The "Line in the Sand".
The list of WHO members/regions is shown in this Wikipedia link. It was last updated 4May2024. Assuming the list is correct, those regions that sign the upcoming WHO Pandemic Treaty will be showing themselves as the Globalists that they are regardless of what rhetoric they speak versus those nations that decline and refuse what the Globalists seek to do through unLawful institutions.
Time will tell (not much time left for the revealing).
13:59 Fight Satan, to make this planet a better place, and for your right to survive, and go home.
13:60 Anyone, who is not actually fighting, for good, is automatically allowing, and, therefore, is
fighting for evil, because, by doing nothing, you are helping evil to win, by default; just as if you
were actually fighting for Satan, against God, yet-again. âHe who is not WITH me, is AGAINST
meâ (Matt. 12:30 & Rev. 3:15-19).
ARMAGEDDON SURVIVAL-KIT CD available from http://JAHTruth.net/ask
81
13:61 There is NO middle-ground, and you can NOT sit on the fence, because your time is running-
out, and you are getting closer to âThe Fireâ, and your execution.
Fight or die!
13:62 Fight with the truth, love and DETERMINATION. Determination is will-power, and the will
is the eye of the soul. If you donât have enough will-power, of your own (even though your life
depends on it), ask God to help you and to reinforce your will-power (Mark 9:24).
13:63 If you donât fight for God, then, not only are you going to die, but you are also hurting
yourselves, because you are helping to make the world into a worse place, for yourselves to have to
live in.
In an interview published April 19, Dr. Masanori Fukushima, who spearheaded the first cancer outpatient clinic at Kyoto University and launched the first course in pharmacoepidemiology there, listed a slew of problems with the COVID mRNA jabs, evidencing what he called an evil âabuse of science.â
He pointed out that âturbo cancers,â a kind âpreviously unseen by doctorsâ that progress extremely quickly and are typically in stage four by the time they are diagnosed, have started to appear after the jab rollouts. These âturbo cancersâ are emerging along with excess mortality due to cancer in general, which Fukushima says cannot be explained only by lost opportunities for screenings or treatment during the COVID outbreak.
As a tragic example of the fatal danger of the COVID shots, the oncologist shared the story of a 28-year-old man who was found dead by his wife when she tried to wake him in the morning, five days after he received his second Pfizer shot.
âThe doctor who did the autopsy said that when he tried to remove the heart, it was soft and had disintegrated,â Fukushima said. âAnd even just one case like this shows how dangerous this vaccine can be.â
He pointed out that these severe harms, including death, have been afflicting people â post-jab â who have a history of good health.
âItâs serious. Itâs essentially murder. In the end, I want to state clearly that this is my view,â the doctor said.
He lamented that the media, including newspapers, generally have not reported on these harms, and that in fact those who question the safety of the COVID shots â just as with the flu shots â have been characterized as anti-science âheretics.â He described the attitude of those who shut down the voices COVID âvaccineâ critics, however, as far from scientific, and âmore akin to faith, hysteria or even cult behavior.â
âI am now deeply concerned not only about a serious crisis in medicine but in science and democracy,â Fukushima said.
He highlighted the fact that countries that most aggressively pushed the COVID shot, such as Israel, saw the highest rates of death and infection, as shown by studies comparing Middle Eastern countries, including Jordan, Syria and Egypt. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arranged a special deal with Pfizer to use Israelis as lab rats in a national injection program with the Pfizer Covid âvaccine.â
âIsrael led in early and widespread vaccination but also had the highest death and infection rates. The less aggressively vaccinated areas saw less harm,â said Fukushima, noting that âIsrael was quick to halt the vaccine.â
There were problems, moreover, with the very technology used to administer the mRNA â the lipid nanoparticles â that the doctor said result in âoff-target effectsâ on various organs, including the ovaries, brain, liver, and bone marrow.
