Yes, "LESS" confrontational. "Less" differs from "not confrontational" which was not said.
1 Like
Did I say that you said not? No, I did not.
If we take a case like this, China surrounding Taiwan with warships and giving out statetements like that, I'm not sure what event/statement or stance, as you say, of the US would be more confrontational?
1 Like
Agreed. I did not say you said "not". I was merely clarifying the statement I made.
Biden said "he does not support Taiwan's independence". An example of being less confrontational. But, will send forces to defend Taiwan. Remains confrontational, but it is ambiguous.
1 Like
Ok
CHINA MASSIVE DRILLS BEGAN TO TAKE TAIWAN IN EARLY JUNE
The Chinese PLA exercise Joint Sword-2024A involving the navy, air force, missiles and land forces, began to surround Taiwan from all directions. The massive maneuver, described as a “punitive” exercise, was linked by China in early June to an attempt to seize Taiwan, which China fully supports and blocks the “reunification” of the island by the US.
1 Like
Military Tube Today, with AI narration.
Seems to be propaganda from the Chinese government itself. Might be a good idea to add some kind of disclaimer to videos such as these so that someone doesn't mistake you and this forum to be a Chinese propaganda operation.
Also, for fairness sake and to make it easier for "researchers" to do their job it would be a good idea the link to the original video. Oh and so that someone doesn't mistake you to be the original source of it...
2 Likes
Anyone ever checked these guys, please?
1 Like
We are already suffering, we can't even enjoy our own fish anymore because of the mistakes of our greedy corrupt governmentts, soon may be illegal to be an African.
It's a pity
1 Like
KAREN KINGSTON: CHINA'S NEW GLOBAL NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS
Karen Kingston with Dr. Joseph Sansone discuss China's new law requiring companies and their officers that do business in China to serve the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese military. Karen explains how China is infiltrating governments around the world to do its bidding. Is China affecting the U.S. government’s decision to allow the on going border invasion? Karen also raises questions about Elon Musk’s operations in China and national security concerns.
1 Like
Trump's Trade War FAILS: China DUMPS Dollar, Putin & Iran Just Got STRONGER w/ Ben Norton
Journalist and geopolitical commentator Ben Norton joins the program to break down the devastating impact of Trump's trade war and how it's blown back in a big way not just on the US economy but on the future of US global power itself. Russia, Iran and China are building a new world order and it's accelerating under Trump's reign. Don't miss this must-watch conversation.
Global Geopolitics and Declining US Power: How China Won the US-China Economic War | Einar Tangen
@DG-Truther-Videos
Einar Tangen is a Senior Fellow at Taihe Institute and a Founding Partner of the Center for China and the World at City University of Macau.
I have not forgotten the massacre at Tiananmen Square. Have you?
The 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests and Massacre: Consequences and Significance
INTRODUCTION
The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 represent a pivotal moment in China's history, and remains today as a symbol of the lengths to which authoritarian regimes will go to maintain control. What began as peaceful student-led demonstrations, calling for greater political and democratic freedoms, was met with disproportionate and unimaginable force, and arguably escalated to one the most tragic incidents in the late 20th century.
It was a significant moment in China’s post-revolution history, as students, intellectuals, and labor activists gathered to demand political reforms, including freedom of speech, transparency, and an end to government corruption. The movement, which began in mid-April, drew hundreds of thousands to Tiananmen Square, and for several weeks, it appeared that the government might be willing to negotiate with the protesters.
However, on June 4, 1989, this hope was shattered. The Chinese government declared martial law and sent in the military to suppress the protests. Armored vehicles and troops unleashed deadly force on civilians, with estimates of the injury toll exceeding 3,000 and over 200 individuals, including 36 university students, died that night. Moreover, it is important to note that these estimates were released by the Chinese government, and that many researchers are skeptical of the official Chinese report and most frequently cite the toll as hundreds or even thousands killed.
THE AFTERMATH
The aftermath of the massacre had far-reaching consequences. The government’s response effectively destroyed China’s pro-democratic movement, and moreover, instilled a significant sense of fear across the country. Discussion of the protests and massacre remain under heavy censorship in China till the present day, and with any public acknowledgment of the event leading to severe punishment. The emotional scars of this repression are felt not only by survivors but also by the new generation of Chinese citizens, many of whom have grown up in a society where open discussion and criticism of those in charge is incredibly suppressed.
Many organizations, one of them being Amnesty International have been vocal about how this forced silence and lack of accountability continue to affect the mental health of those who were directly and indirectly impacted. The suppression of historical memory prevents collective healing, deepening societal trauma and contributing to ongoing anxiety and emotional distress. Understanding these consequences is crucial, not only for recognizing the psychological toll but also for advocating for a more open dialogue, which is essential for both individual well-being and societal progress.
LOOKING AHEAD
In the years since, those who have sought to honor the memory of the victims or push for political reform have faced severe repercussions. The Chinese government continues to wield its power to silence, making it dangerous for individuals and organizations to openly discuss the events of this tragic and bloody incident. Human rights activists and scholars, both within China and abroad, have been targeted, with many imprisoned or forced into exile. The government’s surveillance and censorship have created a society where fear of retaliation is a constant, preventing any genuine movement toward democratic reforms.
This repression is not only a political issue but also a profound mental health challenge. For survivors, witnesses, and their families, the inability to speak about their experiences without fear of persecution has only intensified their trauma. As Human Rights Watch notes, the suppression of human rights activism in China has intensified since the protests, making it harder for those impacted to seek psychological or social support. The absence of open acknowledgment and justice for the atrocities committed has left an emotional void, one that has continued to deepen and worsen over time.
Looking ahead, the future remains uncertain. The Chinese government shows no signs of loosening its grip on the narrative surrounding the massacre. However, activists continue to fight for recognition and reform, often at great personal risk. International organizations and foreign governments have an important role to play in holding China accountable and advocating for the rights of those who seek justice. Without pressure from the global community, China is unlikely to acknowledge the massacre or its long-term consequences. It is critical that the world remembers what happened at Tiananmen Square and continues to push for a future where historical truth can emerge, enabling those affected to heal and move forward.
1 Like