He uses a computerized voice to narrate already published articles such as the VIGILANT CITIZEN. Just perhaps he MAY want to maintain his anonymity and not be targetted....all his videos are linked with published articles, it is not composed by AI unless the original articles are. NOT everything is created by AI.......yet. When I mirror his vids I always find the original written article and add it in the description.
1 Like
Ryan Veli warns against Trump's AI Project
Artificial Intelligence expert Ryan Veli is WARNING America and the rest of the world of what is to come from Trump's AI 500 Billion Infrastructure plan. This is a wolf of techno tyranny disguised as Freedom Cities. - NC.
I'm glad to see that you are spreading links to TWH on your videos.
However, something that I've been pondering upon lately is that if poor quality content is used there is a possibility that the receiver of the link might so to say throw out the baby with the bath water.
In other words, is it a good idea to spread The Word using substandard material? Do the details not matter? Would a disclaimer and explanation be a good idea? Also, in relation to this; what is a "truth forum"?
I'm pointing out this kind of channel/videos/AI-usage to hone your, the reader's perception and prepare you for the very near future when it will be impossible to know if a video is real or AI....Just this wee
...and of course the theory that "they" have technology atleast 50 year ahead of what they release to the general public has a paranoid mind thinking what this could imply (?!).
We're clearly at the point where it's becoming impossible to hear if it's a real voice or not, which is the main reason I brought it up here.
He....or she, or judging by how quickly new videos are released; they. This is probably a so called "content farm", a team of people or fiverr workers producing this stuff.
Or it could even be something more nefarious, for instance use expert virality techniques to gather a huge following, then when the time is right start producing something more nefarious...
In order for you to know that you would have to have gone through all of his videos to verify that.
I checked about 10 and they did not have links to articles.
Or perhaps you mean the ones you publish on your channel?
Oh,ok
All of them? Directly "borrowed" articles without mentioning them?
Sorry, there's a bit of confusion here. Have you noticed and confirmed that his videos are not written by AI by finding the original articles written by someone else?
Then there is the question if these articles are any good and whether "Everything inside" rewrote them using AI.
Something else generated by AI on his channel are some of the thumbnail images. Examples:-
Their thumbnail styles vary and they seem to be experimenting with various kinds. And of course there are various kinds of algoritmic methods and A-B testing to see which thumbnail is the most viral one.
I have not studied the videos in detail but
BTW, the one you posted today claims that the Azimuthal projection map, the one that many flat earthers believe is their map, is how the earth really looks. This is a lie.
Here's another channel that I recently came across that can be labeled "content farm". 3.19M subscribers. A new video released every 2-3 day or so. Monthly revenue: 50K or so?
https://www.youtube.com/@WATOP_VIDEO/videos
This one has much more blatant AI generated images.
These videos feature a man wearing a mask pretending gesturing and pretending to talk and/or is overdubbed with a smooth voice that people don't seem to know whether it is AI or not. I've seen atleast two long discussions about this channel and the voice.
The guy has a Russian keyboard is one known detail...
Close
1 video per day ( maximum ) of around 8 minutes duration, I am not sure what you consider hard work but this is hardly a strain...
I have for the past 5 years.
On my channel not his....I find the original source and include it.
Here we go again, as we have endlessly discovered your idea of a good article is something produced by the CIA mainstream media, most people here probably have a different sources than yours.
Last time I checked the USA has a population of 330m, the MSM is stuggling to attract even 1% of its population to watch it's top rated shows. It maybe different in Finland where 2/3 of the population ( as reported in worldwide surveys ) trust the media - the highest figure in the world.
Thank you for your reply and apologies if what if the following sounds hurtful. I’m only writing this believing that I’ve made a vital insight and in the spirit of helpfulness. If anyone believes I am at fault here please let me know, thank you.
Your reply raises the question:
Is this way of replying as you just did, and quite often have done in the past when interacting with me, something that we should be doing?
With we, I mean Followers, and a people that should set an example to others.
