More about the "magical" Astrazeneca's Vaccine.
RT talks to Malcolm Kendrick, a GP for the UK’s National Health Service about he claims that AstraZeneca’s vaccine is not particularly effective for people over 65, for whom risk of severe illness from COVID is much greater than for younger people (6-min).
AstraZeneca’s vaccine is a ‘busted flush if it doesn’t work for elderly’ –..
Host: Considering Nations everywhere are lining up the elderly, the vulnerable first for the vaccine, how concerning would claims be that a jab is not particularly effective over the age of 55?
Kendrick: I think to a certain extent, it's a deal-breaker in a way, because healthy people under that age of 55 are remarkably unaffected by the virus itself.
Other things Kendrick said (paraphrased):
The population who are likely to die from this infection are this very group... The mortality rate of people under 70 is .005, so realistically it's got to work for the elderly or it's like a busted flush.
The other vaccines, it's very difficult to work out. We are dealing with remarkably small numbers here. Moderna tested in on I think on 110 people up to the point where they released results. These would normally be considered early-stage testing, rather than a major trial. The AstraZeneca's trial isn't expect to be complete until Oct 2022; and the Pfizer one until April 2022, so these trials are in very early stages. It's a bit early for one company to be jumping up and down saying yours doesn't work and ours does.
Kendrick also address the safety issues of the other vaccines, which some say shouldn't be called vaccines.
While Kendrick isn't anti-vax, he does bring up some important issues to consider, given the hype and propaganda.
But Please Note: Vaccines are against God's Law.