Agreed. It looks a lot more than just a grass-roots movement that took off like wild-fire. It looks orchestrated and heavily funded. The gay-pride parades for decades took place one day out of the year and if I recall correctly that day was Halloween (no coincidence there). There was one parade on the East Coast (New York) and the other one on the West Coast (California). I do not think it began right away as the rainbow design being used as the motto.
2 Likes
No coincidence either that a conversation about sodomites would be on the "International Women's Day" thread. The two go hand-in-hand. Here is what it has to say in TWHOFTF:
12:67 The next step, was to get the eunuchs and homosexuals/sodomites in government, to make sodomy legal, and, with that, came queer liberation, which, combined with womenâs liberation, and the general emasculation of men, has brought about an almost total, and complete reversal of GODâS order of things.
12:70 On the Last-Day, the womenâs liberationists, the homosexuals/sodomites, and ANYONE who teaches organized-religion, will be in the most danger, and first into âThe Fireâ.
12:78 Legalizing homosexuality/sodomy has, naturally, brought about an increase in the molesting of little boys.
12:79 Along with all this emasculation of mankind, and womenâs effect on things; by allowing themselves to be used UNWITTINGLY, by Satan, to get Godâs Laws changed; capital and corporal punishment have been abolished, in many countries, which has brought about a further perversion of Godâs Plans. - End of Quotes.
Sodomy became legal in America not very, very long ago. It started in the 60's when some of the States began to repeal the sodomy law as a crime.
It was only on June 26th, 2003 that laws against sodomy were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. This means that homosexuality was decriminalized nation-wide only 17 years ago. https://www.homoglobin.org/blog/the-history-of-decriminalizing-homosexuality-in-the-united-states
5 Likes
@phithx ,
True. The rainbow is magnificently beautiful, hard to forget the sight of, and the true meaning God promised over the earth, people and animals.
Genesis 9 :12 And God said, This [is] the token of the Covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that [is] with you, for perpetual generations:
9:13 I do set My bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a Covenant between Me and the earth.
9:14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud:
9:15 And I will remember My Covenant, which [is] between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.
Wisdom 43:12. It compasseth the heaven about with a glorious circle, and the hands of The Most High have bended it.
Rev. 10:1 And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a "Cloud": and a rainbow [was] upon his head, and his face [was] as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
4:3 And He that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and [there was] a rainbow round about the Throne, in sight like unto an emerald.
More likely than not, money, money, money, for the love of money is the root of all evil (1 Timothy 5:10).
4 Likes
Agreed, that as well.
4 Likes
Agreed.
4 Likes
Yep, agreed.
3 Likes
A fish rots from the head down...
3 Likes
Makes sense to attract attention because even a child can notice a rainbow and shout see over there, a rainbow....
Thank you kindly.
2 Likes
Agreed because it's like they have dedicated themselves to do the opposite of what Father said and thinking they are fooling and hurting Him, yet they are only hurting themselves. We shall see the end of their laughter if they can still laugh forever when reality hits up
1 Like
It appears so.
Deut. 7:9 Know therefore that the "I AM" thy God, He [is] God, the faithful God, which keepeth Covenant and mercy with them that love Him and keep His Commandments to a thousand generations;
7:10 And repayeth them that hate (or disobey) Him to their face, to destroy them: He will not be slack to him that hateth (or disobeyeth) Him, He will repay him to his face.
7:11 Thou shalt therefore KEEP the Commandments, and the Statutes, and the Judgments, which I command thee this day, to DO them.
3 Likes
You are certainly welcome.
thank you too.
2 Likes
@Nam ,
You are most welcome.
2 Likes
You're welcome.
2 Likes
By Janice Fiamengo
(abridged by henrymakow.com)
I t's back-to-school time, and we can expect more complaints about how the lack of young men at college today is victimizing young women.
We've been told for years that the future is female, that everyone benefits from female leadership and everything improves when women take charge.
Any man on a college campus who has ever objected to the plethora of special university programs and women-only scholarships and pro-woman propaganda was told he had a problem with gender equality.
But now it turns out that some women themselves are not entirely happy with the deal feminists engineered for them, which sees them outnumbering men at close to 3-2 at most English-speaking universities, and thousands of words have already been devoted to the idea that college women deserve a more satisfactory dating experience.
According to Monica Greep in an article from last fall for the Daily Mail, "How Golden Penis Syndrome is ruining dating for university women," the "deficit of male students" at college "means men develop inflated egos and become Casanovas who cheat--despite a lack of social and sexual skills." ...
What articles such as this one won't admit is that these guys are "prizes to be won," and increasingly so in light of the reported imbalance.
