An 18-year-old from Springdale, Arkansas, who had a heart attack after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine said he’d rather get COVID than have a heart attack.
In an interview with The Defender, Isaiah Harris said he received his first dose of Pfizer on April 8 and second dose on April 30. Within 12 hours of the second dose, the teen developed a fever and chills. His father, Justin Harris, initially didn’t think much about it because he got sick after both doses of the Moderna vaccine, although his symptoms weren’t serious.
That wasn’t the case for Isaiah. Within 48 hours of the second dose, Isaiah’s heart started hurting “very very bad” and things started going downhill fast. Harris said they grew really concerned when their son started having trouble breathing.
WHO Issues Critical Guidance Urging Children and Adolescents to Stop Getting Vaccinated Against Covid-19
The Backtrack -
BREAKING UPDATE, Sunday, June 27th: not only did WHO rescind a guidance that children should not get motivated based on political considerations, Biden, Fauci and the establishment writ large are now weaponizing the “delta variant” to stoke fears and manufacture “vaccine” consent.
Update: June 22nd, this article has been revised as of 8:05 PM EST after the World Health Organization literally sanitized their website to erase any mention of a guidance that they issued on June 3rd (this is WHO’s archived page that contains the version they deleted) concerning the “vaccination” of children and adolescents for Covid-19. Up until an hour ago, WHO’s position was that children should not get “vaccinated” because, in their words, “there is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19”.*
12-15 year olds in Gibraltar will be offered the COVID-19 vaccine once this has been approved by the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.
Last month, the UK regulator MHRA approved the Pfizer jab for use on this demographic. The UK’s vaccine committee now needs to take a decision, but is yet to so.
On the Rock, the Government has confirmed it will follow suit, if the UK committee approves it.
Though there is not enough vaccine stock in Gibraltar to cater for the vaccination of 12-15 year olds, the Government has told GBC that the UK will supply the Rock with additional Pfzer vaccines, if approved by its vaccination committee.
At present, the UK is only offering jabs to 12-15 year olds with severe neuro-disabilities.
In Europe however, the rollout to 12 year-old's and over has begun, with 20 European countries, including Spain and France signing up to administer the vaccine to those in this age bracket. Further afield, the US has already given a first dose of the Pfizer to 30% of its 12-15 year old citizens. However, some are hesitant, Portugal, for example, has not given the shot vaccine to any youngsters.
Outbreaks of the virus have increased in educational settings in the UK over the last week. Here on the Rock, of the ten cases identified this week, two of them were in the 10-15 year old age range.
A decision from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation is expected imminently, however until then, no date can be set for the vaccine to be offered to this age group in Gibraltar.
Of course, Gibraltar marches to the drum of another. Are there any independent thinkers within the whole of the government body or health authority willing to make a stand for the children? Read this thread (see all the above posts) - jabbing children is completely unnecessary (and insane) unless one has an alternative motive – like keeping in Lockstep with the evil global totalitarian plan and depopulation – and of course Satanic Child Sacrifice:
The practice of child sacrifice has persisted throughout history and conjures up images of screaming children being wrenched from their wailing parents’ arms by tribal henchmen to be sacrificed to the gods. However, historical records indicate that parents were very often willing participants in the ritual, and offered their children to the state without coercion.
Fast forward to 2021 and we are on the verge of possibly the largest mass child sacrifice event in human history. Millions of parents around the world will offer their children up to the state to be injected with a rushed, experimental vaccine that has not been tested for long-term effects on health. In return for this game of Russian roulette with their children’s health, parents will hope to receive in return some of the same psychological and social benefits that Maya parents received. What other reason could parents have for offering their children up to receive their “shot”?
Read more on the article published on The Irish Sentinel.
Apparently not, unfortunately, as THEY are too busy hanging up rainbow flags everywhere, instead of researching into the damaging effects of the jab and possibly more so for the younger generation.
2nd July 2021
The Minister for Equality, Samantha Sacramento, has spoken of her disappointment to see how a minority in the local community expressed anger towards the initiatives that were put into place to mark Pride Month on the Rock.
In response to the criticism, Ms Sacramento said that more awareness, education and work was needed to encourage greater acceptance of all members of the community.
