan is literally — shoot up kids first, get the data later.

This approach is completely unprecedented in the history of the FDA and it must be stopped.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in two weeks — on Feb. 15 — to evaluate this EUA application for a product that failed the clinical trial.

That’s what we are up against -

Urgent! Stop FDA Approval of Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years

The clinical trial failed in this age group. We have 14 days to stop the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from committing a crime against humanity.

By Toby Rogers, Ph.D.

This announcement came out Jan. 31 and it is so horrifying. It took me several minutes to come to grips with what is happening. I know the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is evil but this takes things to another level.

Pfizer wants its disastrous mRNA shot added to the official schedule for children so that the vaccine maker can have liability protection forever.

The Pfizer mRNA shot in children 2 to 4 years old failed in the clinical trial. But, acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock, likely following orders from the Biden administration, asked Pfizer to submit an application anyway.

So on Feb. 1, Pfizer submitted an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application for children 6 months to 4 years old.

Pfizer and the FDA are proposing to start with two shots in this age group even though that approach has already failed and then they will add a third dose later in the spring if data comes in that supports that use.

The plan is literally — shoot up kids first, get the data later.

This approach is completely unprecedented in the history of the FDA and it must be stopped.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) will meet in two weeks — on Feb. 15 — to evaluate this EUA application for a product that failed the clinical trial.

That’s what we are up against.

So warriors, you know what to do. I need you to get on the phone, get your fax machines humming, and start sending out emails like the future of this country depends on it — because it does.

Physical paper letters sent in the next couple days via the U.S. Postal Service will probably get there in time, too.

In October we generated tens of thousands of calls, emails, and faxes. Our goal in the next two weeks must be to generate hundreds of thousands of calls, emails, faxes, and letters.

The message we need to send to these bureaucrats is — ABSOLUTELY NOT! Every single person who plays a role in this decision needs to get the message that:

  1. We are watching.
  2. The clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine failed in this age group.
  3. You must vote NO because this proposed use violates the prohibitions against illegal medical experiments as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.

Anyone who goes along with Woodcock’s bullying on behalf of the cartel will be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.

It’s hard to know exactly who will be at the FDA’s VRBPAC meeting because the FDA uses Temporary Voting Members and the VRBPAC has not met since we exposed them as frauds back in October (when they rubber stamped Pfizer’s EUA application for kids 5 to 11 — in spite of no data showing clinical effectiveness).

But the best guess is that the voting members will be roughly the same as the last meeting so that is who we are reaching out to now.

Please contact the 23 people listed in the article by before Feb. 15. Please be respectful and courteous.

This is why they have to vaccinate children – Liability Protection

4 Likes
2

This must be why T.H.E.Y want "mass testing" of children – so that they can create a "Lateral Flow Test Pandemic" and justify the measures to vaccinate them - and get that liability protection.

See more -

3 Likes
3

Please see the cover up from the testimony of Doctor to the FDA for EUA on children as young as 5.

The new document warns medical staff, but not the general public, to bear in mind that, according to the May document, following administration of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, there is “an increased risk of the development of inflammation of the heart muscle [myocarditis]”.

Problematic testimony by Israel’s head of Public Health Services

In a discussion before the Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on September 17, 2021, several months after her Health Ministry's warning of increased risk of myocarditis after the Pfizer shots, and after most of the 162 cases of post-vaccination myocarditis were discovered, Dr. Elroy-Preis reported that Israel’s vaccine campaign led to just one case of myocarditis after three million people received a third (booster) dose. Elroy-Preis apparently failed to mention the more than 100 confirmed cases that followed the first

Prior doubts about Elroy-Preis’s reliability

Elroy-Preis’s claims are all the more concerning considering that the FDA committee before which she testified was convened specifically to consider Pfizer-BioNTech’s request to amend the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for its vaccine to include children aged 5 to 11.

2 Likes
4

Protect the Kids: Demand the FDA Vote No on EUA for 6 month olds up to 5 years!

Watch this important video on what’s at stake and how you can get involved.

On February 15, the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) is scheduled to meet to deliberate granting Emergency Use Authorization to Pfizer’s BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for babies aged six-months and children up to five years old despite the lack of safety and efficacy to support its use.

If the committee grants the EUA to Pfizer for this age group, nearly 20 million American infants and preschool-aged children could be at risk of vaccine injury based on the indicators we’re seeing in the published medical literature.

Please listen to the critical message in this video from Mary Holland, President and General Counsel of Children’s Health Defense, who explains why we need to speak up now to protect our children.

There is no COVID emergency for children under five years old. Children have a 99.995% recovery rate from COVID and healthy children are not dying from COVID. Not only is this injection medically unnecessary for this younger age group, but there are clear signals coming from U.S. government sources that the risk to human health is real, and that adverse events to human health is real, and that adverse events to this vaccine are not rare.

