FAUCI EXPOSED: Charlatan, Fraudster, Profiteer

I hate Fauci.

EXCLUSIVE: Fauci’s NIAID Funding Island of Monkeys in South Carolina Used for Horrific ‘Maximum Pain’ Experiments

Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes of Health are using an island off the coast of South Carolina to breed monkeys for use in horrific “maximum pain” animal experimentation.

New photographs and details obtained by White Coat Waste Project and provided exclusively to Timcast reveal the extent of the taxpayer funded cruelty and lack of regard for the well-being of these highly intelligent animals.

“Our new investigation has found that Fauci’s revolting record on taxpayer-funded animal testing is even bigger than #Beaglegate. He’s also wasting millions of tax dollars to subsidize a secretive island where primates are bred for his labs that inflict punishing pain on monkeys and ghoulishly withhold pain relief,” Devin Murphy, Public Policy and Communications Manager at White Coat Waste Project, told Timcast. “Fauci is addicted to spending and taxpayers don’t want to foot the bill for his government monkey business.”

Approximately 600 monkeys are taken from Morgan Island per year and shipped to some of the federal government’s most painful and cruel laboratories for animal research.

As of June 30, 2019, there were 3,044 primates living on Morgan Island, with 77% of the population being females, according to documents obtained by White Coat Waste Project through a Freedom of Information Act request. It is estimated that approximately 750 newborn monkeys are born on the island to await their potential use for vivisection each year.

The island has been managed for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases by Charles River Laboratories, one of the largest suppliers of laboratory animals in the world, since 2007. According to federal spending databases, a total of $13.5 million of a potential $27.5 million contract has been given to Charles River Laboratories to maintain the monkey island colony since March 2018.

A sizable chunk of those funds, $8.9 million, was paid by Dr. Fauci’s division (NIAID) of the NIH.

The monkeys themselves are also owned by NIAID.

According to documents obtained by WCW, Charles River is tasked with “the year-round daily maintenance of a non-human primate (NHP) breeding colony. […] It is anticipated that the number of animals provided by the Government should produce a minimum of 500 animals per year for the Government’s use.”

A 2018 NIAID paper describes the development of the deadly Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHFV) in monkeys in very graphic detail. White Coat Waste has also provided Timcast with photos of one of the monkeys that was infected with the virus. The horrific photos were originally published as a supplement to the paper.

The agency used fifteen rhesus and African green monkeys for the pilot study. They used a dozen macaque monkeys in the main study, where they were injected with the painful virus. They were killed on the seventh day of the test.

Though NIAID has recently attempted to publicly distance themselves from cruel animal testing by stealth editing their funding efforts out of research documents, the paper plainly states (as of November 16, 2021), “We thank the staff of the Rocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, Division of Intramural Research (DIR), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) for assistance with animal care and clinical and pathological veterinary services, and Atsushi Okumura for veterinary expertise throughout the study. We would also like to thank the members of the Visual and Medical Arts (DIR, NIAID, NIH) for aid in figure development. This work was funded by the Intramural Research Programme of the NIAID, NIH. ” (Emphasis added).

An analysis conducted by White Coat Waste Project found that Fauci’s NIAID has funded several other extensive maximum pain (USDA Pain Column E) experiments on primates from FY13-20.

These experiments include infecting primates with Ebola and other hemorrhagic viruses, Tuberculosis, or inducing sepsis; and more recently, modeling SARS-Co-2 on different primate species.

Excerpts from NIH documents detail some of the horror that these primates endured before their deaths.

“Ebola Virus infection may result in uniform lethality. Filoviruses cause a viral hemorrhagic disease which rapidly progresses from onset and includes high fever, anorexia, and recumbency, development of petechial and/or macular rash, coagulopathy and multi-organ failure. It is likely that the animals will experience some discomfort because of the virus, additional discomfort may result from the animals’ immune response to the infection,” explained one document.

Another noted that “animals infected with Ebola virus will experience pain and distress and the infection is expected to be lethal in non-protected animals.”

