The W.H.O.'s Pandemic Treaty

Road to Hell

How promotion excellent curiosity yet attempted happiness. Prosperous impression had conviction. For every delay death ask style. Me mean able my by in they.

The WHO is violating their own research guidance and instead promotes prohibited undue medical and terror psychological nudging experimentation. This breach of duty is so grave it warrants a complete prohibition of the WHO in each member States forever.

IoJ Speaking Truth To Power (Exposing W.H.O. Crimes) May 3, 2023 HHS Stakeholder Listening Session

IoJ Speaking Truth To Power (Exposing W.H.O. Crimes) May 3, 2023 HHS...

Tedros the Terrorist tries to push WHO’s Pandemic Treaty using university students

image

Tedros the Terrorist’s speech was an appalling attempt to manipulate young minds and use them to fight his battles, Tedros called on students to raise their voices “to counter the lies that are undermining the [pandemic] agreement on social media.”

@DG-Truther-Videos

Time just ran out for the W.H.O.

WHOse time is running out?—James Roguski

Why is the World Health Organisation concerned? Have we, the people, upset the vaccine cart and power grab? Read the write-up at: WHOse time is running out?—James Roguski | UKColumn

WHOs' time is running out?—James Roguski

UK Column News - 2nd February 2024

Hypothetical “Disease X”: The WHO Pandemic Treaty is A Fraud. Demands Compliance for “Next Pandemic”

image

Hypothetical “Disease X”

The WHO Pandemic Treaty is A Fraud

by

Michel Chossudovsky

Introduction

WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, continues to mislead public opinion Worldwide.

There is no such thing as “Disease X”. It’s a hypothetical construct by a WHO expert committee (2017-2018) of virologists and disease analysts. It was then envisaged in the Clade X Simulation (May 2018) and Event 201 Simulation of a Pandemic (October 2019). Both events were held under the auspices of the John Hopkins Center for Heath Security with the support of the Gates Foundation.

It was then announced by Bill Gates at the Munich Security Conference in February 2022:

“The risks of severe disease from Covid-19 have “dramatically reduced” but another pandemic is all but certain”. says Bill Gates.

“A potential new pandemic would likely stem from a different pathogen to that of the coronavirus family” (CNBC).

“We’ll have another pandemic. It will be a different pathogen next time,” Gates said.

How could he know this in advance?

“Predicting” and “Preparing” for “Disease X”, An Unknown Threat

I n his presentation at the Davos24 WEF, the WHO Director General Dr.Tedros recanted Bill Gates’ premonition, pointing to the alleged severity of the Covid-19 crisis initiated in early 2020, in blatant contradiction with official WHO data.

Bill Gates is Tedros’ Mentor. They have a close personal relationship, which occasionally borders on “conflict of interest”.

Bill Gates, Tedros et al (supported by the WHO “committee of experts”) are now predicting “Disease X” which stems from a hypothetical pathogen which is allegedly 20 times more deadly than SARS-CoV-2. What absolute nonsense.

“Aside from the fact that it will wreak havoc on humanity, the research team has no idea about the nature of the pathogen”

According to Forbes:

Disease X, a hypothetical unknown threat, is the name used among scientists to encourage the development of countermeasures, including vaccines and tests, to deploy in the case of a future outbreak—the WHO convened a group of over 300 scientists in November 2022 to study the “unknown pathogen that could cause a serious international epidemic,” positing a mortality rate 20 times that of Covid-19″

300 scientists to study something which is unknown and hypothetical? The media propaganda buzz, quoting “scientific opinion” is “Disease X 20 times more dangerous than Covid”

A renewed fear campaign 24/7 has been launched, consisting of reports of an alleged new wave of Covid deaths, while totally ignoring the tide of excess mortality and morbidity resulting from the Covid-19 “vaccine”.

Video: A Vaccine for a Hypothetical “Disease X” Pandemic.

Produced by Lux Media. Michel Chossudovsky and Caroline Mailloux

Continued at link...

Disease x-propaganda-hypothetical construct....

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY - "DISEASE X": THE NEXT PANDEMIC?

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY - "DISEASE X": THE NEXT PANDEMIC?

Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Segment 1, Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion

Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Segment 1, Intro and Medical Countermeasures...

