Using strategies to position it as a healthy alternative for natural meat, the industry's fake meat is just another name for ultra-processed food, full of GE and pesticide-laden ingredients designed to look as much like meat as possible.
By Dr. Joseph Mercola] (Dr. Joseph Mercola • Children's Health Defense)
The day before Thanksgiving, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, along with Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, deposed Anthony Fauci (head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID]) at the National Institutes for Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported in May that the Missouri and Louisiana Attorneys General filed a lawsuit (Missouri v. Biden) against the Biden Administration, including Joe Biden himself, Anthony Fauci, the Department of Homeland Security and nearly a dozen federal agencies and Secretaries.
The suit alleges a massive coordinated effort by the Deep State, the permanent administrative state, to work with Big Tech to censor and manipulate Americans – from average citizens to news outlets – on issues including the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell, 2020 Election Integrity, COVID-19 origin and extent skepticism, COVID-19 vaccine skepticism, among other issues.
As Gateway Pundit has previously written, the Attorneys General, along with Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft and several other individuals sued the Biden Administration – including Anthony Fauci – for censoring speech surrounding COVID-19, among a large number of other topics.
Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft and attorney John Burns were present at the deposition and witnessed the octogenarian squirm, stall, and lie for seven hours.
While the deposition uncovered no smoking guns, the sheer volume of things Fauci “couldn’t recall” or “couldn’t remember,” along with his obvious attempts at providing misleading and deceptive responses, collectively damned his testimony.
No reasonable observer could find his testimony to be credible. Simply put: he lied even when the truth would have made a better story.
Here are some observations and highlights from the Fauci deposition:
****** Fauci is a skillful liar. As we have seen now for months in his public comments, he lies when he feels he can get away with it or when he feels there will be no meaningful consequences.
****** Fauci frequently lied unless and until he was confronted with alternate facts. For example, he claimed he really wasn’t familiar with Ralph Baric (creator of the COVID virus) or Peter Daszak (who brokered Fauci’s NIAID grant money to the Chinese biolab in Wuhan), until he was confronted with evidence that his own chief of staff emailed him describing Daszak and Baric as being part of Fauci’s team!
****** Fauci claimed that he had no knowledge that his communications team did not coordinate with social media companies to stop “misinformation and disinformation” until he was forced to admit that he actually did know of certain instances of coordination.
****** Fauci continued to push the now-debunked assertion that COVID-19 was a naturally occurring virus.
****** Fauci said disinformation and misinformation (information he disagrees with) puts lives at risk.
****** Fauci refused to define “gain of function” research saying it was too broad of a term to define.
**** F**UN FACT: until VERY recently, Fauci’s daughter worked for Twitter.
****** FUN FACT: Fauci is a hypochondriac. In a bizarre and stunning segment during the deposition, Fauci blew off some of his frustration on the poor court reporter. The court reporter transcribing the deposition sneezed, and Fauci stopped the deposition and scolded the court reporter: “WHAT’S WRONG WITH YOU??? Do you have some sort of respiratory illness, because in the era of COVID, I’m concerned about being near you.” Court Reporter: “I’m not sick, I just have allergies. I can wear a mask though.” Fauci: “Ok. Thank you, because the last thing I want is to get COVID. [notably, (1) Fauci himself did not wear a mask at any point during the deposition, and (2) he appeared to be several feet away from the court reporter].
****** FUN FACT: in another Fauci hypochondria spasm, Fauci conspicuously mean-mugged Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry after Landry sneezed into his suit coat jacket.
****** Gamesmanship. Whenever introduced to a difficult topic, he dishonestly refused to define key terms so he could avoid being pinned down and held accountable. For example, when discussing the topic of “gain of function” research, he refused to acknowledge what the term meant, objecting that it was a term so broad it could not be defined.
****** Fauci repeatedly claimed that he “couldn’t recall” or “couldn’t remember,” and attempted to bolster these incredible statements by appealing to the volume of emails he would receive or issues or studies that would come across his desk. This is simply not credible for nearly all of such statements, because the incidents in question were either recent or within the past three years, and they were all highly politically charged.
