Nanotechnology and Transhumanism Unfolding Before our Eyes with Dr. Mihalcea
1 Like
108 Days After Slide Preparation: One Drop of Blood, One Drop of Dental Anaesthetic Carbocaine. Technology is still moving.
This is not Browning Motion (LOL). This is not bacteria, which have metabolic needs of evolved biology. This is technology (200x, phase-contrast microscopy).
I called this technology KAMS (Kinetically Active Micro Structures) as placeholder for what I am observing. Where do they get energy from? I suspect, from the electromagnetic field they are surrounded with, as suggested by various patents (i.e metallic nanoparticles), and/or by applying Teslaphoresis to CNTs (carbon nanotubes). Whatever it might be, this is not a behavior of evolved bacteria.
Carbocaine is a product of Abbot Pharma.
Notice, in the second video all adjacent Red Blood Cells have been emptied out and filled with these particles (see the “empty shell hypothesis” substack). KAMS are still moving among the invaded and disfigured shells of erythrocytes.
How do I know the technology is coming from Carbocaine? Here is my reasoning:
-
Yes, KAMS are observable in blood smears (prepared from both vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects). However, they remain kinetic only up to 2 weeks or so, and the percentage of emptied RBC is under 5% .
-
But when blood and Carbocaine are mixed at the 1:1 ratio, KAMS keep moving up to 108 days (and going), and 100% of RBC end up emptied.
So, here is where we are. My findings have been independently confirmed by Dr. David Nixon using dark-filed microscopy. This is an interim report. I thought 100 days would be an appropriate landmark to “celebrate” but I overshot by 8 days…
One Drop of Blood, One Drop of Dental Anaesthetic Carbocaine. Tech is still...
Subscribe to Homo Interruptis, with Len Ber MD
1 Like
1 Like
MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH!
Dr. Santee and several patients are CONSISTENTLY emitting ZERO Blue Tooth codes from their bodies after using Vax, Shedding, Nano neutralizing, proprietary protocol!
Graphene Nano Confirmed in Dental Drugs! Dr. Mihalcea
1 Like
Anyone have idea how much memory in kilobytes the bluetooth stack takes up and how they made that tech into nano size?
Most of this tech can be observed under an optical microscope, so is therefore micro rather than nano.
And that's just what they admit too, officially
1 Like
Scary stuff.
Fortunately flat earther (should tell alot of his reasoning abilities) Stew Peters, his sponsors and Dr Diane Kazer have solutions to these issues in the form of products to sell the listener.
"I can affirm the presence of graphene oxide particles in this anesthetic with high confidence."
Jessica C. Hankins University of Colorado Boulder Raman Microspectroscopy Laboratory
Jul 31, 2024
A dentist named Dr. Lundstrom, commissioned micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis (of a local anesthetic that he uses in his practice) through the University of Boulder, Colorado. The results were highly significant. Here are two short snippets from his website:
“Is there Graphene in dental anesthetic?
We asked the University of Colorado Boulder to test samples of dental anesthetic. We sent samples of Articaine Hydrochloride 4% and epinephrine 1:200,000, lot number (10) 230109 for testing. The testing was completed using Raman Microspectroscopy. At the conclusion of testing, Jessica C. Hankins, Sr Professional Research Assistant, Raman Microspectroscopy and Geomicrobiology Lab Manager reports ‘I can affirm the presence of graphene oxide particles in this anesthetic with high confidence.’”
Here is a link to the full report
“Who have we contacted about testing the dental anesthetic?
We have reached out to many sources to inquire about getting testing completed either through them/their universities or asking them to provide us with contacts for a trusted testing site. Along with asking for testing to be completed, we have also provided some of the sources with samples of dental anesthetic for testing. Below you will see the efforts we have made in trying to pursue testing and some of the responses we have received…”
This is evidence which adds to the microscopic work done by multiple citizen investigators over the past several years that strongly suggested that GFN’s are present in injectable local anesthetics. This should be correlated with the original work of Dr. Pablo Campra, who first reported the presence of graphene in samples of CV19 “vaccines” in 2021.