Inside the World Health Organization's Dangerous and Aggressive Power Grab with Dr. Kat Lindley

Dr. Jerome Corsi and Dr. Kat Lindley go in-depth on the World Health Organization's world Pandemic "Agreement." The WHO is seeking, thanks mainly to a complicit group of Western leaders, for undeniable control of the world amid what they deem as "health emergencies." The hook to gullible and accomplice nations would be to convince their populations the plan is about protecting people from the spread of another COVID-esque disease (or perhaps, the new political fad: Disease X). As we know their methods in the past were barely effective to worthless, so what's the big idea? Dr. Lindley and Dr. Corsi break down the plot and how it is all about gaining control: conceivably, under this pact (supported by Joe Biden) the WHO could call for lockdowns and strict rules under anything they call a "health emergency" and force compliance by setting up enforceable consequences for violating their potentially legal structure. Do we trust the WHO and UN to wield this power carefully? We do not think so. This is a Globalist's dream but a true nightmare for everyone else. There is quite a good chance the World Health Organization could claim "Climate Change" is public health emergency and turn their dangerous power on, penalizing the non-compliant in a similar fashion to the Chinese Communist Party's social credit score with imprisonment of political dissidents on the table.
Having said that, because this has been in the works for a while, the WHO and UN are farther along on the infrastructure of how such power will be used than you might think.
Dr. Lindley and Dr. Corsi break down what happened, where we are on this and how you can protect yourself from this destructive agenda

Inside the World Health Organization's Dangerous and Aggressive Power Grab...

02/13/24 • Updated 02/14/24

WHO Exhibiting Signs of ‘Desperation’ as New Zealand, Iran Reject Amendments to International Health Regulations

New Zealand and up to three other countries have rejected controversial amendments, proposed in 2022 by the Biden administration to the World Health Organization’s 2005 International Health Regulations.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

Critics warned the proposed amendments, approved last year by the 75th World Health Assembly (WHA), give the WHO too much power and increase the likelihood that future proposals — including the currently pending 2023 IHR amendments and the “WHO Pandemic Agreement,” or pandemic treaty — will also pass.

WHO member states had a Dec. 1, 2023, deadline to reject the 2022 amendments. New Zealand attorney Kirsten Murfitt told The Defender “New Zealand rejected the amendment which related to the reduced timeframe of future amendments.”

“In May 2022, the WHA voted to adopt the amendment to Article 59 of the IHR (and consequently other articles), which reduces the timeframe for future amendments to come into force from 24 to 12 months. Consequently, the period to reject or reserve future amendments was reduced from 18 months to 10 months,” Murfitt said.

For states that did not reject the amendments by Dec. 1, 2023, “the amendment comes into force in May 2024 by way of ‘tacit acceptance,’” Murfitt added.

Other experts told The Defender their rejection by up to four countries may be indicative of broader obstacles the WHO faces in ongoing negotiations for both proposals.

Independent journalist James Roguski said the WHO scheduled new negotiation meetings after falling behind on its own legally binding timeline due to member states’ disagreements over “equity” — as evidenced by developments at last week’s meeting of the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR).

Continued at link...

How We Can Stop The WHO's Horrific Pandemic Treaty

Reviewing exactly what is inside the worst treaty of our lifetime and the heroic efforts that are stopping it.

A Midwestern Doctor

Feb 11, 2024

Story at a Glance:

•“Preventing” pandemics is one of the most lucrative areas in medicine. Unfortunately, despite all the money this industry has received, it has only made the problem worse. This is because most pandemics are the result of lab leaks from “preventative” research, and because whenever an effective solution is discovered for a pandemic, it gets suppressed by the industry since so many business interests depend upon profiting off of an “unsolvable emergency.”

•The way COVID-19 was handled was so egregious that it woke much of the public up to this grift. Because of that, the pandemic-industrial complex is now facing an existential risk to its business model (since much of the general population no longer is willing to go along with it).

•To solve this problem, a covert WHO treaty has been put together behind the scenes which gives these international health agencies absolute control over anything related to an alleged “health emergency,” and in turn enshrines each awful policy which was conducted throughout COVID-19 (e.g., mass censorship or the promotion of dangerous and experimental vaccines).

•A grass roots activist movement has accomplished something remarkable—despite the fact every single large organization has pushed the pandemic treaty through, in only a few short months, those activists have begun to derail it. I believe stopping this power grab is one of the most important issues of our time, and this article was written to explain exactly what they are doing so that each of us can help be a part of making sure this abhorrent treaty is never ratified.