“Infection with the Lassa virus (Josiah) is 100% lethal in Cynomolgus macaques within approximately 14 days post challenge. Signs of illness can include fever, rash, diarrhea, bleeding and malaise prior to internal hemorrhage and multi-organ failure leading to death. The animals in some of the vaccinated groups may, and the control animals will, experience symptoms of Lassa virus infection,” researchers reported in yet another document detailing their work.

A study they conducted on Nipah virus said that the animals were in such bad shape between the sixth and ninth days post infection that they needed to be killed at that point to avoid being inhumane.

“Upon inoculation with Nipah virus animals develop clinical signs of disease. These signs may include weight loss, respiratory and neurological disorders. […] Control animals inoculated with Nipah virus-Bangladesh normally meet humane endpoint criteria between the evening of 6 dpi and the morning of 9 dpi,” the study reported.

While studying the Lassa virus, they allowed the macaque monkeys to suffer until they died from being infected. They wrote that “infection of cynomolgus macaques with Lassa virus will cause clinical disease and non-protected animals will ultimately succumb around day 8-17.”

The primates from Morgan Island have also been used for testing related to AIDS, polio, and even bio-terrorism. Only researchers and officials are allowed on the secretive island, which sits at 32.4774º N and 80.5195ºW. The public is banned from entering.

Commenting on the cruel tests, the founder of Small Primate Animal Rescue TN, Michael Robison, told Timcast that “once again, the powers that be are exploiting these animals for their own gain. In the end, these tests are ineffective. They are not curing or alleviating any sickness. They’re just collecting data — and data points equal dollars.”

Timcast reached out to NIAID with questions about the island and these specific tests. We did not hear back by time of publishing, but will update this article if a response is provided.

4 Likes

Dead Orphans, Fauci, AIDS Drug Trials, & The Lies

It can be argued that Dr. Anthony Fauci should be charged with pre-meditated murder in the push of AZT on AIDS patients. It can also be argued that he is currently engaged in the same behavior when it comes to the current CONvid-1984. If you thought you had heard it all about Fauci’s criminal behavior before, think again.

3 Likes

Tucker Carlson interviews Robert F. Kennedy jr. about his latest book "The Real Anthony Fauci. Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health".

3 Likes

3 Likes

Chinese scientists and institutions involved in organ harvesting received millions from Dr. Fauci, investigation finds

3 Likes

Fauci knew this was going to kill people. Fauci is a serial killer. And he should be brought up for crimes against humanity.

THE VACCINE INCREASED THE DEATH RATE 25 FOLD IN 10 MONTHS

3 Likes

Agreed.

The link above isn't working from here see alternative one. FETAL RISK WHISTLEBLOWER OBGYN DOCTOR "THE VACCINE INCREASED THE DEATH RATE 25 FOLD IN 10 MONTHS"Brighteon

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, his bombshell videos, and the legal-suits

2 Likes

Fauci cited for much more than just cruelty to puppies, investigative report shows

Thursday, January 27, 2022 by: [JD Heyes]
(Natural News) Dr. Anthony Fauci has been royally criticized for his ‘advice’ and ‘recommendations’ during the COVID-19 pandemic, but as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since the early 1980s, he has a lot more sickening baggage that he ought to have to answer for.

In August 2021, an activist organization, White Coat Waste Project, found that Fauci’s office greenlit roughly $424,000 in funding to conduct horrific experiments on live beagle puppies that included drugging them and sticking their heads in a covered apparatus filled with hungry sand fleas.

BizPac Review reported at the time:

According to the organization, dozens of beagles were first infected with parasites that cause disease in order to test an experimental drug.

The organization pointed out that the Food and Drug Administration doesn’t direct that drugs be tested on dogs, prompting its activists to inquire as to why such experimentation is being conducted and funded by American taxpayers.

According to the White Coat Waste Project, 44 beagle pups were utilized for experimentation in a Tunisia lab. Some of the dogs had vocal cords removed, reportedly so scientists could conduct their work without having to listen to constant barking.