“I find it incredible that people felt so strongly and were so offended,” she said.
“This demonstrated to us the need to have this trigger and this conversation.”
“It tells us that we have to reach out further and continue our education.”
Ms Sacramento also called for more respect towards people and their fundamental rights.
“In Gibraltar, everyone’s a Gibraltarian and everyone has rights and we have to be respectful of people’s rights.”
She added that the negative responses motivate her to work even harder towards inclusion for all.
Ms Sacramento told the Chronicle that talking is key in educating and creating awareness.
“That’s important, the fact that people are asking questions is part of the process, because this has to be a conversation, and education and awareness is about getting people talking,” she said.
In an attempt to continue creating awareness throughout the community, the pelican crossings displaying LGBTQ+ symbols have been continued for the foreseeable future.
An online survey for members of the LGBTQ+ community was also recently announced.
Ms Sacramento encouraged people to participate and voice their opinions and concerns.
“I want to hear from them, what their experiences are like, where they are throughout the different services that we provide, I want them to tell me what more I can do”, she said.
Ms Sacramento added that the support for Pride Month by most of the community was encouraging and that the Government continued to work towards creating awareness, building on a foundation of important legislative change over recent years.
“I am happy that Pride has been welcomed and embraced, the symbolism is very positive,” she said.
“I think this year really symbolises the journey we have been on and there has been so much work done that we forget it, but it’s all been the foundation blocks to have us where we are today”
“I think that this year it has been abundantly clear that, as a government, we are supportive of LGBTQ+ rights”, she added.
Nevertheless good to see there is at least some resistance to this promotion of clearly not gay people.
"Gay-homosexual - denotes someone who is unhappy with their gender and wants to pretend to be the opposite gender or to have a relationship with someone of the same gender because they are not happy with normality, so gay, which really means happy, is the opposite of its definition."
How Pfizer Manipulated COVID Vaccine Trial Protocols To Obtain Emergency FDA Authorisation For Children
Analysis and comparison of the review document submitted by Pfizer to the US Food and Drug Administration, on the basis of which the FDA gave the green light to expand the emergency permit for vaccination also for children aged 12-15 (1), as opposed to the study protocol in children (2, 3), reveal concerning findings, including violations of the protocol established by Pfizer itself, and no less serious, designing the trial protocol in a way that will allow the company to present as positive findings as possible in terms of vaccine safety in children.
The UK Government's chief medical adviser has warned that rates of long COVID are likely to increase, particularly among young people. Long COVID is the term for long-lasting health effects after having contracted COVID, even if the infection itself has passed.
Professor Chris Whitty said the two ways to prevent this are to keep COVID rates down, and to make sure everyone is vaccinated so they get a mild version of the disease. His concerns were echoed by the head of NHS membership organisation NHS Providers, who said there were concerns over the number of unvaccinated young people getting mild symptoms upon first contracting the disease, but then developing much more severe long COVID-type symptoms afterwards.
Chris Hopson said the long-term health consequences are not yet fully understood, so we all need to be careful and remain aware of the risks.
It seems the jab-happy medical tyrants are hell-bent on creating a reason to get those under 12 vaccinated.
How long did it really take the government to approve the experimental jab for those 12 and over? Not long.
And while the UK and Gibraltar government say they will wait on JVCI's recommendation to do so, do we really think that JVCI's recommendation will take? Current headlines read they are not recommending it; and this may cause people to let their guards down.
LucijaTomljenovic has presented documentation which appears to show that the Joint Committee of Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) has made continuous efforts over many years to withhold critical data from parents and health practitioners on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations in order to reach overall vaccination rates which the JCVI deemed necessary for “herd immunity,” a vaccination concept which does not rest on solid scientific evidence – Vaccine-injured children: a UK tale of neglect, corruption and cover-up? – UK Reloaded
How much of JCVI's weighing back and fro is "just for show".
Propaganda to go for the children is increasing - from them being blamed for the next wave to "protecting" them from this thing called "long covid" (What ever happened to the common cold/flu?).
