https://thecountersignal.com/pfizer-documents-over-1200-died-during-pfizer-vaccine-trials/
Following the release of the Pfizer documents, it’s now confirmed that 1,223 people died within the first 28 days after being inoculated with the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine during trials — and it was still approved for use.
Continued at the link.
These people are monsters.
Contradictions everywhere Pregnant women who had Covid vaccine 15% LESS likely to suffer stillbirth, 'reassuring' study finds | Daily Mail Online
It's horrifying seeing what they are capable of.
58 Babies Who Received mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Suffered Life-threatening Adverse Events
By Ranit Feinberg and Yaffa Shir-Raz
Real Time Magazine – via Global Research
An analysis of VAERS reports shows that contrary to the FDA’s briefing document claiming that the majority of adverse events in Pfizers’ clinical trial were non-serious – at least 58 cases of life-threatening side effects in infants under 3 years old who received mRNA vaccines were reported.
For some, it is unclear if they survived. It is also unclear why the infants were vaccinated, and whether they were part of the clinical trials.
“Chest pain; cardiac arrest; Skin cold clammy”. This short description of a cardiac arrest, which occurred one hour after receiving a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, is taken from the VAERS system – the US Vaccine Adverse Eve Reporting System ( case number 1015467), and it does not refer to an elderly person, nor to a young adult, or even a teenager. It is hard to believe, but this report refers to a two-month-old baby.
“A 2-month-old male patient received bnt162b2 (PFIZER-BioNTech COVID-19 VACCINE) lot number: EL 739, via an unspecified route of administration on 02 Feb 2021 at single dose for COVID-19 immunisation”, thus stated in the report.
“Patient administered vaccination, observed for 15 minutes left the clinic then returned one hour later on 02 Feb 2021, presenting as skin cold, clammy and with chest pain, cardiac arrest event then developed, patient stabilised and transferred for further medical treatment… The outcome of the events was unknown. This case was reported as serious with seriousness criteria-life threatening from HA. No follow-up attempts possible. No further information expected”.
How did a 2-month-old baby receive the mRNA vaccine? These vaccines have not yet received EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for approved use in children ages five and under by the FDA, or any other regulatory authority, and even if it will, the EUA will only include babies 6 months and older.
Was this baby a participant in Pfizer-BioNTech’s clinical trials, testing efficacy and safety among babies?
The answer is unclear. According to the person who wrote the report “Unsure if patient was enrolled in clinical trial”. However, the author of the report also states that the report was ”received from a contactable Other Health Care Professional by Pfizer from the Regulatory Agency”.
This note implies that the infant might have actually participated in Pfizer’s trial. The regulatory agency report Safety Report Unique Identifier GB-MHRA-ADR 24687611 – indicates that the report came from Great Britain (the first 2 letters in the report ID stand for the country of origin, GB- Great Britain, and MHRA indicate that the source of reporting was its’ drug authority).
Why did they not follow up on the 2-month-old baby’s condition, after going into cardiac arrest an hour after receiving an experimental vaccine? Why is there no further information? Is it because he died? Or was the baby removed form an experiment? Why would the author of the report not mention this?
Shockingly, it turns out that this incident is not isolated, but in fact one of many in the VAERS system, describing babies and children under five exposed to mRNA Covid vaccines, who suffered life-threatening adverse reactions.
Even though children under five were not considered eligible for these vaccines unless they were part of a clinical trial, astonishingly, it appears that there are many reports in the system describing babies and toddlers who were vaccinated. Some of the children suffered from life-threatening adverse events.
In some cases, it is not clear what happened to them; did they survive and recover, do they still suffer from health problems, or did they die.
In a couple of days, on June 15, the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will discuss Moderna and Pfizer’s EUA requests for vaccines for infants and toddlers aged 6 months to 4 years – the only group not yet eligible for COVID-19 vaccination today.
According to the FDA’s briefing document released today ahead of the VRBPA committees’ meeting, there were “245 US reports” to the VAERS system “in children 6 months through 4 years of age”, who were injected (“product administered to patient of inappropriate age” or “off-label use”) or exposed to the vaccine “via breastmilk”.
Nevertheless, both companies announced already in May that their findings indicate that their vaccines are safe and effective.
