The alleged COVID-19 pandemic has affected every aspect of our lives, and the approval of the COVID-19 vaccine for children was seen as a ray of hope by those who believe everything that their television tells them.
However, recent statistics given to EuroMOMO by the official authorities of 27 countries across Europe, including the UK, France, Italy, Spain and most of Germany, have shown a significant increase in excess deaths among children ever since the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the COVID-19 injection for 12 to 15-year-olds in 2021, and then 5 to 11-year-olds just a few months later.
So much so, that they have increased by a worrying 1,580% compared to the same period of time when it was both the height of the alleged pandemic, and the Covid-19 injection was not being offered to children.
Prior to the approval of the Covid-19 vaccine for children, the number of excess deaths among children in Europe was non-existent.
According to EuroMOMO, in the first 21 weeks of 2021, there were 346 fewer deaths than expected, meaning there were minus-346 or 0 excess deaths.
However, as soon as the EMA approved the Covid-19 vaccine for 12 to 15-year-olds in week 22 of 2021, the number of excess deaths began to rise, significantly.
The CDC has announced today that they have added the COVID-19 âvaccinesâ to their childhood immunization schedule.
The COVID-19 âvaccinesâ now add another 2-3 doses of vaccines to the 25 doses of other vaccines already on the CDC schedule that can be injected into babies and toddlers during their first 15 months of life.
This seems to be the first time in the history of the CDC that vaccines that are not even FDA-approved but only have EUAs (emergency use authorizations) have been added to the CDC childhood immunization schedule.
How is this even legal?
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, while appearing before Congress yesterday, was asked why these shots were added to the Child Immunization schedule.
Dr. Rochelle Walensky on Why an Experimental Vaccine was Added to the Childhood Schedule
"The reason ACIP recommendedâŚgetting the COVID-19 vaccine on the pediatric schedule, it was ONLY because it was the only way it could be covered in our 'Vaccines for Children' program" pic.twitter.com/k1CVf4cv09
The Vaccines For Children (VFC) program is a U.S. Government program to provide vaccines to low-income families receiving government aid through the Medicaid program.
Could this be a path the U.S. Government is creating to require lower-income families to have their children vaccinated in order to receive other Government aid benefits, such as food stamps?
If Brazil is an example of what is to come here in the U.S., then it is most certainly possible, if not probable.
Social Credit Brazilian Style: All UBI Recipients Must Be Vaxxed
Anybody who seriously thinks that Universal Basic Income (UBI) programs of the future wonât be full blown social credit systems need look no further than Brazil, where newly selected socialist / globalist Lula da Silva just decreed that the Bolsa Familia program will require family members to be vaccinated in order to continue receiving benefits.
The news comes via The Rio Times, which describes the Bolsa program as âa social welfare program for the poorest families in Brazilâ and âa kind of Universal Basic Incomeâ. (Full article.)
Having the CDC add the EUA COVID shots to their childhood immunization schedule also opens the door for local health departments and school districts to now add these shots to the CDC list of already recommended vaccines as a requirement for school attendance.
At this point, my guess would be that the FDA will fully approve these âvaccinesâ before the next school year starts, and the Secretary of Heath and Human Services (HHS) will move the shots into the NVICP (National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) giving the pharmaceutical companies legal immunity for any injuries and deaths, even after they are no longer covered by the PREP Act and the CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).
Thanks to Wayne Rhode, author of âThe Vaccine Courtâ, and his input into the reporting of this article. You can find him on Substack here.
Judy Mikovits, It is predicted that 50 million will die from the covid-19 vaccine, Sherry Tenpenny added some things are worse than death, if they don't die they will have serious disorders, be merciful if they died.
Pfizer is killing Children for Profit: Europe suffers unprecedented loss of lives among its Children with 760% increase in Excess Deaths since EMAâs Emergency Approval of COVID Vaccine for Kids
As the Childrenâs Health Defense eBook, Conflicts of Interest Undermine Childrenâs Health, tries to make clear, the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986 was a watershed event that emboldened vaccine manufacturers and their public- and private-sector accomplicesânotably the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)âto systematically hide the serious damage caused by vaccines.
In addition to making a mockery of pre-licensing safety testing and post-marketing surveillance, these entities have regularly manipulated (or destroyed) data to exaggerate both the benefits and effectiveness of vaccination.