Look at the JVCI's argument for delaying the jabs for those under 12. It's weak and given enough time they will "work it out" that the benefits of jabbing them outweigh the risks. Evil people:
For a health system to offer any vaccine to a child, two key ethical questions must be asked. First, do the benefits outweigh the risks? Second, if the vaccine is in short supply, does someone else need it more? Careful attention to both questions suggests that we should not yet roll out covid-19 vaccination to otherwise healthy children.
Is that the only key ethical questions they can come up with? Public health officials look at a benefits/risks assessment, which means a certain number can be harmed and it's still considered a "good" thing. So when your child is the one paralyzed from the jab, you should think that is is for the good of all. Next, they think about the supply of jabs. Seriously? If this thing actually protected children, you'd think they'd be prioritized. Besides, they have other means to programme children without giving them this dangerous jab. It's been done in the schools for years.
Covid-19 vaccines in adults have been remarkably effective.
What a bold-face LIE. Keep up on the negative adverse reactions from Yellowcard. Just because MSM isn't covering them, doesn't mean you can't find the information.
There is good reason to expect that the same will be true in children.
That's conjecture, but from a medical official is sounds plausible, right?
First, we know less about the risks. Randomised trials to date have given vaccines to only about 3500 adolescents. These trials are not designed to identify rare side effects. For example, the US government’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recently identified a risk of myocarditis in adolescents who have received mRNA based covid-19 vaccines an estimated 56-69 cases per million vaccine doses. We do not know whether other complications will emerge.
Exactly, they don't know. These are experimental jabs and trials aren't over for the world population until 2023.
Second, the potential benefit in children is much smaller. Most children who get covid-19 have mild illness. There are low risks of hospital admission and death (around two per million children in the UK), as well as rare multisystem inflammatory syndrome.
They know children don't really suffer. That's why the propaganda is heightened with variants and long-Covid.
However, serious illness from covid is much less common than in adults. Moreover, young children and schools seem to play a limited role in transmission. Vaccination of children would have marginal benefit in protecting others, particularly once people at higher risk are immunised.
Please remember this stance – because it will change, like they changed it about pregnant women and like they did about wearing face-masks.
There are also indirect effects (for example, interrupted education) and potential long covid.
Pulling out a reason that has nothing to do with their health, which they can weigh toward the benefits of jabbing the young. If they really were concerned with them missing school, why the lockdowns, which has proven to be about control not health; and children are suffering in other ways because of lockdowns, especially mentally.
They then plant "long covid" as a reason to jab the young. And Gibraltar's Sohail Bhatti does his evil part by planting that ideal on The Rock.
Now read this carefully:
Before we roll out a covid-19 vaccine for children, we should scrutinise safety data carefully and wait if there is any uncertainty. Crucially, if reports of serious complications arise they could harm our wider immunisation programme. Community confidence in vaccination can be easily threatened, leading to surges in vaccine preventable disease.
Since they don't know – if children start dropping like the elderly; if they start getting sicker; if their immune systems are weakened, compromised, the health tyrants aren't going to be able to explain these occurrences away like they did with the elderly. They might not be able to do the damage control of the vaccines being related to the adverse reactions, which means they are scared of public reaction – maybe people coming after them with pitchforks.
And look at what they are really concerned with – Crucially, if reports of serious complications arise they could harm our wider immunisation programme. Community confidence in vaccination can be easily threatened – isn't that what it boils down to?
They had to pull out all stops to come up with a reason that 18-year-old Camilla Canepa, from San Martino, didn't die of the vaccine (although they halted the AZ jab for those under 60 afterwards); and that may be the official narrative, but one should know better by now. This healthy 18-year old experienced death by injection.
Then, they bring up vax-inequity. Blah-blah-blah.
Then main point is they've got to get the other groups done first, because they know recommending it for this this young age group could have disastrous effects on their worldwide jab programme which started taking out the weak, poor, vulnerable and elderly in true eugenic-fashion.
Governments follow their health advisors and their health advisors follow Big Pharma – so how long will it take for them to change their stance? Not long, especially when their goal is to jab school children this Autumn.
Parents might find this document useful –
especially because they are letting children make health decisions after they've been programmed to believe Big-Brother and the Nanny-State in school settings:
Gillick Competence in the Age of Covid19: Empowering Children To Make Informed Medical Decisions.
Dear@DOTS Good News : Standing for TRUTH is The Way.
