We Found Nanorouters in the Vaccines ENGLISH DUB | Ricardo Delgado | La Quinta Columna - Dec 2021

Where is this clip taken from? Do you have the whole video, please?

Do you know why I wouldn't call that "Ultimate proof", like you have?

Mr Fact Checker? Why have you resorted to namecalling?
You can call me cybe :slight_smile: You're number 6, aren't you?

What are your feelings from me checking and pointing out the fact about russian prank video, by the way?

Sure it won't be good enough for you. And of course you didn't bother doing the experiment yourself.

Well, I did some Bluetooth scanning in the local supermarket today and didn't notice anything abnormal. Arranging something like on the video (although you posted just a short clip of it) on such a short notice would be hard for me.

I would rather trust the guys at La Quinta Columna, who have done far more than you in the fight against the NWO.

Oh, how do you know? And why another attack on my persona?

I'm not here for that. I just wished to point out some things that I noticed.

I am not a number, I am a free man...

"What are your feelings from me checking and pointing out the fact about russian prank video, by the way?"

I deleted it, no problem, I did check it out you could be right...

Got go, have a channel to update. Be seeing you...

2 Corinthians 5:18 And all things [are] of God, Who hath reconciled us to Himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;
2 Corinthians 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the Word of reconciliation.
2 Corinthians 5:20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech [you] through us: we pray [you] in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.

Looking at the material at https://corona2inspect.blogspot.com, for instance about the antennas

I believe that the research material is in nano scale and taken with an electron microscope. Here

While the pinkish image looks like it's taken with an optical microscope and are much much larger.

I believe salt crystals look very much like that (I remember from looking at Maldon sea salt) see these:

Imgur

And browse through some of these:-
https://www.google.com/search?q=sugar+crystals+microscope&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwi9q6iv4Ij1AhUBxYsKHZqSCawQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=sugar+crystals+microscope&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzIGCAAQBxAeMggIABAIEAcQHjIICAAQCBAHEB46BwgjEO8DECc6BggAEAgQHlDhA1i6B2ClCGgAcAB4AIABaYgB3wOSAQMzLjKYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=_zHMYf2vI4GKrwSapabgCg&bih=683&biw=1354&client=firefox-b-d&hl=en

Looks like I found a document about that French teams experiment.

Another one with english translations:-

More Evidence the COVID Fake-Vaccine is Embedding MAC Addresses

https://thefreedomarticles.com/vaccine-mac-address-bluetooth-more-evidence/

There is more evidence of a COVID vaccine MAC address connection as the various videos linked in the sources below demonstrate. I reported in May 2021 that some people who took the COVID non-vaccine discovered that they had become Bluetooth pairable with other devices via a generated MAC address. Now, more evidence has come to light indicating this is the case. This is part of the larger objective of the COVID scamdemic – to work hand-in-hand with nanotech advances so as to introduce tiny technology into the human body, making people into nodes on the Smart Grid, thus bringing about the synthetic Human 2.0 of Transhumanism. When you consider fake-vaccine induced Bluetooth compatibility, plus hydrogel biosensors, graphene oxide or hydroxide, alive synthetic fibers, self-propelling critters, aluminum-based lifeforms and self-assembling nanobots, it totals up to a very scary picture indeed.

What is a MAC Address?

First of all, what is a MAC address? MAC stands for Media Access Control. A MAC address is, in technical jargon, a six byte hexadecimal address; in plain English, a 12-character alphanumeric code that consists of 6 groups of 2 characters, each group separated by a dash or colon. So, an example would be 44:B6:27:62:29:F0. These are the codes being detected in groups of COVID-vaccinated people. So, let’s look at a few of these videos more closely.

