Judge Unseals 400 Pages of Evidence, Clears Way for Pfizer Whistleblower Lawsuit

A whistleblower lawsuit alleging fraud during Pfizer’s COVID vaccine trials is moving forward, after a district court judge unsealed the complaint, including 400 pages of exhibits.

Brook Jackson in January 2021 sued Pfizer and two companies the drugmaker contracted with to work on the trials: Ventavia Research Group and ICON PLC.

Jackson worked for Ventavia for a brief period in 2020 before being fired after she filed a complaint with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over alleged improprieties she observed during the vaccine trials.

She also gave The BMJ a cache of internal company documents, photos and recordings highlighting alleged wrongdoing by Ventavia.

Jackson filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division, under the False Claims Act. The lawsuit includes several charges of fraud and retaliation on the part of both Ventavia and Pfizer.

The complaint remained under seal until Feb. 10, when U.S. District Court Judge Michael Truncale ordered it unsealed.

Pfizer ‘deliberately withheld crucial information’ about vaccine’s safety

Continued at the link.

Thomas Renz wants to know who's going to jail for murder

Court Orders FDA To Comply With FOIA and Release Information On Pfizer EUA – First Batch of Documents Shows Over 1,200 Vaccine Deaths Within First 90 Days – EVIDENCE OF MURDER


No, Pfizer can’t use the government as a shield from liability for making false claims about covid vaccine, lawyers argue

Tuesday, September 13, 2022 by: [Ethan Huff]

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

Image: No, Pfizer can’t use the government as a shield from liability for making false claims about covid vaccine, lawyers argue

(Natural News) Attorneys involved in a whistleblower lawsuit against Pfizer say that the drug giant cannot use the government as a cover for making false claims about its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine.”

In response to a motion by Pfizer to dismiss the False Claims Act lawsuit, lawyers representing Brook Jackson, who worked as a regional director at one of the trial sites where Pfizer developed its Fauci Flu shot, had this to say:

“Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud. A drug company cannot induce the taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for a product that honest data would show poses more risks than benefits, and that ignores the actual contract and the law itself.”

Pfizer and two of its subsidiaries, the suit alleges, violated the False Claims Act by providing bogus clinical trials to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which accepted them without question and authorized the shot at warp speed. (Related: Pfizer also bullied the government of South Africa into shielding it from all liability for injuries and deaths caused by covid shots.)

If successful, the lawsuit will force Pfizer to pay out $3.3 TRILLION in damages

Under federal law, an individual can sue a drug company on behalf of the government and win treble damages if he or she can prove that an individual or company deliberately lied to the government about a drug or vaccine.

In this case, said treble damages could amount to as much as $3.3 trillion, according to Warner Mendenhall, one of Jackson’s attorneys. This would be more than enough to completely bankrupt Pfizer and send a warning shot to other pharmaceutical giants to watch their backs.

Mendenhall’s law firm has won numerous multi-million-dollar False Claims Act cases over the years. He personally believes, based on the $2 billion the United States government shelled out to Pfizer to buy more than 100 million doses of its mRNA (messenger RNA) poison, that $3.3 trillion is an accurate estimate.

Pfizer is, of course, arguing full innocence on the matter, claiming that it knew about Jackson’s claims for at least two years and expressed “full confidence” in the data it presented to the FDA in favor of the injection.

Mendenhall, conversely, says that Pfizer’s argument is dead on arrival because a false claims action is independent of the government’s knowledge on the matter. All Jackson has to do, he says is prove that Pfizer and its subcontractors presented fraudulent information to the FDA.

“Jackson was third in command of the clinical trials conducted by Ventavia Research Group as part of Pfizer’s application for emergency use authorization of its COVID-19 vaccine,” reports The Epoch Times about the case. “She was there for only 18 days before being fired by Ventavia after reporting what she called ‘absolute mayhem’ and an utter disregard for safety protocols and federal regulations in developing the vaccine.”

“Jackson has submitted over 400 exhibits as part of her complaint. Jackson said that a former Taco’s cashier was among those tasked with injecting patients with the experimental jab. She alleged that the trial staff falsified patient signatures on informed consent paperwork. And she has described a daily mess of unsanitary conditions.”

In a desperate attempt to destroy Jackson over the lawsuit, Pfizer is now claiming that she is “anti-vaccine” and “anti-government,” and thus not credible. Pfizer also claims that Jackson is only out for herself and is seeking a large payout because she was fired for telling the truth.

1 Like

Pfizer’s defense was not that these allegations are false.

Update on the Biggest Trial Against Big Pharma in American History


We’re moving into the litigation stage of our information war against the Cabal and Constitutional lawyer, Robert Barnes is representing Brook Jackson in her monumental and historic fraud case against Pfizer and he believes that hers is the only argument that can bring down the entire COVID Hoax. He says:

“What was extraordinary to me was Pfizer’s defense. Pfizer’s defense was not that these allegations are false. They challenge whether the allegations are true but at this stage of the pleadings, they have to assume them to be true legally. Their argument was solely, even if they created a dangerous, ineffective drug that they disguised as a vaccine, that they said would be for the prevention of COVID-19, that didn’t prevent COVID at all, in fact, in some cases, it appears the infection rate, it goes up with COVID, depending on how many booster shots that you’ve had. Not only other dangers of the vaccine.

“The words ‘For the prevention of COVID-19’ are listed as a deliverable item more than a half dozen times in the contract Pfizer signed with the Defense Department.

“And yet, what did they deliver? They delivered something that was not safe. In fact, it was uniquely and extraordinarily dangerous, according to the government’s own Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; that it was not effective – as the whole world knows – and, as Pfizer’s own CEO admitted to the European authorities, saying, ‘We didn’t really test for whether it was effective or not.’

“It didn’t prevent infection, it didn’t prevent transmission. We now know, of course, it wasn’t a vaccine, it was a gene therapy. It’s important to note, this Defense Department contract was created at a time when the word ‘vaccine’ still meant vaccine. It still meant something that inoculated and immunized against a disease.”

Listening to Robert Barnes stuns with his articulation of the case and with his fluency in the law. He’s brilliant and it’s like getting a mini legal education, just listening to him.

He gets your head in the game that we all need to playing right now, which is to find ways to sue these Fascist Totalitarian assholes.

1 Like