Charles III and Keir Starmer have violated the rule of law and must step down

General (other)
,
1

Charles III and Keir Starmer have violated the rule of law and must step down

By Rhoda Wilson on October 21, 2024

image
image1200×675 100 KB

Last month, Steven Ward delivered a letter to King Charles III and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer stating they have violated the rule of law. By doing so they have acted unconstitutionally.

Using Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights as the foundational documents for the rule of law in the UK’s constitutional arrangements, Ward explains to the two men why they have violated it. The violations centre around the covid so-called vaccines and allowing foreign influences to cause harm to British subjects.

In the case of Charles III, his violations of the rule of law also includes entering into arrangements with foreign governments and organisations, such as the World Economic Forum to initiate and promote The Great Reset.

Ward has called for them to both “stand down” as, constitutionally, they are untrustworthy and unfit to proceed with matters of the State.

The uncodified constitution of the UK is understood by few. And few will be familiar with the concepts raised by Ward in his letter. So, we have dived in and attempted to provide context and background that will help our readers understand Ward’s ‘Letter Upon Constitutional Principle’.

It’s a long one folks, so grab a cuppa and then settle in.

The Rule of Law

The rule of law is a defining feature of constitutional democracies and a fundamental principle underpinning the British constitution. It prevents the abuse of state power, requires the law to be followed by all and ensures that legal rights are fulfilled in practice. It also underpins social functioning and stable economies by providing clear and legitimate dispute resolution mechanisms and facilitating the elimination of corruption. The rule of law alone is not sufficient to make a state democratic, but a state which does not observe it cannot be a healthy democracy.

There is no one universally agreed definition of the rule of law, but its core concepts include legality, legal certainty, equality before the law, protection for fundamental rights, judicial independence and access to justice.

What is the Rule of Law? The Constitution Unit

It is the contravention of the rule of law that forms the basis of a ‘Letter Upon Constitutional Principle’ that Steven Ward delivered to King Charles III and the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer last month.

On 18 September Ward, who uses the moniker Stong Aingel, sent a letter to King Charles III and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer stating that neither were following the rule of law and so should stand down and consequentially, “Parliament(s) must be prorogued until lawful Elections are held.”

Ward points out that Charles III has contravened the “Rule of Law” in more than one instance and Starmer has contravened both the “Rule of Law” and the “rule of law” in more than one instance.

Continues.

Petition to the Gibraltar Parliament Demanding the Return to God’s Law

2

UK Government in Crisis: Starmer Grilled After Hasina’s London Links Spark Resignation Drama | Watch

1 Like
3

Britain’s working class will never fight Starmer’s war for Ukraine

23 Feb, 2025
The UK prime minister is mulling sending troops to Ukraine – but his ignored and alienated citizens won’t follow

image
image768×432 80.3 KB

Following the Munich Security Conference last week, European Union leaders appeared shell-shocked by US Vice President J.D. Vance’s scathing attack on Europe.

He criticized the continent for multiple reasons, including the lack of free speech, arrests of European citizens for inflammatory social media posts, insufficient commitment to security, and destabilization due to both legal and illegal migration. Although Vance seemed to address Western European politicians and officials, it is likely he was speaking over their heads, directly to the public. His words resonated with widespread discontent about politics and politicians across the region, aligning with the prevailing sense of unfairness felt by many ordinary citizens.

Western European leaders, including British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, appeared agitated and uncomfortable with Washington’s tone. Perhaps the hard truths Vance presented have forced them to reconsider their consistently underfunded armed forces. Vance’s warnings made it clear that they cannot indefinitely rely on the US for military power and financial aid, particularly regarding the Russia-Ukraine war. Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky also heard that signal and immediately called for a ‘European Armed Force’. Western European leaders arranged an emergency meeting in Paris hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron and, astonishingly, Starmer indicated British soldiers could be sent to the Ukraine to enforce any peace deal.

The British public and Parliament were caught off guard by what many see as a reckless proposal from their PM. He announced the possibility of “British boots on the ground” just hours after the Munich meeting ended. This decision, or threat, appears to be a unilateral move by Starmer. It is unlikely to gain widespread support across the country and is already sparking outrage, particularly in the “Red Wall” – Britain’s former industrial heartlands. A poll in The Times just last week showed that only 11% of young people in the UK would consider fighting for their country, showing what we all know: that the UK is deeply divided over class, race, and region.

Continues.

4

We previously published an article questioning what religion Charles “The Great Reset” King follows. It explores claims that Charles converted to Islam sometime before 1996, that he gravitates towards Islamic and Greek orthodoxy and that Charles has a deep respect for the cosmology of Universalism. And Matthew Ehret has said Charles III is a British Israelite. Additionally, the British royal family has long and historic links to Freemasonry.

In another article, we explored Charles III’s role within the Venetian Black Nobility, which controls the Committee of 300, and their New World Order agenda to gain worldwide control. We noted that in his book ‘Club of Rome’, Dr. John Coleman said, “The basic religion followed by the Club of Rome is Gnosticism and the cult of the Bogomils and Catharis. Members of the British monarchy are firm believers in these ‘religions’ and in the main, it is accurate to say that certainly, the royal family members are not Christians.”

The title ‘Defender of the Faith’ dates back to Henry VIII and is used by subsequent English and British monarchs. At his official accession, Charles stated his constitutional responsibility as Defender of the Faith. He reiterated his commitment to protecting the Church of England.

According to The Guardian, Charles III swore to uphold “the laws of God and the true profession of the gospel, maintain the Protestant Reformed religion established by law and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline and government thereof, as by law established.”

He has also emphasised the importance of respecting other faiths. It must be noted that there is a huge difference between respecting another’s belief and promoting it.

It’s not only his dubious beliefs that should make us question whether Charles III is fit to be the British monarch.