GRAND JURY - The court of public opinion

Following the Grand Jury model proceeding to date, I'd like to point out the following:

"We are committed to independent, transparent and evidence-based analysis," states the Corona Investigative Committee website. Nevertheless, it took until the 90th session to finally talk about the fundamental question of whether viruses exist at all. Invited from the small faction of "virus deniers" were Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Andrew Kaufman. Up to 40000 viewers in the Livestream showed that the topic met a large interest.

The viewers had to experience then that on the part of the Corona committee obviously no large interest in the scientific arguments of Dr. Lanka and Dr. Kaufman existed, who had to wait besides very long, until they came to word. In particular, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, who was also present, prevented important gains in knowledge and understanding through his interactions, coupled with a certain stubbornness.

"I want to have the topic off the table today," said Wodarg, for whom disease-causing viruses must exist because, after all, people get sick. He even demanded that Dr. Lanka prove the non-existence of viruses, which is a logical impossibility because only something that exists can be proven.

It was the first time that guests were treated unkindly in the Corona Committee. This suggests that here opponents of the infection theory should be silenced in a concerted action by the lawyers and Dr. Wodarg to protect mainstream medicine. Dr. Reiner Füllmich obviously prefers to take the complicated route and attack the ineffectual PCR test than to go to the root not only of this pandemic but of all other viral crises. In this respect, unfortunately, no virus critics have their say in the ongoing Grand Jury proceeding either.

Nevertheless, it may be interesting to hear how Dr. Thomas Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Stefan Lanka evaluate the 90th meeting of the Corona Committee:

The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available

3 Likes