Worse, the spike proteins produced by the mRNA have been detected in the human body more than a year after the administration of the COVID shot, noted the oncologist, indicating âa severe problem.â
The doctor took aim at the World Health Organization (WHO) for âhastilyâ pushing the COVID shots without proper investigation, and moreover for trying to enforce a one-size-fits-all approach in countries with widely varying âmedical circumstances, habits, and systems,â calling it âsomewhat absurd.â
He argued that it is âcrucialâ that the WHO take responsibility for the harms of the COVID shots, which he called âan abuse, a misuse of science and an evil practice of science, to be frank.â
Fukushima pointed out that the WHO is âawareâ of harms from the so-called vaccines because they are compensating for these damages in certain countries, and yet they are not properly addressing the COVID shot-induced death and injury through an investigation and report.
âImagine finding your spouse dead in the morning. Itâs no joke. A vaccine that causes such outcomes, even a single death, is unacceptable,â said Fukushima, adding that in Japan alone, the government has documented 2,134 deaths reported due to the COVID shot, which is likely a low estimate.
âThere are tens of thousands of people who must see a doctor because of vaccine-related issues,â he continued, asserting that a big chunk of them â 30 percent â are âsuffering from ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis) or chronic fatigue syndrome.â
This is just the beginning, according to Fukushima, because the rates of all sorts of diseases have been spiking since the COVID shot rollout, including âautoimmune disease, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and infections.â
âItâs as if weâve opened Pandoraâs box⌠We must take these damages seriously and address them earnestly. Any efforts to dismiss these damages as if they didnât happen are frankly the work of evil. This is a quintessential example of the evil practice of science,â Fukushima said.
He called on scientific and medical institutions, led by the WHO, to directly confront these outcomes through research efforts in order to âshine the light of scienceâ on the shots.
âWe should never again use such vaccines,â he said. âThis is a shame for humanity. Itâs a disgrace that we did this.â
Source document: Japanâs most senior cancer doctor: COVID shots are âessentially murderâ - LifeSite
Japanâs most senior cancer doctor Dr. Masanori Fukushima - COVID shots are âessentially murderâ -- With link to document below the video in description section
âThis Pandemic Treaty, if implemented, will change the global landscape and strip you and me of some of our most basic rights and freedoms.
Make no mistake, the WHO Pandemic Treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.â (Peter Koenig)
The Worldwide QR Verification Code project lays the groundwork for the instatement of a âDigitized Global Police Stateâ controlled by the financial establishment. Itâs part of what the late David Rockefeller entitled âThe March towards World Governmentâ based on an alliance of bankers and intellectuals (See Michel Chossudovsky, Chapter XII). Peter Koenig describes the QR Code as:
âan all-electronic ID â linking everything to everything of each individual (records of health, banking, personal and private, etc.).â
The World Health Organizationâs (WHO) General Assembly, the World Health Assembly (WHA) representing all 194 member states, will take place in Geneva, from 27 May to 1 June 2024.
During that crucial week, the WHA is expected to vote on the controversial âPandemic Treatyâ and the new revised International Health Regulation (IHR, last revision 2005).
These two strategic pillars of the covid-19 agenda are:
Unprecedented in World history, these two strategic pillars are currently instrumental in triggering a process of depopulation which indelibly points to extensive crimes against humanity.
At the time of writing (June 2022) the fourth jab of the Covid-19 âvaccineâ is being administered resulting in a dramatic increase in the number of victims.
The enforcement of the depopulation agenda requires a socially repressive structure of âglobal governanceâ controlled by the financial establishment.
It also requires a cohesive propaganda apparatus with a view to enforcing social acceptance Worldwide . In turn, this process requires the demise of the institutions of representative government coupled with the criminalization of the judicial system.
The first part of this article focusses on âdigital tyrannyâ, namely the structures of âWorld Governanceâ, which are slated to be implemented in late May 2024 under the auspices of the WHO Pandemic Treaty.
Were it to be adopted, the Treaty would override the authority of WHO member states. It would create a giant data bank at the level of the entire planet, namely âa global health governance entityâ, which is the object of Part I of this article
Part II of the article focusses on the Eugenist Depopulation Agenda, its historical roots and its Worldwide implementation by the Globalists.
.
âA worldwide digital ID system is in the making. ⌠The aim of the WEFâand of all the central banks [is] to implement a global system in which everyoneâs personal data will be incorporated into the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) network.
In early 2022, the WHO signed a major contract with Deutsche Telekom T Systems to develop a QR Verification App and Software which is to be applied Worldwide.
