The AI analysis and the words science and journalism was left in on purpose, for atleast two reasons.
Did you really think I would make such a lousy mistake by contradict myself by saying "no serious truth-seeking process" and then, cite something as problematic as science and journalism as prime examples?
I was not referring to human science and journalism.
The most serious truth seeking process comes from Father, and all his sciences are one.
I believe we should ponder upon what journalism means in relation to what we are doing here/our channels of information and for instance The Gibraltar messenger. Is it not a form of journalism?
I do not believe that you are citing me correctly.
Perhaps you remember how I once said that I believe that the right way of living on planet Earth was in the garden of Eden. So we shouldn't be digging up resources from the ground and building contraptions etc.
If I cite TWHOFTF:-
12:16 The world has been sent communications-technology, in all its many varied forms, to make the publishing of God’s Truth, to all the nations of the world, quick and easy.
And say that it seems we are using mixtures of evil/non evil technologies as "neccesary evils", perhaps you are able to get what I'm explaining?
I hope that I've been able to explain to you, dear reader, that that arguments in my message was not backed by earth-bound things.
Do you still think that saying:-
is ok, and in accordance to The Way home or face The Fire, 3:131?
or is the definition of that message really more like a fallacious, nihilistic, self-contradictory appeal to relativism that dismisses objective truth, undermines evidence and expertise, and reduces credibility and truth to purely subjective opinion, all while implicitly claiming its own assertions are valid—a paradox that exposes its own incoherence. ?