Daniel Davis does not understand that this is all part of the Marxist NWO plan to incite WW3 and the demolition of the West. Trump is playing his part; following his leader (synagogue of Satan).
"These people are not kings and presidents. Kings and presidents do not rule the world any more than prime-ministers and politicians do. This world is run by a small group of EXTREMELY rich jews who are known as "The Hidden Hand". They say they are Jews and are NOT. They are the "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 3 v 9). "The Hidden Hand" is the very same organisation that was running the world for Satan 2000 years ago and was behind the "Sanhedrin" and engineered the crucifixion. They decided to crucify the "King of Israel" rather than give-up their immense wealth and power. These people were condemned by Christ when the FIG tree was cursed in Matt. 21 v 19. The FIG tree is the symbol of Judaism. These same people had already been previously condemned as traitors by God through Jeremiah in the third chapter of Jeremiah - note well verses 9-11 - "Treacherous Judah". Christ acknowledged that Satan was running the world through these people and their political systems, calling Satan "the prince of this world" in John 14 v 30. They were referred to as being "the sons of Satan" by Christ in John 8 v 37-47, and condemned in Matt. 23 as being hypocrites for their evil legal and political systems." https://JAHTruth.net/horse.htm
TRUMP REVERSAL: Ukraine Can Win Back Territory from Russia
Danny contrasts Russia’s growing industrial war capacity—artillery, shells, drones, missiles, air power—with Ukraine’s inability to match it. Ukraine suffers severe personnel losses and strategic mistakes, such as overextending in battles like Bakhmut, Avdiivka, and failed incursions into Russian territory, wasting manpower they cannot replace. Meanwhile, Trump has called Russia a “paper tiger,” citing gas lines and supposed economic weakness, while claiming Ukraine is improving and could retake all its 1991 territory, or even parts of Russia. The speaker criticizes this as detached from reality, especially since Ukraine is losing territory and has no reserves.
Recent Russian advances near Lyman, Sievierk, and Kramatorsk show Ukraine’s defensive weakness, compounded by insufficient manpower and lack of strategic reserves. NATO aid is minimal—only €2.3 billion compared to Zelensky’s request for $120 billion to sustain the state, plus another $60 billion for military needs. Europe and NATO lack both the will and the stockpiles to supply the scale required. Ukraine’s losses are increasing, while Russia’s are declining due to more effective operational methods, leaving Ukraine’s army being “ground to dust.”
Trump’s suggestion that Ukraine can suddenly go on the offensive to 1991 borders is described as fantasy. NATO doesn’t have the equipment or stockpiles to provide the support implied. U.S. resources are already strained, especially with additional aid going to Israel. Trump’s approach—treating weapons supply as if it’s just a matter of writing orders on paper—ignores real industrial limits.
At the UN, Trump also suggested imposing tariffs on Russian oil buyers (China, India, even NATO members) to end the war, but critics argue this would devastate European economies by cutting cheap energy and raising production costs, while demanding higher defense spending. Europe cannot realistically meet these conditions.
Later, Trump praised Ukrainian bravery, hinted at NATO strength, and spoke about weapons sales, treating the war in transactional terms—benefiting defense industry elites rather than nations as a whole. The critic emphasizes that Trump even floated the possibility of authorizing U.S. forces to shoot down Russian planes, a dangerously escalatory stance that passed without much notice. - D.D.
Pretty sloppy work by Russia
Either that or it’s just lies about the glorious Russian motherland by corrupt western Jimmy Saville BBC.
Perhaps something @ThePrisoner might want to comment on.
Probably the latter, without looking into it….there is this too…
Good memory. Should I trademark it?
Is something that Russia would probably not do?
US Jets Scrambled To Intercept Russian Warplanes Off Alaska Amid Growing Incidents
“NORAD indicated in a fresh statement that the incident occurred Wednesday, and involved a pair of Russian Tu-95 long-range strategic bombers and a pair Su-35 fighter jets traversing the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ).”
“The ADIZ is considered international airspace that borders US and Canadian sovereign airspace. Such an action by Russian aerial forces has become somewhat routine, but has occurred more frequently over the last couple years, also as war continues to rage in Ukraine.”
NOTE WELL : The ADIZ is considered International Airspace. The bedwetters have to find something to get hysterical about I guess to drum up support for a WW.
@Cybe Estonia and Finland’s EEZs You didn’t point out this very narrow corridor we are talking about here. I wonder why, would it give some benefit to doubt to the Russians perhaps?
Do you believe it is so narrow that Russian military planes could accidentally slip into Finnish or Estonian airspace?
I do not. Modern navigation, strict flight plans, and constant radar tracking probably make “mistakes” virtually impossible. Any crossing would be deliberate, not accidental.