The QR code-based software solution is slated to be used:
âfor other vaccinations as well, such as polio or yellow fever, T-Systems said in a statement ⌠adding that the WHO would support its 194 member states in building national and regional verification technology.â (emphasis added)
According to a Deutsche Telekom I-T Systems Communique âThe WHOâs gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systemsâ, which essentially implies a coordinated global structure of QR surveillance, which oversees the entire population of Planet Earth.
And once established: it will police âevery aspect of our livesâ, wherever our location. âIt can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records.â
According to the CEO of Deutsche Telecom T Systems:
âCorona has a grip on the world. Digitization keeps the world runningâ.
Bill Gates had a long-standing relationship with Deutsche Telekomâs former CEO Ron Sommer going back to the late 1990s.
Continued at link...
The ninth meeting of the International Negotiating Body (âINB9â) has failed to yield an agreement ahead of next weekâs 77th World Health Assembly (âWHAâ). However, delegates were still optimistic yesterday that an agreement on a Pandemic Accord would eventually be reached.
Although it seems we might have been given a temporary respite, the fight to defeat the World Health Organisationâs (âWHOâsâ) pandemic plans is not yet over.
Besides the Pandemic Accord there is also WHOâs proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Dr. Meryl Nass shares a white paper explaining why developing countries should vote to defeat WHOâs proposals and why people of goodwill everywhere should be delighted if both of WHOâs proposals fail.
The people who brought us the disastrous national and global response to the outbreak of covid-19 have been labouring assiduously, by all means possible, to convince the world that they were right about the origins of the pandemic, about what needed to be done to contain it, about the importance of evidence and science in making decisions, that all collateral damage was caused by the pandemic and not by policy choices that benefitted almost no one, and that any failures that occurred are due to misinformation and disinformation and the vaccine resistance that it caused.
This fairy tale has been put on trial in Geneva, where developing countries have been opposing a massive, concerted effort to push two sets of binding international agreements. These instruments will establish a $155 billion global apparatus to make sure that all resistance will be suppressed the next time the WHO Director-General exercises his unilateral authority to declare a pandemic emergency.
The accompanying white paper explains why developing countries, who have been most harmed by the massive economic and financial fallout from the pandemic policy responses, should vote to defeat these proposals, and why people of goodwill everywhere should be delighted if both proposals fail.
The Pandemic Treaty Will Compound Past Mistakes, Dr. Meryl Nass, 24 May 2024
The following is the white paper mentioned in the quote above from Dr. Nass as published by Brownstone Institute.
By Michael T. Clark and Meryl Nass
The new Pandemic Agreement and revisions to the International Health Regulations (IHR) â both legally binding instruments â are being negotiated for adoption during the 77th meeting of the World Health Assembly, 27 May to 1 June 2024.
This article, by Michael T. Clark, explains why developing country delegates should vote no, and why prudent national, provincial, and community public health leaders everywhere should welcome a decision to scrap the current proposals, undertake a serious reflection on what just happened during the covid-19 pandemic, and begin anew.
Michael T. Clark is a specialist in the political economy of international relations. He has held a variety of positions in international diplomacy, business, research, and the international civil service, including more than nine years as Senior Coordinator for Governance and Policy at the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations. He earned his BA at Harvard and an MA and PhD at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.
The identification of apparently new, emergent virus outbreaks is an artefact resulting from the recent advances in the technology of pathogen testing and identification â PCR, antigen, serology, and digital sequencing â and the growing reach and sophistication of public health systems worldwide. Most pathogens in the WHO global mapping of viruses should not be described as new or emergent, but newly identified or characterised. Most are also either low virulence or low transmissibility resulting in very low mortality.
Deaths on the order of magnitude of covid-19 due to naturally occurring pathogenic outbreaks are extremely rare â on the best evidence available, a once-in-129-year event. As demonstrated by researchers at Leeds University, the evidence from the last century and the first 20 years of this century shows that pandemic caseloads, frequency of outbreaks and lethality reached a peak nearly twenty years ago and have been declining sharply ever since. The urgency of putting in place new and binding arrangements in expectation of an impending global viral attack is not justified by evidence.
