Reminder: Please remember the behavioral guidelines before interacting with this message:-
This case; Sabrina Wallace - is she speaking the truth or not could work as an example and focusing point when striving to answer some of the questions and elephants in the room of this truth forum.
The beginnings of an article about this has been forming in my mind for quite some time and collaboration in writing it would be appreciated.
Questions like: what really is a truth forum? fact checking, definition of discuss/argue/debate, what is waste of time, confirmation bias, division, cognitive dissonance, cherry picking, what does X have to do with Defending Gibraltar, etc.
Perhaps the main question is how much the details matter when striving to get people to know The Truth.
Perhaps the "keep it simple stupid" approach is best: as a comparison: mining for metals, oil, and inventing machines of various kinds is not what Father had in mind when he put us here so similarly to how these computers we are now using are a neccessary evil that we have to use in order to spread The Truth...Can this be used as a comparison to using/spreading various claims that we are unable to know for sure are true?