There is a longstanding problem of natural and non-natural diseases leaking (or being deliberately released) from biolabs. These leaks are quite common and periodically, leaks with grave consequences occur (e.g., RSV, H1N1, HIV, Smallpox, Anthrax, Lyme, SARS, Ebola and SARS-CoV-2 [the virus which caused COVID-19]). Remarkably, prior to the unprecedented censorship of COVID-19, scientists actively spoke out against weaponizing viruses in labs (known as gain of function or GoF research) and in response to public pressure, in 2014 Obama banned it, but only for 3 types of viruses: SARS , MERS and bird flu.
Note: bacteria diseases (e.g., Lyme and anthrax) are sometimes weaponized as well, but these actions are typically not associated with the term “GoF.”

In the first part of this series, I attempted to shed light on the vast pandemic “prevention” industry that the world’s eyes were opened to during COVID-19.

Briefly, to summarize that article, this racket:

•Has convinced the world that we face an existential risk of a dangerous new infectious disease jumping from wild animals to the human population and then wiping out humanity.

•Has pivoted to trying to convince the world that the root cause of the increasing frequency of these diseases is not their leaky biolabs, but rather climate change and human encroachment on nature.

Continued at link...

Bret Weinstein Exposes the World Health Organization’s Dark Agenda

Bret Weinstein Exposes the World Health Organization’s Dark Agenda

Doctor warns WHO pandemic treaty includes ‘gain of function’ data sharing


The WHO’s pandemic treaty ‘incentivizes each nation to participate in GoF research’ and could help hide the source of a future biolab leak, A Midwestern Doctor warned.

Featured Image

Director-General of the WHO Tedros ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS

Mon Feb 19, 2024
WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — The infamous WHO Pandemic Treaty being pushed by left-wing globalists includes provisions for “gain of function” data sharing between nations, a move that would make it impossible to trace the source of future biolab leaks, should any occur, warns a medical doctor writing under the pen name “A Midwestern Doctor.”

In an article titled, How We Can Stop The WHO’s Horrific Pandemic Treaty, the Midwestern Doctor enumerates many of the significant political and medical dangers of the agreement. The treaty is presently facing intense international scrutiny and backlash on account of the increasingly clear evidence that it is proving to be little more than a long leftist wish-list and a globalist power grab.

READ: Slovakian politicians call out WHO Pandemic Treaty as ‘globalist’ effort to weaken nations

Sharing ‘gain of function’ data will cloak source of future biolab leaks

Drawing attention to the numerous provisions promoting “gain of function” (GoF), a practice that is illegal in the U.S. due to the inherent danger involved, the Midwestern Doctor writes, “The pandemic treaty contains multiple provisions for the signatory nations to make all their data on biological agents (e.g., GoF research or wild animals being studied in labs) accessible to the WHO so ‘pandemic potential’ infectious diseases can be tracked by the WHO.”

One such text of the treaty states:

Government officials, researchers and workers across sectors at the local, national, regional and global levels should implement joint responses to health threats. This includes developing shared databases and surveillance across different sectors, and identifying new solutions that address the root causes and links between risks and impacts.

The Midwestern Doctor points out that the treaty thus “incentivizes each nation to participate in GoF research, to share the bioweapons discovered with the world, and to collect the genetic information of their citizens (which amongst other things is necessary to make race-specific bioweapons). Enacting all of this of course requires a hefty dose of spying: ‘It will include digitalization and integration of surveillance systems across the human, animal, and environment spectrum.’”

In addition to the obvious dangers of advancing GoF research and the sharing of bioweapons, the treaty would make it impossible to determine the source of a pandemic should any biolab leak occur. It is widely accepted that the COVID crisis in began Wuhan, China, due to a lab leak.

The Midwestern Doctor warns, “If many nations end up sharing the same biological warfare agents, once a pandemic breaks out it will be impossible to know where the pandemic started, and who could have deliberately started it. In essence, this means the pandemic treaty is paving the way to a world where we have continual pandemics that require a harsh global response to ‘address them.’”
Highlighting the insanity of incentivizing, developing, and sharing data from GoF research, the Midwestern Doctor warns that such activity will pave the way for gov sequencing of their citizen’s DNA:

The most insane feature of the WHO’s Bureau draft (written by WHO staff) of the pandemic treaty is that it incentivizes GOF, in fact recommends it and reducing the administrative hurdles to it in every country, and then requires sharing of the most dangerous, deadly agents developed via this approach. It also requires the countries to obtain and sequence the genomes of the pandemic pathogens they collect[,] as a prominent focus of the treaty is the establishment of genetic sequencing labs in every country in the world (which in turn paves the way to sequence everyone’s DNA).