It is well known that college-educated men who marry are, on average, likely to work the longest hours, seek promotion most aggressively, and become high earners focused on supporting their wives and families (even post-divorce, as too often happens). A woman who is fortunate enough to marry a man like this stands to secure a materially better life, often at her husband's expense of health and leisure, than she would have had if she had depended solely on her own earning power and work ethic (women are famously more interested in "work-life balance" than men are). Now with these men in the minority, women are having to compete for the men's attention, and we're supposed to feel sorry for them....
The whole point of the article is to make clear to men that they are not to trade on their value when they're in demand. They're supposed to be grateful to be desired at all, and to believe that they are the lucky ones. Ultimately, they're supposed to happily sacrifice themselves on the marital altar with a woman who will enjoy the fruits of their labor....
(This is what Communists mean by gender equality)
The situation described in the article is a serious one despite the foolishness of the writer's perspective. Our societies are telling women two contradictory things: that they can and should take men's college spots, jobs, and status (and call that "equality"), and still expect to marry a high-status man who will provide for them lavishly and give them the option, if they want it, to work part-time or not at all.
The problem of declining male success has been evident for decades, but even the whistleblowers have been afraid to address it honestly. Christina Hoff Sommers published The War Against Boys (still a must-read) more than twenty years ago, showing how boys and young men were being discriminated against across the entire school system by mostly female teachers with anti-male convictions. She had to change the subtitle of the book, obviously under pressure from feminists, from "How Misguided Feminism is Harming our Young Men" to "How Misguided Policies are Harming our Young Men." Even when feminism is directly responsible for a problem, it can never be named as such.
Universities have become so anti-male in their policies and teaching, not least in their sexual assault policies (see, for example, KC Johnson and Stuart Taylor's definitive The Campus Rape Frenzy), that some men have made the decision to stay away, especially from university programs in the Humanities and Social Sciences, where the anti-male slant is unavoidable. Even in the tiny number of programs where young men are still relatively well represented, the feminist war continues. There is actually a worldwide international day commemorating governments' stated goal to promote women in the few remaining higher education fields and professions in which women do not already outnumber men.
(Janice Fiamengo)
A large-scale study by two MIT researchers entitled Wayward Sons: The Emerging Gender Gap in Labor Markets and Education found that the trend has been building for decades, and they explain its circular nature.
Low-income men lack the economic potential to attract and support a mate, but they are still likely to father children with women who choose to raise their children alone, an arrangement that contributes to child poverty, fatherlessness, and all the problems that come in their wake.
Sadly, male children born into single female parent households "appear to fare particularly poorly" suffering impaired health, delinquency, early school leaving, addiction, depression, and higher probability of incarceration. "Thus the poor economic prospects of less-educated males," the study authors summarize, "may create differentially large disadvantages for their sons, potentially reinforcing the development of the gender gap in the next generation." We can expect that even fewer young men will go to university in the future, and fewer women will find high-earning men to date and marry.
And now this predictable outcome is presented as the fault of the minority of young university men who are recognizing the short-term benefits of their scarcity.
The article throws around the grotesquely insulting and mocking phrase Golden Penis Syndrome, telling us at length how badly behaved some men are in these situations--with abundant anecdotes based on women's (subject and unverifiable) tales of neglect and rudeness while berating men for thinking THEY are special. Your penises are not golden, is the implied smear throughout.
What really seems to bother the experts is that the women's discontent shows that these men may actually be platinum.
The author of a book about dating designed to help women stay "in charge" recounts how at universities where men outnumber women, the guys make special Valentine's cards for their female peers, and wake up early on Valentine's Day to make pancakes for them. What are the young women doing for the guys at colleges where the female sex is over-represented? We know the answer: not much except complaining about poor treatment to anyone who'll listen.
We can keep on blaming men for making decisions in their own short-term best interests, and we can keep on telling them that they should be grateful for any female attention at all, even while they're pushed out of college and high-status jobs by gender equity policies, affirmative action hiring, and a maniacally woman-favoring culture.
Maybe instead it's time to have a frank conversation about what men want and need, and why happy men are important in a well-functioning society.
2 Likes
Not forgetting part of these few men are sodomites, while others opted out for catholic priesthood.
1 Like
This thing called women emancipation is a con that has come to steal our souls and put us in danger for abusing Godly order in marriage, not only marriage but society at large.
A manâs desire is not food. Cook the best food he can get is it in a restaurant.
A manâs desire is not sex, he can get it from a street through a side chick.
A manâs desire is not your attire. Women who dress for sex will get it.
The greatest thing you can ever take from a man that will cause a beast in him to come out is disrespect. When heâs given disrespect his natural animal instincts will rule instead of his spirit Being. Inherent in every man is a beast=animal and a king=spirit Being. A human+Being.
If you choose to be a queen, you will bring out the spirited king in him. If you be a torment, disrespecting him, you will banger his beastly nature.
