By Nina Massey, PA Science Correspondent
The UK has approved the Pfizer/BioNTech coronavirus vaccine for use in children aged 12 to 15.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) authorised the use of the jab in the younger age group on Friday following a review of its safety, quality and effectiveness.
The Pfizer Covid-19 jab was the first to be authorised for use in the UK at the end of last year.
Dr June Raine, MHRA chief executive, said: “We have carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits of this vaccine outweigh any risk.
“We have in place a comprehensive safety surveillance strategy for monitoring the safety of all UK-approved Covid-19 vaccines and this surveillance will include the 12- to 15-year age group.
“No extension to an authorisation would be approved unless the expected standards of safety, quality and effectiveness have been met.
“It will now be for the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) to advise on whether this age group will be vaccinated as part of the deployment programme.”
A Department of Health spokeswoman said: “The government has asked the independent experts at the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) to advise whether routine vaccination should be offered to younger people aged 12 to 17.
“We will be guided by the expert advisors and will update in due course.”
Why would there be a push to vaccinate 6-month-old babies or 10-year-old children via an experimental vaccine that delivers genetic code into your cells instructing it to produce a portion of the virus (the ‘S’ or Spike protein), yet with no safety data and based on trials that didn’t run to the required duration to adequately assess the safety of the vaccine?
Why put our children at undue risk when they can be allowed to be infected naturally and harmlessly as part of day-to-day living, by mingling?
This is illogical, irrational, unsound, and, we argue, an absurd position of experts who should know better.
“It was the middle of the night,” Franks told local media about when he first started to develop severe adverse effects from the injection. “I was walking upstairs from the basement when I got a sudden constricting feeling in my chest.”
Franks’ parents immediately rushed their son to the hospital where it was determined that he had serious inflammation around his heart. Doctors refused to link the condition to the injection, but Franks’ parents have come to that conclusion all on their own.
“That’s when things became eye-opening for us because it became much more serious very, very fast,” Karen Franks stated.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is supposedly looking into the matter to determine whether or not the “Operation Warp Speed” injection is linked to the boy’s serious health condition.
You can watch a news segment about the incident below:
## Young boys, men most damaged by Pfizer’s mRNA injection
Matthew 24:19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
24:20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the Winter, neither on the Sabbath day:
24:21 For then shall be great oppression, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the Elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
COVID-19 child vaccination: irresponsible, unethical and unnecessary
It is shocking that as of Friday 6 June the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the use of the Pfizer vaccine in children aged 12 to 15 years old.
The MHRA apparently carried out a “rigorous review” and found that “safety, quality and effectiveness have been met”. Quite how they can be satisfied that the required safety standards have been met is unclear when this product is still at the research stage with only limited short-term safety data available and nothing yet known about any medium or long-term side effects.
The child clinical trials will continue to be monitored for long term protection and safety two years after vaccination. If serious, long-term health impacts emerge, it will be too late for those who are vaccinated now, who will have to live with the consequences. Already there seems to be a signal in the data from Israel revealing myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) described by the Israeli health authority as 1 in 44,000 16-30 year-olds, but with higher incidence in the youngest groups. This is not responsible medicine and is a reckless approach to children‘s health.
During an FDA meeting Thursday to discuss granting Emergency Use Authorization for COVID vaccines for children under 12, several experts spoke out against the plan, saying the benefits don’t outweigh the risks for young children.
French ethics committee advises against rush to vaccinate teenagers
June 11, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) -- One week after the French government announced that youth between ages 12 and 18 will be able to receive the experimental COVID vaccines starting June 15, the National Ethics Advisory Board (CCNE) published an answer to a question submitted by the Ministry of Health regarding the ethics of giving the jab to minors, stating in an official notice published Wednesday that the CCNE “regretted” that the decision to vaccinate adolescents had “been made so quickly” without waiting for its opinion.
The 19-page notice poses many questions regarding the benefits, or absence thereof, of the “vaccine” for young people and also underscores the imperfect knowledge both of the disease the jab is supposed to protect against and of its effects on young people because the phase III testing of the experimental vaccines is incomplete, and particularly so regarding teenagers.
Hodkinson - This of course is an experimental vaccine. It should have never been released. It was never an emergency which predicated the development of the vaccine. As with all vaccines there are complications, which were predicable with time. But there was never enough time given for the clinical trial.