The VRBPAC Briefing Document lists a variety of adverse events reported following the exposure to the vaccine in this age group, including “pyrexia…, body temperature…, cough, headache, rash, diarrhea”.
According to the document, “Among US VAERS reports for individuals aged 6 months through 4 years, which may reflect unauthorized use of the vaccine or may reflect a reporting error, the majority (96.3%) were non-serious”.
While the document specifies safety concerns identified from post-authorization safety surveillance data in VAERS, including anaphylaxis, myocarditis, and pericarditis, it does not relate to these safety concerns identified in the younger age group.
Instead, it states: “No unusual frequency, clusters, or other trends for adverse events were identified that would suggest a new safety concern”.
But is that really the case? It seems that regardless of the results, and despite the disturbing and shocking findings that are being exposed from Pfizer’s documents, it is expected that both companies will receive the desired EUA very soon.
In fact, the CDC website, already in April, had advertised a protocol regarding children’s vaccination, which included babies 6 month to 4 years as well.
In light of this expected approval, RT Magazine conducted an analysis of the cases reported in the VAERS system referring to babies up to 3 years old.
During the analysis, cases were removed in which it was stated that the exposure to the vaccine was through breastfeeding (these cases were analyzed separately and will soon be presented in a follow-up article), as well as cases that were identified as errors in the age registration.
The analysis shows there were at least 58 cases of severe and life-threatening adverse reactions among babies and toddlers 3 years old and younger. This finding is especially puzzling considering the fact that they weren’t supposed to be vaccinated at this age to begin with.
Sadly, similarly to the case reported above, most VAERS reports do not indicate how and under which circumstances they were exposed to the vaccine – were they participants in the companies’ trials? And if not, why and in which circumstances were they vaccinated?
Both companies have not yet released the safety data from their trials on this age group. However, one thing is clear from the VAERS reports: there were many babies who were injured after receiving the vaccine.
Whether they were vaccinated in the trials or illegally in their communities, Pfizer and Moderna will defiantly not be able to claim, when presenting their data to the FDA, that the vaccine is safe for babies, and that there weren’t any severe adverse events in this age group.
Moreover, the FDA’s committee experts who will discuss the EUA approval will not be able to ignore those cases and argue that they did not know. The data presented in this article demonstrate beyond any doubt the complete opposite, and this time – these data are presented to the public in advance, before the EUA is granted and ahead of the VRBPAC discussion.
One of the most chilling reports refers to a 43-day-old female baby, who on January 30, 2021, received Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine. In the incident description (report no. 1133837) it is clearly stated that she was vaccinated and that the vaccine was injected to the muscle:
“A 43-days-old female patient received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY), intramuscular on 30Jan2021 (Lot Number: EK9788) as SINGLE DOSE for COVID-19 immunisation”.
Right after the vaccination, the baby suffered a variety of life-threatening multi-system injuries, such as “Anaphylactic reaction (broad), Asthma/bronchospasm (narrow), Anticholinergic syndrome (broad), Acute central respiratory depression (broad), Pulmonary hypertension (broad), Cardiomyopathy (broad), Eosinophilic pneumonia (broad), Vestibular disorders (broad), Hypersensitivity (broad), Respiratory failure (narrow), Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (broad)“.
Although in the section reporting death the statement states “No”, the section reporting recovery also states “No” – meaning the baby has not recovered.
What then happened to her? Is she alive or did she die?
In addition, this report, like many others, raises some difficult questions. How did a 43-day-old baby receive a vaccine not yet approved for use in babies?
Furthermore, the current clinical trials conducted are supposed to include babies and children over 6 months. Was this baby a participant in Pfizers’ trial?
The report does not answer to this question.
Just like this baby, it turns out that in most of the reported cases several life-threatening side effects were recorded for the same baby. The most common severe adverse events were dangerous hemorrhaging; anaphylactic shock – a life-threatening allergy that can damage the respiratory system and cause dizziness, fainting, and even death; anticholinergic syndrome- a condition that occurs when the receptor sites for the neurotransmitter acetylcholine are blocked, which can lead to coordination problems, increased heart rate, and other symptoms; encephalitis – a brain infection, that can cause headaches, vomiting, loss of consciousness and death; hypoglycemia – very low blood sugar, a condition that can quickly escalate to death in infants; and neuroleptic syndrome – which is also life-threatening , and can damage the heart muscles, other muscles, and the kidneys.