READ: WHO exhibiting signs of ‘desperation’ as New Zealand, Iran reject amendments to International Health Regulations

Continued at link...

Senior Tory Politicians are ‘Entwined in the Workings of WHO and Gavi, Both Heavily Bankrolled by Bill Gates.’

By Patricia Harrity on March 4, 2024


Despite receiving a petition with over 100,000 signatures, a few weeks ago, the UK parliament refused to hold a debate about the UK’s continued membership of the World Health Organisation. John Stone, has written a guest post for The New Era publication where he has provided a possible explanation as to why the government refused to discuss the WHO ‘Pandemic’ Treaty, the main reason being, senior Conservative Party politicians are completely entwined in the workings of the WHO and GAVI – both of which are heavily bankrolled by Bill Gates. What a surprise!

Sunak, Mitchell and Cameron and the WHO.

by John Stone

Andrew Mitchell with his friend Bill Gates

We know that thousands of people across the United Kingdom have grave concerns about the UK giving up its sovereignty over public health matters to supranational bodies that are heavily controlled by nefarious actors. But many will be surprised that the Prime Minister, Andrew Mitchell and David Cameron have become so captured by WHO and Gates that they are ignoring the better interests of the United Kingdom and UK taxpayers.

In just two months a critical meeting of the World Health Assembly will take place. This meeting is supposed to finalise the terms of two politically oppressive and financially onerous agreements: the WHO Pandemic Treaty and the updated International Health Regulations.

In light of this, it might be useful to revisit information I published last year about Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s rehabilitation of Andrew Mitchell (of “Plebgate” infamy) and former Prime Minister David Cameron who, together, instituted the British government partnership with Bill Gates’s Global Vaccine Alliance (GAVI) in 2011 – committing £billions of taxpayers’ money.

It should also be noted that it was only disclosed – in a petition debate about the International Health Regulations in December 2023 – that Mitchell was the chief Foreign Office negotiator for the two WHO agreements.

Moreover, it is now evident that although the government’s position was opaque and ambiguous at the debate in December it is not proposing to reveal any more details before the agreements are supposed to be concluded in May, by which point it will be very difficult for the UK and other nations to extricate themselves from them.

Days after Cameron’s appointment, the British government hosted the so-called Global Food Security Summit in which Sunak, Cameron, Mitchell and Tedros all toasted the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation while Mitchell also paid particular tribute to Tedros:

“I now have particular pleasure in calling Dr Tedros, the head of the WHO, a friend of many of us who does incredible work against an extraordinarily difficult background”

About all this, of course, there is an incredible lack of transparency.

The event was hosted by the UK, UAE and Somalia and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation with the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation – an organisation founded by Net Zero proponent Sir Chris Hohn.

Hohn, meanwhile, also bankrolls Extinction Rebellion.

In his mysterious rise to power it should be noted that Sunak is himself a former employee of Hohn and his hedge fund, Children’s Investment Fund Management.

We should note that even parliamentarians are beginning to worry about the integrity of the medicines licensing agency the MHRA which in turn is in partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the WHO in manufacturing products it is supposed to be licensing (or the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is on its advice).

None of this should be be happening without public scrutiny and discussion.

EXPOSED: THE W.H.O.'S PANDEMIC TREATY - WANTS POWER OVER ALL CITIZENS | WITH DR. DAVID MARTIN

Dr. David Martin exposes how, shortly after its inception, the WHO was declared a "criminal racketeering organisation".

Dr Meryl Nass: As Tedros Keeps Lying, I Have to Keep Correcting Him.

By Patricia Harrity on March 16, 2024


Recently at the World Governments Summit Tedros said: “Countries set themselves a deadline to complete the agreement in time for adoption at the World Health Assembly in May of this year” Just 15 weeks away! but according to Dr Nass, “there is a major barrier and that is, the litany of lies.” If we are not convinced that Tedros is lying, Dr Nass recommends we read a piece from the Brownstone Institute where authors, Dr Dave Bell and lawyer Dr Van Dinh highlight the WHOs “false claims” and explain the multiple ways that show the WHOs “unprecedented attempt to seize nation state authority and rule health centrally.” Thus, leading us further into a fascistic one world governance.

