A "zombie apocalypse" scenario (like the one shown in the illustrative image above) has been shown in many blockbuster movies. Movies have often been shown to be a means of "predictive programming" for the future as far as what is being planned. Films like "I Am Legend", "World War Z" and "28 Days Later" all showed a future collapsed world being overrun by "zombies", many times involving "vaccines" or some new experimental "therapy" having unintended consequences on the population, causing mutations and ultimately an outbreak of zombie like behaviour in people.
Some have been making concerned statements that there is likely going to be increasing numbers "vaccidents" seen on the roadways, etc., due to the vaxxed suddenly suffering so-called "side-effects" while driving, as a result of the experimental injections that they were given.
Conversations have been seen of people reporting that car drivers have lost consciousness behind the wheel, suddenly just veering off the road and driving into nearby trees, etc.
If this is going to be happening, then people may also want to think twice about for instance getting onto a plane, despite their "vaccine passports" supposedly having been issued to give them a feeling of some reassurance of safety.
From the linked article:
It has been craftily designed to make people want something "appealing" that will kill them. And the end [for them] is very near. Life Insurance companies are already talking about not paying the Vaccinated. No compensation for insanity, stupidity, or gullibility!
Similar to this, it has been seen claimed that:
This is what Jacques Attali wrote in 1981, who was then an advisor to François Mitterrand: “The future will be about finding a way to reduce the population. We start with the old, because as soon as they exceed 60-65 years, people live longer than they produce and that costs society dearly. Then the weak, then the useless that do not help society because there will always be more of them, and above all, ultimately, the stupid. Euthanasia targeting these groups; Euthanasia will have to be an essential tool in our future societies, in all cases. Of course we will not be able to execute people or build camps. We get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good. Overpopulation, and mostly useless, is something that is too costly economically. Socially, too, it is much better when the human machine comes to an abrupt standstill than when it gradually deteriorates. Neither will we be able to test millions upon millions of people for their intelligence, you bet that! We will find or cause something a pandemic targeting certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus affecting the old or the fat, it doesn't matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and stupid will believe in it and seek treatment. We will have made sure that treatment is in place, treatment that will be the solution. The selection of idiots then takes care of itself: You go to the slaughter by yourself. " [The future of life - Jacques Attali, 1981] Interviews with Michel Salomon, Les Visages de l’avenir collection, éditions Seghers. "...
Some have thought of quick comebacks to being asked if they want to be vaxxed, like these:
"I told them, if you want to vax me, kill me, then after that you can vax my dead body as much as you like. That then quickly ended the inquiry."
Another person said:
"Another good one, is to tell them that you are part of a control group that does not get the experimental injection. :-)"
Perhaps quick comebacks such as these may work in some general situations.
But then this approach would be even better: