If I've posted links to articles/videos it's been mainly to share information and usually has not been my opinion. If you are able to better point out where I've given problematic opinions please cite them so that we know what you're talking about.
How do you know what I expect?
Isn't it a little bit too easy and imprecise just to say that. My comments? All of my comments? Do you really expect me to believe that they all are faulty somehow?
Compare that to really clearly seeing, understanding and being able to tune into the other persons "wavelenght" with the help of Father and explain in perfect detail (meaning not too little, not too much) so that the other person gets the optimal chance to see and learn?
By offering concrete examples and sound reasoning, you'd not only demonstrate your insight but also help me recognize and understand the patterns you claim are 'self-evident.' Without this, it’s hard for me (or anyone reading this?) to assess the validity of your statements, let alone learn or grow from them.
If you are not able to clearly show what I've said or done wrong and explain it and help me see and understand, perhaps someone else reading this can?
Not quite sure what list you are referring to. Do you mean when I said that I enjoy logical truthful communications with integrity and defined some key aspects of integrity?
Thank you. Likewise. Let's keep focusing on this, all of us, keeping the vital rules.