Gibraltar still on board with Contacting Tracing
Fuehrer Picardo still telling you to “trust the government”, continuing with the hoaxathon briefings.
Fuehrer Picardo still using his usual tactics – insults and guilt trips.
So, if fear, insults and guilt-trips don’t work, will GoG move forward with mandatory apps?
Yet, the government has decided to scale back on testing entire population:
HOWEVER – it is the testing that is touted as a major component to making “contact tracing” effective.
Read here:
“If those people aren’t tested, their contacts won’t be recorded.
“Even if you make contact tracing better, faster, safer, that still isn't really a solution. If you don't have testing, if you don't have isolation, if you can't deliver food to people who need that [in order] to actually be quarantined, then your contact tracing is meaningless.”
Don't be lead blindly –
You can’t as yet depend on the government to give you exact details about how their contact tracing will work, so it’s best to do your own research and decide for yourself whether or not to jump on the band wagon.
The Apple and Google API is “decentralized”; but even though information is stored on the person’s phone, according to the article below, the cloud is still overhead:
“Those beacons are stored in the cloud , but they’re the phone’s own.
HOWEVER – There’s also the issue of giving Tech companies access to more data, as the UK found out:
NOW – it’s interesting that Apple and Google are turning the tables:
Apple-Google Contact Tracing App Gets First Trial in Switzerland
EXCERPTS:
Apple and Google have tried to forestall obstacles stemming from privacy and security concerns, by requiring public health authorities (PHAs) to sign legal agreements governing use of the Apple-Google API:
- Apps built using the APIs can be used only to fight the coronavirus epidemic;
- The amount of data collected must be minimized;
- The PHAs must get user consent at multiple stages;
- Users can turn exposure notifications on and off;
- They cannot ask permission to use a smartphone's location services;
- They cannot employ user data collected for things like targeted advertising; and
- The API will be available for only one app per country or region, depending on the government's approach.
However, they (decentralized) are more difficult to secure overall because of their increased complexity, greater contact surface, and numerous weak links, Enderle told TechNewsWorld. Further, analysis "is often slower and less comprehensive."
Still, both approaches are dangerous because "we're building an infrastructure that can easily be perverted by a police state," Jude said. "Any system like this can and will be used for nefarious purposes."
AND – You also have to factor in WHO’s recent declaration:
REALIZE – it’s been a “live exercise” from the start; and the government is still on board with an evil NWO Agenda.
Are you buying all this fake news
GoG is still in “trial” mode and being a supporter of technology, and as so they are likely to hold on to using it to push the agenda; and pushing the contact tracing app no matter if it flops or not.
One way for you to show your displeasure with their constant overreach is not to play ball. They need 60 percent of the population to download the app; but this still will not guarantee success.
On a side note:
Perhaps the gathering at Chatham Counterguard last Friday was an indication that many Gibraltarians are not buying into the hoax any longer.
And hopefully the protest on June 29 is not “controlled” just to give you a way to vent your frustrations, while THEY still try to maintain control.