Spain Gloats It Has Been Given Control of Gibraltar’s Borders as Part of Brexit Deal

Spain on Tuesday again signalled before the United Nations its willingness to reach a UK/EU treaty on Gibraltar’s post-Brexit relations with the bloc, adding it sees “enormous potential for prosperity” on both sides of the border.

The message was delivered to the UN Fourth Committee in New York by Agustín Santos Maraver, Spain’s permanent representative at the UN.

But as he does every year, Mr Santos also underscored Spain’s traditional stance on sovereignty and territorial integrity, insisting that any agreement on Gibraltar would not impact on that position.

The Spanish intervention drew a response from the UK Government, which said it enjoyed “a modern and mature relationship” with Gibraltar and reaffirmed its commitment to self-determination for the people of Gibraltar.

Addressing delegates at the session, Mr Santos echoed the words of Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez in an address to the UN General Assembly last month, during which he repeated before the international community his government’s wish to develop “an area of social and economic prosperity” covering Gibraltar and the Campo de Gibraltar.

“Spain is favourable to the prosperity of both the inhabitants of the Campo de Gibraltar and those of the Rock,” Mr Santos told the Fourth Committee on Tuesday.

“We believe there is enormous potential for prosperity on both sides of the [border] fence.”

“We have demonstrated that in the negotiations on Brexit, which the majority of the population of the Rock of Gibraltar voted against in the referendum.”

Mr Santos said the UK and Spain had negotiated a tax agreement and four memorandums on citizen rights, tobacco, police and customs cooperation and the environment as part of a negotiating process that sought a Brexit “as orderly as possible”.

And he told the UN too that the political framework agreement reached on New Years’ Eve in 2020 “should serve as the foundation” for a future UK/EY agreement on Gibraltar’s post-Brexit relations with the bloc.

“The objective of this understanding is the creation of a zone of shared prosperity, as the prime minister of the Government of Spain, Pedro Sanchez, signalled before the General Assembly a few weeks ago,” Mr Santos added.

“That understanding must not permit, through action or measures in its application, any modification of Spain’s legal position in respect of sovereignty and jurisdiction in relation to Gibraltar.”

Mr Santos said Spain had always been willing to negotiate with the UK in line with UN resolutions on territorial integrity, which he described as “the only available solution” to Gibraltar’s decolonisation.

“I want to reiterate, as in previous years, our willingness to reach an agreement with the UK to put in place a new framework of regional cooperation for the benefit of inhabitants on both sides of the fence that divides Gibraltar [from Spain],” he added.

Mr Santos outlined Spain’s traditional position on Gibraltar, referring to the Treaty of Utrecht and arguing that Gibraltar had no territorial waters or airspace.

He referred too to UN resolutions calling on the UK and Spain to agree the decolonisation of Gibraltar in accordance with the principle of territorial integrity, resolutions that the UK was “ignoring”.

But he introduced too a new observation that highlighted a key issue for Spain in its relations with Gibraltar, namely the British military presence here.

“As is known, the nucleus of the colonial situation in Gibraltar is the British military presence on the Rock, which again goes against the doctrine of the United Nations’ General Assembly,” he said.

At the end of the Fourth Committee session, the UK Government exercised its right of reply and welcomed earlier submissions by the Gibraltar Government and the Self Determination for Gibraltar Group.

“The United Kingdom's position is clear regarding its sovereignty over Gibraltar and the territorial waters surrounding it,” a UK diplomat to the session in New York.

“The United Kingdom also recalls that the people of Gibraltar enjoy the right of self-determination.”

“The 2006 Gibraltar Constitution, which was endorsed in a referendum by the people of Gibraltar, provides for a modern and mature relationship between Gibraltar and the United Kingdom.”

“The Government of the United Kingdom restates its longstanding commitment to the people of Gibraltar that it will not enter into arrangements under which the people of Gibraltar would pass under the sovereignty of another state against their freely and democratically expressed wishes.”

The UK intervention prompted another reply from a Spanish diplomat, who again told the UN that Gibraltar had been captured by military force and that its “original inhabitants” had been expelled and replaced with “settlers”.

He repeated too Spain’s position that Gibraltar has no territorial waters or airspace, and its view that Gibraltarians did not have the right to self-determination.

“In line with UN doctrine, Spain rejects the attempts by the administering power and the authorities of the colonised territory to alter their political relationship to pretend there are no colonial ties, while at the same time claiming a hypothetical right to self-determination,” he said.

“It is Spain that suffers colonisation on its territory, which is why Spain has the right for that same territory to be decolonised though the restoration of its national unity and territorial integrity.”

1 Like

*Unknown whether British military considerations impact on treaty
*Reference made by Spain at the UN to British military
*Military considerations should not stop Gibexit treaty
*Spain emphatic of potential for shared prosperity
*Military reference at UN is new development coinciding with Gibexit talks
*Rumours persist about military considerations posing a problem in talks
*Gibraltar’s support for British military is steadfast and unwavering
*Mood of optimisms reigns in statements from Gibraltar and Spain

SPAIN HIGHLIGHTS MILITARY TO UN

It is difficult from the outside to understand what, if any, influence the British military presence in Gibraltar will have on the desire of all parties to reach a treaty on Gibexit between the UK and the EU. Such a treaty is intended to govern Gibraltar’s future relations and engagement with the EU.

The issue arises due to, aside from rumour, a reference to the British military by Agustin Santos Maraver in his address to the UN Fourth Committee last Tuesday, 4th October 2022. He is Spain’s permanent representative to the UN.

He mentioned that presence after making the usual arguments with emphasis this year on the desire to create the circumstances for shared prosperity. The mention of the military indicates that it is a consideration that may be playing on the minds of those negotiating any Gibexit treaty.

Hopefully military matters will not be a brake that will result in no ‘deal’. The impact of that on the civilian population of Gibraltar will likely be substantial. A no ‘deal’ result should only come about if there are fundamental concessions on sovereignty, jurisdiction and control sought that will favour Spain.

HUGE POTENTIAL FOR PROSPERITY

The reference to the military came after Mr. Maraver had underscored Spain’s belief that there was a great deal of potential to unleash prosperity on both sides of the border. He emphasised also that a tax agreement and memorandums on tobacco, citizens’ rights, the environment, and customs cooperation had been reached in the negotiations.

He went on to refer to the objective of the New Years’ Eve framework agreement of 2020, which he said is intended as the foundation of the proposed Gibexit treaty, being to create “a zone of shared prosperity” He emphasised that Spain wished to agree with the UK a framework to benefit those living on both sides of the border.

On those subjects not involving the military Mr. Maraver is on the same page as the submissions being reported as having been made on the part of Gibraltar and the UK. In short there seems to be progress towards agreement.

All that remains conditioned on Spain’s well-known position on the sovereignty and jurisdiction of Gibraltar not being changed by any agreements. In this context Mr. Maraver referred to the Treaty of Utrecht, UN decolonising resolutions based on territorial integrity.

MILITARY CONSIDERATIONS

Mr. Maraver is reported in the Gibraltar Chronicle of 6th October 2022 however of introducing “a new observation that highlighted a key issue for Spain in its relations with Gibraltar”. It says that consideration is “the British Military presence”.

He is quoted as having pointed out, “As is known the nucleus of the colonial situation in Gibraltar is the British military presence on the Rock”.

The timing of this reference to the military could be significant. It coincides with the ongoing talks between the UK and the EU to arrive at a Gibexit treaty covering the future relationship of Gibraltar with the EU.

WORD ON THE STREET

In hushed voices people speak not so much of the British military presence but about issues that may have arisen in the Gibexit talks about how such personnel will be treated by EU immigration authorities.

The talk is of lack of agreement as to how military personnel will be made known to EU officials upon entering Gibraltar. They gain access to the whole of the EU upon entry to Gibraltar if a treaty is agreed. It is suggested that the UK military are reticent to inform about the identity and details of such individuals which the EU does not accept.

GIBRALTAR’S SUPPORT FOR BRITISH MILITARY

There is no doubting that Gibraltar welcomes, encourages and is fully supportive of the British military in Gibraltar. It is the most tangent sign of British sovereignty, jurisdiction, and control in Gibraltar, and it is seen as such.

Any further reduction of that will not be welcomed as indeed past cuts have not been liked. The consolation has been that those have been due to UK wide Defence cuts. A reduction of or the use of Gibraltar’s military installations due to Gibexit arrangements will be even less welcome.

The indications are that there is an increased use of Gibraltar by the British military in the last months. Certainly, the visit of Royal Navy vessels over several months and the permanent stationing of one in Gibraltar indicate greater use of Gibraltar. Those visits are coincidental with a visit by a US nuclear submarine.

OUTCOME AWAITED

The conclusion of the Gibexit talks is keenly awaited. The mood is one of optimism as that is the message being given by the Chief Minister, Fabian Picardo. It is also the message coming from Spain.

Last week Juan Jose Sanz, the representative in the Campo de Gibraltar of Spain’s Foreign Ministry, said that Spain remained optimistic that a Gibexit ‘deal’ was possible and that much progress had been made with many parts agreed already. His emphasis was on the details of the negotiations being diabolically complicated.

He indicated that some issues remained to be resolved and that those were “very important issues on which we are working, where there are proposals on the table”. He said that he had been asked by his Ministry to convey a message of optimism, saying “We firmly believe that an agreement is possible.”

