Excerpt from speech in movie:In reviewing this year's progress, let me say we have been highly effective in conditioning people's minds to accept our solution to the world's problems. The energy crisis here in the United States was exceptionally successful worldwide; and we expect similar success with our upcoming food shortage. Our labor leaders have made great progress in causing confusion and work stoppages in all areas of the world...
Watch the Full Movie:
Summary: A Christian woman wants a newspaper man to publish a story about a One World Foundation being set up whose only goal is to control the world. She wants him to warn people that this is coming and explain how it ties into the end times spoken about in the Bible. The newsman is opposed to such an idea until he sees the woman being pursued by the Foundation. As this adventure unfolds, the newspaper man begins to realize that what the woman is saying could be true.
This Simpsons cartoon clip seems like quite an overt example of it concerning the plandemic. Both in terms of showing the plan in advance and mocking people.
The Simpsons predicts Donald Trumpâs 2024 presidential run in 2015 clip (article):
As we noted, the Simpsons did not âpredictâ a 2024 presidential election victory for Trump. What you see in the 2015 video clip is an example of predictive programming, wherein U.S. voters are subconsciously conditioned to accept Trumpâs second term in office.
As in most of the western world, politics in the U.S. is not a genuine contest between advocates of one set of political beliefs or another. Itâs a carefully stage-managed spectacle thatâs meant to convey the illusion of political freedom.
In effect, itâs an evolved updated version of the old principle of âBread and Circusesâ.
Thatâs not to say Trump is any better than Biden. Joe Biden was placed in the White House through a rigged election and his performance since has been so abysmal that even those who might have opposed Donald Trump will now welcome his return.
That was the intention of putting a senile old man in the Oval Office.
Once reinstalled, President Trump will then go on to perform his real task, which is to lead America into direct conflict with Russia, China and Iran. The video below is part of a psychological bait to unconsciously lure Americans into this trap. Ed. https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=280667
"The Death of Grass" is also a climate change BS agenda pre-advertiser. Upon a brief skimming of the 1956 book, it calls the virus the Chung -Li Virus and it keeps mentioning Australia and New Zealand. The 2009 intro to the book, mentions 'The Day of the Triffids' twice. Which of course is another clot shot predictive programmer like 'Invasion of the Body Snatchers'. The 2009 intro starts with "We live in an age of epidemics. Avian Flu, SARS, mass inoculations".
FlyMetotheMoon is a 2024 film about a fake moon landing in 1969. The lead character, a marketing specialist, prepares a fake moon landing, to be aired if the real mission fails, in a project codenamed "Artemis".
I liked that movie. It actually showed that the moon landings were not faked but that there were government agents external from NASA however who wanted to exert forceful control over the outcome since they were not prepared to admit to a failure in case of something going wrong with the mission. That actually rang as a plausible explanation of the various theories. Maybe they were telling the truth here, who knows. It would explain why some people seem to be so sure of what they believe regarding it, if for instance both things are true, that they (i.e. like an external government agency not prepared to accept whatever the outcome would be and also not having faith that they would in fact succeed) worked on creating a âfakeâ filming, and that NASA also actually went and did it for real. Like in the movie they worked on a backup plan but which was never used. And then of course those people who came to try and control everything because they were afraid of potential embarrasment disappeared back into the shadows afterwards, while the astronauts and people who actually did all the work to achieve the actual thing end up getting disrespected and smeared by some, as being fakes and liars, etc. for the rest of their lives. I always thought of this as probably the most plausible explanation since seeing the movie.
Being a psyop, that probably was the intention of the movie causing discourse, confusion. It is not an uncommon occurrence for films to cover future events. THEY have studied human-behaviour so thoroughly and intensively, to the point of being a crime against privacy and âfreeâ thinking (in an attempt to alter discernment and judgment). Even if âman went to the moonâ which they did not, having a âback-upâ plan for a cover-up is a criminal offense on a very large scale. And that it was. NASA is Not ASpace Agency rings true to my ears (metaphorically speaking). And sometimes quite literally Thank-you for your comment and thoughts on the matter, even though they do not match mine.
I was just about to delete my comment because I realized that I had posted a spoiler for anyone who has not seen the movie yet. In any case, yes an interesting movie.
Thank-you for your comment and thoughts on the matter, even though they do not match mine.