Creepy Joe strikes again! Biden sneaks up behind girl, grabs her shoulders and tells her 'no serious guys until you're 30' - as the uncomfortable teen tries to laugh it off
- President Joe Biden was speaking at a community college in California on Friday when he was seen grabbing a girl by the shoulder as he gave dating advice
- After posing for a photo, he told the girl to not have serious boyfriends until 30
- The girl appeared disturbed at both the comment and actions but laughed it off
- Biden has a history of making eyebrow-raising remarks about girls and women
- He has been photographed kissing girls on the head and seemingly sniffing hair
- In 2019, Biden released a statement saying he 'does not believe' he ever acted inappropriately
- He added it has never been his intention to make anyone uncomfortable
Biden stood to take a photograph with the girl. As he did so, he appeared to sniff the girl's hair before imparting the 'fatherly' relationship advice.
America Last: Biden Regime to Send Another $725 Million in Weapons to Ukraine
Joe Biden has sent more than $85 billion of US taxpayer money to Ukraine this year.
After Billions Stolen From Americans & Sent To Ukraine, NATO Initiates 10-Year Plan To Rebuild Ukraine’s Nazi Military & Defense Industry
Nowhere in the US Constitution was it authorized to steal billions of the People’s money and send it to foreign countries, especially with those who are Nazis. Yet, we have seen for years how that has been done in the transfer of wealth from the US to Ukraine and it’s in the billions! Now, we are seeing how NATO has set forth a 10-year plan to rebuild Ukraine’s military and defense industry. What could go wrong?
NATO needs to be abolished and the treasonous criminals that continue to fund Ukraine brought to justice for their treason against the people they are to serve.
Fake-president Joe Biden is a liar. He needs to be removed.
Joe Biden's broken promise to avoid war with Russia could lead to Armageddon
On March 11, 2022, President Biden reassured the American public and the world that the United States and its NATO allies were not at war with Russia. "We will not fight a war with Russia in Ukraine," said Biden. "Direct conflict between NATO and Russia is World War III, something we must strive to prevent."
It is widely acknowledged that U.S. and NATO officers are now fully involved in Ukraine's operational war planning, aided by a broad range of U.S. intelligence gathering and analysis to exploit Russia's military vulnerabilities, while Ukrainian forces are armed with U.S. and NATO weapons and trained up to the standards of other NATO countries.
Biden says nuclear ‘Armageddon’ at highest risk since Cuban Missile Crisis
NEW YORK (AP) — President Joe Biden is declaring that the risk of nuclear "Armageddon" is at the highest level since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, as Russian officials speak of using tactical nuclear weapons after suffering massive setbacks in the eight-month invasion of Ukraine.
Speaking at a Democratic fundraiser, Biden said Thursday night that Russian President Vladimir Putin is "a guy I know fairly well" and the Russian leader is "not joking when he talks about the use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological or chemical weapons."
"I don't think there is any such a thing as the ability to easily use a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon," Biden said.
He added that he was still "trying to figure" out Putin's "off-ramp" in Ukraine.
"Where does he find a way out?" Biden asked. "Where does he find himself in a position that he does not only lose face but lose significant power within Russia?"
Putin has repeatedly alluded to using his country's vast nuclear arsenal, including last month when he announced plans to conscript Russian men to serve in Ukraine.
"I want to remind you that our country also has various means of destruction … and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal," Putin said Sept. 21, adding with a lingering stare at the camera, "It's not a bluff."
Joe Biden: a modern-day Koschei the Immortal
With origins that go back eons, fairy tales offer timeless lessons on truth and morality. Today, both Russia and Ukraine face a villain in Washington DC who is right out of Slavic folklore.
Not since Adolph Hitler and Nazi Germany has one man brought so much suffering, death and destruction upon the Slavs of Eastern Europe.
That man is Joe Biden. If he wanted, he could use his immense power to bring peace to Ukraine, but instead, his policies cause more destruction. Biden’s Neo-liberal crusade has brought the world to the edge of nuclear war. We are on the brink. There’s no room for error; one more mistake and it’s all over .
