Maui Fires

PENTAGON ADMITS THEY HAVE [DEW] DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS

UL FSRI Home Furnishings Comparison (Natural vs Synthetic)

Yes I had to state the obvious since you at first didn't account for that by saying: -

Please show us this footage so that we can analyze it.

Or, perhaps; crazy theory: green leaves (70-90% moisture) and living tress (50% moisture) don't easily catch fire...

Everyone is a fire expert now, huh?

0 proofs of DEW in this video also....

THE MEDIA IS LYING. THERE ARE MORE DEATHS ON HAWAII.

These videos perhaps...

Screen shot from one of the videos I put up here. Analyze away, no fuel ie other combustible materials nearby.

https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=272184

What kind of “wildfires” burn in a perfect circle, and JUMP OVER WATER, igniting all the boats?

Good day Everyone,

Another Miles Mathis analysis added into the mix for your perusal and interest: http://mileswmathis.com/maui.pdf

"Why are They FAKING photos from Maui?" just over 10 pages...

The cars fuel and plastic parts.

  • We don't know what's in front of the car / behind the camea.
  • We don't know the wind direction during the fire.

What if it was for instance from behind the car at very high velocity as the fuel in the car burned violently and car interior, tyres working as a wick.

Well the question how fire can jump over things we already covered and all understand.

As for the "perfect circle" which isn't really a perfect circle, I don't think it's too odd. Perhaps the fire spread very quickly in one direction due to regular patches of fuel (for instance a rectangular patch of weeds)...a road could also play a part.

THAT DIDN'T TAKE LONG! LOOK WHO DONATED $100 MILLION TO MAUI'S SMART CITY...

THAT DIDN'T TAKE LONG! LOOK WHO DONATED $100 MILLION TO MAUI'S SMART CITY REBUILD!

1 Like

What kind of wildfire turns everything white and nothing black?

He seems to be suffering from Dunning-Kruger.

He's determining that "everything" turned white and nothing black from a low resolution satellite picture? And the rest of the whole first paragraph based on it?

I was able to find it in high res, here...
A fake photo? I don't see any signs of fakery.


only available in small size?

Here it is from Getty. I see no signs on Photoshopping. No signs of DEWs...

So he's a computer graphics expert? And he wasn't able to reverse image search to find these images in higher resolution?

He continues:

And if you tell me it is hurricane winds plus fire, why did the hurricane winds leave the fronds on the trees? Those rees don't even look scorched. They look green, with the narrow leaves intact. Obviously they were pasted in, probably along with the mountain.

Here we'd need to know how resistant palm fronds are to strong wind.

They and the mountain obviously DON'T look photoshopped in.

I'm not seeing any signs of fakery in this image


a bit larger? wasn't able to find the original? still looks fake? Licked by computers all over?

Here it is in (8256 x 5504, 4.9 MB) resolution.... I see no signs of fakery in this one either.

Is that so? Let's reverse image search it:-

Here it is in high resolution (you can open it fully by clicking on it)

not seeing any signs of fakery...


So it's just an actress? According to this page she's Sydney Carney

Here's a video of her. People react and deal with things differently. I understand completely how someone might react like her in the face of losing your house.

So is the author some kind of fire expert? If things burn down to ash then ash happens to be grey.

Big congealed puddles from plastic? No, plastic burns very effectively.

I give Miles Mathis’ PDF file 0/10 points.

WHATS REALLY GOING ON IN MAUI?

No tell-tale signs of DEW in this video either

Thats a bit harsh Cybe... its just his opinion that i shared as i thought it was relevant. i respect your opinion(s) too and you are certainly most welcome to have them. I saw some other 'posts' elsewhere that are saying some of the photos are actually from 2003. I dont know about that for sure either however based on experience i would suggest it is highly likely that there is more to this story than we are being told.

What is? Me claiming he has Dunning-Kruger?

2The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities."

No, sounds about right, he's giving out his expertise in various fields (fire, computer graphics....) but close scrutany proves him to be incompetent and not someone's opinion to be respected / looked up to / considered worthy of high regard.

We know it’s his opinion. But is his opinion worthwhile? And is it true? Yeas it is relevant for this thread. Thank you for posting it.

Who's opinion did you respect more? Mine or his? Or I should ask, who was correct?

If you still have them please post them so we can have a look at them.

This video shows a transformer explosion in Chile. The “beam” is simply a reflection of light.

I'm not very good with computers and typing and so apologies for not responding in line above neatly as you do.

  1. not that - 0 out of 10 was a bit harsh (I thought.. sorry, it was just an opinion with no firm data to back it up :slight_smile: ). Again, in my opinion, at least he is doing something cybe, many folks these days seem completely apathetic and docile which helps no one. . so... I'd give that at least a 1 out of 10 for making an effort, shouldn't you too?

  2. Thanks for the education on Dunning-Kruger - fascinating. you seem to make a spectacular leap of judgement here with regards to the author - based on just over 10 pages of opinion. check him out in more detail here: http://mileswmathis.com/ and here: Homepage for Miles Mathis science site

  3. I like the way he writes and he seems quite dedicated to the truth from what I have read thus far. So... in my opinion yes it is worthwhile. Also, you're welcome cybe :slight_smile:

  4. I respect both your opinions and I am still not that sure with it all to declare who is "correct"

  5. I don't ...I just remember seeing something on a "post" - if I see again or find I shall send over for further scrutiny and comment

The destruction in Maui is immense - nearly total. No need to tear much of anything down, it's already been flattened. They can go straight to building a new smart city..

THE MASSACRE IN LAHAINA MAUI

PART 1
I believe it's going be a new port area (possible submarine base entrance at Lahaina through the underground cave system and access via elevation from the top of the mountain where the others fires were burning. When the Chinese bought the port in Beirut as a part of their belt and road plan, it was easier to blow the whole thing up rather than tear down then rebuild, hence the #DEW fire locations. There's probably another fire coming to the south at Malalee. This study was done in 2019 and the areas being burned now are what's mapped out in this report. In February 2023, "Japanese and local astronomers said a Chinese satellite has been caught on video beaming down #GreenLasers over the Hawaiian Islands." "Some kind of topographical mapping or they’re also used for measuring stuff in Earth’s atmosphere," The atmospheric testing is bullshit. That was #LIDAR used for getting accurate contour lines of the topography below and underwater. The #GreenSpectrum (532 nm) laser beam from an airborne bathymetric LiDAR system can penetrate up to 300 meters underwater Guarantee there is a fire coming to Malalee.

Oprahs 870 acre estate on Maui is right in one of the fire zones near the top of the mountain. nice place for a secret entrance.

i still think the big one is coming to south near Maalaea. they have already adjusted google earth to show that exact same "danger burn area" from the 2019 report as being barren. https://twitter.com/Paulmuaddib61_/status/1690364038717288448

"We need a port, this is where Maui comes in"