Mask Control: Prove Coronavirus Exists! – A. Freeman’s post makes Henry Makow

Mask Control: Prove Coronavirus Exists!

The direct hyperlink to this post featured on HenryMakow is –

A. Freeman’s logical post on Vigilant Citizen’s Forum got the attention of Henry Makow.

In the post, Freeman asks for those advocating wearing masks to please “provide proof” in four areas.

For those of us who appreciate A. Freeman’s articles on [Time to Think] and posts here on DEFENDING-GIBRALTAR, we’re glad to see his logical thinking has grabbed Makow’s attention.

The original post on Vigilant Citizen is


Thank-you @TimeToThink for the good news. I’m really glad. @A_Freeman has common sense and a well thought out and convincing writing style, as well as a talent for easy to understand phrasing.


Let’s hope the A. Freeman post on the vigilant citizen forum goes viral.
No pun intended. LOL.

Thank-you A.Freeman.


From Vigilant Citizen to Henry Makow to The Truthseeker

Mask Control: Prove Coronavirus Exists!

Here's the link:


This is great.Thank-you A-Freeman for sharing this well thought out defense against mind-control mask. Also thank-Y/you at Time To Think`
for all the good news and articles found there.

1 Like

@NancyDrewberry Thank-you for sharing your experiences in the medical field. Also the heartfelt words of isolation unleashed on families and loved ones, in my opinion, is so cruel and ALL uncalled for, creating more fear and further dividing families and friends. My heart goes out to many who are suffering needlessly and dying alone. Money, greed and power rule the masses. Agreed… Sad to say, but we live in world of dystopian. I too am grateful for the LOVE that leads us into the Light, (Christ/ The Light of The World) to be able to hear and see the TRUTH, to see through the lies and deceit others would have us to believe.

Thank-you again.


Thank-you Naomi for your reply. This current so-called pandemic reminds me of the AIDS pandemic as far as the isolation; however, AIDS was a reality and it was reasonable to be cautious. This current pandemic is so incredibly deceitful, I just want to scream, but I won’t.


You are certainly welcome New Song. Agreed about AIDS and our current situation being different. This dystonia is so unbelievable, it’s hard to see how the masses can not see it for what it really is. Insanity at level not seen before. Unbelievable. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

Informative article concluding surgeons infection findings while NOT wearing mask.

As a person who went to medical school, I was shocked when I read Neil Orr’s study, published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: “ It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all ” and that wearing a mask during surgery “ is a standard procedure that could be abandoned .”

This evidence was found to be true after the study was conducted.

  • Ritter et al., in 1975, found that “ the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination .”

  • Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “ Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments .”

  • Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “ No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used ,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.

  • In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.

  • A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that “ The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.

  • Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that “ surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable .”

  • Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.

  • Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “ no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.

  • Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “ Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist ,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.

  • Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.

  • Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “ no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials .” Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.

  • Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “ none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not .”

  • Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “ there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection .”

  • Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “ there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination .”
    Studies of Surgical Masks Efficacy: Masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease (even during surgery)

Masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.

Schools in China are now prohibiting students from wearing masks while exercising. Why? Because it was killing them. It was depriving them of oxygen and it was killing them. At least three children died during Physical Education classes — two of them while running on their school’s track while wearing a mask. And a 26-year-old man suffered a collapsed lung after running two and a half miles while wearing a mask.

Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them.

“We are living in an atmosphere of permanent illness, of meaningless separation,” writes Benjamin Cherry in the Summer 2020 issue of New View magazine. A separation that is destroying lives, souls, and nature.


A fake test for a fake virus so the fake (witch) doctors can promote the fake threat of a fake pandemic...


BREAKING: A study that observed two school districts with different masking policies in North Dakota found that masking had NO impact on case numbers.

So why did they mask our children for the last two years?