Manufacturers have also used their money and power to subordinate the mainstream media, medical journals and front groups, making it possible to publish and broadcast deceptive studies that whitewash questions inconvenient to the financial bottom line.
From multiple standpointsânot least of which is childrenâs dismal state of healthâthe status quo is untenable. Three of the most urgent steps to be taken include repealing the NCVIA, eliminating vaccine mandates (making both childhood and adult vaccination voluntary) and addressing conflicts of interest by establishing a fully transparent and independent vaccine safety commission.
Repeal the NCVIA
The NCVIA has been an unmitigated disaster. As New York University law professor Mary Holland has written, the Actâs passage has allowed the government and vaccine manufacturers to ride roughshod over three important legal protections:
Free and informed consent to an invasive medical procedure
Accurate and complete information about vaccine ingredients and possible side effects
The right to sue manufacturers and medical practitioners directly in the event of injury.
According to Holland, the absence of these legal protections for vaccination is âstrikingâ compared to âalmost all other medical interventions.â
The legal protections are interrelated. For example, an individual cannot exercise truly informed consent unless he or she has access to full and unbiased information.
Recognizing this, one provision of the NCVIA was a mandate for the CDC to develop (and health care providers to distribute) patient education materials about vaccine risks and benefits.
However, not only has the CDC repeatedly dumbed down the materials in a variety of ways, but research suggests that many doctors do not comply with the legal requirement to hand out (much less discuss) them.
Instead, providers and the media continue to blandly assure the public that vaccine injuries are a âone in a millionâ event, never mentioning that 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported. Under the circumstances, no meaningful assessment of vaccine risks is possible.
Research shows that by eliminating consumersâ ability to sue, the NCVIA has had a tangibly negative effect on vaccine safety.
After an extensive analysis of nationwide and state-level U.S. data, a researcher reported in 2017 that vaccines licensed after NCVIAâs passage were associated with âa significantly higher incidence of adverse eventsâ compared to vaccines licensed prior to the lawâs passage.
The researcher concluded that âproduct safety deteriorateswhen consumers are no longer able to sue manufacturers.â
Repealing the NCVIA and reinstating product liability would not solve all of the ethical problems that permeate the pharmaceutical industryâs business culture, but it could curtail the âfree-for-allâ environment that has prevailed since 1986 and might incentivize manufacturers to treat vaccines in the same way as drugs and put safety on somewhat of a more even footing with profits.
NCVIA repeal would also draw greater attention to the exorbitant financial stress experienced by vaccine-injured individuals and families. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) not only has âfailed to compensate generouslyâ but, far more often than not, does not compensate at all.
Holland and others have identified many factors contributing to the low levels of vaccine injury compensation, including:
Public and medical ignorance about vaccine injury
Ignorance about the NVICP
The NVICPâs three-year statute of limitations
An adversarial litigation context
Inconsistent judgments by the vaccine court
Delayed and below-market compensation for attorneys and medical experts
Medical expert fear of âanti-vaccineâ stigma
Unavailability of medical documentation
An impossibly high burden of proof for most types of injuries
Despite the NCVIA legislationâs focus on childhood vaccines, 71% of compensated claims have been for vaccine injuries in adults, leaving many vaccine-injured children and their families out in the financial cold.
In the only study ever to explore petitionersâ experiences with the NVICP, petitioners described the vaccine injury claims process as âconfusing, time-consuming, too lengthy, and traumatic,â and about half rated the award amount as âinadequate to cover past and future medical care.â
In short, whereas Congress marketed the NVICP as a speedy, non-adversarial, no-fault compensation mechanism that would free the injured of the need to prove vaccine-related causation, it has turned out to be slow and litigious, requiring proof of causation for more than 90% of claims filed.
As one individual familiar with the system has stated, âeven when cases are fairly simple, âthe government will fight.ââ
Eliminate Vaccine Mandates
Medical informed consentââthe primary paradigm for protecting the legal rights of patients and guiding the ethical practice of medicineââis meaningless if an individual does not have the option of âdetermin[ing] what shall be done with his bodyâ and declining a given medical intervention.
Vaccine proponents and medical ethicists have proven themselves willing to blur the lines of informed consent in multiple ways, arguing, for example, that âadolescent autonomyâ and improved vaccine uptake justify eliminating parental consent requirements for HPV vaccination in preteens and adolescents.