In particular, complications are now coming out that are very disturbing. The latest one in the last few days, starting off in Israel is the frequency of myocarditis in young adult males and getting worse the younger they are in teenagers.
Myocarditis is a medical term for inflammation of the heart.
Now, the CDC is calling this reality of a large number of these events (with over 200 events in the US recorded).
The CDC is calling this an "unbalanced" realization. It's the CDC that's unbalanced.
Myocarditis is Never Mild
as they are describing it for the general public, many not terribly significant.
The heart muscles – the cells that make up the heart muscles NEVER regenerate. If one dies, they are done.
What will the plausible deniability be when children die? Will it be similar to their lies about elderly deaths? Or will it be adverse effects from the vaccines disguised as a "new variant"?
Isn't it odd how when confronted with truth, whether it's police staff or hospital staff – they are very hands off; confrontational and hard-headed?
In other news:
UK Medical Freedom Alliance Demand Devi Sridhar to Make Public Apology For Misleading Claims About Covid-19 Vaccine Safety for Children
You state the benefit of the vaccine for children would be that they then “don’t need to worry about Covid-19”. Children are already in a position where they do not have to worry about Covid-19, as the risk to them is close to zero.
You state that another benefit would be that they then are likely to not infect their parents. Children do not play a major role in transmission, and there is also no evidence from the regulatory trials that the vaccines prevent transmission. This is clearly a statement intended to provoke an emotional response of guilt followed by a sense of duty, and as such it is propaganda rather than factual advice.
You state that the main downside of getting the vaccine is that it is “another injection into your arm”. This is a gross misrepresentation of the known and unknown risks of potential serious adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccines for children...
Life-threatening effects and deaths have been reported in young adults and children in the US and Israel, which you do not refer to at all.
Exclusive: Dad Says Life ‘Not the Same’ for 21-Year-Old Student Who Developed Myocarditis After Second Moderna Shot
A New Jersey student whose college, the New Jersey Institute of Technology, requires all students to be fully vaccinated in order to attend classes in the fall became ill within hours of receiving the second dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine.
A 21-year-old New Jersey student suffered severe heart inflammation after receiving his second dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine. Justin Harrington, whose school required him to get the vaccine in order to attend classes in the fall, experienced flu-like symptoms followed by heart pain within eight to 12 hours of receiving the vaccine.
In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Justin’s father, Timothy Harrington, said his son felt different after the second shot. “Every time his heart beat it hurt and he felt pressure,” Harrington said. “Then he developed heart pain down both arms.”
Harrington said his son, who has no underlying medical conditions, did not experience heart pain with his first dose of the vaccine.
On May 24, two days after Justin received the second shot, his father took him to the emergency room at Morristown Memorial Hospital because the symptoms had worsened.
“The physicians weren’t connecting it to the vaccine until I informed the doctors my son just got the vaccine, and shared with them the information I had found on myocarditis,” Harrington said. “I didn’t think the doctors were stupid, but physicians sometimes see with blinders on.”
Physicians checked Justin’s blood levels, which showed high protein numbers. Abnormal scans, including an EKG, led to a diagnosis of myocarditis. Justin was hospitalized for three days while doctors attempted to get the condition under control.
Harrington said even though his son has been released, he still has chest pain and his life is not the same.
“He has to wear a heart monitor and take four different medications for six months,” Harrington said. “He has to sleep propped up, can’t exert himself and he’s missing out on one of the most important times of his life.”
Harrington said his son is supposed to be doing internships, “but how can he go out and find a company to work with him when he can’t exert himself? He’s so smart and now he’s side-lined. Doctors want my son to lie around for three to four months.”
As for Justin’s recovery, Harrington said, “He has minor scarring on his heart and doctors hope they caught it early enough that there will be no other issues — but it’s pure conjecture at this point.”
School’s mandate doesn’t allow exceptions for students who already had COVID
After Justin’s diagnosis, doctors recommended Harrington’s 19-year-old son, who received one dose of the Moderna vaccine, not get the second shot.
However, both sons were told they needed to get vaccinated in order to attend school — despite both previously having had COVID, Harrington said.
“Justin’s a rule follower and he was pressured to get it,” Harrington said.
