Sure buddy....
Plenty of structural engineers have analyzed the collapse of the WTC towers, I suggest you do some research. This maybe a good starting point for you to start:
Is a fire commisioner a structular engineer? No
Is the cast iron stove analogy accurate???? No
Visualize a cast iron stove—thick, heavy, solid. Now scale that to the size of the WTC. It would be an unbreakable monster. The towers, on the other hand, were mostly air and thin steel skeletons. Not even close.
How are you Cybe? Is this your new handle?
1 Like
1 Like
How are you Cybe? Is this your new handle?
?
I merely wished to point out the dishonest analogy.
Cybe we miss you.
1 Like
9/11 portrayed 20+ years before it happened. Predictive programming? A plan in the making? I'm inclined to go with Project Looking Glass.
I’m unsure, the fat woman on the cover looks Jewy to me…
1 Like
Welcome back buddy..... 
I'm not sure what a Jewy woman looks like exactly, but I will admit that I knew a Jewish woman who looked like she could be that lady's twin sister with uncannily similar physical features and body size. Even same exact hairstyle. She lived in New York too. Maybe sometimes there are coincidences ... or maybe not.
It is who it is.
Is who it is what matters? Is pointing out the person, past interactions, what we should be doing?
Whoever it is is we have a very special set of guidelines on this forum that I believe prohibits this kind of behavior.
Treat others the way you’d like to be treated, or preferably even better. Interact with them as you were interacting with The Lord.
Matthew. 25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done [it] unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done [it] unto me.
Matthew 25:45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did [it] not to one of the least of these, ye did [it] not to me.
Are these guidelines just something that one can pick and chose bits from as one feels like but not really that relevant or important?
Furthermore, is it good to ignore the very simple questions brought up followed by bringing up other arguments?
Is there anyone here who can give a simple yes or no—is the cast iron stove analogy accurate, or not?
Not very honest to keep faking multiple personas all the time. Why? It is immediately apparent it is you.
Building 7 REVEALED! Congressman Curt Weldon reveals the TRUTH about 9/11 and what really happened
Omniwar Is a War against All of Us—Get Out of “Conspiratainment” Mode and Find Ways to Resist
In 2010, Dr. Judy Wood published her groundbreaking book, Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11, in which she presented ample forensic evidence indicating the deployment on 9/11 of some technology unknown to the general public. Wood’s work has not received the attention it deserves. International relations scholar David A. Hughes, PhD is trying to change that by publishing a series of articles in defense of Wood. In this interview, Hughes returns to the Solari Report to join me in discussing the geopolitical and other major implications of Dr. Wood’s work on 9/11’s invisible weaponry.
Wood is a former mechanical engineering professor who received her PhD in materials engineering science from Virginia Tech. In the 500 pages of her book, which includes numerous high-quality images, she argues that “Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic” and shows that what we see in the pictures does not match the explanatory narratives presented to us—neither the “official reality” narrative of airplanes causing the collapse nor the alternative theories of a “pancake collapse” caused by nanothermite or mini-nukes. For example, hardly any debris—from two towers weighing half a million tons each—was visible at Ground Zero just moments after the event. According to Wood, the towers did not so much collapse as appear to turn into dust mid-air.
Full Report: The Implications of Dr. Judy Wood’s Work with David A. Hughes | Solari Report