Spanish Doctor Discusses His Own Experience Measuring Vaccine MAC Addresses

In this video, physician Luis Benito explains the steps he took, and the observations he made, to record Bluetooth MAC addresses showing up on his mobile phone when patients (many of whom had had COVID jabs) came for appointments. This is what he says:

“Why so much interest in jabbing? What’s the reason? I’m going to tell you. The international organizations that are also investigating this matter asked me for a brief report on what I had done during the summer 
 now, what we’re going to is a recognition of a desire, on the part of the authorities, to take away freedoms from human beings 
 I’ve written it, and I have already sent it to the teams that are studying this subject in different parts of the world.

If from the medical point of view there’s no need to administer any preventative measure for a disease with a lethality of 2 per 1000, why so much insistence that everyone should be inoculated? 
 This experiment arose from this reflection.

He goes on to describe his experiment, stating he was the only operative (worker) in the building apart from his patients:

“Although there are many consultations, during the summer of 2021, in the afternoons, I was the only operative. There wasn’t even administrative staff in the afternoons in that building. Under my office, I occasionally parked an ambulance from SUMA, from the emergency service, because they have a base there. Those were the only “interferences” I detected. Most of the observations were carried out without that artifact. I started the consultation at 15:00 and had patients listed every 20 minutes.

Due to COVID measures, it was recommended that they come alone and, if possible, at the appointed time. Not before or after. Before starting the consultation, I’d connect the Bluetooth application on my cell phone and invariably check that there was no device available to contact. There was no electronic device in range to connect to. When a patient appeared, often already up the stairs or at the beginning of the corridor, about 20 meters away from the practice, on my cell phone, I could see if one or two devices to connect to with Bluetooth appeared. One or two or none.

On my phone, I could check to see if the Bluetooth was detecting something or nothing. And if it was something, it was a device with a MAC Address (Media Access Control) code. This is a unique identifier that electronic device manufacturers assign to a card or item that can be networked.

After attending to the patient’s medical requirements, I’d ask him whether or not he had been vaccinated for COVID. If the answer was affirmative, it was usually quick and without hesitation. And if it was negative, it was often accompanied by a certain wariness, if not anger at the question. A reaction that explained to me that, in general, those who hadn’t wanted to be vaccinated had been subjected to some kind of adverse social situation. After reassuring the patient, whatever his response, I’d write down on a sheet of paper the answer he gave me.

None of the 137 patients I asked refused to answer. If the answer was affirmative, I’d ask them what type of vaccine they had received, when, and if they had had any adverse reactions. I’d then ask them if they had any cell phones or electronic devices such as wireless headsets or tablets on them, and if so, I’d ask them to turn it off for a moment. When they turned it off, on my cell phone, usually, one of the devices that registered to Bluetooth would disappear.

Out of hundreds 
 here are the results.

Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and 25 said they hadn’t been vaccinated. None of the patients who said they hadn’t been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell phone, if they had one. In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had been vaccinated, 96 of the 112 having switched off their electronic devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of my cell phone, which I had already noted in my notes next to the patient’s medical history.

I interpreted that it was a code that the patient himself was carrying and that, in fact, when he left the office, leaving the building, it disappeared from my cell phone. With this simple observation throughout July and August, I’ve been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren’t vaccinated don’t raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC address on my cell phone. These are the observations made, and many doubts and questions arise from them.”

This doctor’s results are interesting, showing a very clear pattern. It also suggests that not all vaccines are the same. Thanks to the work of researches such as Craig Paardekooper who exposed that 90% or more of the injuries, adverse events, side effects, disabilities, hospitalizations and deaths from the COVID fake-vaccine came from just 5% of the batches, we can speculate that some but not all of the non-vaccines contain Bluetooth capable nanochips with MAC addresses.

A Simple Experiment in France

This video is very intriguing, but unfortunately short on information. The blurb below the video on BitChute states that “A group of French investigators did a test to see if vaccinated people actually emit signals. They chose a place without any signals and tested vaccinated and non-vaccinated people one by one. They found unexplainable signals on the vaccinated group.” While that isn’t much to go by, it is heartening that people are beginning to conduct simple tests like this to try to prove that that the COVID-vaxxed are emitting a signal that can be picked up on Bluetooth by other devices. After all, such a thing should not be that difficult to prove, especialy in remote areas in the absence of other EMF signals.