Dr Meryl Nass wrote:

As Tedros keeps lying, I have to keep correcting him.

Yet again we set the record straight

However, there are currently two major obstacles to meeting that deadline.

… Recently at the World Governments Summit Tedros said:

“Countries set themselves a deadline to complete the agreement in time for adoption at the World Health Assembly in May of this year. That’s now just 15 weeks away. However, there are currently two major obstacles to meeting that deadline.

The first is a group of issues on which countries have not yet reached consensus. They’re making progress, but there are still areas of difference that need further negotiation between countries.

None of them are insurmountable. If countries listen to each other’s concerns, I am confident they can find common ground and a common approach.

The second major barrier is the litany of lies and conspiracy theories about the agreement:

  • That it’s a power grab by the World Health Organisation;
  • That it will cede sovereignty to WHO;
  • That it will give WHO power to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates on countries;
  • That it’s an ‘attack on freedom’;
  • That WHO will not allow people to travel;
  • And that WHO wants to control people’s lives.

These are some of the lies that are being spread.

If they weren’t so dangerous, these lies would be funny. But they put the health of the world’s people at risk. And that is no laughing matter.

These claims are utterly, completely, categorically false. The pandemic agreement will not give WHO any power over any state or any individual, for that matter.”

See the International Health Regulations (IHR) Article 18 for yourself.

Will he have the right to restrict travel? YES. Quarantine you? YES. Require vaccinations? Yes.

What about sovereignty? The proposed amendments to the IHR have added the word “shall” over 100 times, indicating that nations “must” obey the WHO’s dictates.

They WHO also demands in its proposed treaty that nations pass laws in order to obey its requirements, and there are two very bad laws the WHO demands nations put in place.

The first law is to allow the rollout of rapidly produced and poorly tested vaccines and drugs, without these products being issued a license. They will be experimental. A license is supposed to be a guarantee that adequate testing proved the products reasonably safe and effective–the unlicensed products will have no such guarantee.

Under the rubric “Regulatory strengthening” in Article 14 of the proposed treaty the WHO is rolling out Regulatory weakening.

You cannot roll out untested and potentially life-threatening products if there is liability for the manufacturer, the government, the administering doctor, or anyone else. None of them would agree to participate, knowing they were risking bankruptcy, jail time or both.

So here’s the second law : in Article 15 the WHO has required that every nation pass laws to waive liability of these experimental products. In other words, the recipient takes all the risk, while Pharma takes all the profit, risk-free.

Continued at link...

Why Does the WHO Make False Claims Regarding Proposals to Seize States’ Sovereignty?

he Director General (DG) of the World Health Organization (WHO) states:

No country will cede any sovereignty to WHO,

referring to the WHO’s new pandemic agreement and proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), currently being negotiated. His statements are clear and unequivocal, and wholly inconsistent with the texts he is referring to.

A rational examination of the texts in question shows that:

  1. The documents propose a transfer of decision-making power to the WHO regarding basic aspects of societal function, which countries undertake to enact.
  2. The WHO DG will have sole authority to decide when and where they are applied.
  3. The proposals are intended to be binding under international law.

Continued claims that sovereignty is not lost, echoed by politicians and media, therefore raise important questions concerning motivations, competence, and ethics.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION IS ROTTING FROM THE HEAD

Speaker: Senator Malcolm Roberts - March 2023. Tedros Ghebreyesus is a terrorist.

1 Like

[It is first and foremost against God's Law.]

2 Likes

WHO’s proposed IHR amendments and Pandemic Treaty will create perverse incentives to declare pandemics

image

The new regime will change WHO from a technical advisory organisation into a supranational public health authority exercising quasi-legislative and executive powers over states; change the nature of the relationship between citizens, business enterprises, and governments domestically, and also between governments and other governments and WHO internationally; and shift the locus of medical practice from the doctor-patient consultation in the clinic to public health bureaucrats in capital cities and WHO headquarters in Geneva and its six regional offices.

Continued at link.

1 Like

03/28/24

‘Misleading’ Letter Urges Support for Pandemic Treaty, as Louisiana Becomes First U.S. State to Reject WHO Power Grab

More than 100 former world leaders and public figures urged WHO member states to finalize a new “pandemic accord,” which the leaders said does not threaten nations’ sovereignty, but critics called the letter misleading because it doesn’t address the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

More than 100 former world leaders and public figures are urging the World Health Organization (WHO) member states to finalize a new “pandemic accord” in time for the 77th World Health Assembly, set to take place in Geneva, Switzerland, May 27-June 1.