****** Fauci’s other method of lying was simply to pretend that he didn’t understand something, and then hope the lawyer asking the question wouldn’t be able to catch him in the lie. For example, he very obviously lied at one point when he claimed he didn’t know what Meta (parent company of Facebook) was, until he was forced to admit that he did, in fact, know what Meta was.
****** Another Fauci tactic: when forced to admit he had made a communication or reviewed a key record at a key time, or knew or worked with a key individual, he would try and downplay each negative fact by (1) downplaying the significance of the communication, (2) suggest that while he reviewed the key record, he didn’t really read it carefully, or (3) with false humility suggest that he was not an expert in X field and so did not fully understand the scientific study at issue, or (4) claim that, while he did “know” said individual, he doesn’t really know them that well because he meets so many doctors and scientists as part of his job.
****** Other Fauci deceit tactics: throwing subordinates under the bus. Fauci is a famous survivor among bureaucrats. One way he has survived this long is by only taking credit for wins and pawning off losses on hapless subordinates. This trend continued in his deposition, in which he brazenly argued that, while he is the head of the NIAID and its $6 billion dollar budget, he repeatedly didn’t have any knowledge about what his immediate direct reports were doing right under his nose. Fauci supports accountability, so long as he has a subordinate to sacrifice.
****** Fauci argued that Hydroxychloroquine was “dangerous” and had “toxic” side effects. This is absurd, because HCQ is one of the safest medicines known to man, but also because the COVID “vaccine” has killed tens of thousands of people and injured hundreds of thousands more. Similarly, Fauci’s bogus medical cure, Remdesivir, has almost no positive effect in treating COVID, yet it’s also horribly toxic.
****** Fauci claimed HCQ was ineffective in treating COVID, but couldn’t cite a single study to support his claim. Fauci also rejected the list of 371 studies on HCQ and its effectiveness in treating the disease when he was presented with the list.
****** Fauci had no scientific evidence to support any of his scientific conclusions in his deposition. He simply preferred to use invective against positions he disliked. When confronted with over 370 studies finding HCQ was effective in treating COVID, he flailed and had no meaningful response.
****** Fauci admitted lying to the public. In one of the more amazing segments during his deposition, Fauci admitted that he knowingly made false public health statements at the beginning of the pandemic, advising people against using masks in order to discourage the public from depleting the supply of masks.
****** Fauci admitted he got his ideas of a lockdown from the Communist Chinese who implemented their extreme lockdowns in January 2020.
****** Fauci also admitted privately to friends that the masks didn’t work (the pores of masks are too large and the virus is smaller than the pores), while simultaneously advising the public that they did work.
The deposition lasted seven hours. This did not include breaks.
The government employee who escorted John Burns, myself, and the Missouri and Louisiana teams to the deposition room told me about the facilities in the US. I did not ask him about the US funded labs in Ukraine.
During the covid-19 scandal, Danish Prime Minister, Mette Frederiksen, threatened individual rights, slaughtered animals out of hysteria, and repeatedly violated the country’s constitution. She also worked with the governments of Austria and Israel to rapidly develop a deleterious mRNA vaccine program that is destroying the world population today. Mette has dubbed herself the “Prime Minister of Children” while pushing harmful jabs onto children. When she was recently confronted on the streets, she ran scared and summoned her security detail to suppress the interrogation.
The seemingly powerless Prime Minister was confronted by Kent Nielsen, the leader of a new Danish political party called The Freedom List (Dutch translation: Frihedslisten). The Freedom List is a relatively new political party that formed during the covid-19 scandal. The party’s message grew popular in the face of medical tyranny, as its leaders fought for individual rights, scientific integrity, and the truth about the fraudulent covid-19 “vaccines.” The party, founded by Fleming Blicher, was able to get on the ballot in 26 municipalities throughout all five regions of Denmark. The Freedom List is currently interrogating and holding to account those government figures who promoted unlawful mandates and depopulation experiments for the “greater good.”
When Nielsen confronted the Prime Minister on the street, he went for her throat (metaphorically) and questioned, “How do you feel about the fact that you lied about immunity for a year?”
