See list above your reply
Of course this is totally out of the question......
So, as someone who closely follows the Russia-Nato situation, would you you assess that this particular Borzzikman report is of good quality?
If we weight it on a scale and compare it to the Wikipedia (and elsewhere) claims about the cable-incidents in the Baltic and elsewhere would you say that Borzzikman's report is the more likely one to be the Truth. please?
I posted it and we have your wikipedia rebuttal. Further discussion isn't necessary.....
Like this hasn't happened before?
Ok..
But... I do believe it is healthy to discuss this since these videos keep being posted here.
There's a detail that I can't ignore.
The Wikipedia article refers to sources for their claims. Other pages, people's research etc.
Borzzikman on the other hand NEVER refers to any sources, he (or they) just claim things... Wild incredible things that one cannot find elsewhere. And this anonymous "independent researcher" found them out, how?
And is one supposed to blindly believe them? If so, why? Is confirmation bias a good reason?
I wonder; If the Kremlin for some reason chose to create propaganda outlets online, what would they and their reports look like?
Addition:-
Let’s not view this as bickering or arguing for the sake of ego or being right.
If you believe you're correct and I’m mistaken, consider approaching it as someone with greater understanding—by explaining, teaching, and leading by example.
And rather than assuming, for instance, that “he is too stubborn and will never learn,” take a more hopeful view: that people can change, and that truth and justice will ultimately prevail when approached with determination and divine guidance.
Borzzikman rocks! 
[ "rocks" in this instance is slang and used to mean " like or approve of someone or something a lot" ] 
P.S. To be clear, my opinion is not to portray a pro-Russia sentiment per se since I am not pro any nation at this time on Planet Earth. Rather, I am pro-Kingdom of God (on earth as it is in heaven). That being said, the Borzz news and updates provides a source of information that can be helpful in learning the direction this Russia-Ukraine war is taking. Take it or leave it. I prefer to continue following Borzzikman's reports.
1 Like
Why do you like Borzzikman so much?
I have already answered that question.
Hi Cybe,
Though I disagree with some of your opinions, I respect your rights to have them.
It is probable that we will continue to disagree on certain topics. I'm okay with that. It is appreciated to have a forum to share and communicate. I publicly would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain this DG forum. It is a good space for various topics and even various opinions. Thank-you and to all others who share in it.
I'm just not too happy about having what I believe is blatant propaganda and obvious nonsense being hosted here and getting the feeling of being ignored and gaslit when I strive to expain and point out the problems...
Assuming you were / are an expert on what qualifies as "blatant propaganda and obvious nonsense", then I would agree. But, you are no such expert. Agree to disagree and move on. I've agreed with some of what you have said elsewhere, but the persistence to debate till blue in the face is troublesome. I see no evidence of anyone here gaslighting you. As far as you being ignored, I admit to thoughts to ignore you as I perceive you at times to be troublesome, but out of respect for your position here on the DG forum, I reply to you. Please note the intention is not to offend you. I wish to avoid the trouble it can cause.
Ok. so is this correct: I'm not an expert on what would qualify as "blatant propaganda and obvious nonsense" so I have no way of determining if Borzzikman is that or not?
What if there existed propaganda that is so blatantly obvious that one wouldn't even have to be one?
@c.deleted
I've said all I'm going to say. No further comment. Perhaps, someone else will chime in if called to do so. Take care. All the best.
One example is me wondering why BorZikman is a good source of information and getting the reply that “he rocks” and that he is a good news source.
Borzzikman offers a direct alternate viewpoint to the Luciferian Liar AshkeNAZI counterfeit "jew" controlled western propaganda. If you don't like BZ-man, maybe you should try to sway them to your mindset, rather than trying to control people with what they choose to post to bring a wider audience to The Lord's Forum.
1 Like
US Talks "Peace" With Russia as US-trained Operators Kill Russian Generals in Moscow
Even as the US poses as seeking "peace" between Russia and Ukraine, the ongoing conflict is in actuality a US war on Russia simply using Ukraine as an intermediary.
US media has revealed in recent years that US generals serve at the top of Ukraine's chain of command and that the CIA reorganized and directs Ukrainian intelligence, including units carrying out armed attacks inside Russia and Russian-held territory.
Among these US-trained operators is Kyrylo Budanov who has admitted Ukrainian intelligence has killed Russian journalists and commanding officers in Russia.
Thus, as US envoys talk with Russia, US-trained and directed Ukrainian operators are killing Russian generals in the streets of Moscow.
What does direct mean in this sentence? What is your proof that it's a direct alternative?
The sentence is very similar to Nancy saying that Borzzikman rocks!
direct (click to expand)
The term "direct" can carry specific connotations, particularly in the context of rhetoric. It generally implies an unambiguous, clear, or straightforward approach to conveying a message or viewpoint, often without detours or obfuscations. When used in relation to ideologies or propaganda, it suggests a method of communication that seeks to cut through confusion or complexity and present a seemingly transparent or immediate truth.
The power of the word "direct" comes from its implication of clarity and decisiveness, creating an impression that the speaker or message is cutting through distractions to deliver something essential or undeniable. However, its strength can be manipulative if it creates an illusion of absolute certainty, especially when the "directness" dismisses nuances or contradicts other viewpoints without engagement.
In terms of its potential impact, "direct" can be persuasive when it plays on the audience's desire for clarity and simplicity, but it can also limit critical thinking by presenting a viewpoint as the sole or unquestionable truth.
Are you trying to control me with the use of the word direct ?
If there would be at least some discussion and disclaimers from others to take Borzzikman with a grain of salt, and that it doesn't quite seem completely credible that Borzzikman is an Independent Truth Seeker then it would be "ok" for me to have the videos published here.
But when videos are posted here on a conveyor belt with no examination when the videos sound to me exactly like 100% state propaganda and NOT an Independent Truth Seeker.
If someone disagrees with me, please do a mental excersise of looking at a random Borzzikman video, then try to imagine and compare what a similar video directly from the Kremlin would look like and how it would differ.
They cide NO SOURCES what so ever to incredible claims. The videos obviously strives to control minds with clickbait images, AI generated FAKE images, propaganda-mind-control words and sentences. I predict that they will soon include AI-generated video in their clips too.
But when I point these things out they are usually ignored and countered with logical fallacies and now I'm being accused of trying to control people, then that just does not feel right and the way that a forum of Followers should look like.
NATO calls for an URGENT Meeting: Russia Deployed The World's DEADLIEST Hypersonic Missile in EUROPE