Juzzz News

After the Shameful Failure of the US Patriot System, Israel Refused Ukraine...

Strike Ready For Israel? IRAN Make Large-Scale Purchases Most Dangerous...

Is RFK Jr Anti-Semitic or too Pro-Israel? Hidden Autopsies Show Covid Vaccine...

BREAKING:"COUP ATTEMPT IN ISRAEL" / "NETANYAHU RUSHED TO HOSPITAL AGAIN"

Top Jewish Pornographer Admits Jews Have Controlled The Porn Industry From Its Very Beginnings

https://archive.is/20230525174717/https://christiansfortruth.com/top-jewish-pornographer-admits-jews-have-controlled-the-porn-industry-from-its-very-beginnings/#selection-669.0-669.94

As part of the ā€œTaboo Talksā€ series presented by the San Diego Center for Jewish Culture at the Lawrence Family Jewish Community Center in San Diego on May 8, 2013, Mike Kulich, the late jewish owner of Monarchy Distributors, one of the largest pornography companies in America, candidly revealed that Jews do, in fact, control and dominate every aspect of the pornography industry:

Kulich stated:

ā€œJews in the adult industry, thereā€™s a lot of themā€¦.The adult industry was pretty much founded by the Jews. Basically, in the early nineteen hundreds, the German Jewish immigrants came in, and when they were trying to get into different industries, there was a lot of antisemitism where they couldnā€™t get into normalized workā€¦.so they gravitated toward the porn industry because itā€™s kind of the seedier cousin of the Hollywood industry which had already been controlled by the Jews. Basically, they pretty much took it over. If you look at the big starsā€¦

So basically back in the 1960s, 70s, it was founded by people like Dan [unintelligle], and then later in the 80s, The Godfather of the modern day porn industry, his name is Reuben Sturman, who was actually an Orthodox Jew who owned over 200 bookstores all around the country. Heā€™s actually my godfather, which is kind of weird. So Reuben Sturman, what the Jews did pretty much was they revolutionized the adult industry and made it their own. So there was no space for antisemitism. And they basically controlled everything.

So back in the 80s, the only way to get pornography was to go through someone like Reuben Sturman, and he controlled all of his stores and all the stores that he didnā€™t own, they actually had to pay him a tax to carry his product, and he was the only place to get product from, peep shows from. And later what the Jews did they started the manufacturing end of the business. There were a lot of Italians that were coming into the business, but what they [the Jews] did was they created the manufacturing side which is the replication of printing because back in the day if you wanted to make a VHS or Beta tape or whatever, you couldnā€™t go down to Kinkos or whatever or any mainstream printer. It would be like, I want to print ā€œGg Bg My Mom Number Threeā€.

So what they did was they created all these companies that manufactured DVDs and VHS and Beta and printing and all the companies pretty much had to go through the Jews. So Reuben Sturman eventually he died in prisonā€¦.they tried to get him for obscenity back in the ā€˜80s, which was a big thing, and there actually still is an obscenity risk today. But he eventually died in prison because of tax evasion, because didnā€™t want to pay taxesā€¦

Back in the ā€˜70s, the majority of the male porn performers were jewish, and the majority of the female performers were Roman Catholic. And if you look at the names of the classic porn stars, you got Ron Jeremy, which isnā€™t really jewish [sounding], but you have Hershel Savageā€¦.Itā€™s kind of funny because those guys came into the industry, and I actually asked a couple of them, cause I asked Ron Jeremy, ā€œWhy did you guys decide to go into the porn industry? What was it that drew you in besides the obvious?ā€ He was like ā€œI got to f*k Roman Catholic chicksā€ā€¦.and fulfill every fantasy of every jewish boy has ever had.*

So I think the jewish performers, theyā€™ve always been really prevalent in the industry, and even now Ron Jeremy is still one of the most well known performersā€¦.Joanna Angelā€¦Daphne Rosenā€¦thereā€™s a bunch of them. And for the most part, the business side is still controlled by Jews. Steve Hersch, who runs Vivid. Steve Orenstein, who runs Wicked. You have me who runs the biggest porn company [Monarch] in the world. Second biggest. But for the most part, the business owners are pretty much Jewish or have Jewish ties, or at some point worked for a Jew in the business to get their start.ā€

So letā€™s get this straight: Kulich claims that Jews controlled Hollywood from the beginning, but because of ā€œantisemitismā€, Jews couldnā€™t get jobs working in jewish-controlled Hollywood, so they had no choice but to work in pornography. Thatā€s what he said, and no one challenged him on that absurdity. If it sounds familiar, it should because Jews also claim that the reason they engaged in usury is because they couldnā€™t get jobs doing anything else, and Christians werenā€™t allowed to lend money at interest.

But of course when Kulich claims that Jews control the porn industry and Hollywood, heā€™s not attacked for making age-old antisemtic ā€œtropesā€ and ā€œcanardsā€ for the simple reason is that heā€™s bragging about it and implying that itā€™s a good thing. When the goyim make the same claim, however, they are attacked as ā€œantisemitesā€ because we donā€™t think porn and Hollywood filth is good for society. Jews love to control everything, but they donā€™t want to be criticized when that control leads to any negative consequences or backlash, which it inevitably does.