This argument prevailed in California in 2011 when then-Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill allowing minors as young as 12 to consent on their own to the HPV and hepatitis B vaccines.
Compulsory vaccination policies in the U.S. have not had positive results. Instead, they have given rise to a wide variety of unintended and undesirable consequences, including unnecessary vaccinations that have wreaked havoc with childrenâs normal immune system development; unsafe vaccines; inadequate warnings about vaccine risks; conflicts of interest in national vaccine policy; insufficient compensation for the vaccine-injured; and an alarming decline in childrenâs health and well-being.
Research shows that there is no relationship âbetween mandatory vaccination and rates of childhood immunization.â Rather than trying to corral the small percentage of individuals who are currently eligible for medical, religious or philosophical vaccine exemptions into a âvaccinate-at-all-costsâ police-state dragnet, the U.S. should recommit to international principles of informed consent and make all vaccines voluntary.
Unfortunately, there is an accelerating trend toward greater use of mandates and âother legal instrumentsâ not only in the U.S. but also in Europe.
There, some experts have cautioned that legal sanctions are being applied by âthose who want to punish a countryâor, in the case of vaccinations, a citizenâthat deviates from the norm.â These experts warn that mandates often have a high cost in the court of public opinion.
Address Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interestâfar from being occasional aberrationsâare part and parcel of the U.S. vaccination program, and they have had a decisive and negative impact on childrenâs health.
Over the years since the passage of the NCVIA, a handful of courageous legislatorsâtroubled by the âcozy corporate alliancesâ that exist between industry and captured federal regulatorsâhave put forth pleas for an objective and non-conflicted vaccine safety commission to investigate and resolve safety problems.
Some researchers, likewise, have called for an independent National Vaccine Safety Boardâseparate from the CDC or any branch of governmentâto âensure optimal vaccine safety.â
A 2006 editorial in Nature concurred that in light of waning public confidence in vaccine safety, a strong case could be made for establishing a âwell-resourced independent national agency that commands the trust of both the government and the public in matters of health protection.â
In early 2017, Childrenâs Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. discussed the creation of a vaccine safety commission with then-president-elect Trump and also met with high-level National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials.
The Trump administration chose not to pursue the idea, despite the glaring need to introduce transparency to the U.S. vaccination program.
In March, 2018, Childrenâs Health Defense took to the halls of Congress and shared its multi-pronged Vaccine Safety Project with every member, arguing (among other actions) for the need to:
subject vaccines to a scientifically rigorous approval process,
require reporting of vaccine adverse events,
ensure that all parties involved with federal vaccine approvals and recommendations are free from conflicts of interest and
support fully informed consent and individual rights to refuse vaccination.
Hopefully, concerned parents, health care professionals, legislators and others will lend their voices to these reasonable requests so that conflicts of interest can be abolished once and for all, and sound scienceârather than deep pocketsâcan form the basis of vaccine policy-making.
Report confirms 632x increase in Child Excess Deaths across Europe since
EMA approval of COVID Vaccine for Children
During week 21 of 2021, the European Medicines Agency extended the emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, first to children aged 12 to 15 and later to the age group of 5 to 11.
However, the weeks following the approval witnessed a shocking rise in excess deaths among children, an upward trend that persisted unabated.
Between week 22 of 2021 and week 52 of 2021, an alarming tally of 919 excess deaths among 0 to 14-year-old children should have sent shockwaves through the continent. But the data was suppressed.
Child deaths soar an alarming 10% to 15-year high due to pandemic suicides, overdoses and homicides: Doctors warn they are now seeing suicidal EIGHT-YEAR-OLDS
Between 2019 and 2020, the mortality rate for ages 1 to 19 soared by 11%, and increased by an additional 8% the following year, a new study has revealed
This reversal in pediatric mortality was not caused by COVID but soaring violence, self-harm and drug abuse - with guns the leading cause of death
COVID - which strained mental healthcare and isolated children - 'poured fuel on a fire' that has been burning among America's youth for a decade, the study said
Published: 13:39 EDT, 17 May 2023 | Updated: 15:42 EDT, 17 May 2023 Child deaths have spiked by a tenth to a 15-year high fueled by pandemic suicides, overdoses and homicides.
Between 2019 and 2020, the mortality rate for ages 1 to 19 soared by 10.7 percent, and increased by an additional 8.3 percent the following year, according to a new study which analyzed CDC figures.