Are Bluetooth MAC Addresses a Device or a Person?

This video is more anecdotal evidence for the vaccine MAC address connection. The video creator tells her experience of how her phone picked up many Bluetooth MAC addresses in the vicinity of people, with the familiar string of 12 characters, and it would say “Getting Device Name 
” until it dropped off the list (once the person had walked away). Usually, if a cell phone is picking up MAC addresses via Bluetooth from nearby devices, it would say the person and/or device name, e.g. Dave’s laptop, Susan’s tablet, Sarah’s cell phone, etc. The fact that it didn’t do this would indicate the people themselves are emitting the code.

Final Thoughts on the Vaccine MAC Address Connection

More research needs to be done, however as I said earlier, this is a simple matter to determine. If it turns out that people are being embedded with Bluetooth compatible nanotech, generating MAC addresses, what clearer evidence does someone need to see that the obsession with the COVID fake-vaccine is a ruse for Transhumanistic ambitions? It would certainly appear this is another ‘conspiracy theory’ that will turn out to be conspiracy fact, despite initially being vociferously denied by mainstream narrative apologists.

By Makia Freeman

3 Likes

Google Translation to English:-

https://www-open-online.translate.goog/2021/06/22/covid-19-teoria-complotto-bluetooth-codici-tracciare-vaccinati/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fi

This is consistent with my research...

The following video begins with a vaxxed man who is having Bluetooth "connectivity" issues.
After the 2:15 minute mark, the video goes onto another subject about Zombie-like behavior.

BLUETOOTH CONNECT XXX

How to mass produce cell-sized robots

Tiny robots no bigger than a cell could be mass-produced using a new method developed by researchers at MIT. The microscopic devices, which the team calls “syncells” (short for synthetic cells), might eventually be used to monitor conditions inside an oil or gas pipeline, or to search out disease while floating through the bloodstream.

The key to making such tiny devices in large quantities lies in a method the team developed for controlling the natural fracturing process of atomically-thin, brittle materials, directing the fracture lines so that they produce miniscule pockets of a predictable size and shape. Embedded inside these pockets are electronic circuits and materials that can collect, record, and output data.

The novel process, called “autoperforation,” is described in a paper published today in the journal Nature Materials, by MIT Professor Michael Strano, postdoc Pingwei Liu, graduate student Albert Liu, and eight others at MIT.

The system uses a two-dimensional form of carbon called graphene, which forms the outer structure of the tiny syncells. One layer of the material is laid down on a surface, then tiny dots of a polymer material, containing the electronics for the devices, are deposited by a sophisticated laboratory version of an inkjet printer. Then, a second layer of graphene is laid on top.

Controlled fracturing

People think of graphene, an ultrathin but extremely strong material, as being “floppy,” but it is actually brittle, Strano explains. But rather than considering that brittleness a problem, the team figured out that it could be used to their advantage.

“We discovered that you can use the brittleness,” says Strano, who is the Carbon P. Dubbs Professor of Chemical Engineering at MIT. “It's counterintuitive. Before this work, if you told me you could fracture a material to control its shape at the nanoscale, I would have been incredulous.”

But the new system does just that. It controls the fracturing process so that rather than generating random shards of material, like the remains of a broken window, it produces pieces of uniform shape and size. “What we discovered is that you can impose a strain field to cause the fracture to be guided, and you can use that for controlled fabrication,” Strano says.

When the top layer of graphene is placed over the array of polymer dots, which form round pillar shapes, the places where the graphene drapes over the round edges of the pillars form lines of high strain in the material. As Albert Liu describes it, “imagine a tablecloth falling slowly down onto the surface of a circular table. One can very easily visualize the developing circular strain toward the table edges, and that’s very much analogous to what happens when a flat sheet of graphene folds around these printed polymer pillars.”