Biden’s foreign policy worsens international relations, antagonizing both partners and foes, plunging the world into poverty and economic chaos. In just 18 months, Biden has caused more international crises than we’ve seen in the entire past two decades combined. He fosters strife and discord; not peace and understanding.
Biden doesn’t care about Ukraine. We can entirely dismiss his words about protecting “freedom and democracy” in Ukraine. In fact, the American establishment has long had a disdain for Slavs — Poles, Serbs, Ukrainians, and Russians . Perhaps only the Czechs are somewhat respected.
General Jack Keane (retired) recently told the media that U.S. aid to Ukraine is a great “investment” because “Ukraine is doing the fighting against Russia”. Hey Ukrainians! You hear that? Uncle Sam considers the deaths and maiming of hundreds of thousands of your men as an “investment”. Are you fine with that?
Of course, Biden tries to pin the blame on Putin. But let’s look at the facts. Biden pumps Ukraine, which is 4,500 miles from the U.S. border , full of weapons to fight Russia. And now, Biden’s ultra-nationalist Ukrainian army is bombing inside Russia and massacring Russians.
Please stop and think about that. Imagine if Moscow was financing and arming Mexicans to attack the U.S. in order to reclaim lands, such as Texas, which we took in the 1840s. We all know how swift would be retribution from Washington DC.
Biden knows that Ukraine can’t defeat Russia and that further fighting will only lead to more destruction and death for both sides. But instead of using America’s power to reach a peace agreement, at least a ceasefire, Biden stokes the fires of war .
And No, I don’t blame Putin. He’s reacting to NATO expansion to Russia’s borders. For 8 years, Moscow tried to negotiate with the West, and offered reasonable terms for Ukrainian neutrality and protection of ethnic minorities from Kiev’s far-right death squads. (When Trump was in the White House, the pro-war gang in the State Department and Senate retained control of policy towards Ukraine).
Let’s remember — the Ukrainian conflict began in 2014 when Biden was Obama’s vice-president. He played a key role in inciting a violent insurrection in Kiev to overthrow the elected president (who was from Donbas).
Immediately a pro-U.S. regime was installed in Kiev. Within a few weeks it unleashed brutal ethnic cleansing against separatist (Russian-speaking) Ukrainian citizens in the Donbas. Those eastern regions, including Crimea, naturally appealed to Moscow for help and protection. In essence, this is a civil war between western Ukraine and the country’s eastern regions that recently voted to join Russia.
I’ve been visiting and working with Ukraine, on and off, since 1991. Ukrainians were always a pleasant and peaceful people, and most saw their country as one civilization, one family with Russia, and that preserving the relationship was vital for their national interests. Indeed, many Ukrainians have close relatives in Russia.
However, throughout 2013 to 2020, Washington’s militarism and plans to expand NATO eastward were accompanied by a campaign of far-right nationalistic disinformation that poisoned the minds of many Ukrainians . A spirit of hatred, racism and a desire for revenge for perceived historical grievances began to take hold.
Even in 2018-19, I was stunned how educated Ukrainian friends became raving ultra-nationalists filled with hatred for Russia. Now, any person who is sane and intelligent knows that you have to get along with your neighbors; like it or not. It’s in your interest to do so. But sinister forces in Washington are very good at poisoning minds and turning people against each other.
Unfortunately, the war has unleashed a torrent of hatred. Each side accuses the other of atrocities. Deaths mount on both sides, and each rains down fire on the other’s cities. Talk of peace is now forgotten. This downward spiral of animosity threatens to tear all of Europe apart; not to mention lead to nuclear war .
Like many, I used to think of Biden as a senile fool, a puppet controlled by oligarchs in Washington and New York. But now I believe that while he suffers from age-related impairment, his embrace of evil is genuine.
For years, Biden’s family has profited from corrupt deals with Ukrainian oligarchs. Joe even recently boasted that “no one fucks with a Biden”. That’s gangster talk. That’s what the head of an organized crime family says. Biden should not be let off the hook as a feeble old fool. He’s an evil mastermind.
