Picardo is not following science. He is following orders. He is following Their Evil Plan:
- To Bankrupt Gibraltar and make it beholden to the Banksters.
- To Destroy Sovereignty.
(Beware the deals with EU/Spain and the CCP-controlled shell companies) - To Bring in Digital Identities.
(Beware the Beast-system, where you can't buy or sell). - To establish the Brave New World of Global Technocracy in Gibraltar.
He's a wolf in sheep's clothing. What's he going to do when he has successfully destroyed Gibraltar from the inside?
Not Led By Science - it's the antithesis of science
"As soon as anyone disagrees with the expert opinion of people like Witty and Valance, politicians and the media are quick to accuse them of *"denying science."* This tactic is used incessantly. It is not done in the service of science. It is always done to defend policy decisions.
We can say this is always the case, because to accuse someone of being a science denier when they are using reasonable, evidence based arguments, only serves to illustrate how ignorant of science the person making the denier allegation is. Science is not based upon certainty. It is based upon doubt.
We have been told that lockdown and other political measures, in response to COVID-19, are all "led by science." This is not science in a form that most of us would recognise, however. It appears to be the antithesis of science.
Many people decry these experts but, without those who have expert knowledge, knowledge itself could not progress. Experts aren't the problem. The problem is that our reliance upon experts can be exploited by those with a vested interest.
The political response to COVID-19 claims legitimacy by citing scientific experts. The UK government say they are guided by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE.) The two most high profile SAGE members are Sir Patrick Vallance and Chris Witty (both are compromised by conflicts of interests).
This is not a conflict of interest because the government say it isn't.
It doesn't matter if everyone on Earth accepts the theory. If just one scientist can show evidence which proves it could be wrong, it is no longer cohesive theory. The theory cannot be said to be true until it accounts for all the evidence.
Read the entire article on UK Column.
Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that claim to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific method. Pseudoscience is often characterized by contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; absence of systematic practices when developing hypotheses; and continued adherence long after the pseudoscientific hypotheses have been experimentally discredited.
"Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.“ — Joseph Goebbels.
Don't be fooled the doublespeak.
Don't be fooled by those calling up-down, left-right, or black-white.
Matt 3:7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees (politicians) and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
Matt 12:34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
Matt 12:35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.
Matt 23:33 [Ye] serpents, [ye] generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell-fire?