Take Action: Four Ways to Get Involved

image
image1500Ă—1500 147 KB

5

FDA Postpones Meeting on COVID Shots for Kids Under 5 After Pfizer Says Not Enough Data. But Don’t Let Up

Citing insufficient data, Pfizer today said it will delay applying for Emergency Use Authorization of its COVID vaccine for infants and children 6 months to 4 years old.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-postpones-meeting-covid-shots-kids-pfizer/

6

Did Recent Court Rulings Force the FDA to Delay Approving Pfizer’s COVID Shots for Infants?

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Operation Warp Speed has hit its first bump in the road.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced yesterday that it was delaying approval of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines for young children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years old.

Since up until this point the FDA has illegally approved all other Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccines” by simply rubber-stamping Pfizer’s own data which is hidden from the public, the question that begs to be answered is, why?

Pfizer has worked hard to hide the clinical data from their trials from the public, but recent court rulings have not exactly gone their way. The FDA had originally asked the court to delay releasing their clinical data for 75 years, but then agreed to provide 500 pages per month.

In late January, Attorney Aaron Siri reported that a federal judge shot down the FDA’s requested rate of 500 pages per month and instead ordered the FDA to produce at the rate of 55,000 pages per month starting on March 1. Siri also reported that Pfizer was joining the FDA in the case. And why not, since the FDA basically works for Pfizer?

2 Likes
7

From ICAN:

The Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) was scheduled to meet on February 15, 2022 to consider Pfizer’s application to amend its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for its COVID-19 vaccine to include use in children between 6 months and 4 years old.

As we shared already, that meeting was canceled two business days prior to the meeting. In advance of that meeting, ICAN, through its attorneys, wrote a letter to VRBPAC’s Members urging them to not vote in favor of recommending this vaccine.

Because VRBPAC will likely not meet to address this issue until April, VRBPAC has no excuse to do anything other than seriously consider ICAN’s letter and the important information it puts forth.

ICAN’s letter noted that, first and foremost, there is no emergency as it relates to COVID-19 in children between 6 months and 4 yrs old.

As of January 19, 2022, the rate of hospitalization in children under 4 years old was reported to be just 6 per 100,000. But even that low rate is likely inflated, as CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky and NIAID Director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, have both admitted.

Moreover, numerous studies show that healthy children simply do not die from COVID-19. In fact, as ICAN pointed out, a recent study from researchers at Johns Hopkins studied 48,000 children diagnosed with COVID-19 and found a mortality rate of zero among those without a pre-existing medical condition.

The letter to VRBPAC also goes into the serious efficacy and safety issues with this vaccine and you can read the entire letter http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/59671307:soJMsfHXN:m:1:2386568050:75E4081F66E68F5E859BE08012C6EF9C:r

ICAN will continue to lobby against the authorization of these dangerous and ineffective vaccines in the very youngest and most vulnerable of us, and we will keep you updated along the way.

Please consider sending an email to the FDA before this meeting is rescheduled to share your opinion on whether or not this EUA should be granted. You can email VRBPAC at [email protected].

Also consider sharing this critical legal update using this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/ican-demands-vrbpac-decline-to-authorize-pfizer-vaccine-for-babies/

Thank you for your continued support of ICAN and TheHighWire. Your contributions help us fight and win. Donate today to support our legal efforts here.

8

Moderns is now seeking "approval" from the FDA, (Fraudster's & Deadly Annihilator's) to jab the youngest children, with their murderous brew.

Stéphane Bancel CEO, and thug of MODERNA wants to vax children 6 months to under 6 years of age.

**https://vaccineimpact.com/2022/moderna-seeks-approval-from-fda-and-european-medicines-agency-ema-to-start-injecting-children-under-6-with-mrna-covid-19-vaccines/**

Once again you can make phone calls and send messages to those who are voting to inflict pain on the innocent children, such as Paul Off it:
Who is Paul Off it?
And the rest of the lot...

KARMA hasn't forgotten you...

She's just having her coffee and sharpening her nails...

You will experience her.

image
image768Ă—960 64.8 KB

1 Like
9

image

The FDA repeatedly asserts the importance of tracking Covid infections in the workplace, schools, etc., authorizing hundreds of tests and even claiming that “testing remains a cornerstone of the national response to the pandemic and plays a central role in helping Americans get back to work, school and other important activities …”

But it does not appear the FDA follows its own advice in getting its employees back to work. In February 2022, ICAN, through its attorneys, demanded that the FDA produce documents showing how many FDA employees had COVID-19 in June, July, and August 2021. The FDA’s response? Here it is in the FDA’s exact words: “FDA does not collect this information and therefore we have no responsive records.”

So, while companies are often required to track positive Covid-19 cases, the FDA itself is apparently not doing so?!

10

(1:32)

2 Likes
11

Pfizer docs released (and interpreted)...

NAOMI WOLF- PFIZER LATEST DOCUMENTS

Link below contains the documents described in the video: