RUSSIA VS NATO

I agree. And in order for this one needs to view many interesting possibilities and weigh them, compare them, look at various aspects of them etc and compare them with what one has learned previously etc...

If I've given anyone the appearance of trying to argue that some side's propaganda is the best I apologize for not communicating clearly enough.

And here we come again to the word argue which can be interpreted in quite differing ways.

Argue:

  1. Give reasons or cite evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory, typically with the aim of persuading others to share one's view.

I do not see anything wrong with this. However, there are times when the aims of persuading others to share that view isn't relevant/feasible/worth while.

  1. Exchange or express diverging or opposite views, typically in a heated or angry way.

I do not enjoy this and strive to never become angry.

I believe there is something else to gain here on the forum than just seeing who is right for the sake of being right or any other fruitless behavior.

What I enjoy is logical truthful communication with integrity.

Key aspects of integrity include:

  1. Honesty - Being truthful and transparent in communication and behavior.
  2. Moral uprightness - Adhering to ethical principles and doing what is right.
  3. Consistency - Aligning words, actions, and values, maintaining them across all contexts.
  4. Accountability - Owning one’s decisions and their consequences.
  5. Reliability - Being trustworthy and dependable.
1 Like