Which can be seen moving in various directions instead of just up if they were air bubbles.
Sure, whatever works for your, look away, brush it aside if you encounter something that bursts your bubble.... I however don't recommend it.
Depends what angle the diver is pointing the camera surely?
Why is Dave Keegan an expert on space?Looks like he had a photography channel for 5 years and within the last year has become interested in shilling for NASA. But hey go ahead and treat him as an authority figure if you like.
And if anyone missed this very thorough analysis / comparison of weather satellite images and Apollo 11 images. It effectively debunks Sibrel's RIDICULOUS claim that the crew of Apollo 11 faked being far away from earth whilst being in low orbit.
Exactly he has no expertise at all, probably never interviewed anyone involved or done any original research on the subject. But I am sure sheeple think he is smart.
Sure, perspective and camera objective could make parallel things appear not parallel like for instance the shadows on the moon issue I've covered on this thread many times.
Would not explain this video, though:-
Oh great the Guardian...the Mi6 PROJECT. I am not interested in the MSM. Do you understand? Its purpose is not to convey information or knowledge but to push elite agendas. Wake up old chum. Its supported by Bill Gates for starters. I wouldn't get vaccine advice from them either.
I knew you'd grab on to the the easiest and quickest way out...
Well, here's the same video sourced elsewhere.. well, it's originally from NASA, I guess so... sorry
Only with artificial light sources, not with the sun.
What about all the other bubbles, like the single one's, in other footage? This video even if it is true which is highly unlikely from NASA ( Never A Straight Answer ) doesn't cover those.
1965 Space Walk Rotating Helmet in the Vacuum of Space
1965 Space Walk Rotating Helmet in the Vacuum of Space
Incorrect, as I've brought up in these posts below which you've ignored multiple times.
What about them? Debris, dust, paint etc, perhaps ice...
Yes, what about it?
"The Gemini G3C and G4C used from the first US spacewalk (Gemini 4) to Gemini 12 used a conformal helmet with a neck ring and bearing that can swivel independently from the body."
The main point here is the rotating helmet which moves as he turns his head, do you seriously believe that is real? It's ridiculous, in a vaccuum of space, it's as ridiculous as the Apollo astronauts fly zippers. In fact if it was all real the spacesuits should be like miniature space crafts themselves.
LOL
NASA has a massive budget for psyops and can produce as much "proof" to try and debunk all these anomalies as they want. You think its proof, I thinks it's lies. Ball bearings indeed, filed in 1958, before they even went to space.
It's not that ridiculous, it's just 0.3 atmospheres in the suit and 0 outside it. I don't see an anomaly and believe it is possible to engineer a collar that rotates that would be able to withstand the pressure difference.
Yes, a good idea to design and construct it BEFORE going to space instead of after...
It seems the MSM are as enamoured with the Finns, as they are with the MSM:
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=270656
Of course such indoctrination does come at a cost - high vaccination rates and high excess death rates. You reap what you sow:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=509982