In all cultures of the world, the last thing a man cannot take is disrespect. Some women are grossly disrespectful thinking they are liberated. The marriages before this time period were better Godly examples when there were no marriage seminars, conferences, no lectures on marriage but marriages succeeded properly because they were properly bonded under Divine rule.
This thing called women liberation has not been defined in a proper context leading females to believe it is a good thing when in fact creates the opposite outcome by their destructive ways. A women God given ability, and is true liberation for women, is to enter into governance not to dominate the marriage. The women emancipation concept should be properly defined and then redrilled again in the minds of women because women have taken this man emancipation into marriage. There are standards in marriage that no generation can ever take.
A woman is to submit to a man Ephe. 5:22, Col 3:18 and the man is to love a woman that is the standard. But womenâs liberation has come to tell us that a woman has equal rights to men and freedom since women are president they can also be husband. Women can be presidents, governors, women can be viewed but a woman can never be a husband because husband is not a position, not a rank, husband is not an office, husband is an ordained responsibility and until every woman comes to this point and understand that your proper place will never come to where you become a husband then respectfully everyone should take her place in marriage as the helper God made her to be.
That is why at times I say some physical response from men is a product of emotional abuse from women.
The next thing we have to understand is this, not everybody has the same capacity women compare a lot. A woman will want her husband to be like her neighborâs husband, cut your clothe according to your clout.
Any man that God gives you is because that is the capacity of a man you can manage. God cannot give you something better than you, because if you were better off, God would give you something better, so please, let us understand this that people who most likely to say look at that useless man who beats up his wife, I donât support wife beaters but I can tell you before a man raised his hand, what were you doing there? Until he got to the extent of raising his hand on you.
We grew with our mothers in the 80s that our mother would make we want to re-act, by the time they are talking she gives a way. A woman will talk to the extent or send her finger into your nostrils because of women emancipation. I think we should go back and redefine this concept of women liberation A woman can never be a husband because that position is a rank that got men positioned and nobody breaks it.
Proverbs 18:21
18:21 Death and life [are] in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.
Mathew 12:37
12:37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
1Peter 3:10
3:10 For he that will love Life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile:
Psalms 34:12-13
34:12 What man [is he that] desireth life, [and] loveth [many] days, that he may see good?
34:13 Keep thy tongue from evil, and thy lips from speaking guile.
James 3:7-13
3:7 For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind:
3:8 But the tongue can no man tame; [it is] an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.
3:9 Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude (in the image) of God.
3:10 Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought NOT so to be.
3:11 Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet [water] and bitter?
3:12 Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? or a vine, figs? so [can] no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.
3:13 Who [is] a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him show out of a good conversation his works with MEEKNESS from wisdom (the truly wise are meek and humble).
3:14 But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the Truth.
Proverbs 11:13
11:13 A talebearer revealeth secrets: but he that is of a faithful spirit concealeth the matter.
Proverbs 15:1
15:1 A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Proverbs 17:1
17:1 Better [is] a dry morsel, and quietness therewith, than an house full of sacrifices [with] strife.
Proverbs 25:11
25:11 A word fitly spoken [is like] apples of gold in a setting of silver.
Psalm 39:1
I said, I will take heed to my ways, that I sin not with my tongue: I will keep my mouth with a bridle, while the wicked is before me.
Proverbs
13:3 He that keepeth his mouth keepeth his life: [but] he that openeth wide his lips shall have destruction.
Ecclesiates 5:2
5:2 Be not rash with thy mouth, and let not thine heart be hasty to utter [any] thing before God: for God [is] in heaven, and thou upon earth: therefore let thy words be few.
3 Likes
Possibly another reason for LGBTs using a rainbow as their symbol could simply be satan having a laugh at people: having fooled them again, and poking a finger at God; as follows:
The "Rainbow" is God's guarantee, that He will never do Noah's Flood again. Verse 5:21 From The Way home or face The Fire
So, it's Satan's lie to the LGBTs that God won't destroy them (despite that they're breaking His Law!).
But the truth is that they won't be destroyed by water (The Flood), but by Fire:
The Way home or face The Fire 5:19 God did not use âFireâ, because that would have destroyed the souls, and He has reserved âFireâ for the Last-Day, to terminate both the bodies and souls, of those who have not learned to be good, after thousands of Earth years, and hundreds of human lifetimes, and chances (Luke 20:38 & John 9:2)(Sura 2:154).
4 Likes
Deut. 7:9 Know therefore that the "I AM" thy God, He [is] God, the faithful God, which keepeth Covenant and mercy with them that love Him and keep His Commandments to a thousand generations;
7:10 And repayeth them that hate (or disobey) Him to their face, to destroy them: He will not be slack to him that hateth (or disobeyeth) Him, He will repay him to his face.
2 Likes