So, who is Koschei the Immortal?
Koschei is the arch villain in Slavic fairy tales that many Russians and Ukrainians grew up on. He’s a bony, vicious old man with supernatural powers. He’s like a living corpse and his bones clatter. Basically, Koschei is the living dead. (Koschei derives from the Russian word kost’ - bone).
Koschei can fly, uses dark magic, and preys on lovely young women. With his deception and wicked spells, Koschei lures his victims into captivity, sometimes promising them vast amounts of gold.
Indeed, the conflict in Ukraine has all the elements of an epic tale of Good vs. Evil. We can substitute “Koschei” with “Biden”; substitute “gold” with “billions in western aid”; and substitute “beautiful girl” with “Ukraine”. (The only difference is that Koschei doesn’t sniff his victims like Joe does.)
So, can the modern-day Koschei be defeated? Can Ukraine be saved from his evil plan? If you’re an American and truly want to Stand With Ukraine, then know that the real fight is taking place in Washington. We Americans have a responsibility to the people of Ukraine and Russia to defeat the living corpse in the White House.
Russia and Ukraine are bound by 1,200 years of a common history, culture and religion. Geography dictates that the two countries will always be neighbors and must learn to live with each other. The planet’s fate depends on it.
In Ukraine, we’re witnessing an epic battle of Good vs. Evil. And Good must triumph. Peace must triumph. No one can remain indifferent. So, make your decision. Are you for Peace, or for Koschei’s war? For Life, or for Koschei’s death cult?
Choose your side. Choose wisely. Because you choose for eternity.
Creepy Joe Biden or Patriot Trump?
Biden 'not competent' to be president after appearing to zone out during MSNBC interview: Rep. Claudia Tenney
Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., joined "Sunday Morning Futures" to discuss President Joe Biden's cognitive abilities after his latest sit-down interview has some critics wondering about his ability to serve. Tenney warned that the question is "serious," arguing that he is "not competent" enough to be the president of the United States after appearing to zone out during an MSNBC interview this weekend.
Crown Prince Mocks Biden As Mentally Challenged Amid Crashing US-Saudi Relations
Just when you thought the Saudis couldn't humiliate the Biden administration any more, the Wall Street Journal reports that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is reportedly talking massive trash about the US president behind closed doors .
What ever would give MbS that impression?
Saudi foreign minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan has denied the report - saying "These allegations made by anonymous sources are entirely false," adding "The kingdom’s leaders have always held the utmost respect for U.S. presidents, based on the kingdom’s belief in the importance of having a relationship based on mutual respect."
That said, the two leaders haven't been on good terms since even before Biden took office - with Biden calling Saudi Arabia a "pariah" while on the 2020 campaign trail over the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, adding that he saw "very little social redeeming value in the present government in Saudi Arabia."
President Pervert is at it again!!
'You Want to Come Up? You Don't Have to But You Can" - Biden Gets Distracted, Creeps on Little Kids Before Starting His Speech at White House Diwali Celebration -- SHOCKING VIDEO
Joe Biden celebrated Diwali with several Indian families on Monday in the White House.
There were several little children in the audience. So you know what that means… Old Joe was on the prowl.
Joe Biden invited some young kids in the front row to join him on stage.
Creepy Joe asked one little boy, “You want to come up? You don’t have to but you can.”
‘You Want to Come Up? You Don’t Have to But You Can” – Biden Gets Distracted, Creeps on Little Kids Before Starting His Speech at White House Diwali Celebration — SHOCKING VIDEO
By Jim Hoft
Published October 25, 2022 at 10:00am
Comment
Share TweetGab Share 
Telegram
Gettr 
Share
Joe Biden celebrated Diwali with several Indian families on Monday in the White House.
There were several little children in the audience. So you know what that means… Old Joe was on the prowl.
Joe Biden invited some young kids in the front row to join him on stage.
Creepy Joe asked one little boy, “You want to come up? You don’t have to but you can.”
His handlers don’t have enough sense to put the kids out of arm’s distance from the old perp.
