https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_uranium26.htm
Ken O'Keefe upholds Adolf Hitler as a hero (Stew Peters may also, but I have not heard flat-earther Stew say that directly). There is a misinformation campaign going on, of which both of these characters (Ken and Stew) may be a part of. If they are being paid/funded by Nazis, it is ironic because they are being funded by Nazis who are working with the Ashkenazis jews (unbeknownst to Ken and Stew?) hence being funded by the enemy "jews" they are always talking about.
1 Like
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (Free 1-hour version) AE911Truth.org
This is the 1-hour version of our 1 ½ hour groundbreaking documentary
1 Like
2 Likes
1 Like
The following article has quite a few problems and it cites no sources to it's claims.
Here are just a few things to take into consideration:-
"The primary argument made by those still duped into believing the government narrative, is that ordinary office fires, with the introduction of some jet fuel,"
- What is an ordinary office fire? What's an unordinary one?
- Was this an ordinary office fire?
- "some jet fuel"?...
- Are thousands of gallons of jetfuel sprayed over the offices a part of "an ordinary office fire"?
- How many tons of combustable materials were there per floor?
And if we are to believe what was shown on television, MOST of that fuel – if it was fuel at all – burned up OUTSIDE of WTC2, in a giant fireball.
What is the source for the claim that MOST of the fuel burned up? Or how was it determined?
Within minutes of impact, black smoke was seen pouring out of those buildings from the smouldering, oxygen/fuel-starved office fires inside.
- Were fires still seen or were the fires just smouldering? Source?
Also buildings WTC1 and WTC2 and other skyscrapers were specifically designed to withstand airplane impacts, after the Empire State Building had been hit by a large plane in 1945.
- Any kind/size airplane?
- Any speed?
- Was the fuel taken into consideration?
"The primary argument made by those still duped into believing the government narrative, is that ordinary office fires, with the introduction of some jet fuel,"
- What is an ordinary office fire?
- Was this an ordinary office fire?
- Are thousands of gallons of jetfuel sprayed over the offices a part of "an ordinary office fire"?
- How many tons of combustable materials were there per floor?
Also buildings WTC1 and WTC2 and other skyscrapers were specifically designed to withstand airplane impacts, after the Empire State Building had been hit by a large plane in 1945.
On July 28, 1945, a B-25 Mitchell bomber of the United States Army Air Forces crashed into the north side of the Empire State Building in New York City while flying in thick fog. The crash killed fourteen people, and an estimated twenty-four others were injured.
- Any kind/size airplane? Any speed? Was the fuel taken into consideration?
- How large was the plane in 1945 compared to the planes that flew into the WTC towers?
...even though no steel skyscraper has ever failed due to fire?
- Are all skyskrapers the same?
- Are they constructed the same way and equally as durable?
- Were the types of fires comparable to the WTC fires?
- Is jetfuel a factor?
Further, it would have been impossible for fires to weaken the steel structure in a perfectly uniform manner, so that every single joint failed simultaneously . If any part of either of the twin towers were to weaken first, the building would list/tilt and fall over in that direction.
There was a tilt as atleast one of the towers collapsed:-
There was a video years back that explained how nuclear demolition was used to bring down the towers. From all options it made the most sense to me personally as it explained what was seen, including things like the pools of molten rock and steel that was seen at "ground zero" (which is a nuclear term itself). It's been a while, but I believe this to be it:
2 Likes
Pity it didn't show either impacts, just a second explosion from a cut away view, doesn't really add anything to the story.
