Is Dr. Ardis' snake venom theory plausible and credible? May I ask for Your/your assessment? Thank-You/you.
- Yes, I think it is.
- I think it is nonsensical.
- I still know too little about the subject.
0 voters
My original gut instinct, when listening to Dr. Ardis speak about it in late March, was that it was nonsensical. At that time, I felt concern for his reputation in regards to what he was saying. I am returning to my original gut instinct and voting it as nonsensical.
P.S.
But I am open to further information on the subject.
Thank-you @Widetracker for sharing further information on the subject. It is complicated and confusing which is not a good thing.
You're welcome. We need to keep looking at all the different views.
Agreed, but thus far (as far as I have seen), he has been interviewed by those without a science background. Mike Adams is the closest one with a science background and even Mike is not a geneticist or a specialist in that field. When I see interviews with the likes of Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche or even Dr. Robert Malone, then my ears will perk up and pay attention.
Dr. Ardis' basic premise is weak. He was contacted by Dr. Bartlett who posed the question about the snake bite. Ardis said the question had nothing to do with CV19, but that is not true. It was posed because Ardis spoke out against monoclonal AB which is directly related to CV19 albeit under a lot of controversy and Bartlett was challenging him with the question. Ardis discovers that anti-venom is a monoclonal AB. This is his hypothesis which he says he has now proved to be true: Anti-venom is a monoclonal AB and monoclonal AB are used to treat CV19 then CV19 is snake venom.
The issue many people have with the hypothesis, is probably due to the fact that snakes are venomous, not poisonous. This is because venom is not the same thing as poison.
There are multiple videos of people drinking snake venom on YT and showing them surviving it. The explanation given is that because venom is a protein, the body simply breaks it down and digests it when someone drinks it - if they don't have any internal cuts that would allow the venom to enter the blood.
According to people who have studied snakes, the difference with snake venom is that it has to be able to directly enter the bloodstream in order to have its effect, unlike poison. Therefore, snakes are venomous but not poisonous.
Another issue is the logistics and sheer amounts that would be needed to be able to hypothetically put it into everyone's water supply.
Based on this, I tend to think it may be a misguided hypothesis at best, possibly due to not being fully informed, about the difference of venom vs. poison, or it may be intentional fearmongering and/or trolling, at worst. Not necessarily by the person reporting it, but that the story may have been "seeded" by evil people with ill intent to confuse and distract people.
We have been taught here that fear lowers people's immunity to disease, so, false theories being pushed that promote fear, may be the actual intent of those who do psy-ops.
You're welcome.
"Watch the Water" with a Grain of Salt by Meryl Nass, M.D.
At least ten people have asked me what I think of the Stew Peters-Brian Ardis video titled "Watch the Water."
Many statements in this video are accurate, but some are definitely not. The conclusions are simply illogical. Brian Ardis is a chiropractor. Because chiropractors are not allowed to prescribe medications, they have no training in pharmacology (drugs and vaccines).
Here is something true and interesting from the Remdesivir label:
Risk of reduced antiviral activity when coadministered with chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine sulfate: Coadministration of Remdesivir (VEKLURY) and chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine sulfate is not recommended based on cell culture data demonstrating an antagonistic effect of chloroquine on the intracellular metabolic activation and antiviral activity of VEKLURY.
This may be yet another reason the system does not want patients to receive chloroquine drugs, because their use would be a contraindication for use of Remdesivir.
Snake venoms
Snake venoms have multiple protein toxins that do lots of bad things to creatures the snakes want to eat. These include impairment of blood clotting, failure of neurotransmission to paralyze the prey, and even reduced heart and lung function via beta blocker activity.
As noted in one academic paper,
"Snakes are limbless predators, and many species use venom to help overpower relatively large, agile prey. Snake venoms are complex protein mixtures encoded by several multilocus gene families that function synergistically to cause incapacitation...
We identified 20 toxin families in the king cobra venom gland transcriptome (Fig. 1 and Dataset S2), including all toxin families annotated in the genome. Of the transcriptome hits, 14 toxin families were identified in the venom proteome (SI Appendix, Figs. S7–S9 and Tables S3 and S4 and Dataset S3), and nerve growth factor, phospholipase-B, and cobra venom factor have not previously been reported in king cobra venom. We also identified a unique snake venom protein, insulin-like growth factor, which we found selectively expressed in the venom gland and the venom proteome..."