From the summary of the findings of the analysis according to age and gender groups, the following picture emerges:
In the age group of 0-6 months – there are 28 reports, in which 10 are males, 16 are females, and 2 whose gender was not specified.
9 of them (32%) suffered an anticholinergic syndrome, 9 (32%) had an anaphylactic shock, 8 (28.6%) suffered Neuroleptic syndrome, 5 suffered from heart rhythm irregularities, and 5 had hypoglycemia.
In the age group of 6-12 months – in this group, 5 reports were found – 3 males, one female, and one whose gender was not specified. This group is small compared to the other groups. The list of adverse reactions included: anaphylactic shock, anticholinergic syndrome, and Neuroleptic syndrome.
In the age group of one-to-three year old – in this group 25 cases were reported, of which 5 related to males, 19 related to females, and one to a baby whose gender was not specified.
6 of the babies (24%) had an anaphylactic shock, 6 (24%) suffered anticholinergic syndrome, 5 (20%) suffered from Neuroleptic syndrome, 4 (16%) suffered encephalitis, 3 (12%) had irregular heartbeats, one baby was hemorrhaging and one suffered from hypoglycemia.
It should be noted that the adverse events listed above are only some of the ones reported in VAERS with respect to babies. We have chosen to focus only on life-threatening and common adverse events.
Table No. 1: Analysis of reports by age and gender
Table No. 2: Analysis of reports by adverse events
Similarly to the previous case described, another baby, two months old, also went through anaphylactic shock after being exposed to a single dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on January 6, 2021, and just like her, according to the report (no. 976433), she suffered from an array of multi-system symptoms.
Regarding the method of administering the vaccine, it was stated ”via an unspecified route of administration”, meaning it is not clear in what circumstances the baby was exposed to the vaccine.
Was she part of Pfizers’ clinical trial? Again, it is unclear from the report.
However, the more important question that should be asked, just like in the previous case, is what happened to the baby? Did she survive? Is she alive?
And again, in the section reporting death, it states “No”, meaning the baby did not die. However, in the report description it says, “The patient had not recovered from the event. No follow-up attempts possible. No further information expected”.
It is hard to believe, but this basic question – what happened to a baby after suffering such severe and life-threatening adverse reactions – also arises from other serious cases, such as the case of a 6-month-old baby (report # 2084418) who “received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY), intramuscular” on December 29, 2021, and went through anaphylactic shock, anticholinergic syndrome, Neuroleptic syndrome, infectious pneumonia, other infections, and multi-system symptoms.
In this case as well, the section reporting death states “No”, meaning supposedly the baby did not die, while in the event description it says “outcome ‘unknown’… No follow-up attempts are possible. No further information is expected”.
In another case (report no. 1012508) a one-year-old baby who also received a Pfizer vaccine, in January 19, 2021 (this case it is specified that the baby did not take part in a trial) developed a pain in her left ear that escalated to full paralysis, which was diagnosed as Guillain Barre syndrome.
In the case description it was stated that the baby suffered Guillain Barre Syndrome, face paralysis, non-infectious encephalitis, non-infectious meningitis, earaches and hearing disorders. Nonetheless, in the summary of the report, it was written, again, that “No follow-up attempts are possible”.
And another shocking case (report number 1379484) emerges from the report of a baby who was only one month old, who suffered “Vaginal bleeding/ Constant heavy vaginal bleeding with chunks of clot” the following day after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on May 19, 2021.
Although the symptoms the baby suffered from were defined as “serious as medically significant”, in the incident description it is stated that the result is “unknown” and that “No follow-up attempts are possible. No further information is expected”.
As mentioned, in some of the cases it is stated the babies were not part of a clinical trial, while in others it is not clear whether they participated in a clinical trial or were vaccinated in other unknown circumstances.
But whether they were part of the trial or not, the report does not explain the absence of this critical information; what happened to these babies? Did they survive? And if so, did they recover?