This dad decided to stand for TRUTH, face his test instead of taking the easy way out, caving into their satanic lies and deceit they offered him, (to abide by their fraudulent man-made-up unlawful rules) and it paid off well. God hears all, and knows all, and has the last say on all. What a lovely friend to have.
Taken from TWHOFTF 2:18 God, being the answer to every question, and the cure for every ill, is the ONLY thing that every SOUL needs, because with God, a soul has EVERYTHING it NEEDS (God being the source and supply of “Light” and everything good - Matt. 6:33& Luke 12:31). God is the best friend that any soul can ever have (for ever), and He is with you 24 hours a day, wherever you go. 2:19 No human friend can be with you 24 hours a day, every day, everywhere you go. Your human friends can not protect you from the Devil, and really, they are all bad, whereas God is good and the Ruler of the Universe, the most powerful “Force” in the whole of creation. What an amazing friend to have.
After 9 years of legal battles against the government of Canada, David Stephan announced on his Facebook Page this weekend that all charges had been dropped against him and his wife over the death of one of their children, where he and his wife were singled out by the Canadian government to be made an example of what happens when one dares to take on Big Pharma.
A champion of Health Freedom for years, when the young son of David and Collet Stephan died in what is now known as gross negligence by the medical system, the authorities tried to make an example of the Stephans for their way of life that included trusting God and generally not using pharmaceutical products when natural remedies were available.
They were charged with “failure to vaccinate” their child and blamed for his death, in the hopes of setting Canadian policy that failure to use Big Pharma sanctioned products by parents was the same thing as withholding the basic necessities of life from children, such as food, water, and air.
When their case against the Stephans did not go as they planned and massive corruption was uncovered, they turned to the corporate media in Canada to control the narrative, and for a while it worked, as millions of people, not only in Canada but around the world, vilified this couple and branded them as criminals for allegedly withholding proper medical treatment that they thought would have saved their child.
So effective was this negative media campaign against the Stephans, that the father, David, had to spend 21 days in solitary confinement in jail, as the other inmates considered him a child murderer and tried to kill him.
Health Impact News got involved in this story in 2016, and it was one of our most-read stories that year. We had already had our own run-in with officials in Alberta, Canada, on another story we had covered with a German-born teenager who had been medically kidnapped and held against his will and the will of his parents.
We exposed some of the corrupt officials involved with the teenager’s case, including their contact info which apparently hundreds of angry Canadians used to protest, which prompted the Solicitor General from the Department of Justice in Calgary to contact us and demand that we remove their information from our article.
We did not comply, and instead published his letter along with his contact info. (Story here.)
The German embassy eventually got involved in the case and was able reunite the family and fly them back to Germany in 2015. (Article here.)
So when we heard about what was happening to the Stephan family, I had my top reporter at that time contact them and get their side of the story, and we published it on the Health Impact News network.
By then the Canadian corporate media had vilified this family so much, that we literally received hundreds of complaints from people for standing up for the parents whom they believed were “child murderers” for allegedly failing to use modern medicine to heal their son.
But as the facts of the case unfolded, and as even the Supreme Court in Canada threw out their case for lack of evidence, it was obvious that there was massive corruption and cover-ups and that a failure to treat their son properly by paramedics when transporting him to the hospital is what really caused his death. (Canada is ran by communist, evidence **DNA test to prove Justin Trudeau is the son of Fidel Castro)
After this short update, the next day he explains the history of this case, and their plans going forward to seek justice, and to take a stand for the parental rights of all Canadians.
He explains how they offered him a plea deal in the beginning, where he could have admitted he was guilty of causing his son’s death, and that he only would have faced 18 months probation, and saved hundred of thousands of dollars in legal fees.
But he refused, choosing instead to take a stand for the truth, fighting for the parental rights of all parents in Canada, no matter what the cost.
If anyone backs vaccine for children, tell them to read this compelling scientific rebuttal
I want to share with you a report entitled Covid-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents. It is authored by Dr Byram Bridle of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance – a group of doctors, scientists and health practitioners committed to providing independent, evidence-based information about Covid.
Dr Bridle’s paper consists of more than 40 pages with appendices and it is worth reading thoroughly.