“How can you sleep at night knowing that you are harming and killing Danes?” asked Nielsen. “You must feel guilty, Mette.” Nielsen told the newly elected Prime Minister that 83,000 Danes were killed by the controversial vaccines, and more than 150,000 were injured. So, the “woman who claims to be ‘the Prime Minister of the children’ is murdering Danish children and murdering Danish adults,” he said. Nielsen didn’t relent. “It’s not hard to live with yourself when you are murdering and harming your own people,” he asked. “So, you’re just ice cold? The ice lady who doesn’t care that you are killing and injuring other people.” Mette quickly darted off to her tour bus. Nielsen continued, “And then your bus sign says, ‘Let’s care for the future!’ So the “woman who claims to be ‘the Prime Minister of the children’ is murdering Danish children and murdering Danish adults. And then runs from it all. It’s crazy.”
Mette refused to respond. Her security detail moved in quickly to stop the dialogue and intimidate. An officer forced Nielsen to stop filming, to identify himself and to give up his social security number. Nielsen cooperated with the security, but before he stopped filming, he raised his voice one more time, “And then she escapes in her bus of slaughter, Disgusting!”
Nielsen’s public interrogation of the Danish Prime Minister provides an excellent blueprint for how to deal with “untouchable” government and corporate criminals in the days to come. Crimes against humanity must be pursued with rigorous calls to justice: amnesty denied. Truthful and powerful language (and sometimes public shaming) will be necessary in order to hold these criminals accountable.
No one is above the law. If the courts are slow to recognize the evidence of mass medical fraud and murder, then those with conviction and courage must call out the crimes in the public square. Mass murder is mass murder, whether there was intent to commit the murders or not. The deprivation of rights, the mass discrimination, and the threatening of lives is more than enough evidence to show intent to harm. As the victims of covid-19 vaccines pile up, the criminals in government must be brought to trial. They must be made to answer for the medical violence and human rights abuses they inflicted on millions of families worldwide.
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The Big Tech Crash of 2022-2023 is accelerating here in 2023, and yet almost nobody is sounding the alarm as to just how significant the crash is going to affect everyone’s lives.
Instead, we are pummeled every day with reports in both the corporate and alternative media about how the technology is advancing, and that AI is poised to take over the world and replace humans.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
While it is easy to collate the news and come to this very simple conclusion, that Big Tech is crashing, I have yet to see one other journalist refer to what we are now seeing as a “Big Tech Crash” which is very rapidly making the Dot.com technology crash of 2001 look like a walk in the park by comparison.
I started reporting on this at the beginning of the 4th quarter in 2022. Here are some of our previous articles on the Big Tech Crash.
And as we complete just the 1st week of March, 2023, things are only getting worse, much worse.
Embark Technology Self-Driving Trucks. Image source.
According to Layoffs.fyi, there have now been 125,977 layoffs in Big Tech for the first two months of 2023. There were 161,411 layoffs in Big Tech in all of 2022.
On October 28, 2022, I announced that the fantasy of fully autonomous self-driving vehicles was dead, and I have yet to read anyone else acknowledge this, at least not publicly. See:
Yesterday it was reported that autonomous trucking firm Embark Technology plunged 33% after they reported that they were exploring a range of options including potential dissolution of the company, and liquidation of their assets.
They have lost nearly $5 billion in valuation in under 2 years.
Shares of autonomous trucking firm Embark Technology plunged 33% Monday after it said it was exploring a range of options including potential dissolution of the company and liquidation of its assets.
Embark was valued at more than $5 billion two years ago when it went public on Nasdaq through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company. But like many other autonomous vehicle firms, it struggled to develop and commercialize its technology while burning through cash. After Monday’s steep decline, Embark’s current market capitalization is about $60 million.
In a regulatory filing last Friday, Embark said it was laying off about 230 employees. (Source.)
This follows an announcement a few weeks ago that Google’s self-driving taxi company, Waymo, was also laying off employees.
Alphabet’s Waymo Robotaxi Subsidiary Cuts Staff, Including Trucking Engineers
Alphabet’s self-driving vehicle unit Waymo quietly laid off staff Monday, continuing a wave of job cuts at the parent company of Google, according to LinkedIn posts from affected employees and one person briefed about the move.
The posts indicated that Waymo cut recruiters, people who help train other employees to operate the vehicles, and technical staff focused on automating semitrailer trucks. The total number of laid off “Waymonauts” at the roughly 2,500-person company couldn’t immediately be learned.