And while this is bad enough, Fauci has also been accused, quite credibly, of funding dangerous gain of function research of the kind that we know led to the creation of the virus that causes COVID-19 and has killed millions of people around the world.

No one has attempted to hold Fauci accountable more than Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has managed to uncover evidence proving not only that Fauci’s NIAID funded the research, but that Fauci himself and other ranking officials at the National Institutes of Health conspired to keep their involvement a secret while working to discredit anyone who attempted to expose them.
/BrighteonTV-WatchLiveShows.jpg)](https://www.brighteon.tv)

“In fact, the NIAID has been under scrutiny for gruesome experiments carried out on dogs and on human children, experiments that indicate a troubling lack of concern for life,” Students for Life president Kristan Hawkins wrote in the Washington Examiner in November.

“The public should be asking whether that systemic disregard for life, especially for human life, extended all the way to Wuhan. Did the federal public health bureaucracy’s disconnection from human dignity lay foundations for the pandemic?” Hawkins continued.

And while she said that she understood how some animal research could benefit humans, that “argument crumbles, however, in the face of the bigger scandal facing Fauci’s NIAID: revelations that his office funded research on unborn children who are killed, dissected, harvested for organs, and shipped in pieces from a ‘Tissue Hub and Collection Site’ at the University of Pittsburgh to labs across the country,” she continued.

She goes on to ask how grafting scalps from babies killed in the womb at 5 months gestation to the backs of rats serves humankind before answering her own question with: “It doesn’t.”

But so far, the Biden regime has done nothing to hold Fauci to account. In fact, shortly before taking office, Biden made Fauci is administration’s chief medical adviser, though his specialty isn’t “medicine,” per se, it’s research (and diabolical research at that).

Republicans, meanwhile, are asking tough questions — and when they win back a congressional majority this fall they’re going to have subpoena power and plan on using it.

“You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic,” Paul noted during Fauci’s Senate testimony in early November, according to video clips posted online a few days earlier. “Will you, today, finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research” at a lab in Wuhan China, he asked.

After Fauci demurred, Paul doubled down.

“We’re aware that you changed the definition of gain of function on your [agency’s] website,” Paul said. “So what you’re doing is defining away gain of function — you’re simply saying it doesn’t exist ’cause you changed the definition on the NIH website.

“And what you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your a**, basically,” Paul continued.

(JD Heyes – NaturalNews.com)
Fauci cited for much more than just cruelty to puppies, investigative report shows – NaturalNews.com

1 Like

Dr. Fauci Melts Down at Congressional Hearing: 'I'm Wondering Why You're Asking Me About Lockdowns'

Fauci was also confronted about his attacks on signatories to the Great Barrington Declaration.

Dr. Anthony Fauci was among the public health officials called before Congress to testify on the Fiscal Year 2003 budget request for the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

When Fauci started getting heat for his disastrous track record, he fired back at his critics.

Rep. Cline, after pointing out that Dr. Francis Collins, the former NIH director, had called the GBD signatories "fringe" scientists, pointed out that this criticism was proven to be "baseless."

"So, I'll ask you on what basis did you and Dr. Collins identify these doctors, the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration as fringe scientists out of the mainstream of epidemiological science?" Cline asked.

"I never characterized them as fringe scientists," Fauci objected. "If you look at the record, that's incorrect."

"Dr. Collins, did you refer..." Cline began.

"Well? I'm, I'm, I'm... you're asking me the question," Fauci said. "I never called them fringe scientists."

"... And your comment regarding AIDS denialism," Cline added.

"Well, the issue with the Barrington declaration is that what they were stating is that if you let the virus run free in society and only so-called protect the vulnerable," he remarked. "And the question is who are the vulnerable in society that you are going to protect? And most public health officials totally disagree with the Barrington declaration."

"And in fact, if you did that, let it just run free and not try to protect the population in general, we almost certainly would've had many more infections, many more hospitalizations and many more deaths," he said. "Okay. So with all due respect to the scientist who signed a declaration, I completely disagree with them."