Joe got distracted before he even started his speech. He had just reached the podium when he was already distracted by the little boys and girls in the front row.
Shocking.
Creepy Joe strikes again.....
CNN is fact-checking Biden? 
Fact check: Biden’s midterms message includes false and misleading claims
https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/05/politics/fact-check-biden-midterms-2022/index.html
Biden’s pitch has included claims that are false, misleading or lacking important context. (As always, we take no position on the accuracy of his subjective arguments.) Here is a fact-check look at nine of his recent statements.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment for this article.
Joe Biden Abruptly Cancels G20 Meeting Amid Reports of Serious Health Concerns
President Joe Biden abruptly canceled a G20 meeting on Tuesday, as world leaders gathered in Indonesia to conduct the official business of managing world affairs.
However, the official explanation for Biden’s last minute drop-out has many wondering once again if something is seriously wrong with the president.
“This Is An Investigation of Joe Biden” – BREAKING: House Republicans Announce Investigation of Joe Biden and Biden Crime Family (VIDEO)
House Republicans announced on Thursday that they will investigate serial liar and crook Joe Biden.
Rep. Jame Comer (Oversight Committee Ranking Member): We’re releasing a report today that details what we’ve uncovered. We’re also sending letters to Biden Administration officials and Biden family associates renewing our request for voluntary production of documents relevant to this investigation. This is an investigation of Joe Biden. And why he lied to the American people about knowledge and participation in his family’s international business schemes.
House Republicans have been investigating the Biden Crime Family since at least as far back as 2020.
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1593257706349293569
Joe Biden told reporters this week an investigation into his family is “almost comedy.”
https://twitter.com/Xx17965797N/status/1591008465371418624
Here’s a 3-minute video proving Joe Biden knew all about his family’s corrupt foreign business dealings.
https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1593259443940167680
“This Is An Investigation of Joe Biden” House Republicans Announce...
Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election
While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.
The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.
It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court, several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Perhaps these institutional and security threats have provided powerful incentives for the Court to put Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the Court’s independence. Or perhaps conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber-stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference.
Moreover, recent weeks have brought a cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis that could be difficult to resolve without the Court’s intervention. It is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was colluding with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor news of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election – a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. Meanwhile, the January 6th committee may soon send a criminal referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was reportedly working with Big Tech to censor election critics.
Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution – the supreme law of the land, the final recourse may be the Supreme Court.
As the Brunson lawsuit argues, all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.
Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020. That deadline was set by executive order and by Congress itself. When December 18th came and went without ODNI submitting its report, Congress should have started asking questions and investigating. In fact, DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were split as to its significance and whether such breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election. And yet there was no action whatsoever by Congress, no inquiry and no investigation. Instead, Congress approved the possibly fraudulent election results on January 6th without asking any questions of the DNI and the Intelligence Community.
When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. In contrast, in early 2021 Congress had nearly two weeks to investigate before the January 20th date of the Presidential Inauguration. Had Congress waited even just one more day, they would have received the long-awaited ODNI report reflecting a split in the Intelligence Community and the DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community, concluded at the time, the Intelligence Community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and U.S. intelligence agencies to coverup evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason.
The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.
The fact that the Brunson case has made it to the Court’s docket suggests profound concerns about a lawless January 6th Congressional committee, politicized federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies, and major constitutional violations intended to overthrow an elected government by manipulating the outcome of the presidential election.