Click on link-box for more information.
Do Governments and health authorities always follow BigPharma?
Larissa Morgan, JD, MBE1 University Pennsylvania Law promotes propaganda and lies to vaccinate children without consent.
COVID-19 Vaccination of Minors Without Parental ConsentRespecting Emerging Autonomy and Advancing Public Health
In May 2021, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration in adolescents aged 12 to 15 years, with authorization for younger children expected later this year.1
This delusional Scribe states:
Despite reported clinical trial data indicating that the vaccine is safe and 100% efficacious for this age range, some parents and guardians may remain hesitant or outright opposed to vaccinating their children, particularly in politically and culturally conservative communities.2
Although COVID-19 illness is generally less severe in younger people, the disease has nonetheless caused substantial morbidity and more than 325 deaths among US children and adolescents, a burden of disease greater than that of many diseases for which vaccines are routinely recommended in this age group.6
She claims children are able to make comprehensive decisions on vaccines, yet the billions of adults who have opted for this vaccone, clearly weren't given the truth or facts of the matter.
Children and adolescents have the capacity to understand and reason about low-risk and high-benefit health care interventions. State laws should therefore authorize minors to consent to COVID-19 vaccination without parental permission.
Factors such as social pressure, emotional regulation, and planning skills affect minors’ ability to make well-considered choices. To account for these developmental facts, laws require parental permission and presume that parents know and will act in the best interest of their children. Despite this presumption, parents and minors might disagree about health care decisions. In the context of vaccination, some older minors may possess a more accurate understanding of the risks and benefits of a vaccine than their hesitant guardians. In younger children, and depending on the intervention, such cases present challenges and may entail judicial intervention.
Given the risks and the ongoing devastation of the pandemic, as well as the high benefit of vaccination for individual and public health, existing laws authorizing minors to consent to vaccines should be expanded to include COVID-19 vaccination and adopted nationally
Although the percentage of parents who may decline to vaccinate their children is currently unknown, the reported hesitancy among adults—including the age groups that include most parents of minors—suggests that this number is likely substantial.
23:13 But woe unto you, lawyers and (Pharisees - Farsis - Persian converts to Judaism, who were the) politicians, hypocrites! for ye shut up The Kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither allow ye them that are entering to go in (see Enoch 93:4-104:6).
23:14 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
23:15 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell-fire than yourselves.
23:27 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead [men's] bones, and of all corruption and filthiness.
23:28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and inequity.
Will they make sure children will be injected with Graphene through the flu vaccine?
The UK announced vulnerable children aged 12-15 will be offered Pfizer vaccine, but not healthy children –
The JCVI is not currently advising routine vaccination of children outside of these (vulnerable) groups, based on the current evidence.
Before you think children are out of the woods from this assault, a plan to push the FLU vaccine on them is instead in the works:
The UK government recently announced that there will be a mass vaccination programme against the flu, which will include children aged 2-15.
Kevin Courtney, Joint General Secretary of the [National Education Union NEU), said: “The welcomes the news that there will be a mass vaccination programme against the flu including of children.
... "long Covid providing another valid reason to vaccinate children against the flu."
Vaccinating children against the flu and Covid is pointless
Whilst the NEU states that Covid cases are highest amongst children and younger people, they fail to mention that children are the least likely age group to fall seriously unwell or die from the virus.
Graphene oxide gives a boost to new intranasal flu vaccine. Reasearchers created a two-dimensional nanomaterial (polyethyleneimine-functionalized graphene oxide nanoparticles) and found that it displayed potent adjuvant (immunoenhancing) effects on influenza vaccines delivered intranasally.
Did you think that only COVID vaccines contained graphene? Well, now this nanomaterial has been also found in the flu vaccine Vaxigrip Tetra. The same study by the Spanish researchers found graphene in this flu vaccine.
According to this article on Europe Reloaded, the researchers deduced "that the GO has been used in all vaccines, including tetanus, meningitis, children’s vaccines, etc., for some years."
La Quinta Columna says that GO was also in the 2018 flu vaccine, and that could account for why people exhibit magnetism despite not having had the “Covid” vaccine. This could also account for the high number of “flu” deaths after the 2018 flu vaccine campaign.