Wyoming Fire: Who's Controlling this Weather | Hurricane - Fire – Floods
“Nearly 73000 acres of the Bighorn National Forest are now on fire” . Now that may sound like just another forest fire but you have to look deeper than that to see why this is an anomaly. “The previous largest fire recorded in the forest’s 100-year history topped out at around 18,000 acres and took weeks to grow that size. Over the weekend, the Elk Fire grew more than 25,000 acres in a matter of hours, they said.” So basically we have a once-in-a-lifetime fire raging on in Wyoming and no one is talking about it. Well luckily someone is not shy about asking questions and he also has a rather interesting theory. Details in video.
Bill Gates Owns Hurricane Controlling Weather Patents | Redacted News
Not only is Bill Gates invested heavily in Tampa's 15-minute-city waterfront project, but he's also the proud patent holder of Hurricane controlling patents.
by Meteorologist Nick Lilja
Building on my previous post, it's important to recognize the difference between cloud seeding and full-scale climate manipulation.
In my last post, I discussed the manipulation of air parcels and the atmosphere as a whole. It simply can't be done because the energy and work (the physics version of "work," not human effort) required to manipulate the air over something as small as a pot of boiling water is already quite large. Scaling that up to the entire atmosphere is, frankly, not possible, especially when considering other energy factors like solar and oceanic energy, which far exceed anything humans could contribute.
So, attempting to steer or manipulate a storm or hurricane in any particular direction is impossible.
For those suggesting I "Google" cloud seeding, I want to assure you that no one gets through an Earth Science degree or a 15-year career as a meteorologist without encountering such topics. I've read scientific papers and scholarly articles on the subject—no need for Google.
Does cloud seeding happen? Yes.
Does it work? We can't know.
Here's an example to explain why:
A typical cloud might be 2 miles wide and 25,000 feet tall. Some quick math shows that it contains about 2,189,564,415,845.94 cubic feet of air. That’s two trillion, one hundred eighty-nine billion, five hundred sixty-four million, four hundred fifteen thousand, eight hundred forty-five point nine four cubic feet.
Most cloud seeding is done by small airplanes. But let’s think big and use a C-130 cargo plane. A C-130 has about 5,000 cubic feet of potential payload space. That payload is only 0.00000025% of the volume of that cumulus cloud.
Could the C-130’s payload help a single cloud grow slightly taller for a brief period? Perhaps. But we can’t measure the difference it makes because there is no "control" cloud to compare it against.
Sure, it has rained from cloud-seeded clouds before. So let’s assume the cloud only rained because it was seeded. Great, you've nucleated some water vapor around the seeded material. Now you have raindrops forming around those particles.
Once the raindrops fall out of the cloud, they take all the seeding material with them. Then what? Do you seed again? And again? And again? Given the size and scope of this process, you can see how entropy (as discussed in my previous post) becomes a massive factor. It takes a lot of work to bring order to this chaos.
And even with all that effort, we still can't effectively measure the impact.
Furthermore, seeding a single cloud is vastly different from trying to seed an entire hurricane. As I mentioned previously, a typical hurricane contains around 78,824,318,970,453,922.64 cubic feet of air. That’s seventy-eight quadrillion, eight hundred twenty-four trillion, three hundred eighteen billion, nine hundred seventy million, four hundred fifty-three thousand, nine hundred twenty-two point six four cubic feet.
Now, the payload of that same C-130 represents about 0.0000000000025% of the volume of the hurricane.
For context, salt makes up about 3.5% of seawater, sodium about 0.2% of soft water, and chlorine about 0.003% of pool water.
A C-130’s cloud-seeding payload represents 0.0000000000025% of the water vapor in a hurricane.
Even if cloud seeding were attempted, given the raindrop formation processes in a hurricane (have you ever noticed how much smaller raindrops are in tropical systems?), the effort would be washed out almost immediately.
And I'm left asking, "then what?", again.
None of this is a feasible solution to an end goal of some sort of control and manipulation of our atmosphere. It simply can't be done with any sort of measurable outcome - good, bad, or otherwise.
I looked through the video and didn’t find it.
What is it referring to?
Is it the list of patents? All of them or some specific ones?
Do you actually think they churn out patents and not utilize them?? Just curious. Also if you could give other examples of hurricanes with multiple tornadoes at the same time, don't bother with the climate change excuse either ( I have already checked the MSM fact checkers and this is their line ).
Usually Florida gets 66 tornaodes ANNUALLY.
Who are you referring to?
There are tons of patents that don't work and tons of patents that aren't utilized.
So which of these weather modification patents do you believe have now been used to create these hurricanes? A list like this was briefly shown in "The aftermath of MILTON! All the proof you need to see to realize this was a..."
•0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall
•1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker
•1225521 – September 4, 1915 – Protecting From Poisonous Gas In Warfare
•1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
•1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
•1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
•1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
•1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method
•1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment
•2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987
•2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture
•2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator
•2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device
•2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather
•2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
•2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture
•2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator
•2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987
•2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere
•2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device
•2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987
•2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields
Perhaps the "Bill Gates Owns Hurricane Controlling Weather Patents"
The applications made public by the U.S. Patent Office last week describe floating devices that could reduce the strength of hurricanes by drawing warm water from the ocean's surface and channeling it down to the depths through a long tube. A second tube would reverse the process and bring deep, cold water up to the surface.
Well.. sure, it would control a hurricane, right? how would that work?
Oh, so not ok to talk about sea temperatures and their effect on hurricanes?? They have nothing to do with it or are falsified?
So the logic in the above messages appears to be the same?
That the hurricane was much more powerful than what nature usually has in store ("not organic") and is therefore manmade using some kind of fantastic technologies? (But human caused climate change is a impossible and fake?) Doesn't seem very logical to me.
Here's a long list:-
It is however compiled on Wikipedia so you can just disregard it as disinformation...
"This is HAARP on steroids" Whistleblower reveals weather machine at South Pole | Redacted News
Former Raytheon Employee Eric Hecker, who worked at the South Pole Station reveals how they use direct energy to control storms.
Is this proof enough???
Eric J Hecker
Currently residing in Alaska, Eric is a self research investigator that takes from his many odd life experiences and connects with others.
Eric was raised on Long Island the home of the now famous Montauk Project. His childhood included being part of the Stargate Project run by the CIA/DIA. Later on he had experiences in the Submarine Service. Following that he became a plumber for some of the wealthiest people in the world back on Long Island. In 2010 Eric took a contract to work at the South Pole Station for a year.
Always the avid researcher, it was not until Eric began working remotely thoughout the State of Alaska that he started making connections that his own life may not have been what he thought it was.
Now he is trying to help others see that things may not be as we were told!!!
Does his bio make him more credible or less?