Whitney Webb EXPOSES Kamala, Trump, Israel And More! (Interview)
Extremely sobering, tour-de-force interview with the great Whitney Webb from Sept 1, 2024. Interviewed by Sabrina Salvati. It's not a pretty picture, folks!
The Unholy Union of Trump-RFK-Thiel-Musk
Derrick exposes how the individuals supporting Donald Trump are the same forces supporting Kamala Harris, and how the masses - even in the "freedom movement" - are falling back into the two party trap just in time for the (s)election.
They Lie About EVERYTHING - Fact Checked. Do You Still Believe THEM?
Britain's MI5; Ken McCallum; Russia and Iran; lying establishment; WMDs that didn't exist; 9/11; covid scam; lethal injections; there was NO virus; Tucker Carlson avoiding the uncomfortable truth?; WHO continues to lie.
3 Likes
Army to Use Lethal Force for Election Civil War | DK
- Dept. of Defense "gives itself power" to use LETHAL FORCE AGAINST CIVILIANS.
- Lala can destroy your life with "SWIPE OF MY PEN", the Dems DoD is making moves for use of force.
- Trump yesterday says he supports using military against civilians ("the enemy within") as well as adding more calls for vengeance and censorship of media he dislikes.
- Press on each side reports on the authoritarian wish lists of the OTHER candidate, but not on their own.
1 Like
1 Like
New DoD Directive Expands Military's Domestic Role to Include Use of Lethal Force Words of Wisdom - Beware of Government - #134 by ThePrisoner
Will We See U.S. troops, On U.S. Soil, Using Lethal Force Against Americans?
Pentagon issues Federal Directive allowing military to use âlethal forceâ against Americans as video resurfaces showing Kamala fantasizing about weaponizing DOJ against U.S. citizens
A video clip has resurfaced from May of 2019 in which Kamala Harris fantasizes about weaponizing the DOJ against speech the government doesnât like, and the platforms that allow it.
In the meantime, one month before a tense presidential election, the U.S. Department of Defense has authorized U.S. military âdefense intelligence componentsâ to use âlethal forceâ against American citizens if requested by state or local law enforcement in an emergency situation. More on this in a minute, but first letâs get to the May 2019 video showing Kamala Harris unleashing her inner dictator.
Continue reading ...
Biden Admin Accused of âMurder,â âTreason,â âGenocide,â and Use of âWeapons of Mass Destructionâ with COVID-19 Shots, 5G, Chemtrails, Mosquitos: Texas Lawsuit
Plaintiffs claim to have been "targeted with biological and technological weapons of mass destruction."
A monumental lawsuit filed on October 15, 2024, in the Southern District of Texas accuses Joe Biden, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Alejandro Mayorkas, and other top officials of âmurder,â âtreason,â âgenocide,â and facilitating the use of weapons of mass destruction.
The plaintiffs in Yellen et al v. Biden et al (Case No. 3:24-cv-00297) argue that the administrationâs policies, particularly concerning COVID-19 vaccines, 5G technology, and chemtrails, are part of a deliberate plan to harm the American public.
The 114-page filing lists an array of alleged crimes that extend into multiple domains, demanding immediate court action
Plaintiffs and Defendants
The plaintiffs, led by Mike Yellen, Christy K. Albinson, Shelby Rosana, and several others, claim they have been âtargeted with biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.â
They specifically assert that they have âlost and will continue to lose friends and family to these same weapons of mass destruction.â
The plaintiffs bring forth an expansive case against prominent government officials, including President Joe Biden, Dr. Rochelle Walensky (former director of the CDC), and Alejandro Mayorkas (Secretary of Homeland Security), along with other high-ranking members of various federal agencies, such as the FBI and FEMA.
The lawsuit also names numerous âJane/John Does,â representing individuals within these agencies whom the plaintiffs allege are complicit in a mass-scale assault on U.S. citizens.
Accusations of Genocide and Murder
One of the lawsuitâs most startling claims is that the Biden administrationâs actions amount to âgenocideâ under 18 U.S. Code §1091.
The plaintiffs accuse the government of facilitating the mass harm of American citizens through policies related to the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.
The lawsuit states that plaintiffs have been harmed by the administrationâs push for âmRNA nanoparticle injectionsâ and demands that the court âprohibit the distribution, promotion, access and administration of COVID-19 injections, mRNA nanoparticle injections, and all mRNA products in the United States.â
The document also includes an accusation of âmurder,â citing 18 U.S. Code §1111.
The plaintiffs argue that government officials have actively engaged in âmurderâ by pushing for the administration of these vaccines, which they claim contain harmful ingredients.
Chemtrails
The lawsuit takes a sharp turn into accusations of environmental warfare, asserting that the U.S. government is releasing âpoisonous heavy metals, chemicals, and other dangerous ingredients into the sky throughout the United States.â
This claim refers to what many describe as âchemtrailsââallegations that the government is deliberately spraying harmful chemicals into the atmosphere.