The policy response included travel bans, lockdowns, school closures, mask and vaccine mandates, accelerated vaccine development and curtailed safety and efficacy testing, and widespread indemnification of manufacturers of health products, including medicines, test kits, and vaccines against liability and compensation for harm. There was also experimentation with social control, suppression of free speech and denial of other basic human rights.
Cntinued at link...
The old system, NWO is crumbling, everyone MUST return to, enforcing God's Law, ( Let the Inhabitants of The Rock sing the âNew Songâ) in order to defeat evil Government/W.H.O. anything that opposes His Law and enslaves the people.
The final meeting of the 9th meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body was held on Friday May 24, 2024. The live stream of the 9th meeting of the INB has just ended.
After a short delay, the recording of the meeting should be available here:
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/e/e_inb-9-resumed-session.html
No official documents have been published.
Also, there is no word yet on the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
They have failed to reach an agreement, but they have not yet given up.
Now is the time to work even harder!
By Rhoda Wilson on May 28, 2024 â˘
Nothing in WHOâs Pandemic Treaty can rise from the ashes of the negotiations to be voted on this week. The treaty is done.
And of the amended International Health Regulations articles that were agreed upon and will be put forward for countries to vote on this week, the only one of any real concern relates to the surveillance of citizens to combat misinformation and disinformation.
However, as Dr. Meryl Nass points out, governments are already monitoring our speech, censoring and propagandising us. So, although it is a great concern, it is nothing new.
Continued at link...
By Rhoda Wilson on May 30, 2024 â˘
A draft resolution on the Pandemic Treaty submitted by 47 African nations to the 77th World Health Assembly on Tuesday proposes two things:
At first glance, it doesnât seem that these proposals bear any significance. But Dr. Nass explained why they are of benefit.
By the INB continuing in its present form, the bureaucrats are prevented from âswapping outâ negotiators that they feel would not go along with the agenda.
âIt also means that the negotiators will all have the necessary institutional memory of the process so far, and can avoid having to rework areas already handled,â Dr. Nass said. â And it means that no new negotiating body will be created whose members could be wild cards.â
âI like this!â
By time-limiting future negotiations to conclude before the end of the year, âstops the process from being dragged out forever, from costing nations too much and yet provides a reasonable timeline for discussions to be concluded,â Dr. Nass explained.
âIt is likely that the negotiations will therefore end in November after the US presidential elections. This is something the globalists did not want, given the positions of Trump and Kennedy on the WHO,â she added.
Continued at link...
RFK Jr.: Help Me Stop The WHO Treaty
"I apologize to all of you. So many have died, and they shouldnât have"
Today, the largest protest against the World Health Organization (WHO) began, with an opening speech by Kazuhiro Haraguchi, a former Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications in Japan and a current member of the House of Representatives. The massive gathering aimed to highlight several critical issues, as Haraguchi delivered a powerful and heartfelt address that resonated with many.
Haraguchi began by addressing the grief and loss felt by countless individuals and families due to the pandemic. With a deep sense of sincerity, he extended his condolences and took responsibility for the failings of those in power. "I apologize to all of you. So many have died, and they shouldnât have, " he said. His words reflected a deep empathy and regret for the preventable tragedies that have occurred, setting a somber yet resolute tone for the event.
One of the key points in Haraguchiâs speech was his criticism of the ban on Ivermectin, a drug developed by Dr. Satoshi Omura, which he believed could have played a significant role in combating the pandemic. Haraguchi questioned the motives behind the ban, suggesting that economic interests were prioritized over public health. "Why? Because they are cheap. They don't want it because it will interfere with the sales of the vaccines, " he argued. This statement drew loud applause from the crowd, many of whom felt that corporate profits had taken precedence over human lives.
Haraguchi then shared a deeply personal story about his own health struggles. After receiving vaccines, he developed a severe illness, specifically a rapidly progressing form of cancer. "This time last year, I had neither eyebrows nor hair. Two out of the three supposed vaccines I received were lethal batches, " he revealed. This candid account of his battle with cancer, which included significant physical changes like hair loss, struck a chord with the audience. He recounted an incident where his appearance became a point of distraction in the Diet, with an opponent focusing more on his wig than the issues at hand.