Why was there not a follow-up on the medical condition of babies who suffered from severe and life-threatening adverse events, while it was clearly stated that they did not recover? Is it not required in such severe cases by the FDA that the company should make every effort to locate these babies, find out what their condition is and follow up on them?
There is only one way to know whether or not the vaccine caused any of the deaths in the 21 vaccinated patients who died: proper histopathology.
Pfizer never did it and the FDA never asked for it.
This was the biggest mistake in the pandemic and nobody has acknowledged that or lifted a finger to correct it (as I point out below). Had they done the proper testing on the 21 deaths, the vaccine would never have been approved.
Continued at link.
Naomi Wolf called these Documents the “greatest crime against humanity in the history of our species ”. And there are still people out there still in denial about the nature of these Vaccines aka Depopulation Bio-Weapon.
Good Summary Article:
The article includes three videos - here's an excerpt from the one from Naomi Watts:
Naomi Wolf discusses the evidence found in the Pfizer documents that she believes constitutes a crime against humanity.
Evidence Found in Pfizer Documents
Government Response
More at the link.
6-minute clip:
THIS WILL MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL!
PFIZER KNEW
Pfizer Recorded 5 Million Harmful Outcomes Across 1.5 Million mRNA Injected Victims
June 24, 2023
The following interview with Dr Naomi Wolf comes to us courtesy of the very fine UK Column.
It is important because it lays bare:
The extent of injuries caused by the Covidvaxes which are far worse than even the most ardent “antivaxxers” have been saying.
Data on the nature and extent of the injuries and deaths comes from vax manufacturer Pfizer’s own research. Let, me say that again PFIZER’S OWN RESEARCH.
This is tantamount to a serial mass murderer producing documents that describe how he is going to kill people in very large numbers. The only difference is that such a written confession would get the serial killer hunted down and locked up but in this case the serial killer is protected by his chums in government and the media because they quite like what he is doing.
The level of evil here is so great the rational mind is repelled but we all need to confront the truth of what has been done to our friends, loved ones, colleagues and fellow citizens and IS STILL BEING DONE with malice aforethought in the full knowledge of what the booby trapped pseudovaccines will do to many of those pressured or dupe into taking them.
Dr Wolf reveals many eye-opening and often horrifying facts. Just one such that stuck in my mind is this: since the rollout thee has been 13-20% drop in live births across Europe and America resulting in a million “missing babies” in Europe.
The full horror of the Mass Poisoning Event is now emerging inexorably despite desperate efforts by those complicit in the atrocity to keep the lid firmly on their can of worms, thanks to fearless crusaders such as Naomi Wolf and the good people at UK Column.
We can all play our part in ensuring that the truth continues to emerge and continues to force its way through the force screens of censorship to reach The People.
And we can all raise our voices in a unified demand for justice until the subhuman sociopaths responsible for these horrific crimes are held to account for what they have done.
You can also watch the video n Rumble here
Mass Poisoning Event shock update: Pfizer knew! But kept right on pushing their killjabs
Bombshell: Pfizer Employees Were Given “Special” Batch of Vaccine
By Patricia Harrity on August 5, 2023
The following article was written by Jim Hoft from The Gateway Pundit
Spokesperson Admits During Australian Senate Hearing that Pfizer Employees Were Given Special Batch of Vaccine, Different from What was Distributed to Public
The admission came during a rigorous questioning session on Wednesday, in which Pfizer Australia’s Country Medical Director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and Head of Regulatory Sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt, spoke before the Australian Senate’s ‘Education and Employment Legislation Committee’ about the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.
Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts led the interrogation with forceful inquiries regarding Pfizer’s potential involvement in the introduction of vaccine mandates for employment in Australia.
Senator Roberts, in his questioning, alleged a significant transfer of wealth from the Australian people to Big Pharma via the government’s Covid-19 mismanagement.
He sought clarity on Pfizer’s role in implementing vaccine mandates for employment and their participation in potential government bans on alternative treatments such as Ivermectin.
“Pfizer has no involvement, had no involvement in the imposition of vaccine mandates… Pfizer has had no involvement in relation to Ivermectin,” said Dr. Thiru.
The inquiry took a contentious turn when Roberts probed into Pfizer’s confidential indemnity agreements with the Australian government, suggesting that the taxpayers who funded the vaccine have the right to see the details of what they bought.