Waymo is at least the fourth Alphabet subsidiary to cut staff this month. Google laid off roughly 12,000 workers on Friday, or 6% of staff, including people with high performance ratings, The Information reported. Robotics unit Intrinsic and life-sciences company Verily cut a total of more than 250 people two weeks ago, representing about 20% to 15% of staff in those units, respectively.
Alphabet has been under pressure to stem losses at Waymo, which has the largest headcount of any of its “other bets.” In November, activist investor TCI called on CEO Sundar Pichai to curb its spending, citing steps by Ford and Volkswagen to shut down their self-driving car projects. (Full article here. Subscription needed.)
Here are some other current reports on the massive failure in technology as the Big Tech Crash is still on “full speed ahead” mode.
by Joseph Cox
Vice
Banks in the U.S. and Europe tout voice ID as a secure way to log into your account. I proved it’s possible to trick such systems with free or cheap AI-generated voices.
The bank thought it was talking to me; the AI-generated voice certainly sounded the same.
On Wednesday, I phoned my bank’s automated service line. To start, the bank asked me to say in my own words why I was calling. Rather than speak out loud, I clicked a file on my nearby laptop to play a sound clip: “check my balance,” my voice said. But this wasn’t actually my voice. It was a synthetic clone I had made using readily available artificial intelligence technology.
“Okay,” the bank replied. It then asked me to enter or say my date of birth as the first piece of authentication. After typing that in, the bank said “please say, ‘my voice is my password.’”
Again, I played a sound file from my computer. “My voice is my password,” the voice said. The bank’s security system spent a few seconds authenticating the voice.
“Thank you,” the bank said. I was in.
I couldn’t believe it—it had worked. I had used an AI-powered replica of a voice to break into a bank account. After that, I had access to the account information, including balances and a list of recent transactions and transfers.
Banks across the U.S. and Europe use this sort of voice verification to let customers log into their account over the phone. Some banks tout voice identification as equivalent to a fingerprint, a secure and convenient way for users to interact with their bank.
But this experiment shatters the idea that voice-based biometric security provides foolproof protection in a world where anyone can now generate synthetic voices for cheap or sometimes at no cost. I used a free voice creation service from ElevenLabs, an AI-voice company.
Read the full article at Vice.
Image source: Washington Post.
Scammers are using artificial intelligence to sound more like family members in distress. People are falling for it and losing thousands of dollars.
by Pranshu Verma
The Washington Post
The man calling Ruth Card sounded just like her grandson Brandon. So when he said he was in jail, with no wallet or cellphone, and needed cash for bail, Card scrambled to do whatever she could to help.
“It was definitely this feeling of … fear,” she said. “That we’ve got to help him right now.”
Card, 73, and her husband, Greg Grace, 75, dashed to their bank in Regina, Saskatchewan, and withdrew 3,000 Canadian dollars ($2,207 in U.S. currency), the daily maximum. They hurried to a second branch for more money. But a bank manager pulled them into his office: Another patron had gotten a similar call and learned the eerily accurate voice had been faked, Card recalled the banker saying. The man on the phone probably wasn’t their grandson.
That’s when they realized they’d been duped.
“We were sucked in,” Card said in an interview with The Washington Post.
“We were convinced that we were talking to Brandon.”
Read the full article at The Washington Post.
by Aidan Ryan, Akash Pasricha and Michael Roddan
The Information
Crypto companies need banks to operate—but finding one is getting a lot harder.
During the crypto boom of recent years, a number of small banks looked past potential risks to embrace the fast-growing crypto industry. Now, following the implosion of FTX, top crypto-friendly bank Silvergate Bank is struggling to stay afloat and Signature Bank is cutting back on working with crypto customers.
That means crypto companies, whose customers need a bank account to wire money to, are scrambling to move money to banks that will still take them.
Read the full article at The Information (Subscription required.)
See Also:
Image source: GoFundMe
by Melissa Fine
Bizpacreview.com
According to the Lake County Sheriff’s office, Volkswagen refused to help police search for an abducted two-year-old in a stolen Atlas SUV until someone forked over an unpaid fee to reactivate the vehicle’s tracking device.
The search for the toddler was delayed, the agency said, because of what the car manufacturer is calling “a serious breach of the process.”