- The writer is a Professor of Law at the Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law in Fort Lauderdale where he teaches Constitutional Law. For faculty bio: Tim Canova | Shepard Broad College of Law
[1] Matthew Vadum, “Supreme Court Hears Case That Could Empower State Legislatures, Not Judges, to Regulate Elections,” The Epoch Times, Dec. 7, 2022: Supreme Court Hears Case That Could Empower State Legislatures, Not Judges, to Regulate Elections
[2] Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al., Supreme Court Case No. 22-380, Docketed Oct. 24, 2022: Search - Supreme Court of the United States
[3] Raland J. Brunson v. Alma Adams, et al., Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
[4] Jordan Conradson, “Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer Colluded With Federal Agency, CISA, To Censor Election Critics,” The Gateway Pundit, Dec. 7, 2022: BREAKING: Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer Colluded With Federal Agency, CISA, To Censor Election Critics - The Gateway Pundit Mentioned By Name
[5] Masooma Haq, “DNI John Ratcliffe Confirmed There Was Foreign Interference in November Elections: Report,” The Epoch Times, Dec. 17, 2020: DNI John Ratcliffe Confirmed There Was Foreign Interference in November Elections: Report
[6] Jerry Dunleavy, “Intelligence analysts downplayed Chinese election influence to avoid supporting Trump policies, inspector finds,” Washington Examiner, Jan. 7, 2021: Intelligence analysts downplayed Chinese election influence to avoid supporting Trump policies, inspector finds | Washington Examiner
Joe Biden Compared To Satan Following His Christmas Address
The US president failed to mention Jesus by name or say Christ during his message where he instead referred to the biblical figure as the ‘Son of God.’
He said: “And we look to the sky, to a lone star, shining brighter than all the rest, guiding us to the birth of a child, a child Christians believe to be the son of God; miraculously now, here among us on Earth, bringing hope, love and peace and joy to the world.”
Indy100 reports: On Twitter, Hamlet Garcia wrote: “Satan never mentions Jesus by name, he is afraid of God and he is afraid of Christians who know how to pray in a way that brings God closer. #Biden Delivers Christmas Address Without Mentioning Jesus By Name: A Child Christians Believe To Be The Son Of God.”
Similar sentiments were expressed by former Hercules actor Kevin Sorbo who referenced abortion laws after being asked for his opinion on Biden’s “War on Christmas.”
Zuckerbucks Takes on New Life in 2024 with CTCL’s ‘US Alliance for Elections Excellence’ an Organization Aimed at Recruiting Far-Left Operatives to Take Over Elections Offices Across the Country
If you thought the Zuckerberg interference in US elections was over in 2020 when Democrats pulled off a shocking victory over President Trump five days after Election Day, you would be wrong.
Zuckerbucks are back. And Democrats are now going after local elections offices around the country and pushing far-left candidates or secret sleepers to move elections in the Democrat Party’s direction.
Democrats no longer have to worry about nominating candidates who are senile or can’t string together two sentences. All they have to do is make sure they are running the elections offices and counting the ballots.
It’s nothing new. Joseph Stalin excelled in this effort.
According to its website, The U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence is a collaboration between the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the Center for Civic Design, Center for Secure and Modern Elections, the Elections Group, Hasso Plattner Institute of Design (the d.school) at Stanford University, Prototyping Systems Lab, and U.S. Digital Response.
the Alliance is a five-year, $80 million strategy funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to recruit far-left candidates to run local elections offices around the country.
The Arizona Sun Times reported:
The injection of private money into public election administration — or “Zuckerbucks” — is continuing in a new form, as left-leaning candidates are being recruited to run for local elections offices by an organization that receives funds from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
The U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, a project of the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), is awarding funds to counties and municipalities under the Centers for Election Excellence program. The alliance will provide $80 million over five years “to envision, support, and celebrate excellence in U.S. election administration,” according to CTCL.
CTCL poured nearly $350 million into local elections offices managing the 2020 election, with most of the funds donated to the nonprofit by Zuckerberg. The nonprofit has claimed its 2020 election grants — colloquially known as “Zuckerbucks” — were allocated without partisan preference to make voting safer amid the pandemic.
Critics of the unprecedented level of private funding injected into election administration offices in 2020 argue the grants were awarded disproportionately to boost voter participation in swing state Democratic strongholds. A House Republican investigation found that less than 1% of the funds were spent on personal protective equipment.
Following controversy surrounding the disproportionate resources funneled to Democratic jurisdictions and claims the imbalance helped sway the election in Biden’s favor, 24 states have either restricted or banned the use of private money to fund elections, while 12 counties have also restricted or banned the funds, according to the Capital Research Center.
These far-left Zuckerberg elections groups are coordinating with Big Tech, Government entities, and other liberal groups.