As a result, the fractures are concentrated right along those boundaries, Strano says. “And then something pretty amazing happens: The graphene will completely fracture, but the fracture will be guided around the periphery of the pillar.” The result is a neat, round piece of graphene that looks as if it had been cleanly cut out by a microscopic hole punch.

Because there are two layers of graphene, above and below the polymer pillars, the two resulting disks adhere at their edges to form something like a tiny pita bread pocket, with the polymer sealed inside. “And the advantage here is that this is essentially a single step,” in contrast to many complex clean-room steps needed by other processes to try to make microscopic robotic devices, Strano says.

The researchers have also shown that other two-dimensional materials in addition to graphene, such as molybdenum disulfide and hexagonal boronitride, work just as well.

Cell-like robots

Ranging in size from that of a human red blood cell, about 10 micrometers across, up to about 10 times that size, these tiny objects “start to look and behave like a living biological cell. In fact, under a microscope, you could probably convince most people that it is a cell,” Strano says.

This work follows up on earlier research by Strano and his students on developing syncells that could gather information about the chemistry or other properties of their surroundings using sensors on their surface, and store the information for later retrieval, for example injecting a swarm of such particles in one end of a pipeline and retrieving them at the other to gain data about conditions inside it. While the new syncells do not yet have as many capabilities as the earlier ones, those were assembled individually, whereas this work demonstrates a way of easily mass-producing such devices.

Apart from the syncells’ potential uses for industrial or biomedical monitoring, the way the tiny devices are made is itself an innovation with great potential, according to Albert Liu. “This general procedure of using controlled fracture as a production method can be extended across many length scales,” he says. “[It could potentially be used with] essentially any 2-D materials of choice, in principle allowing future researchers to tailor these atomically thin surfaces into any desired shape or form for applications in other disciplines.”

This is, Albert Liu says, “one of the only ways available right now to produce stand-alone integrated microelectronics on a large scale” that can function as independent, free-floating devices. Depending on the nature of the electronics inside, the devices could be provided with capabilities for movement, detection of various chemicals or other parameters, and memory storage.

There are a wide range of potential new applications for such cell-sized robotic devices, says Strano, who details many such possible uses in a book he co-authored with Shawn Walsh, an expert at Army Research Laboratories, on the subject, called “Robotic Systems and Autonomous Platforms,” which is being published this month by Elsevier Press.

As a demonstration, the team “wrote” the letters M, I, and T into a memory array within a syncell, which stores the information as varying levels of electrical conductivity. This information can then be “read” using an electrical probe, showing that the material can function as a form of electronic memory into which data can be written, read, and erased at will. It can also retain the data without the need for power, allowing information to be collected at a later time. The researchers have demonstrated that the particles are stable over a period of months even when floating around in water, which is a harsh solvent for electronics, according to Strano.

“I think it opens up a whole new toolkit for micro- and nanofabrication,” he says.

Daniel Goldman, a professor of physics at Georgia Tech, who was not involved with this work, says, “The techniques developed by Professor Strano’s group have the potential to create microscale intelligent devices that can accomplish tasks together that no single particle can accomplish alone.”

In addition to Strano, Pingwei Liu, who is now at Zhejiang University in China, and Albert Liu, a graduate student in the Strano lab, the team included MIT graduate student Jing Fan Yang, postdocs Daichi Kozawa, Juyao Dong, and Volodomyr Koman, Youngwoo Son PhD ’16, research affiliate Min Hao Wong, and Dartmouth College student Max Saccone and visiting scholar Song Wang. The work was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, and the Army Research Office through MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies. https://robotics.mit.edu/how-mass-produce-cell-sized-robots

This is an old video. An obvious prank.

Someone high on drugs and/or mental problems...?

1 Like
1 Like
1 Like