There is a challenge in this post:
In looking at Gibmessenger's Thought for the Day about Bombs and the Butterfly Effect, it got me thinking about all the public figures pushing the Climate Change agenda. Their concern about the Earth's Environment is a JOKE; and perhaps T.H.E.Y. are laughing at us, because the real goal of the Sustainability Goals is about a One World Government, and sending us to the dark ages, despite them going on-and-on about how advanced they are.
I came across this article:
EXCERPT: Most military regimes are run by billionaires, psychopaths, and maniacs who lure hordes of incompetents into their grasp to kill on their behalf. Is it really safe to question their authority? So far, no one has dared to venture into that chamber of doom. The “sheeple” complex remains intact while the missing puzzle piece of war’s impact on global warming remains hidden out of sight on the floor.
And this one highlighted three key fact about war's impact on the environment:
EXCERPT: 3 Key Facts About How War Impacts the Climate Crisis and the Environment
- Militaries consume enormous amounts of fossil fuels, which contributes directly to global warming. If the US military were a country, for example, it would have the 47th highest emissions total worldwide.
- Bombings and other methods of modern warfare directly harm wildlife and biodiversity. The collateral damage of conflict can kill up to 90% of large animals in an area.
- Pollution from war contaminates bodies of water, soil, and air, making areas unsafe for people to inhabit.
Then, I got to thinking, who are the characters that on one hand are profitting from war, whilst at the same time croaking about Climate Change.
I'd like this thread to be about identifying them. So I offer up TONY BLAIR first.
Here is one article about him promoting Climate Change Goals:
And here is one article about how he profits from war:
Yes. The joke is on us. And real environmental issues do not really get in the spotlight. And if they do, their association with corporations get lost in a clause of plausible denability, with phrasing like "there is no evidence".
If you want to help identify these characters, please offer one person per reply with two proofs:
1 - Croaking about Climate Change
2 - Their connections to the war-machine.
The point is to identify them with links to the "proof" articles. Let's keep the replies brief, so just links to the articles are fine - no need to load text, other than perhaps a short paragraph-excerpt if you find one exceptional to include.
You can add one article about how war effects the environment per reply.
Again, no there is no need to load entire articles - links with one except is fine, enough to give a gist of what it is about, of which you can put into your own words.