An interesting read and very interesting letting LLMs analyze it. Here's ChatGPT's analysis:-
The piece is written as a polemical narrative, not an analytical assessment. It mixes factually checkable events (NATO scrambles, diplomatic warnings, drone sightings, exercises) with conspiratorial framing and heavily loaded language. Here’s the breakdown:
Framing devices
- Calls the EU–NATO political leadership a “cabal,” setting the tone that hidden coordination or conspiracy drives events.
- Presents escalation as the chosen strategy of elites to mask “polycrises” and retain power, rather than as a response to security dynamics. This presumes motive rather than demonstrating it.
Contradiction argument
- Asserts Western narratives are self-contradictory: Russia depicted as weak in Ukraine yet simultaneously treated as aggressive enough to attack NATO directly. The author uses this to discredit Western messaging.
- This is rhetorically effective but oversimplifies. Western governments and media can hold both views at once—Russia weakened in some domains but still capable of probing or provoking elsewhere. That isn’t strictly contradictory, but the article paints it as such.
Use of events
- Cites Denmark, Latvia, France drone incidents, Estonian airspace, NATO consultations, Bloomberg report of NATO warnings. These are real news stories but are presented as parts of a coordinated “Media-Military-Industrial-Complex” push. No direct evidence of coordination is offered.
- Adds speculative claims (Estonia deliberately reshaping EEZ to provoke Russia), which remain conjectural.
- Introduces Lavrov’s warnings, Trump administration moves, French nuclear exercise. All real, but embedded into a narrative of provocation leading to nuclear war.
Rhetorical strategy
- Selective sourcing: Bloomberg, ERR, United24 are quoted when they reinforce the escalation narrative, but their institutional contexts are dismissed as propaganda when they don’t.
- Sarcastic nicknames (“sunken rot queen,” “Vanity Fair administration”) reduce credibility by signaling contempt instead of argument.
- Repeated analogy: compares to Syria/Assad “gassing his own people,” presenting Western explanations as inherently absurd. This primes the reader to see current claims as false by association.
Logical issues
- Conspiracy bias: treating independent, complex institutional moves across NATO states as centrally coordinated.
- False dilemma: assumes Europe either faces collapse or deliberately escalates to survive, ignoring intermediate motives (deterrence, signaling, domestic politics).
- Circular reasoning: evidence of provocations is interpreted as proof of conspiracy, which in turn explains the provocations.
- Overgeneralization: “Western machine,” “media-military-industrial-complex,” “cabal” lump together disparate actors.
- Straw man: simplifies Western messaging into extremes (“Russia is weak” vs. “Russia attacks NATO”) without acknowledging nuanced intelligence assessments.
Notable techniques
- Uses eyewitness-style Russian commentary (Podolyaka, Starshe Eddy) to grant authenticity.
- Embeds pro-Russian military narratives (Russian mobilization as heroic, Ukrainian offensives as doomed).
- Presents Russian drone AI development as epoch-shifting while mocking Ukrainian capacity—emphasizing asymmetry in favor of Russia.
Overall assessment
- It is agitprop in long-form blog style: mixing verifiable fact with speculative motive attribution, heavy ideological framing, and conspiracy language.
- Its persuasive force comes from rhetorical rhythm—fact, sarcasm, counter-narrative—but it lacks falsifiable claims or systematic evidence.
- Useful as a window into pro-Russian interpretive framing of NATO/EU moves. Not useful as a reliable account of cause and effect in European security.
The core flaw: the article begins with the conclusion (“elites escalate to survive”) and fits all events into that frame, rather than testing multiple explanations. It is more narrative reinforcement than analysis.
Do you believe A.I.? Do you believe it tells the truth? ChatGPT - isn’t it owned by (((Sam Altman))) wouldn’t is have an in-built western bias programmed in? Do you base many decisions on A.I, you do realize people relying on AI have shown brain atrophy?
Ursula von der Leyen says shooting down Russian jets violating NATO airspace is “on the table”
Insane MASSACRE in DNIPRO: Destruction of U.S. Army Personnel was Caught on VIDEO
Col Douglas Macgregor: Ukraine Organized Crime State/ CANNOT STARVE RUSSIAN WAR MACHINE
US “Division of Labor” in Ukraine Takes Shape: US Shifting Costs/Consequences onto Europe
..."at the same time, numerous failures in the equipment of the German frigate were also recorded. All this indicated that powerful electronic warfare system were onboard the Russian combat planes"
So the Russians have started attacking ships now?
The German frigate was probably in international waters when Russian planes buzzed it at under 100 meters and simulated bombing it (though I’m not sure you do that from that altitude). Then acording to BORZZIKMAN they attacked it by firing electronic-warfare weapons at it and their equipment (?) “recorded” numerous failures in the frigate’s systems.
That's really quite something...
Here's another version of that story that doesn't sound so incredible:-