By Rhoda Wilson on June 6, 2024 There has been much coverage of the World Health Assembly adopting the amendments to the International Health Regulations. Unsurprisingly, this coverage has been in independent media and not in corporate media.
The following are brief descriptions of articles, podcasts and press conferences from various sources in recent days. Some of the concerns are the agreement for governments to “address” misinformation and disinformation, and the wording that further strengthens surveillance – thus laying the groundwork for the surveil-declare-threat-lockdown-coerced mass vaccination approach.
It is important to note that countries have 10 months to reserve or reject provisions, except those countries which rejected the 2022 amendments and so have 18 months. We must, therefore, keep raising awareness and put pressure on our governments to reject the amendments before the end of March 2025.
At the end, we have included an article about the World Health Organisation’s Science Council, a “group of unelected people who will control your future.”
Michele Bachmann Reports On WHO Establishing ‘The COVID State’
In a frantic last minute rush, modified IHR were illegally approved by the most recent World Health Assembly
The 77th meeting of the World Health Assembly concluded Saturday June 01, 2024. This particular Assembly meeting, the first following the COVIDcrisis, failed to achieve agreement on wording or passage of a proposed World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic “treaty”, also referred to as an “agreement”. In parallel to the treaty, the World Health Assembly (in close cooperation with the US HHS/Biden administration) has been working on “updating” the existing (2005) International Health Regulations (IHR) agreement, which historically functioned as a voluntary accord establishing international norms for reporting, managing, and cooperating in matters relating to infectious diseases and infectious disease outbreaks (including “pandemics”).
In blatant disregard for established protocol and procedures, sweeping IHR amendments were prepared behind closed doors, and then both submitted for consideration and accepted by the World Health Assembly quite literally in the last moments of a meeting which stretched late into Saturday night, the last day of the meeting schedule. Although the “Article 55” rules and regulations for amending the IHR explicitly require that “the text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration”, the requirement of four months for review was disregarded in a rush to produce some tangible deliverable from the Assembly. This hasty and illegal action was taken in direct violation of its own charter, once again demonstrating an arbitrary and capricious disregard of established rules and precedent by the WHO under the leadership of the Director-General.
There was no actual vote to confirm and approve these amendments. According to the WHO, this was achieved by “consensus” among this unelected insider conclave rather than a vote; “Countries agreed by consensus to amend the International Health Regulations, which were last changed in 2005, such as by defining the term “pandemic emergency” and helping developing countries to gain better access to financing and medical products”, a WHO statement reported, continuing that “countries” agreed to complete negotiations on the pandemic accord with the year, “at the latest”.
Representatives from many WHO member nation-states were not in the room, and the ones that were there were encouraged to keep quiet. After the non-vote, there was giddy celebration of this achievement, clearly demonstrating the lack of somber maturity, commitment to both rules and careful diplomatic consensus, and absence of serious intent and purpose warranted by the topic. This was clearly an insider clique acting unilaterally to circumvent normal process, and mirrors a similar process used to confirm the re-appointment of Tedros to the Director-General position. This unelected WHO clique of “true believers” clearly signals that it believes itself above any requirements to comply with established international norms and standards, including its own. By their actions you will know them; the giddy arrogance of these actions predict that WHO decision making will continue to be arbitrary, capricious, and politicized, and will continue to reflect the will of various insider interest groups (and nation-states) rather than anything even approximating a broad-based international consensus.
A study released in July of excess mortality in 125 countries during the covid pandemic found the major causes of death globally stemmed from public health establishment’s response, including mandates and lockdowns that caused severe stress, harmful medical interventions and the covid injections.
The authors said the theory that the virus caused the deaths is propped up by mass virus-testing campaigns that should be abandoned.
Instead, they found that in many places, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, and most countries showed temporal associations between vaccine rollouts and increases in all-cause mortality.
The United Nations’ (UN) World Health Organization (WHO) has admitted that “monkeypox” is actually a “side effect” of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The admission is buried on the WHO’s VigiAccess website.
The website contains a database that lists all known side effects of all drugs and vaccines that have been approved for public use.
Under “potential side effects” for the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, the WHO lists “monkeypox,” “smallpox,” and “cow pox” among hundreds of other disorders.
They are listed under “infections and infestations” that emerge as “side effects” of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.
An Ominous Agenda Behind Global Health | James Rougski. COVID to climate change. At what cost?
Join James Rougski for a hard-hitting exposé on the World Health Organization (WHO) and its role in shaping global health policies. Presented at the Koh Samui Critical Thinkers Forum in collaboration with Awakening in Health, this no holds barred talk offers a comprehensive review of recent years in global health and a stark warning about the future.
James Rougski offers his expert insights into:
• The true nature of the WHO and its hidden agendas
• Dissecting fear-based headlines and distinguishing fact from fiction
• The WHO's ambitious 4-year plan and its implications
• UN Sustainable Development Goals: The sinister link to climate change
• Follow the money: Who really funds global health initiatives?
• COVID-19 revisited: Analyzing testing methods, mask efficacy, and profitable treatments
• The ongoing push for mass vaccination and its underlying motives
• Defining "Global Public Goods" - health initiative or wealth generator?
• Regulatory capture and its impact on health policies
• The looming threat to national sovereignty and how to protect it
Rougski offers a brilliant summary of the last few years in global health, exposing the disinformation, censorship, and profit-driven motives behind many public health measures. He challenges the official narrative surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and reveals how similar strategies may be employed in future health crises.
This presentation is crucial for anyone concerned about personal freedom, government overreach, and the future of global health policies. Learn how to critically analyze health information and understand the complex interplay between public health, politics, and corporate interests.
Don't miss this opportunity to arm yourself with knowledge and insight into one of the most pressing issues of our time.
Last week, Robin Monotti, an Italian architect and film producer based in London, tweeted a video statement about his thoughts on the Pandemic Treaty that is being negotiated by a group at the World Health Organisation (“WHO”). In the comment accompanying his video, he said:
“I object to the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement. Medicine should only be carried out between doctor and patient and subject to the specificities of both. It’s bad enough when governments start to dictate generic medicine. Even worse when transnational bodies which are under the control of oligarchs, like the WHO, get to dictate what is and isn’t a medical emergency and mandate generic solutions rather than patient-specific approaches, which may even be: do nothing different and ignore the fearmongering!”
Last week, Robin Monotti, an Italian architect and film producer based in London, tweeted a video statement about his thoughts on the Pandemic Treaty that is being negotiated by a group at the World Health Organisation (“WHO”). In the comment accompanying his video, he said:
According to Roguski, they desperately want to reach an agreement in November so they can call a World Health Assembly in December before Joe Biden leaves office.
WHO Pandemic Agreement Update with James Roguski | Noor Bin Ladin Calls... S02E15
While the world holds its breath with the upcoming U.S. elections, escalating wars, migration invasions, and a myriad of other events, James Roguski joins me to discuss the WHO and their progress with the "pandemic treaty". In this brief call, we go over what this agreement really is about, the upcoming negotiating meetings, and why it is imperative you voice your dissent.
Many agree there will be no change and ultimately no peace without a thorough reappraisal of the coronavirus pandemic. As part of this reappraisal, Kla.TV is investigating its main actor, the World Health Organisation (WHO). This documentary thoroughly debunks the WHO‘s self-portrayal as a “health-promoting“ organisation and brings to light the deeply inhumane background and machinations of this organisation.
For almost a month, James Roguski has been calling for people to vlog their thoughts on the World Health Organisation’s proposed Pandemic Treaty.
“Publish your statement [on social media or the internet],” Roguski said a couple of weeks ago reiterating his call, “because at this point in time, as always, your silence is equivalent to your consent … If you’re silent and not going to speak up about it, nothing’s going to change.”
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon has answered the call. In the video message to Tedros the Terrorist, Dr. Stillwagon said:
“You want to push back on an anti-vaxxer? Well, push back on me, Mr. Tedros Gebreyesus. I’m your worst nightmare anti-vaxxer.
“Your vaccines work … they work at killing and maiming, not protecting.
“I’d be happy to openly debate with you or any other expert on these issues anytime, anywhere.”