Dr. Ardis mentions paralysis of the diaphragm. COVID doesn't do this. Snake venom, when enough is injected, causes you to die a quick death. COVID doesn't do that. In COVID, you die from the damage from spike to blood vessels, and by the excessive activation of the immune system in the wake of the viral infection. It usually takes 2 to 4 weeks to die from COVID. You can die quicker from COVID vaccines, or it can take longer, depending on the specific injury.
There are only so many ways to cause severe damage to people. It is not really a surprise that there is some overlap in activity of snake venoms with other activities that kill people, nor with human proteins.
Monoclonal antibodies
Dr. Ardis does not appear to understand that the term "monoclonal antibody" refers to a process by which antibody-producing cells are fused with other cells that can live forever. This produces a factory for growing antibodies. You can make antibodies against almost anything, especially if you attach the right small molecule (a hapten) to what you want the antibody to bind to. Just because you can make monoclonal antibodies to snake venom and make monoclonal antibodies to proteins in COVID does not imply there is any similarity whatsoever between snake venom and COVID.
I will stop now. Dr. Ardis has taught us a lot about Remdesivir. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. This snake venom stuff is hooey.
Thank-you. Agreed.
There is very much evidence 'from the horses mouth', in their own documentation, that what is being vaccinated, and as the antidote, is a synthetic form of snake venom amongst other things. The evidence is in the effective remedy (anti-venom).
When taking into consideration what the WEF is putting out regarding their trans-humanism goals (in their own words), it all sounds like it is in lock-step with all the 5G towers being put up (at least in America). The US is rapidly building new 5G communities in lock-step with their Agenda 2030 goal of moving the masses into these communities (for control/extermination). Please see what is happening in China (starvation and people jumping out of their windows) to predict what will happen in America.
This is why THEY are going after the guns in the US. THEY need to disarm the population for complete compliance.
Please see the video by Max Egan posted in this thread (Re-Writing the Narrative) who also believes that it is 5G and not water, in conjunction with the vaccines that is causing the deaths.
Just because THEY are monitoring the water supply does NOT mean that THEY are poisoning it (although it is not a far stretch when taking into consideration the fluoridation of the water supply). THEY could use this one point to discredit and divert attention/validation from all the other evidence of the harm caused by their poisonous shots.
He makes a very valid point when he says that the elephant in the room is that the people who have NOT taken the vax are NOT dying.
Beware the Snake Oil Salesmen - Mike Stone:
Beware the Snake Oil Salesmen
“My story has never been to create fear, panic, and anxiety about water.” He said he told Peters that he believes “there’s actually a snake venom connection to all of COVID-19, and I think that’s t…
From the WHO:
SBE-WG stands for Snakebite Envenoming Working Group. 
Hmmm
Comprehensively addressing these issues is a key priority for WHO. The SBE-WG, concerned by the current critical situation in sub-Saharan Africa, have set a target of delivering at least 500,000 effective antivenom treatments to that region each year by 2024. By the end of 2030, the target is to deliver, globally, 3 million effective regionally specific treatments per year. To achieve this, WHO will work to strengthen the production of antivenoms, improve regulatory control, and most importantly, rebuild and reinvigorate the market by ensuring that safe and effective products are available, accessible, and affordable.” [Emphasis added]
In addition, the article states that,
“Combined with parallel efforts on community engagement and education, health systems strengthening towards universal healthcare and SDG3, effective partnerships at local, national, regional, and global level, and critically-needed funding, the WHO SBE road map can be transformative and enable many of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable communities to have a chance at living healthy and productive lives.”
It is not the intention of this article to suggest that the people promoting the idea that ‘Covid’ is caused by snake venom are intentionally promoting the goals of the UN 2030 Agenda, but they certainly are doing so, even if unwittingly.
Aha, the Deeper Snake Agenda Revealed! - Canada's Dr. Amandha Vollmer:
See Christine Massey Updates for more on this topic
38 minute mark +
'I might be wrong about the water but it's definitely snake venom.'
The Straight Unswiveled Truth on Snake Venom Claims with Andrew Kaufman, M.D.
This video looks at the paper cited by Dr Bryan Ardis as the main evidence that snake venom plays a role in the current plandemic. The paper purports to have found a potential association between venom-like peptides found from various animals and Covid-19. Dr. Kaufman gives an overview of the relevant issues related to the snake venom controversy and gives a critical appraisal of the experiment and conclusions.
Aerosolized snake venom. Chemtrails.
No.