Is it fair? Honest? Is it balanced? Does it pass the “Do unto others” test?
The way of replying that I’m referring to is the cherry-picking, selective engagement.
The rhetorical tactic where someone only addresses the weaker or easier points while avoiding the stronger, more challenging arguments which would weaken their position. This can create the illusion of refutation.
That said, not every selective reply is necessarily bad. Sometimes, focusing on what is most relevant, most productive, or within one’s capacity to address is the right choice.
And recently there was discussion together with scripture here about silence.
But when done to avoid tough points while maintaining a position, it becomes dishonest.
Also, if someone has said something that is very wrong, illogical or irrelevant, and one has the intelligence to see and understand that, is not the right cause of action then to use that skill to show and explain it to them (and anyone else reading it) instead of ignoring them?
Perhaps some of us don't know all the answers....
Absolutely no problem whatsoever.
Do you ever look in the mirror? Or do you just project?
If you are referring to the above then
If someone writes a message with many questions/points/reasonings I usually strive to reply to them all and not just the quick and easy ones in a dishonest eay.
If you feel that I've replied selectively in a dishonest way then please show me where and I will look into it.
Now that I look at the more closely I see that they are quite simple and not very time consuming to produce.
The most important questions for us concerning these videos of this particular channel is if the information is good, truthful, useful, worthwile. Do they align with the teachings of The Way home or face The Fire?
Or are they a waste of time?
What is the point of spreading them? Fantastical stories about Tartaria? The thumbnails do not immediately give a clear picture of what the videos are about nor do the nonexistant descriptions.
Also an issue with similar videos is the question if just reading what is said in the video is better than watching the video.
Another question I often ask is: can a videos imagery, editing and music have negative effects? Some good examples to look at when pondering upon this is the videos by Borzzikman. What is being shown in the thumbnail and in the video, how, and why, compared to just reading a rather short piece of text.
Personally until I started my channel I hardly watched videos and just read articles on-line. But nowadays this is not such a good way of reaching a wider audience.
I have been thinking about if we should start making "modern" short videos, TikTok format, for instance from contents from Jahtruth.net/GibraltarMessenger... But I don't know. A few test demo clips would be a start and perhaps this forum could be used as a collaborative platform for projects like that.
There is also the question about who we are striving to reach. Everyone, sure, hopefully everyone. But there is the prophecy of 144K. And the mechanism of "seek and you shall find". This is yet another question concerning the function of this forum...
2 Likes
I thought I had already adressed this but apparently not.
I strongly (99%) believe this guy is wrong, and that the artifacts we are seeing are mainly compression artifacts and the rolling shutter effect.
The rolling shutter effect happens because the image sensor (like a CCD or CMOS) captures the frame line by line, rather than all at once. If the camera or subject moves during this process, different parts of the frame are recorded at slightly different times, causing distortions like wobbling, skewing, or "jello" effects.
One of my older camera exhibits this very strongly, in fact so badly that it's almost impossible to film with it whilst moving.
I have a long history of doing alot of experimenting with digital video since the early 1990s.
But Cybe: The guy in the video seems like such an expert and has clearly studied this in detail?!
I believe he is suffering from Dunning-Kruger and is on top of "Peak Stupididity".
Ah yes, here is the other discussion about it:-
1 Like
I hope you will understand and will not mind that I probably will not be going back to review that particular video, but your point presented is noted and well-taken and could be useful for future posts. So, thank-you.
1 Like
You're welcome.
And the analysis comes from someone with a persecution complex—claiming, "They are trying to disappear me into a mental institution." This is one of the most common delusions among people with mental health issues. I've also heard from a very reliable source that the most common belief among people with mental problems is that they are special.
And of course: there is a fine line between genius and insanity.
I sincerely hopes he is able to "come to his senses". All of us here on earth, sans one.
I have ever had this thought.
About the 144k, one time TM said let's preach the gospel so that no one shifts blame that they didn't know or were not told, we just have to do it anyway