Harrington said when he called the dean of NJIT prior to his son getting vaccinated and asked why the school is forcing young people who are at little risk of serious illness from COVID to get the vaccine, the dean replied that unless his son had a valid medical or religious exemption, it was a requirement.
“I am not ‘anti-vax,’” Harrington said. “I am ‘anti-forced-vaxxed.’ They’re forcing these kids to get a vaccine even though they’re not affected by COVID or have already had it.”
According to Justin, he reported his myocarditis to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), but no one from the agency followed up.
Justin said he would “absolutely not” recommend anyone get vaccinated, as he does not want this to happen to any of his friends. “I’m not here to bash Moderna, but I wouldn’t take it,” he said.
Harrington said he also knows of a girl who had to have a heart transplant after being vaccinated and believes his son’s condition could have been even more severe if he hadn’t reached him in time.
According to WLWT 5 News, 19-year-old Simone Scott underwent a heart transplant one month after suffering a heart complication from her second dose of Moderna and subsequently passed away.
Jacob Clynick: 13-year-old Michigan boy develops myocarditis, dead three days after second experimental Pfizer mRNA shot
ZILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN — A 13-year-old boy who loved Pokémon and playing video games is dead in yet another tragic, unnecessary death.
Young Jacob Clynick received his first experimental Pfizer mRNA injection on May 23. He received the second injection on June 13. His aunt, Tami Burages, posted a photo of Jacob’s vaccine card on Twitter. Jacob died just three days after the second injection.
Evidence the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing Children
Authorities in the United Kingdom are currently pondering whether or not to recommend the Covid-19 vaccines are given to children between the ages of 12 and 15. The MHRA has already deemed them to be safe for children and now it is in the hands of the JCVI to put forward their recommendation to the UK government, who are desperate to ensure every man, woman, and child has the Covid-19 jab.
UK Government Plans To Offer Covid-19 Vaccines To Children In Summer
The UK government is planning to offer Covid-19 vaccines to children over the age of 12 by this summer, according to Matt Hancock.
The health secretary made the announcement after the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the Pfizer vaccine for 12 to 15-year-olds earlier this month.
Matt Hancock said that he would take guidance from the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) regarding the decision to determine how and when to rollout vaccines for children.
Corruption, Deception, Genocide – The legacy of Matt Hancock
The actions of Matt Hancock throughout this entire alleged pandemic grow more sinister by the day.
The Health Secretary has knowingly suppressed the use of Ivermectin to treat the alleged Covid-19 disease in favour of instead giving an experimental, gene therapy to every man, woman, and most likely children if he gets his way, throughout the country.
An 18-year-old from Springdale, Arkansas, who had a heart attack after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine said he’d rather get COVID than have a heart attack.
In an interview with The Defender, Isaiah Harris said he received his first dose of Pfizer on April 8 and second dose on April 30. Within 12 hours of the second dose, the teen developed a fever and chills. His father, Justin Harris, initially didn’t think much about it because he got sick after both doses of the Moderna vaccine, although his symptoms weren’t serious.
That wasn’t the case for Isaiah. Within 48 hours of the second dose, Isaiah’s heart started hurting “very very bad” and things started going downhill fast. Harris said they grew really concerned when their son started having trouble breathing.
WHO Issues Critical Guidance Urging Children and Adolescents to Stop Getting Vaccinated Against Covid-19
The Backtrack -
BREAKING UPDATE, Sunday, June 27th: not only did WHO rescind a guidance that children should not get motivated based on political considerations, Biden, Fauci and the establishment writ large are now weaponizing the “delta variant” to stoke fears and manufacture “vaccine” consent.
Update: June 22nd, this article has been revised as of 8:05 PM EST after the World Health Organization literally sanitized their website to erase any mention of a guidance that they issued on June 3rd (this is WHO’s archived page that contains the version they deleted) concerning the “vaccination” of children and adolescents for Covid-19. Up until an hour ago, WHO’s position was that children should not get “vaccinated” because, in their words, “there is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19”.*
12-15 year olds in Gibraltar will be offered the COVID-19 vaccine once this has been approved by the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.
Last month, the UK regulator MHRA approved the Pfizer jab for use on this demographic. The UK’s vaccine committee now needs to take a decision, but is yet to so.
On the Rock, the Government has confirmed it will follow suit, if the UK committee approves it.