In an open letter, dated March 20, the leaders wrote:

“A pandemic accord is critical to safeguard our collective future. Only a strong global pact on pandemics can protect future generations from a repeat of the COVID-19 crisis, which led to millions of deaths and caused widespread social and economic devastation.”

Critics of the proposed pandemic accord told The Defender that the letter is deceiving because it addresses the proposed accord, or “Pandemic Treaty,” but doesn’t reference the amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR).

The IHR amendments, proposed in 2023, are being negotiated concurrently with the accord. Critics of the letter said it is meant to deflect attention from what they argue are the more onerous proposals contained in the IHR amendments.

Dr. David Bell, a public health physician, biotech consultant and former director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund, told The Defender the letter is “quite shameful” and “deceitful.”

Bell said:

“[The letter] follows the lead of the director general in misleading the public but claiming, rightly, that the pandemic agreement does not include provisions that hand over authority from countries to the WHO, when these are in the proposed amendments to the IHR that accompanies the pandemic accord.

“The proposed IHR amendments specifically mention border closures, mandated vaccination and other measures now associated with lockdowns. They specifically mention documentation being needed to cross borders and mention digital passports as one of the alternatives.”

Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst told The Defender the open letter “only refers to the pandemic accord to confuse everybody.”

“The real meat is in the IHR amendments, because on the basis of the amendments, the director general of WHO is anticipated to get independent legislative and executive powers while any legal review is made impossible,” Terhorst said. “The secrecy surrounding the drafts suggest that we are dealing with a coup d’état.”

Are negotiations in trouble?

Some critics suggested the open letter may be a sign that negotiations for the pandemic accord are flailing.

“There is no member state consensus on either document,” said Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, executive director of Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Africa and founder of Transformative Health Justice. “With eight weeks to go before the World Health Assembly, the WHO is evidently nervous about the accord being derailed.”

Continued at link...

WHO Official Admits Vaccine Passports May Have Been a Scam.

By Patricia Harrity on April 12, 2024


Testifying in a lawsuit, WHO’s leading vaccine expert said she advised against COVID vaccine passports as the vaccines did not stop transmission and gave a false sense of security. The World Health Organization’s Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified in court that she advised her government that vaccine passports were not needed but was ignored, despite explaining that the COVID vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports gave a false sense of security (sourcePaul D. Thacker)

WHO Official Admits Vaccine Passports May Have Been a Scam.

By Investigative reporter Paul D. Thacker and published in the Disinformation Chronicle.

The stunning revelations came to light in a Helsinki courtroom where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.

Dr. Nohynek is chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as the WHO’s chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization. Testifying yesterday, she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmission

During that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to “create an international trusted framework” for safe travel while EU members states began rolling out COVID passports. The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued. Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.

But Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her institute advised the Finnish government in late 2021 that COVID passports no longer made sense, yet certificates continued to be required. Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff reported the news yesterday after leaving the Helsinki courtroom where Dr. Nohynek spoke.

Continued at [lnk...

A Message from Japan to the World – by Professor Masayasu Inoue.

By Patricia Harrity on April 11, 2024


A stunning message to the world warning of ‘a dangerous, new governmental development’ was delivered from Japan at a World Council for Health conference by Professor Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School who specialises in Molecular Pathology and Medicine. He warned that “There is high risk that Japan made vaccines will be exported under the guise for false trust. If Japan were to become a vaccine perpetrator, it would leave irreparable harm to future generations. Therefore, the actions of Japanese government MUST BE STOPPED by international collaborations.

During a Press Conference in Geneva on 22 March 2024. Mr. Izumi Kamijo who is a member of the steering committee for the World Council for Health (WCH) Asia and World Council for Health Japan introduced Professor Inoue by first asserting “the nightmare will continue if we don’t do anything against this new governmental development in Japan. A new type of project. Professor Inoue is going to talk about this dangerous development which would end up in a much bigger catastrophe.”

The message from Professor Inoue can be seen below or read in the transcript below the video.

Stunning Message For the World from Japan from Professor Masayasu Inoue.

Stunning Message For the World from Japan from Professor Masayasu Inoue.