At no point did he refer to the British military presence in Gibraltar being a difficulty.

The UK Government is “acutely conscious” of the importance of a fluid border to the Rock’s economy and to thousands of workers in neighbouring Spain, Leo Docherty, the Minister for Europe, said on Tuesday, adding it was “in everyone’s interests” to get negotiations on a UK/EU treaty for Gibraltar “wrapped up” by the end of the year.

Speaking during a visit to Gibraltar, Mr Docherty acknowledged differences yet to be resolved in the treaty talks but expressed optimism that agreement was possible and that all sides were keen to successfully conclude the negotiation.

He underscored too the UK Government’s “100% commitment” to the sovereignty double-lock, under which there will be no discussion or change to Gibraltar’s British sovereignty against the wishes of the Gibraltarians.

“My judgement is that there must be sort of ‘win, win’ situation,” Mr Docherty told the Chronicle during an interview in The Convent on Tuesday morning.

“There are some 9,000 [Spanish] people who come from Spain into Gibraltar every day to work in really good jobs here.”

“That’s in their interests and it’s also in the interests of Gibraltar.”

“The fantastic economic model that you have built here depends on that symbiotic relationship and Gibraltar’s unique position.”

“It seems entirely sensible that everyone collectively – UK, Gibraltar and Spain – would want that to continue.”

“Negotiations are always difficult and I certainly wouldn’t want to get into the details.”

“But in broad strokes, of course there’s positioning and there’s uncertainty, but I think fundamentally there is a landing ground where it can work for both sides.”

“Clearly what we’re acutely conscious of is the inconvenience that people might face at the frontier and the impact that could have on people and families.”

“We want people to have certainty, basically, and I remain optimistic.”

“We would never do anything that undermines Gibraltar’s sovereignty, but I think for economic reasons first and foremost, there are compelling reasons to think that a settlement can be arrived at.”

Mr Docherty landed in Gibraltar just a day after attending the annual British Spanish Tertulias forum in Oxford, an event that brings together MPs, business people, academics and artists to discuss topical issues.

He was also present at a meeting between UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly and his Spanish counterpart, Jose Manuel Albares, on the sidelines of that forum, during which the two foreign ministers discussed a range of issues including the Gibraltar negotiation.

Mr Docherty was accompanied on his trip to Gibraltar by key UK officials in the negotiation with the EU, including Julian Braithwaite, the Director General for Europe at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, and Lindsay Croisdale-Appleby, the UK’s ambassador to the EU who has been involved on Brexit and Gibraltar issues since 2016.

The minister and his officials met with Chief Minister Fabian Picardo, Deputy Chief Minister Dr Joseph Garcia and Attorney General Michael Llamas over dinner on Wednesday night to discuss the latest developments on the treaty talks.

Earlier in the day he visited the air terminal and the border to see at first hand the current arrangements and better understand how these might change if a treaty is agreed.

Negotiators from the UK – with Gibraltar – and the EU concluded the ninth formal round in London last week, almost a year to the day since the process began in October 2021.

The UK, Gibraltar and Spain have repeatedly signalled their desire to conclude an agreement that ensures continued border fluidity as the key to unlocking shared cross-border prosperity after Brexit.

But few details have been made public as to the content of any agreement and, despite the positive messaging, officials have also acknowledged that differences remain.

On Tuesday, Mr Docherty said external factors such as the war in Ukraine, which has placed the UK and EU governments under immense pressure as they coordinate their response, and the Northern Ireland protocol, which has strained UK-EU relations, should not impact progress in the Gibraltar negotiation.

In fact, Mr Docherty said, they could have the opposite effect, as could the new administration in London and a looming general election in Spain next year.

“I would say they’d be accelerant factors,” he said, adding this issue was discussed during the Tertulias meeting in Oxford at the weekend.

“They agreed that the cooperation between UK-Spain because of our collective response to Ukraine is very, very deep.”

“I think that kind of reminds us all that we need to get on with each other and settle other bilateral issues more quickly than not.”

“So the geo-political context of the challenge from the east is one that would accelerate things rather than put a brake on them.”

Even so, Mr Docherty was reluctant to be drawn on any timescale for conclusion of the negotiation on Gibraltar.

“I hope it will be done by the end of the year,” he told the Chronicle.

“There are various accelerant factors, for example domestic politics in Spain not least [a reference to the Spanish general election due next year].”

“I think that’s important to bear in mind.”

“We’ve now got a new administration in the UK, so I think there’s a strong appetite from our side to get it concluded.”

“So I hope that because of fresh impetus from the UK and a desire from the Spanish side to get it concluded, with a following wind it would be marvellous to have it done by the end of the year.”