Officers responded to a frantic call in Libertyville on Thursday afternoon, after a six-months-pregnant mom, returning from the pet store and pulling into her home, took one of her children inside.
As she came back out to collect her two-year-old, a man in a light green facemask climbed out of a white BMW and attempted to get into her car, according to the New York Post. She tried desperately to fight off the carjacker, but she was ultimately overpowered.
“The offender battered the woman, knocking her to the ground,” police said. “He then stole her car with the child inside.”
As the two cars sped away, one ran the 34-year-old mother over. She was hospitalized with severe wounds.
Upon arriving on the scene, police say they “immediately called Volkswagen Car-Net, in an attempt to the track the vehicle,” NBC Chicago reports.
“Unfortunately, there was a delay, as Volkswagen Car-Net would not track the vehicle with the abducted child until they received payment to reactivate the tracking device in the stolen Volkswagen,” the sheriff’s office said, according to NBC.
“Volkswagen takes the safety and security of its customers very seriously,” a spokesperson told the outlet in a statement.
Read the full article at Bizpacreview.com.
The company published new details about a disastrous breach in which hackers stole customers’ vaults. It’s time to switch.
by Joseph Cox
Vice
LastPass, the popular password manager, is out of good will. Ever since the company first disclosed a breach in August, it has slowly provided consumers with drips of information, and the new details that do come out increasingly paint a picture of a company that should not be trusted with your passwords.
On Monday, LastPass published a blog post which provided more information on that breach, which it is now calling “Incident 2,” because the hacker leveraged its initial access to then steal data.
“Our investigation has revealed that the threat actor pivoted from the first incident, which ended on August 12, 2022, but was actively engaged in a new series of reconnaissance, enumeration, and exfiltration activities,” LastPass wrote.
The hackers managed to access LastPass’ corporate vault by targeting the home computer of one of four engineers who had access to decryption keys needed to access cloud data storage where sensitive information was kept.
The hackers did this by exploiting a vulnerability in a third-party media software package, which Ars Technica later reported to be Plex. From here, the hacker installed a keylogger, captured the engineer’s master password, bypassed the company’s multi-factor authentication protections, and accessed the corporate vault.
The post shows that the hacker against LastPass was resourceful and persistent, but also that LastPass was not treating its own crown jewels with the serious security practices it should have.
Read the full article at Vice.
by Theo Wayt
The Information
Amazon in December announced with great fanfare that, after nearly a decade of work, it had finally launched drone delivery in the U.S., in two towns in California and Texas. But by mid-January, Amazon Prime Air had made deliveries to fewer than 10 houses, according to people who worked on the project.
A person with direct knowledge of Amazon’s operations in Lockeford said they were only aware of two households having received a total of three deliveries between them as of mid-January.
Earlier this month Amazon Prime Air encountered another setback: It was hit hard by layoffs. Amazon cut teams working on U.S. commercial deliveries in Lockeford and College Station by more than 50%, according to five people who worked on the project.
The FAA’s restrictions have forced Amazon to adopt labor-intensive workarounds to use the drones for delivery. In Lockeford, for instance, Amazon’s facility was located on an industrial block without any homes, so crossing at least one two-lane road was required to reach any houses.
To cross the road while still abiding by FAA rules, Amazon employees had to act as spotters to make sure no vehicles were coming when the drone needed to fly across the street, a plan the FAA approved, according to one person who worked on the deliveries. The layoffs could further hamper those operations.
Read the full article at The Information (Subscription required.)
These examples are but a very small sampling of examples where technology companies are failing, and I could provide many more.
Most in the technology sector, especially the larger companies, still have plenty of cash left from the fat years, so there is still a lot of spending going on to make it seem like this is just simply a “downturn” and that things will eventually turn around again.
But that money is still not being spent wisely, as technology investments have always been heavy on hype, and low on actual productivity and usefulness.
The Financial Times recently reported that many companies are now facing a cash crunch, and facing difficult times and difficult decisions that they have not encountered since the Dot.com market crash in 2001-2002.
Technology groups that have recently listed in the US burnt through more than $12bn of cash in 2022, with dozens of companies now facing difficult questions over how to raise more funds after their share prices tumbled.
