Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also to takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them. We look at leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in suppressing free and open debate on the subject.
Oracle Films – Thank you to Dr Peter McCullough for the glowing review. Stream and Share Safe and Effective
No intervention is “safe and effective” and covid era interventions have proven the opposite is true
Safe and effective: The mantra “safe and effective” is epidemiological drivel. “Safe and effective”, although a seductive phrase, assumes or implies that whatever you are embarking on is 100% effective and 100% safe or near enough. It’s safe to cross the road means you’ll get to the other side. However, health interventions can’t stake such a claim. Safe, which is the exemption from hurt or injury – no intervention can be safe. Effective could be that the intervention is successful in producing the desired or intended result and requires balancing the different effects and making a value judgement – not everyone presented with the same evidence will come to the same conclusion. No one should be coerced; they should be educated based on impartial evidence but ultimately left to make their minds up.
Continued at link.