“But politicians have learnt by bitter experience to under-promise and over-deliver and never, ever promise anything with regards to things being done by Christmas.”

“It would be in everyone’s interests, economically, politically, and I’ll be going to Madrid sometime soon after this to do whatever I can to keep pushing the process on.”

“It would be good for all sides to get this wrapped up.”

Mr Docherty, a former soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and was a defence minister prior to his latest role, also visited the Royal Navy’s Gibraltar Squadron during his trip to the Rock.

He told the Chronicle “I really do understand” the role of the UK military in Gibraltar and the Rock’s “hugely valuable” strategic importance.

And he played down speculation that disagreement between the UK and Spain on Gibraltar’s military role was impacting the negotiation on the treaty.

Military issues do not form part of the treaty discussion but the UK and Spain have been engaged in separate bilateral talks on defence cooperation since last year.

“The context of course is that Spain and the UK are deep NATO allies and have a very, very close military relationship,” Mr Docherty told the Chronicle.

But he acknowledged too that despite that close defence partnership, there was friction over Gibraltar.

Mr Docherty said it was “remarkable” that there was not closer cooperation between the UK and Spain in this region.

“Perhaps it would be advantageous if two NATO allies coordinated better, but that of course is not part of the [treaty] negotiation,” he said.

Pressed on whether progress on the bilateral conversation on defence issues between the UK and Spain was acting as a brake on the Gibraltar treaty negotiation, Mr Docherty replied: “No, not at all.”

BREXIT

BREXIT: Spain and EU suggest removing Gibraltar border

Madrid and Brussels have approached the British government with a proposal for removing the border fence between Spain and Gibraltar in order to ease freedom of movement, Spain's top diplomat said Friday.

Published: 26 November 2022

BREXIT: Spain and EU suggest removing Gibraltar border

Vehicles queue at La Línea de la Concepción at the border between Spain and Gibraltar on January 4th 2021. (Photo by JORGE GUERRERO / AFP)

“The text presented to the United Kingdom is a comprehensive proposal that includes provisions on mobility with the aim of removing the border fence and guaranteeing freedom of movement,” Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares said, according to a ministry statement.

Such a move would make Spain, as representative of Europe’s passport-free Schengen zone, “responsible for controlling Gibraltar’s external borders”, it said.

The Schengen Area allows people to move freely across the internal borders of 26 member states, four of which are not part of the EU.

There was no immediate response from London.

A tiny British enclave at Spain’s southern tip, Gibraltar’s economy provides a lifeline for some 15,000 people who cross in and out to work every day.

Most are Spanish and live in the impoverished neighbouring city of La Línea.

Although Brexit threw Gibraltar’s future into question, raising fears it would create a new “hard border” with the EU, negotiators reached a landmark deal for it to benefit from the rules of the Schengen zone just hours before Britain’s departure on January 1, 2021.

Details of the agreement have yet to be settled.

With a land area of just 6.8 square kilometres (2.6 square miles), Gibraltar is entirely dependent on imports to supply its 34,000 residents and the deal was crucial to avoid slowing cross-border goods trade with new customs procedures.

Albares said the proposal would mean Madrid “taking on a monitoring and protection role on behalf of the EU with regards to the internal market with the removal of the customs border control” between Spain and Gibraltar.

The deal would “guarantee the free movement of goods between the EU and Gibraltar” while guaranteeing respect for fair competition, meaning businesses in the enclave would “compete under similar conditions to those of other EU operators, notably those in the surrounding area”.

Although Spain ceded Gibraltar to Britain in 1713, Madrid has long wanted it back in a thorny dispute that has for decades involved pressure on the frontier.

The Chief Minister has confirmed the 10th round of treaty talks between the UK and the EU on Gibraltar have been 'very successful' and that both sides are still trying to work towards an early agreement.

Speaking on GBC's Direct Democracy, he stressed Gibraltar would not be an extension of the Schengen Area, which he said would start at the frontier with Spain, adding Gibraltar would therefore keep its own immigration entry points. Nevertheless, he acknowledged that each side was looking at different models that work best for them.

Latest treaty talks successful Picardo says but both sides looking at...

Spanish demands on pensions and the visible presence of their officers in Gibraltar airport and port could scupper the treaty negotiations. The tough position on such matters taken by the Gibraltar government has, according to the Spanish press, meant that it has not been possible to conclude a treaty as yet.

CONFLICTING
The Chief Minister would probably say that a treaty could have been concluded in ten seconds if Gibraltar gave Spain everything it wanted. This is clearly not a realistic proposition so what has ensued for many months is a negotiation where two sides try to agree the conflicting positions they have arrived at coming to the centre from very different angles.