High-growth, lossmaking groups dominated the market for initial public offerings in 2020 and 2021, with 150 tech groups raising at least $100mn each in the period, according to Dealogic data.
As the proceeds from the dealmaking frenzy start to run low, however, many face a choice between expensive capital raises, extreme cost cutting, or takeover by private equity groups and larger rivals.
“[Those companies] benefited from the very high valuations but unless you’re really bucking the trend your stock is way down now. That can leave you kind of stuck,” said Adam Fleisher, a capital markets partner at law firm Cleary Gottlieb. “They have to figure out what is the least bad option until things turn around.”
Last year’s market downturn led to widespread talk in tech circles of a newfound focus on profitability and cash generation, but a Financial Times analysis of recent filings highlights how many companies still have a long way to go.
Of the 91 recently listed tech groups that have reported results so far this year, just 17 reported a net profit. They spent a cumulative $12bn in cash last year — a total that would have been even worse were it not for the standout performance of Airbnb, which generated more than $2bn. On average, cash-burning companies spent 37 per cent of their IPO proceeds during the year.
About half of the 91 were lossmaking at an operating level — meaning they could not simply cut back on investments if they needed to conserve funds.
Meanwhile, their shares have declined an average of 35 per cent since listing, making further share sales appear expensive and dilutive for existing investors. (Full article.)
Last week we published a report showing that as the energy requirements to sustain the electrical grid in the U.S. are increasing, our actual ability to produce electricity is decreasing, thanks to the “Green Energy” agenda. See:
One of the largest sources of electricity consumption in the U.S. are “data centers” owned by Big Tech, specifically Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, which need to expand their electric energy production exponentially to power all this technology, especially AI.
The other non-sustainable issue to build and maintain all this technology are the inputs to build it, such as lithium to produce batteries, and China just closed the door on 10% of the world’s production of lithium.
The techno-prophecies are failing, and you don’t have to be a prophet to analyze the data and clearly see that the technology is crashing, not “evolving.”
But I have yet to find one single person reporting on this quite simple, and obvious fact.
If you can clearly see that this technology is crashing, and if you are taking steps to reduce your dependency on it, then consider yourself one of the few informed people today who can clearly see this.
The rest are going to suffer, because they have no clue as to what is coming down the road, sooner rather than later.
If you want to look at one country that is totally dependent upon technology and is on the brink of a total collapse, just look at Ukraine, where the government’s infrastructure is run by Google, and their communication networks are dependent upon Elon Musk.
To learn more about my own experience in Big Tech, please see:
Video no longer on Mail Online.
from video:"I think in the long run soft power can move MOUNTAINS and achieve a great deal. Over time the cultural battle is a tug of war, it's begun to move in our favor and slip away from the woke brigade of social engineers and their benefactors".
Investing decisions based on a company’s view around its environmental, social and governance (ESG) responsibilities has been gaining momentum as the world on a global scale experiences adverse events as a result of global warming and social injustice.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting that is currently underway in Davos is making a special effort to hone in on the focus that businesses need to put on their ESG responsibilities.
“In the heat-laden months of 2022, it became abundantly clear the health of the planet is deteriorating. Companies are increasingly expected by investors and the wider public to be part of the multistakeholder, collaborative effort to restore it – and be transparent,” the WEF said on its site.
While this has been a notion welcomed by the majority of attendees, a handful have spoken out saying that the narrative and intention around the promotion of ESG is being skewed.
One of these people were Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock Inc – an investment company – who said that the conversation around ESG was creating huge polarisation. American author, Michael Shellenberger, spoke out about the WEF meeting, suggesting that there were other agendas at play.
It was on Shellenberger’s tweet that Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, responded that the ‘S’ in ESG stood for satanic.
The S in ESG stands for Satanic— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 16, 2023
In May, last year, Musk described ESG as a “scam that has been weaponised by phony social justice warriors”. This was said in a tweet where he lamented Exxon being rated in the list of the top ten best in the world for environment, social & governance (ESG) by S&P 500, while his company Tesla did not make the list.
Exxon is rated top ten best in world for environment, social & governance (ESG) by S&P 500, while Tesla didn’t make the list!
ESG is a scam. It has been weaponized by phony social justice warriors.— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 18, 2022