“Does the indemnity you have with the government extend to providing you with indemnity in the situation where an employee is forced by their employer to undergo vaccination and then experiences harm? And if you do have indemnity, I want the proof,” Roberts asked.
Dr. Thiru maintained that the specifics of these agreements remain confidential, per standard practice for contractual arrangements between the government and private organizations.
“Senator, any indemnity agreements between Pfizer and the Australian government are confidential and we are not able to discuss that in this forum,” said Thiru. “Why are they confidential? Because as a taxpayer, I paid for those injections even though I didn’t take any. Why are they confidential? From taxpayers, 26 million Australians. What are you hiding?” Roberts asked.
Roberts also queried about Pfizer’s own employee vaccination program, which Dr. Thiru confirmed was active and conducted in alignment with public health guidance, allowing accommodations or exemptions for those with specific medical or religious reasons for not being vaccinated. He did, however, acknowledge that a small number of colleagues departed the company in light of this programme.
Roberts then questioned Pfizer’s use of a specific batch of vaccine for their employees that was not tested by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), to which Dr. Hewitt CLAIMED that this was done to ensure that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks.
“We’ve read that your vaccine mandate was using your own batch of vaccine, specially imported for Pfizer, which was not tested by the TGA. Is that correct?” Roberts asked. Dr. Hewitt then responded, “So Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination programme, and that was so that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks that were being delivered to clinics as needed.”
WATCH: BOMBSHELL: Pfizer employees were given a special batch… different from what was forced into the general population
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer employees were given a special batch In a Twitter post, Roberts wrote:
“Watch as I question Pfizer representatives last night in a Senate Hearing. The company was very reluctant to attend the committee hearing and also reluctant to supply a straight answer, automatically falling back on their ‘safe and effective’ mantra to dodge answering the question.
Already, this Senate Hearing revealed that Pfizer is rewriting history on transmission of infection. We’re supposed to conveniently forget they said “Get it to protect others, to save grandma” and “When you’re vaccinated the virus stops with you”.
They’re hiding behind their indemnity contract with our government and dodging responsibility. ATAGI and the Australian governments must stop pushing these unsafe and ineffective shots and drop the destructive mandates now.
“ They know what’s coming and are desperate to wriggle out. Now they will put the blame on the politicians to save their skins. They know it’s unravelling. In Britain, we all remember those who insisted that people had to be vaccinated to work in care homes and fly on planes and we know those that pushed the vaccine such as British PM Sunak who made huge profits by investing $500 million of his personal fortune into Moderna while stating they were "safe and effective"
Continued at link.
by Leo Hohmann | Sep 4, 2023
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer tested its Covid “boosters” on fewer than two dozen people before Joe Biden’s Food and Drug Administration approved the mRNA shots for full public use, explosive new documents reveal.
The watchdog group Judicial Watch obtained documents through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit which forced the government to turn over the information.
The organization has published the first batch of those documents and they expose Pfizer’s lax testing practices.
According to the documents, Pfizer only tested the safety and efficacy of its Covid vaccine booster on 23 people in 2021 before putting in a request with the FDA to approve the shots for nationwide public use.
Biden’s FDA immediately approved the Covid booster shot and pushed it out to the public at the end of September 2021.
The participants included 11 people aged 18 to 55 and 12 people aged 65 to 85, Judicial Watch reported. Of the younger group, there were nine females and two males; eight of whom were white, one was black and two were Asian. Of the older group, six were female, six were males, and all were white.
The FDA said it based its decision to approve the shots on the documents presented by Pfizer, as well as input from the CDC, the Israeli Ministry of Health and the University of Bristol in the UK.
Based on those paltry numbers of just 23 human guinea pigs and then checking in with the Israelis and a single British university, the FDA gave its rubber stamp and a total of 8.9 million people across America were injected with Covid boosters within three weeks.
Continued at link
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is leading the way in seeking accountability for Big Pharma companies by launching a lawsuit against Covid vaccine manufacturer Pfizer.
The lawsuit was initially filed under seal, but the judge has since unsealed the petition at the Attorney General’s request. To read the unsealed petition, click here.