You give White Christian men freedom of speech, and they found the greatest nation the world has ever known. You give Jews freedom of speech, and they make pornography, advocate communism, and censor anyone who criticizes them.

Then in 2016:
Mike Kulich, Staples HS Grad and Pornography Entrepreneur, Found Dead: Report

Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but [are] (Idumeans) the synagogue of Satan. King of kings' Bible - Revelation

YOU ARE AMALEK - Full Movie Complete Edition Parts 1, 2 and 3

ALERT! FULL REKAMAN HAMAS Klaim Rebut Pangkalan Militer Israel di Perbatasan...

US stands with Israel in face of terrorist assaults by Hamas: Biden

Rockets fired from Lebanon hits Israeli position in Shebaa Farms

Is Israel planning a ground incursion into Gaza?

SHOCKING: ISRAEL IS OVERRUN BY HAMAS, PALESTINIAN FIGHTERS CAPTURED ISRAELI MILITARY BASE || 2023

SHOCKING: ISRAEL IS OVERRUN BY HAMAS, PALESTINIAN FIGHTERS CAPTURED ISRAELI...

'Israel's Demise...': Hezbollah's Victory Roar As 'Deadliest' Fight With IDF Rages On | Watch

'Israel's Demise...': Hezbollah's Victory Roar As 'Deadliest' Fight With IDF...

Pro-Palestine Protesters Blockade Israel-linked Arms Factory In UK; ā€˜UK Weapons Killā€¦ā€™ | Watch

Pro-Palestine Protesters Blockade Israel-linked Arms Factory In UK; ā€˜UK...

Putin Snubs Netanyahu Again; Calls Hamas To Russia For Talks On Gaza War |...

UK Zionists cry ā€œRACISMā€ whilst permitting GENOCIDE in Palestine!

Technology

US supreme court hears case on governmentā€™s power over online misinformation

Plaintiffs in Murthy v Missouri argue White House requests to take down coronavirus misinformation violate first amendmen

The supreme court heard oral arguments on Monday in a case that could upend the federal governmentā€™s relationship with social media companies and with lies online. Plaintiffs in Murthy v Missouri argue that White House requests to take down coronavirus misinformation on Twitter and Facebook constitute illegal censorship in violation the first amendment.

The arguments began with Brian Fletcher, the principal deputy solicitor general of the justice department, making an argument that none of the governmentā€™s communications crossed the line from persuasion into coercion. He also pushed back against descriptions of events in lower court rulings, stating that they were misleading or included quotations taken out of context.

ā€œWhen the government persuades a private party not to distribute or promote someone elseā€™s speech, thatā€™s not censorship, thatā€™s persuading a private party to do something that theyā€™re lawfully entitled to do,ā€ Fletcher said.

The justices, most prominently the conservatives Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, questioned Fletcher on where exactly the line is between threatening companies and persuading them. Fletcher defended the governmentā€™s actions as part of its broader ability to try to reduce public harm.

ā€œThe government can encourage parents to monitor their childrenā€™s cellphone usage or internet companies to watch out for child pornography on their platforms, even if the fourth amendment would prevent the government from doing that directly,ā€ Fletcher said.

The opening arguments from Benjamin AguiƱaga, the solicitor general of Louisiana, argued that the government was covertly coercing platforms to censor speech in a violation of the first amendment. The suit, the culmination of years of a Republican-backed legal campaign, was filed by state attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri. Jim Hoft, founder of the conservative conspiracy theory site The Gateway Pundit, as well as other rightwingers, also joined the plaintiffs.

ā€œThe government has no right to persuade platforms to violate Americansā€™ constitutional rights, and pressuring platforms in backrooms shielded from public view is not using the bully pulpit at all,ā€ AguiƱaga said in an opening statement. ā€œThatā€™s just being a bully.ā€

Several justices, including the liberals Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, similarly asked AguiƱaga what kind of government outreach over potential harms would violate the first amendment and which would be warranted. Kagan suggested that the government has historically interacted with both platforms and the press over content that could be harmful, such as threats to national security. Sotomayor, meanwhile, heavily criticized factual inaccuracies in the plaintiffā€™s case.

ā€œI have such a problem with your brief, counselor. You omit information that changes the context of some of your claims. You attribute things to people it didnā€™t happen to ā€“ at least in one of the defendants, it was her brother that something happened to not her,ā€ Sotomayor said. ā€œI donā€™t know what to make of all this.ā€

AguiƱaga apologized, saying he was sorry if the brief was not as forthcoming as it should have been.

US supreme court hears case on governmentā€™s power over online misinformation US supreme court hears case on governmentā€™s power over online misinformation | Technology | The Guardian

Why 'Messiah prophecy' haunts Netanyahu

The One Video Israel REALLY Doesn't Want You To See

The One Video Israel REALLY Doesn't Want You To See

4 Likes

https://twitter.com/JamesMason_78/status/1780318947683844514?t=IsqHemU3Rw97cGocIOwApA&s=19

Dubai Airport under water

1 Like

Hormuz Iran river turned blood red

https://x.com/AvivaKlompas/status/1780338706953449744?t=Q6HVtbT2bNxsVrj5KUKX4A&s=09

WEEKEND AT BENJI'S - ISRAELI AMATEUR HOUR | REMARQUE88

Netanyahu

1 Like