Barrister Charles Gomez writes to Director of Public Health asking about...

Obviously, Helen Carter can't disclose the real reasons they want to shoot the children. She's getting paid to forward this vaccine-agenda. Their defense always aligns with the "official narrative" and use words like science-backed, when it is only backed by bias of corrupt individuals, companies, and bent political parties.

This is a step in legally exposing the agenda backed by lies.

We also have this...

RESEARCHERS: Jab Kills At Least 5 Times More Than Covid, So Why Are We Vaccinating Kids?

A new study published by an international team of researchers (published on ScienceDirect) proposes that the weight of evidence is AGAINST vaccinating children with experimental and sometimes lethal COVID-19 vaccines when the risks to their health far outweigh their purported benefits.

A newly published study in Toxicology Reports titled, Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? ,” challenges the dominant narrative being widely promulgated throughout both the mainstream media and the world’s governmental health authorities, namely, that vaccines are universally and a priori “safe and effective,” despite an accumulating body of evidence on both the US government’s VAERS and the WHO’s VIGIBASE databases that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing unpredented harm to the public — which, if true, is in direct violation of the medical ethical principle of informed consent.

Continued at link.

Again, did anyone assume Helen Carter wouldn't be on board with the plan to "vaccinate" all? There are only evil reasons for doing so, if one can see through their claims to virtue.