Adding to the conversation, Haraguchi disclosed that he was not the only member of Japan's National Diet to suffer adverse effects from vaccines. He mentioned that three of his colleagues had been severely affected, with some even hospitalized. "They are falling to pieces, some hospitalized. But they donât speak up, " he explained. This revelation underscored a broader issue: the reluctance or inability of public figures to discuss their personal health challenges openly.
Haraguchi was particularly passionate about the attempts to silence those who question current policies and government actions. He recounted a recent incident where he was banned from speaking on Channel 3 after an interview with its president. "The other day, I spoke with the President of Channel 3, and I was banned. They are trying to silence our voices, " he stated. This attempt to censor dissenting voices highlighted a critical concern about freedom of speech and expression. Haraguchi urged the audience to remain steadfast in their resolve, saying, "They are trying to block our freedom, our resistance, our power. But we will never lose ."
In the conclusion of his speech, Haraguchi issued a rallying call for action. He urged the people to stand united in challenging the government and its questionable decisions. "Letâs overthrow this government, " he proclaimed, emphasizing the need for change and accountability. He called on legislators to continue fighting for the peopleâs lives and freedoms, "Letâs make it happen," he concluded.
The protest that is happening right now (31st May 2024), which aims to draw tens of thousands of participants, marked a significant moment in the global discourse about pandemic management and health policies. Haraguchiâs speech, filled with personal anecdotes and strong criticisms, resonated deeply with the attendees.
Phillip Kruse, Attorney on Amendments to the International Health Regulations and on Possible Dangers That Are Hiding in Those Amendments
SENATORS URGE BIDEN TO REJECT WHO PANDEMIC TREATY
Tedros in Ireland - The Irish Reject The WHO Pandemic Treaty
WHO "Pandemic Treatyâ Fails
WHO tyranny threatens health sovereignty
The World Health Organization (WHO), originally established as an advisory body, has a troubling history of health mismanagement and corruption. Of particular concern are the current negotiations, conducted behind closed doors and without substantial public input, which aim to transform the WHO into a controlling body with unilateral, legally binding authority over member states.
(Article republished from TheTruthAboutCancerOfficial.Substack.com)
Yes, you read that correctly! The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations currently being negotiated by the WHO are specifically designed to override national sovereignty and transfer legally binding authority to the WHO.
This is NOT a conspiracy theory.
Here is the evidence â three official WHO documents (1,2,3).
The proposed changes to the WHOâs core nature and powers directly contradict and nullify the Joint Resolution signed by President Harry Truman in 1948. This resolution explicitly stated that the US is not bound to enact any specific legislative program regarding matters outlined in the WHO's Constitution.
Under the proposed amendments, membership in the WHO would impose legally binding requirements on the United States. This could force us to enact specific legislation that goes against the principles of the US Constitution, potentially infringing on our sovereignty and unalienable rights.
Here are a few excerpts from the International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) Final Report:
âThe proposed amendments to these definitions could be understood as aiming to change the nature of these recommendations from non-binding to binding, and giving a binding effect to WHO recommendations and requests as proposed in other articles.â (page 26)
*âThis proposal also renders mandatory the temporary and standing recommendations addressed under Articles 15 and 16.â (*page 55)
*âThe proposed amendment to include a reference to temporary and standing recommendations seems to make application of these recommendations obligatory.â (*page 67)
*âThis Committee is concerned that these proposals may unduly impinge on the sovereignty of States Parties and give binding effects to what are supposed to be recommendations.â (*page 68)
The 75th World Health Assembly adopted amendments to 5 articles of the International Health Regulations that dramatically reduced the time the 194 member nations will be allowed to reject future amendments. No signatures from leaders or approvals by any Parliament or Senate were required to enact those amendments into international law, which is legally binding on all nations. This happened in 2022, and it can happen again.
Continued membership in WHO is not just a matter of health policy, it's a matter of our constitutional rights. It is incompatible with the US Constitution and our legal system, a fact that should resonate deeply with all of us as citizens.
Continued at link...
Ex WHO Consultant Says WHO Leadership is "Compromised" & Seizing Power Through New Pandemic Treaty w/ Dr. Tess Lawrie â Ask Dr. Drew