Though there is not enough vaccine stock in Gibraltar to cater for the vaccination of 12-15 year olds, the Government has told GBC that the UK will supply the Rock with additional Pfzer vaccines, if approved by its vaccination committee.
At present, the UK is only offering jabs to 12-15 year olds with severe neuro-disabilities.
In Europe however, the rollout to 12 year-old's and over has begun, with 20 European countries, including Spain and France signing up to administer the vaccine to those in this age bracket. Further afield, the US has already given a first dose of the Pfizer to 30% of its 12-15 year old citizens. However, some are hesitant, Portugal, for example, has not given the shot vaccine to any youngsters.
Outbreaks of the virus have increased in educational settings in the UK over the last week. Here on the Rock, of the ten cases identified this week, two of them were in the 10-15 year old age range.
A decision from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation is expected imminently, however until then, no date can be set for the vaccine to be offered to this age group in Gibraltar.
Of course, Gibraltar marches to the drum of another. Are there any independent thinkers within the whole of the government body or health authority willing to make a stand for the children? Read this thread (see all the above posts) - jabbing children is completely unnecessary (and insane) unless one has an alternative motive – like keeping in Lockstep with the evil global totalitarian plan and depopulation – and of course Satanic Child Sacrifice:
The practice of child sacrifice has persisted throughout history and conjures up images of screaming children being wrenched from their wailing parents’ arms by tribal henchmen to be sacrificed to the gods. However, historical records indicate that parents were very often willing participants in the ritual, and offered their children to the state without coercion.
Fast forward to 2021 and we are on the verge of possibly the largest mass child sacrifice event in human history. Millions of parents around the world will offer their children up to the state to be injected with a rushed, experimental vaccine that has not been tested for long-term effects on health. In return for this game of Russian roulette with their children’s health, parents will hope to receive in return some of the same psychological and social benefits that Maya parents received. What other reason could parents have for offering their children up to receive their “shot”?
Read more on the article published on The Irish Sentinel.
Apparently not, unfortunately, as THEY are too busy hanging up rainbow flags everywhere, instead of researching into the damaging effects of the jab and possibly more so for the younger generation.
2nd July 2021
The Minister for Equality, Samantha Sacramento, has spoken of her disappointment to see how a minority in the local community expressed anger towards the initiatives that were put into place to mark Pride Month on the Rock.
In response to the criticism, Ms Sacramento said that more awareness, education and work was needed to encourage greater acceptance of all members of the community.
“I find it incredible that people felt so strongly and were so offended,” she said.
“This demonstrated to us the need to have this trigger and this conversation.”
“It tells us that we have to reach out further and continue our education.”
Ms Sacramento also called for more respect towards people and their fundamental rights.
“In Gibraltar, everyone’s a Gibraltarian and everyone has rights and we have to be respectful of people’s rights.”
She added that the negative responses motivate her to work even harder towards inclusion for all.
Ms Sacramento told the Chronicle that talking is key in educating and creating awareness.
“That’s important, the fact that people are asking questions is part of the process, because this has to be a conversation, and education and awareness is about getting people talking,” she said.
In an attempt to continue creating awareness throughout the community, the pelican crossings displaying LGBTQ+ symbols have been continued for the foreseeable future.
An online survey for members of the LGBTQ+ community was also recently announced.
Ms Sacramento encouraged people to participate and voice their opinions and concerns.
“I want to hear from them, what their experiences are like, where they are throughout the different services that we provide, I want them to tell me what more I can do”, she said.
Ms Sacramento added that the support for Pride Month by most of the community was encouraging and that the Government continued to work towards creating awareness, building on a foundation of important legislative change over recent years.
“I am happy that Pride has been welcomed and embraced, the symbolism is very positive,” she said.
“I think this year really symbolises the journey we have been on and there has been so much work done that we forget it, but it’s all been the foundation blocks to have us where we are today”
“I think that this year it has been abundantly clear that, as a government, we are supportive of LGBTQ+ rights”, she added.
Nevertheless good to see there is at least some resistance to this promotion of clearly not gay people.
"Gay-homosexual - denotes someone who is unhappy with their gender and wants to pretend to be the opposite gender or to have a relationship with someone of the same gender because they are not happy with normality, so gay, which really means happy, is the opposite of its definition."