That is the highest increase for two consecutive years in the 50 years that the government has publicly released such figures, according to the paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in March.
Pfizer's COVID Vaccine Causes VAIDS in Children, Study Proves
We have scientific confirmation that vaccination against COVID-19 causes a marked decrease in immunity to heterologous pathogens such as viruses,bacteria, and fungi . This decreased immunity to other pathogens (acquired immune deficit) is what people colloquially refer to as âVAIDS.â (VAIDS stands for Vaccine-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome)
BOMBSHELL: mRNA COVID jabs damage childrenâs immune response to OTHER viruses as well, study finds 09/01/2023 // Ethan Huff New research published in the journal Frontiers in Immunology shows that children who got "vaccinated" for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) now suffer from a form of AIDS that has left their weakened immune systems prone to catching not just COVID but also all sorts of other viruses and bacteria.
Within weeks after getting a second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA shot, children begin to developprogressively weakened immunity to the point that they eventually succumb to whatever diseases they happen to encounter while simply living their normal lives.
In such scenarios, unvaccinated children with strong and healthy immune systems will be just fine. Meanwhile, those who got jabbed and now have broken immunity will be like walking disease carriers.
"Our study showed that, in children, SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination decreases inflammatory cytokine responses," the authors wrote.
(Related: Studies show that the spike proteins in COVID jabs embed themselves in brain tissue, triggering long-term brain damage.)
Is gaining fake protection against COVID from mRNA shots really worth destroying your entire immune system?
Fortunately for kids, the immune response to bacteria does eventually return to normal. For viruses, though, the researchers observed that broken immunity lasts for at least six months, this being the total duration of their study period.
Had the study gone beyond just six months, chances are the researchers would have discovered that the children's weakened immunity to viruses lasts much longer â perhaps permanently.
The horrific deaths and injuries caused by the experimental COVID bioweapon shots have created new âsuper starsâ in the alternative media who âwoke upâ during the COVID scam to realize for the first time that the U.S. Government has no problem lying to the American public, even when their advice results in many deaths and injuries.
Many of these new âstarsâ in the alternative media continue to earn their income from âexposingâ the COVID scam and how dangerous the shots are almost three years later. Thatâs because they became famous during COVID and the roll-out of the shots in 2021, and they donât really have much else to talk or write about.
Almost everyone among these new âsuper starsâ are now being labeled as âanti-vaccineâ, even though almost all of them are clearly not anti-vaccine, and only anti-COVID vaccines, and still believe in non-COVID vaccines.
There are still a few of us who are truly âanti-vaccine,â such as myself, and have warned the public for many years prior to COVID that vaccines were weapons that killed and injured people, primarily babies and children.
But many who used to expose the dangers of all vaccines prior to COVID, have now been brought into the Childrenâs Health Defense (CHD) organization and either gone on their payroll, or taken advantage of the millions of dollars that Wall Street and Silicon Valley billionaires have apparently contributed to CHD to greatly increase their public exposure.
The revenue coming into CHD has almost tripled each year of their existence, from $1,063,837 in 2018 to $2,928,566 in 2019, to $6,769,658 in 2020, the year COVID started, to an astounding $15,990,132 in 2021. (Source.)
And now their leader, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is running for the office of the President of the United States, and is practically shouting at the top of his lungs to every corporate media outlet that interviews him that he is NOT anti-vaccine.
So what are the chances that those employed by him, who used to expose how vaccines approved by the FDA long before COVID came around were killing and maiming children, will go against their leader and admit that ALL vaccines are bioweapons?
Why was there a 57% increase in Deaths among Female Children immediately after they were offered the COVID-19 vaccine?
The risk of children dying due to the alleged Covid-19 disease is so extraordinarily low that it is negligible, and this is precisely why the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation refused to recommend that children be offered a Covid-19 injection in the UK, citing that the benefits do not necessarily outweigh the risks.
One of those known risks is a condition known as myocarditis, which causes inflammation of the heart muscle and reduces the heartâs ability to pump blood, and can cause rapid or abnormal heart rhythms.
Medicine regulators are fully aware that myocarditis can result from an adverse reaction to the Covid-19 injections, especially to the Pfizer mRNA injection. They are also well aware that it disproportionally affects younger adults and teenagers.