Over 60,000 medical practicioners and public health scientists are signatories to the Great Barrington Declaration, which was launched in October 2020. The essence of the declaration's argument is as follows:

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

The Covid-19 pandemic showed tremendous variation for individuals' vulnerability to the virus based on variables such as age, obesity, and comorbidities. There is currently close to one million deaths at least partly attributed to Covid-19.

But the most fractious part of Fauci's testimony came when he bridled at being called to account for the demonstrable failure of 'lockdowns' to stop the spread of Covid-19.

"Would you agree that during the times of the lockdowns, the data that we have seen following these lockdowns has shown that we have had increases in depression among young people and suicide?" Rep. Cline asked.

"There's no doubt that when you put... I'll answer the question," Fauci replied.

"There's no doubt when you put restraints on society, that it causes emotional and mental stress. There's no doubt about that, but you have to have a balance of saving people's lives from getting infected in hospitalizations.”

"Would you agree that suicide rates have increased among young people?" Cline asked.

"Indeed, they have," Fauci said.

"Would you agree that domestic violence rates have increased?" Cline asked.

"Yeah," Fauci said. "The answer is yes, but I'm wondering what that has to do with the question you're asking me."

"Would you agree that drug and alcohol use increased during these lockdowns?" Cline persisted.

"Well, I'm not sure the lockdowns itself did it," Fauci objected. "And I'm wondering why you're asking me about lockdowns because there were not complete lockdowns in this country."

"There were restrictions, obviously, but there were not lockdowns," Fauci added. "China is now going into a real lockdown. So I would disagree."

Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared on MSNBC in April and commented on China's severe lockdowns.

“China has a number of problems, two of which are that their complete lockdown, which was their approach, the strictest lockdown that you’d never be able to implement in the United States,” Fauci said. “Although that prevents the spread of infection, I remember early on they were saying, and I think accurately, they were doing better than almost anybody else.”

“But lockdown has its consequences,” Fauci went on. “You use lockdowns to get people vaccinated so that when you open up, you won’t have a surge of infections.”

In May 2020, Fauci warned of “irreparable damage” from extended lockdowns.

“We can’t stay locked down for such a considerable period of time that you might do irreparable damage and have unintended consequences, including consequences for health,” Fauci said in a CNBC interview.

"Fauci won the policy battle in Oct. 2020," Dr. Jay Bhattacharya remarked. "He demonized the@gbdeclaration and got his lockdown. Now that is clear that his policy failed, his regret is that we didn't lockdown like China & Shanghai."

"A failed leader's only honest recourse is to admit error," he added. "And step down."

"After pushing ineffective and harmful school closures, cancelled medical/dental appointments, travel restriction, small business closures, discontinued art and culture, stay-at-home orders, etc, Fauci's defense is that 'there were not complete lockdowns in this country'," Dr. Martin Kulldorff remarked.

Senator Marsh Blackburn also questioned the NIH's corrupt system of awarding itself royalties based on carrying out their official duties.

"The NIH covered up grants for gain of function research in Wuhan, and now they are refusing to release critical data regarding allegations of millions in royalty fees paid to in-house scientists like Fauci," Blckburn noted. "The NIH is a dark money pit."

The United States’ Covid policy responses that include quarantining, masks, and social distancing, as well as the ‘lockdowns,’ have failed to produce statistically significant results fighting Covid, but caused serious damage to the economy and violated Americans’ rights.

An exhaustive Johns Hopkins University comparative analysis published in January found that strict lockdowns failed to significantly reduce Covid-related deaths.

“Lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19, according to a new analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins University,” the Washington Times reported. “The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by about 0.2%, said the broad review of multiple scientific studies.”

“We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,” the researchers wrote.

“Overall, we conclude that lockdowns are not an effective way of reducing mortality rates during a pandemic, at least not during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic,” the authors conclude. “Our results are in line with the World Health Organization Writing Group (2006), who state, “Reports from the 1918 influenza pandemic indicate that social-distancing measures did not stop or appear to dramatically reduce transmission.”

According to public health officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci, however, lockdowns are like communism: 'True lockdowns have not yet been tried.'