Baltic state chihuahas lead by women trying to kick off WW3. The ZH readers aren’t fooled by the propaganda…
Do you believe that most likely it is just propaganda and that there in reality was no incursion? Or that if there was it was just a mistake or something and no big deal?
I believe the war-mongers in the west will make up any propaganda in order to justify ww3. They need to be able to point the finger at someone else for starting it, every accusation is an admission. Do you believe those phony drones held together with duct tape going way past their normal range were really launched by Russia? The west will use a false flag to start WW3, and I am sure just like 9/11 and 7/7 it will fool the “pyjama people”, who make up the majority.
So it seems that you believe it is most probable that this incident didn't happen and that it's western propaganda?
Because I believe that in this case one should not ignore past cases of incursion.
I did some digging and found atleast 11 incursions into Finnish airspace by Russia since 2014. 6 incursions into Estonia and 2 into Sweden. (source)
Have these also been fake?
If not, since f there's been so many does it not make the probability of the recent incursion into Estonia more probable?
Let's analyze one point at a time please. But concerning this I ask, do you believe that this is something that Russia would not do because, for instance, hey don't do things like that?
I am sure they do, do these things but not as much as the west.
So what you want to do Cybe, follow the women in charge in the west into battle because a few planes strayed over the border a few times? (I am sure travelling at Mach 2.0 it may easily be done). Or you want to shoot a few Russki planes down is that it, as has been suggested by a couple of the Euro-weenies? It all seems a bit hysterical OR more likely a propaganda/psyop to get people interested in WW3. Careful what you wish for…..
Thank you
So perhaps you believe all those atleast 11 incursions into Finnish airspace since 2014 atleast some were real incidents and not NATO propaganda? (You didn't reply to my first question).
Are you assuming this about me?
So is it your belief that they have just strayed, by mistake? And it's just a few times (so it's ok?).
You are sure? As in no doubt, 100% ?
I believe one would have to be quite knowledable in these matter to make such an assessment. Do you believe you know enough about how Russian military aviation operates, navigation, precision, etc?
The last incident lasted for 12 minutes, that's quite a long time and range for a jet.
You are assuming and as though making a straw man argument...
Me? Do you believe that I'm wishing for something?
Well you do seem fairly hysterical about it 
Seems accidents do happen, even in slow moving boats…Or is this a straw man/Ad hominem etc etc
Could you quote what I've said that has given you that idea and explain, please?
Thank you, I had not heard of that incident, very interesting.
I do not believe your message contains any of he properties of those fallacies.
Interesting whilst looking for links on this it seems the whole MSM in the west is in collective hysteria/warmonger mode. Could they be trying to deflect from problems closer to home perhaps? I can see why you think this is a big deal. Better to switch off your TV.
You are making assumptions again.
Again. I don't own a TV.
OK the Finnish MSM newspapers then
“It was the second such incident in three days involving a British RC-135 spy plane and two Typhoon fighter jets over the Black Sea. It happened last Wednesday. This weekend Russian fighters intercepted two American B-52H bombers in the waters of the Barents Sea. Three incidents involving NATO aircraft near Russia in one week”
This was over a year ago. Did you hear about this? No of course not, its a regular occurence.