In one section of the lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that harmful âheavy metals and chemicalsâ have been knowingly released into the atmosphere by various entities, including government bodies like the U.S. Military and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as well as major airlines such as American, Delta, and United Airlines.
Citing Rachel Carsonâs Silent Spring , the plaintiffs argue that these substances, many of which are âwell-documented carcinogens,â have dangerous, long-lasting health effects on the population.
The plaintiffs also reference "endocrine disrupting chemicals,â which they claim affect the immune system and have been linked to deformities in animals, such as frogs with âhermaphroditic characteristics.â
They further allege that this aerosol â24/7/365 day aerosol assault over our headsâ includes substances like âbarium, nano aluminum-coated fiberglass, radioactive thorium,â and other toxic elements that have been found in water, soil, and air.
These chemicals, they argue, contribute to a wide range of health issues, including respiratory illnesses and heart disease, with the plaintiffs asserting that the U.S. government has failed to address these dangers.
The plaintiffs believe these actions are part of a larger plot to poison and harm the population.
Mosquitos
Moreover, the lawsuit accuses the government of âreleasing deadly mosquitosâ as part of a biological warfare effort, further alleging that these actions are intended to cause widespread harm to U.S. citizens.
In the relevant section of the lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that government agencies, including the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are violating environmental laws by releasing genetically modified, Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes in Hawaii.
These mosquitoes are being introduced as part of a project under the guise of controlling non-native mosquito populations and protecting endangered native birds from avian malaria.
The plaintiffs assert that this project involves âbillions of mosquitoesâ and that it poses a serious threat to Hawaiiâs âfragile ecosystems.â
The lawsuit argues that the final Environmental Assessment (EA) falsely claims that the mosquito release will have no significant impact, while documentation shows that the project could lead to severe âenvironmental impactsâ and may not even succeed in its intended purpose.
They further claim that these genetically modified mosquitoes could potentially spread diseases to birds, wildlife, and humans, and might even be used in experiments to vaccinate people âagainst their will,â referring to these mosquitoes as â1,000 small flying syringes.â
The plaintiffs criticize the lack of proper regulatory oversight, claiming that no Experimental Use Permit (EUP) has been issued by the EPA for this project, thus making the mosquito release illegal.
5G Technology and Radiofrequency Emissions
Another key focus of the lawsuit is the alleged danger posed by 5G technology.
The plaintiffs demand that the government âprohibit radiofrequency from being releasedâ through 5G networks.
They argue that these emissions are harmful and constitute a form of technological warfare, posing a significant threat to public health.
The lawsuit claims that the deployment of 5G is part of a coordinated effort to weaken and damage the U.S. population through harmful exposure to radiofrequency emissions.
In one relevant section of the suit, the plaintiffs claim that ânon-ionizing radiation also can cause biological effects in all systems of the body and in wildlife, including changes in DNA.â
They further argue that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have failed to adequately address the health and environmental impacts of this increased exposure.
According to the plaintiffs, 5G technology poses even greater risks, as its infrastructure requires âhundreds of thousands of wireless facilitiesâ to be deployed across the country, subjecting Americans to âinvoluntary 24/7 radiation.â
The lawsuit critiques the FCCâs failure to consider the consequences of this technology, calling its actions âarbitrary and capricious.â
Weapons of Mass Destruction and Biological Warfare
The plaintiffs further allege that the U.S. government is deploying âbiological weaponsâ in violation of 18 U.S. Code §175, which prohibits the development and use of such weapons.
They claim that the release of harmful substances through vaccines, environmental programs, and technological measures like 5G qualifies as the use of âweapons of mass destruction.â
The plaintiffs argue that these actions are part of a larger agenda to control and harm the public under the guise of national policy.
Call for Immediate Court Action
The plaintiffs request that the court take swift action to address what they view as an imminent and ongoing threat.
They seek an injunction to stop the government from âreleasing poisonous heavy metals, chemicals and other dangerous ingredients into the skyâ and to halt the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and 5G technology.
Additionally, the plaintiffs demand that the court order the government to âsecure the borders around the United States, by stopping illegal migrants and terrorist groups from entering the United States.â
Whether the court will entertain these accusations or dismiss the case remains to be seen, but the plaintiffsâ sweeping demands and detailed accusations will likely provoke significant debate in both legal and political circles.
1 Like
DC Police Preparing To Be Airplane Attacked? | Jwtv
Evacuation "Training Exercise" occurred on October 21, 2024.
FEMA Death Camp Executioners - The Video Freemasonry Doesn't Want You To See!
October 6th, 2024.
FEMA Death Camp Executioners - The Video Freemasonry Doesn't Want You To See!
1 Like
How the U.S. Blockade Sabotaged Cubaâs Power Grid
Manolo De Los Santos, the Co-Executive Director of The Peopleâs Forum and a researcher at Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research discusses the total collapse of Cubaâs national power grid that left the country without electricity for several days. De Los Santos explains how the USâs brutal 60-year blockade has sabotaged the islandâs power grid.