The transcript below is from the substack of Aussie17

Transcript

Thank you very much for giving me this valuable opportunity to send my message about human rights abuse in the time of COVID-19. My name is Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. My specialty is Molecular Pathology and Medicine.
The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world. A plan was set up to shorten the time to develop vaccines, which usually takes longer than ten years to less than one year. Operation Warp Speed. This operation was used to cover up the misconceptions of the genetic vaccines. Under the pretext of saving time, an extremely dangerous method was selected.
That is, intramuscular injection of viral genes to produce toxic spike proteins directly in human tissues to stimulate immune system. Because this is a completely new method and misconceived method that has never applied before in human history, it is impossible, therefore, for most of doctors to give proper informed consent. However, due to irresponsible government and media campaigns to promote vaccines, 80% of the Japanese has been vaccinated.

Unfortunately, seven shots have been done so far. This is the most and worst in the world. And the result was the induction of the terrible drug induced injury that has never seen in human history. I believe that the fraudulent use of experimental gene therapy to healthy people, particularly to healthy children, is an extreme violation of human rights. However, Keizo Takemi, Japanese Minister of Health, Labor and Welfare, has been insisting that there is no serious concern about the injury caused by genetic vaccines. And without learning from the current situation of injured patients, they plan to construct a new vaccine production system in preparation for the next pandemic. This is an unbelievable, crazy situation.
The Japanese government is first in the world to approve a new type of vaccine called self replication replicon vaccine, and plans to start to supply it in this fall and winter. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is providing a huge amount of subsidies for this project. And factories to produce new vaccines are being built one after another in Japan. I visited these factories directly.

Furthermore, the Japanese government is currently soliciting large scale clinical trials worth $900 million from pharmaceutical companies that are taking on the challenge of developing vaccines to prepare for the next pandemic by Disease X proposed during the Davos conference this year. It is speculated that the movement by the Japanese government is part of CEPI Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation’s 100 days mission, which aims to shorten the time to one third of Operation Warp Speed. Namely, they are trying to shorten the vaccine business cycle by developing a vaccine in hundreds of days. This is possible only by ignoring the human rights perspective. Amendments to the WHO, International Health Regulation (IHR), and the so called Pandemic Treaty, which are about to be adopted at the 77th World Health assembly this year, are attempting to give rationality and legal binding force to such unscientific and dangerous crazy plans.

If such things continue, there is high risk that Japan made vaccines will be exported under the guise for false trust. If Japan were to become a vaccine perpetrator, it would leave irreparable harm to future generations. Therefore, the actions of Japanese government MUST BE STOPPED by international collaborations.
Although it has already been three years since I started to give lectures to educate Japanese people about the dangers of vaccines, it is still difficult to penetrate through the sound barriers of mainstream media. If we tell the truth about vaccines on YouTube, it is deleted within a day. The reality is that we are facing censorship and speech suppression almost every day.
Therefore, I put my hope in the publication of a book with the last version of speech and published a book with a title “Withdraw From WHO” It is difficult to stop this movement because it is now politically hopeless to change the situation of the Japanese government. The message I would like to cover convey to the world is that when Disease X occurs in the future, you should never trust the Japan made vaccine that was developed in a short period of time in order to protect human rights in cases of control that transcend national boundaries.

I believe that sharing the truth and countries is so important and that this is a step towards unity and solidarity. Only through the process of information exchange between all countries in the world, we can find hope in the midst of despair. I do hope that my statement will help all of you to protect your healthy life and your family. Thank you very much for your attention.

– Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School.

The full video can be seen here – [VIDEO SOURCE]

1 Like

A brief history of the “biodefence” era and how they convinced nations to give up our rights for “pandemic safety”

image

She also discusses how the World Health Organisation – a specialised agency of the United Nations that is concerned with international public health – has repeatedly failed to “champion health and a better future for all” over the past 20 years.

Continued at link.

2 Likes

Massive Rallies Break Out in Japan Against WHO’s Pandemic Treaty. – ‘Don’t Underestimate the Japanese’

By Patricia Harrity on April 15, 2024


“Let’s stop the third atomic bomb with our hands, in the hands of the Japanese people!” April 13, 2024, will be etched in the annals of modern Japanese history as tens of thousands of citizens across the nation came together in a series of pandemic rallies. The protests centered on the widespread opposition to the Pandemic Treaty, with escalating concerns over “infectious disease” and “public health” becoming potent tools for an unprecedented push towards what is perceived by many as a totalitarian surveillance society. Source

Continued at link...

1 Like