These are the two actual questions. There are others but they are rhetorical.
Well from Eric's mouth, he said the internet had been cut, presumably some others have starlink access or are travelling outside the area to upload. Would be lots more no doubt if the internet was up.
This one I have already posted, the guy was manhandled for questioning the Mayor. I will find it, but you know I did post already. Not my problem you didn't watch it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djYjSxb12ps&t=491s Nick Sortor was his name around the 8.30 mark
Satisfied, I don't promise to answer all your questions OK, as you have seen I had to go back through stuff I already posted. I have lots of things to do.
He wasted everyone's time claiming we went to the moon when we didn't. Every image supposedly on the moon was a fake ok
Thank you.
And those portable units brought over. Nobody had/has internet in the homes left standing because fibre lines were reportedly damaged as well as powerlines:
That happened largely because fiber lines strung on power poles were extensively damaged. It’s unclear when that damage might be repaired.
There are also reports of damage to water pipes, and of course at some point the power was turned off (question is when exactly, HE's claims should not be taken at face value - they face a loss of billions in damages), and water pumps/pumping stations were connected to the main power grid so failed. Damage to water pipes reportedly caused loss of pressure as well. All that, if true, explains the water running dry. I'm withholding judgment on this. Some claim the water was turned off, possibly because some residents assumed "they tumed the water off" when the water supply failed (or was disconnected as the case may turn out to be) and so whoosh that assumption was believed and spread like so many others, including that the Coastguard "did not help":
Captain Aja Kirksey, the Commander of Sector Coast Guard, said an estimated 100 people evacuated to the water as wildfires decimated communities in Lahaina, Hawaii. Kirksey said Coast Guard crews rescued at least 17 people from the waters.
Coast Guard rescued 17 after dozens fled from wildfires in Lahaina
It is now claimed 450 out of 750 power utility poles in West Maui were downed:
Videos showed that the wires that sparked the earlier fire were among miles of “obsolete 1960s standard” power lines that the utility left exposed to the weather and thick foliage, despite a recent push to either bury or cover them.
Sixty percent of the utility poles on West Maui were still down on Aug. 14, according to Kimura at a media conference — 450 of the 750 poles.
While there is indeed some manhandling/getting too close, it doesn't fit the bill of "aggressive attitude to journalists asking questions".
The mayor was taking questions, and when a reporter asked him if he knew if any children were among the bodies, he replied "I don't know". At this point Sortor aggressively accused the mayor of knowing and lying. Sortor could have asked, "When do you think you might know?" or "What is the reason you don't know at this time?" instead of accusing him of knowing and lying, which precipitated the ending of the press conference and the manhandling/getting up too close:
If you can think of others, please feel free to share.
Can't blame Sortor for his aggressive questioning, people there deserve answers and you can bet he knows far more than he is letting on. The guy has souless eyes.
Addressed the water question in last post. It's not as simple as saying they turned the water off. Time will tell. And hopefully those who need to become whistleblowers will do so.
It could be a combination of many factors. I don't know enough about smart meters yet to comment either way.
There was one thing he said I didn't catch first time around, that when he was pressed, he added: "Once I know the answer to that, I'll be happy to answer that."
There hasn't been an exhaustive forensic examination yet, to my knowledge, so maybe he's just being careful about giving out the wrong info, so that he's not accused of having lied. But he got accused of lying anyway.
Personal suspicion should never become accusation without strong evidence.
Is Sortor a resident of Maui? Doesn't look like it:
Is Sortor telling porkies about staying in a tent? Why didn't he answer the questions the resident of Maui was asking him? What's good for the goose is not good for the gander?
Let the people of Maui ask for the answers they deserve when and how they want, without grifters from outside physically interfering with how they choose to do things.
The guy is in charge, with all the incompetence or more likely genocidal action already listed in this thread, the guy deserves lynching, after a trial of course.
The guy looks like a Freemasonic gang-stalker. Pity he wasn't more concerned about harassing his corrupt politicians instead of harassing a guy trying to get the truth out.
Does he have to be? I have a good friend from Maui, who I have sent all the links I posted here. He thinks the whole place is a crime scene, he knows a lot of residents interviewed there too. Luckily he was travelling abroad when it happened. He doesn't share your concern for spreading "false rumours", and neither do I, that coercive/manipulative garbage don't work with me.
Typical politician answer. Meaningless platitude.
I remember the story about Elisha and 42 youngsters who made fun of his looks. Two bears came and ate them. (2 Kings 2:23, 24)
I don't remember Jesus insulting anyone's physical appearance either.
No surprise you two are friends then?
17 years
Not about his looks, it's about his behaviour, stalking a guy at his hotel at 5am. Typical Mason intimidation tactics
Where did my post go?
Why does Danrock give so much slack to perpetrators (yes, they are perpetrators when being so evasive whilst in positions of authority - control) whilst being critical of those desperately seeking to know the truth and EXPOSE the evildoers who LIE and work in SECRECY for their master satan?
Why do you speak about me, instead of to me, like narcissists do with their flying monkeys?
Why not address the so-called "slack" itself, which to me is reasonable, and show how it is UNreasonable?
Posting it publically and addressing you is speaking to you (AND other viewers), hence your reply.
You posted it publicly but you did not address me. You were rude and spoke about me.
Any idea who deleted The Prisoner's post, that I was replying to?
It's Ok it was removed, I was asked if I wanted to re-phrase it and decided to let it go instead.