Total disinfo? Do you mean everything that I've posted are lies and disinfo, and that for instance the Siebrel documentary is 100% true? Is there not even one argument that you believe is correct?
Do you wish to expand the conversation to anti-gravity technology?
Was not one of your arguments the impossibility because of the Van Allen belts? Or that the materials would melt in the thermosphere?
WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON fake moon landing totally exposed
02:25 Since when is anything Bill Clinton said worthwhile?
07:30 Van Allen belts - They did not go through the most dangerous parts.
Additional links
- see my previous posts
16:25 Temperatures. "Alan Beans explanation of using batteries is not convincing" Is the narrators expertise in this matter convincing? He offers no proof. I believe the material available on how the Lunar Module was cooled is convincing.
17:15 "Blasted off, went up 69 miles, somehow docked with the command module travelling at a speed of over 4000mph and then they all flew back to earth...."
The narrator is implying this is impossible when there is plenty of evidence that such speeds (in the vacuum of space), precise orbits and maneuvers are possible (satellites, ISS, ISS dockings, for instance)...
...the whole video is a jumbled mess and does not get to it's points quickly but meanders here and there..... I might return to looking at the rest of it later....
NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON
00:38 wavy flag, lack of any blast crater, absence of stars in space, all adressed in "A Funny Thing Happened on The Way to the Moon - Debunked"
5:10 Van Allen belt again, already covered.
5:51 Don Pettit Technology issue again, already covered.
7:10 Temperature in the thermosphere
What is the issue with this video? 4 men visible? I'm not seeing it. At what point?
Here's an explanation I've found that I believe is accurate. Also, the "A Funny Thing Happened on The Way to the Moon - Debunked" documentary has a good section analyzing similar footage.
you don't even need middle school physics to debunk this one. just reason it with your experience of living in this universe. man jumps up, as he is lifting off the ground, he kicks up some sand. he is still traveling upwards from the initial force from push-off. the sand has a much smaller mass, and a smaller upward acceleration component dependent on the trajectory and force with which the foot kicked it. both the kicked sand and the mid-jump man have the same downward force applied from the moon's gravity. since the sand has less mass and upwards acceleration component than the jumping man, it reaches its trajectory apex sooner, begins to fall sooner, and therefore reaches the ground sooner. if you did this on earth, the same thing would happen, just at a faster rate for both the jumping man and the sand. and that's what we see in the exercise videos that are conveniently slowed down to compare with the moon video.
the "everything must hit the ground at the same time" only applies if they are dropped from the same height at the same time. you start introducing variables when you apply varying magnitude forces with varying trajectories at different times.
