Isn't this the Government of Gibraltar's Use of NUDGES? (Daily Reporting - See last article in this reply)
This constant reporting was/is part of the psychological behavioral tactic set forth by the UK Government, of which Gibraltar and its media were/are all too complicit in participating.
1) The removal of our basic freedoms — in the form of lockdowns, travel bans and mandatory mask wearing — have been passively accepted by the large majority of people. Furthermore, the proportion of the general public expressing a willingness to accept the Covid-19 vaccines has been greater in the UK than almost anywhere else in the world. But has the government achieved this widespread conformity through the unethical use of covert psychological strategies — “nudges” — in their messaging campaign ?
A major contributor to the mass obedience of the British people is likely to have been the activities of government-employed psychologists working as part of the “Behavioural Insights Team” (BIT).* – The Most Remarkable Aspect of the Unprecedented Lockdowns: The Widespread Compliance
2) UK admits to using “totalitarian” methods of “mind control” to instill fear UK Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B): The government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”. Ramping up the threat – Government psychologists admit waging psychological warfare on the nation.
3) Statement from the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational sub-group (SPI-M-O). – According to this model people who have had two vaccines will be the majority of deaths in the 3rd wave expected in the UK.
4) COVID Psychological Stress Being Applied to Break Resistance to Vaccine
Comeuppance or those Nudges?:
Ethical concerns arising from the Government’s use of covert psychological ‘nudges’
We are writing to you as a group of psychological specialists and health professionals to highlight our major ethical concerns about the deployment of covert behavioural-science techniques (commonly referred to as ‘nudges’) in the Government’s COVID-19 communications strategy. Our view is that the use of these behavioural strategies – which often operate below people’s conscious awareness and frequently rely on inflating emotional distress to change behaviour – raises profound moral questions. In light of these pressing concerns we respectfully request that, in your role as chair of the Public Administration & Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC), you instigate a comprehensive inquiry into the acceptability of using these strategies on the British people as a means of promoting compliance with public health directives.
AFFECT/FEAR
The minutes of the SPI-B meeting (5) dated the 22nd March 2020 stated, ‘The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent’ by ‘using hard-hitting emotional messaging’.
Subsequently, in tandem with a subservient mainstream media, the collective efforts of the BIT and the SPI-B have inflicted a prolonged and concerted scare campaign upon the British public. The methods used have included:
Daily statistics displayed without context: the macabre mono focus on showing the number of COVID-19 deaths without mention of mortality from other causes or the fact that, under normal circumstances, around 1600 people die each day in the UK.